baylor-county-featured-image.png

Baylor County Fraternity Hazing Attorneys | $50M+ National Settlements Exposed | Attorney911 — The Attorneys Who Shut Down Pi Kappa Phi | Federal Court | Former Insurance Defense | 1-888-ATTY-911

Baylor County, Earth, North America, Texas, United States

In the heart of Baylor County, a parent receives a late-night call—a call that every Texas family fears. Their child, a bright college student recently immersed in campus life, is in the emergency room, critically ill after a fraternity “pledge event.” The initial story is vague: “just a party gone bad,” or “they drank too much.” But the details that trickle out are far more disturbing: forced excessive drinking, sleep deprivation, degrading rituals, and the terrifying pressure to keep it all a secret.

This scenario, while fictional, mirrors the grim reality for too many families across our great state. While Baylor County itself may not host a major university, its families send their children to institutions across Texas, from the bustling campuses of Houston and Austin to the storied halls of College Station and Waco. And at each of these schools, the shadow of hazing, in its old and new forms, continues to threaten student well-being.

This comprehensive guide to hazing and the law in Texas is written for families in Baylor County and across Texas who need to understand: what hazing looks like in 2025, transcending its outdated stereotypes; how Texas and federal law address this pervasive issue; the critical lessons from national cases and how their patterns apply to Texas students; specific incidents and responses at major Texas universities like the University of Houston, Texas A&M University, The University of Texas at Austin, Southern Methodist University, and Baylor University; and most importantly, what legal options victims and families may have. Our aim is to shed light on a dark corner of campus culture and empower you with knowledge.

This article provides general information and is not legal advice. The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911 can evaluate individual situations based on their unique facts. We stand ready to serve and assist families throughout Texas, including those right here in Baylor County.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

  • If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

    • Call 911 for medical emergencies
    • Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
    • We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™

  • In the first 48 hours:

    • Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine”
    • Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
      • Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately
      • Photograph injuries from multiple angles
      • Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects)
    • Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where)
    • Do NOT:
      • Confront the fraternity/sorority
      • Sign anything from the university or insurance company
      • Post details on public social media
      • Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence

  • Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

    • Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses)
    • Universities move quickly to control the narrative
    • We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights
    • Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

For Baylor County families unfamiliar with modern Greek life or collegiate organizations, hazing might conjure images from movies – silly pranks or harmless dares. The reality, however, is far grimmer and more complex. In 2025, hazing is a sophisticated, often concealed, form of abuse that inflicts deep physical and psychological harm. It’s a dangerous practice that has tragically claimed lives and derailed countless academic careers.

Hazing is defined as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, by one person alone or with others, directed against a student, that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, and occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students. This definition, rooted in Texas law, emphasizes that “consent” is often an illusion within a power imbalance.

Across the United States, and particularly within large university systems like Texas has, hazing persists due to a dangerous cocktail of tradition, misguided notions of brotherhood or sisterhood, and a pervasive culture of secrecy. It’s important to recognize hazing in all its forms, as it often evolves to circumvent detection.

Modern Categories of Hazing

Hazing practices are typically categorized into three escalating tiers, each designed to assert dominance and control over new members:

  1. Subtle Hazing: These behaviors, often dismissed as “harmless” or mere “tradition,” create a power imbalance and psychological distress, setting the stage for more severe forms of abuse. Examples include enforced dress codes, strict verbal greetings, being forced to run errands, social isolation, and mandatory late-night meetings that interfere with academics. Modern twists often involve digital elements, such as requiring new members to be constantly available on group chats, mandatory location sharing, or controlling their social media posts.

  2. Harassment Hazing: This tier involves acts that cause emotional or physical discomfort, contributing to a hostile and abusive environment. Examples include verbal abuse, excessive physical exercises (often called “smokings” or “workouts” that are punitive), sleep deprivation, forced consumption of unpleasant substances (like spoiled food or excessive amounts of certain foods), and public humiliation. Digitally, this might manifest as forcing public social media embarrassment or using live-streaming to capture degrading acts.

  3. Violent Hazing: This is the most dangerous tier, carrying a high risk of severe physical injury, psychological trauma, sexual assault, or even death. It frequently involves coerced or forced alcohol consumption in excessive amounts, drug use, physical beatings, paddling, and dangerous “tests” that put new members at extreme risk. Sexualized hazing, involving forced nudity or simulated sexual acts, is also a horrific part of this category. In recent years, violent hazing has seen adaptions like “retreat” hazing, where activities are moved off-campus to avoid detection, and alarming incidents such as fire/burn hazing and chemical hazing.

Where Hazing Actually Happens in Texas

While fraternities and sororities (including Interfraternity Council, Panhellenic, National Pan-Hellenic Council, and multicultural organizations) are frequently associated with hazing, the problem extends far beyond Greek life. In Texas, families often send their children to a variety of institutions and groups where hazing can lurk:

  • Corps of Cadets / ROTC / Military-Style Groups: At institutions like Texas A&M, the tradition-rich environment of the Corps of Cadets has faced allegations of hazing, blurring lines between rigorous training and abuse.
  • Athletic Teams: From football and basketball to club sports and cheerleading, hazing can occur within teams, often normalized under the guise of “team bonding” or “toughening up.”
  • Marching Bands and Performance Groups: Even seemingly innocuous organizations like marching bands have been implicated in severe hazing incidents, demonstrating that no group is immune.
  • Spirit Squads, Tradition Clubs, and Student Organizations: Groups with a strong sense of tradition, like the Texas Cowboys at UT Austin, have faced disciplinary action for hazing, highlighting that the desire to preserve “tradition” can override safety and respect.
  • Cultural and Academic Organizations: While less common, some pockets of hazing can appear even in these groups, driven by a desire for exclusivity or misguided notions of initiation.

The pervasive culture of secrecy, combined with the powerful social dynamics of these groups, perpetuates hazing despite clear university policies and state laws. For families in Baylor County and throughout our communities, understanding these varied contexts is crucial for recognizing the warning signs and protecting their children.

Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)

Understanding the legal landscape surrounding hazing in Texas is vital for families in Baylor County. Texas has specific laws designed to combat hazing, and these are often complemented by federal regulations and the possibility of civil lawsuits.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

Under Texas law—which governs cases in Baylor County and across the state—hazing is explicitly prohibited and defined in the Texas Education Code, Chapter 37, Subchapter F. This framework is designed to hold individuals and organizations accountable.

Hazing is defined as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, by one person alone or with others, directed against a student, that:

  • Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, AND
  • Occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

This broad definition is critical because it covers a wide range of harmful behaviors and situations. Notably, Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. Even if a student appears to “agree” to participate, the law recognizes that true consent often cannot be given due to coercion, peer pressure, and the power imbalances inherent in initiation processes.

Criminal Penalties (Texas Education Code § 37.152):

  • Class B Misdemeanor: Hazing that does not cause serious injury (punishable by up to 180 days in jail and/or a fine up to $2,000).
  • Class A Misdemeanor: If the hazing causes injury requiring medical treatment.
  • State Jail Felony: If the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. This carries potential prison time.

Additionally, individuals who know about hazing and fail to report it can face misdemeanor charges, as can those who retaliate against someone for reporting hazing.

Organizational Liability (Texas Education Code § 37.153):
The law also extends accountability to organizations. A fraternity, sorority, or other student group can be criminally prosecuted for hazing if:

  • The organization authorized or encouraged the hazing, OR
  • An officer or member acting in an official capacity knew about the hazing and failed to report it.
    Penalties for organizations can include a fine up to $10,000 per violation, and the university can revoke its recognition, effectively banning the group from campus.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

It’s crucial to understand the distinct nature of criminal and civil cases in the context of hazing:

  • Criminal Cases: These are brought by the state (prosecutors) against individuals or organizations. The goal is punishment—such as jail time, fines, or probation—for violating state laws. In hazing, common criminal charges can include hazing offenses, furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, battery, and even manslaughter or negligent homicide in cases resulting in death.
  • Civil Cases: These are lawsuits filed by the victims of hazing, or by their surviving families in cases of wrongful death. The primary aim is monetary compensation for damages suffered and to hold responsible parties accountable. Civil hazing lawsuits often pursue claims based on negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, negligent hiring/supervision, premises liability, and emotional distress.

Importantly, criminal and civil cases can proceed independently. A criminal conviction is not a prerequisite for filing a civil lawsuit, and victims can pursue civil remedies even if criminal charges are not filed or do not result in a conviction.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond state laws, federal regulations also impose responsibilities on universities regarding hazing:

  • Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This significant federal law, expected to be fully implemented by 2026, aims to increase transparency and prevention. It requires colleges and universities receiving federal financial aid to:

    • Publicly report all hazing incidents (including those occurring off-campus).
    • Implement comprehensive hazing prevention programs.
    • Maintain a publicly accessible online database of hazing violations, detailing the organizations involved and sanctions imposed.
      This act will provide unprecedented data and accountability, offering Baylor County families more insight into organizations on Texas campuses.

  • Title IX: This federal law prohibits sex-based discrimination in education. If hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, gender-based violence, or discrimination, Title IX obligations are triggered. Universities have a duty to investigate and address such incidents, regardless of where they occur.

  • Clery Act: The Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act requires colleges to disclose campus crime statistics and security information. Hazing incidents involving assault, sexual assault, or alcohol/drug offenses may fall under Clery reporting requirements, further increasing institutional scrutiny.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

When hazing results in injury or death, a civil lawsuit can target multiple entities. An experienced hazing attorney understands how to identify all potential defendants to ensure full accountability and compensation:

  • Individual Students: Those who actively planned, participated in, or directly caused the hazing acts can be held personally liable for their actions. This includes chapter leaders, “pledgemasters,” or any member. The tragic case of Daylen Dunson, president of Pi Kappa Alpha at Bowling Green State, who was personally ordered to pay $6.5 million to the Stone Foltz family, clearly demonstrates individual officer liability.
  • Local Chapter / Organization: The fraternity/sorority itself, as a semi-autonomous entity, can be sued. This is often the immediate legal entity involved in organizing or sanctioning the hazing.
  • National Fraternity/Sorority: The national headquarters, despite having anti-hazing policies, can be held liable. This often hinges on whether the national organization knew or should have known about a pattern of hazing (at the local chapter or other chapters nationwide) and failed to take adequate preventive or enforcement measures. Their role in setting policies, collecting dues, and supervising local chapters creates a duty of care.
  • University or Governing Board: Universities can be sued for negligence, especially if they had prior knowledge of hazing, failed to enforce their own anti-hazing policies, or showed deliberate indifference to dangerous student conduct. Public universities in Texas (like UH, Texas A&M, UT) may assert sovereign immunity, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, Title IX violations, or when suing individual employees in their personal capacity. Private universities (like SMU, Baylor) generally have fewer immunity defenses.
  • Third Parties: This can include property owners who knowingly rented venues for hazing (e.g., homeowners of off-campus houses), event organizers, and even alcohol suppliers if they illegally provided alcohol to minors.

Every hazing case is fact-specific, and the liable parties can vary widely based on the circumstances. An attorney experienced in hazing law, like those at Attorney911, understands how to investigate and build a comprehensive case against all responsible entities.

National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

The fight against hazing is a national one, with tragic incidents across the country shaping our understanding of the problem and the legal responses to it. For Baylor County families navigating their own hazing concerns, these landmark cases provide crucial context, illustrating common patterns and the serious legal stakes involved. They demonstrate why strong legal action is often the only route to true accountability and systemic change.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

Forced or excessive alcohol consumption remains the most lethal form of hazing. These cases underscore the dangers and the pattern of neglect, delayed medical care, and cover-ups that often accompany them.

  • Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (February 2017): This case became a national headline after 19-year-old pledge Timothy Piazza died from traumatic brain injuries following a “bid acceptance” night. He was forced to consume vast amounts of alcohol, then fell multiple times, sustaining severe injuries. Fraternity brothers, captured on security cameras, delayed calling for help for nearly 12 hours. This led to dozens of criminal charges against fraternity members, intense civil litigation leading to large, albeit confidential, settlements, and the enactment of Pennsylvania’s stringent Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law. This case highlighted how extreme intoxication, egregious delays in calling 911, and a pervasive culture of silence can be legally devastating for organizations and individuals.
  • Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (November 2017): Pledge Andrew Coffey died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event where pledges were given handles of hard liquor. This tragedy led to criminal hazing charges against multiple members, FSU’s temporary suspension of all Greek life, and a significant statewide anti-hazing movement in Florida. Coffey’s death, similar to numerous others, tragically underscored how formulaic “tradition” drinking nights are a repeating script for disaster, showing foreseeability for national organizations like Pi Kappa Phi, who faced litigation in Texas with Leonel Bermudez.
  • Max Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (September 2017): During a “Bible study” drinking game, 18-year-old pledge Max Gruver was forced to drink excessive amounts of alcohol, eventually dying with a blood alcohol content (BAC) of 0.495%. His death led to the passing of the Max Gruver Act in Louisiana, making felony hazing a distinct criminal offense. A jury later awarded the family a $6.1 million verdict against an individual member’s insurer, in addition to prior confidential settlements. This case powerfully illustrates that legislative change often follows public outrage and clear proof of hazing.
  • Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (March 2021): Pledge Stone Foltz died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to consume an entire bottle of alcohol during a “Big/Little” night. This incident led to multiple criminal convictions against fraternity members for hazing-related charges. Civil litigation resulted in a $10 million settlement for the family in 2023, with $7 million coming from Pi Kappa Alpha national and nearly $3 million from BGSU. This case stands as a stark reminder that both national organizations and universities can face significant financial and reputational consequences. Daylen Dunson, the former chapter president, was personally ordered to pay $6.5 million to the Foltz family, highlighting individual officer liability.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Beyond alcohol, physical and psychologically damaging rituals continue to be a hallmark of hazing, sometimes with fatal consequences.

  • Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (December 2013): During a fraternity retreat in the Pocono Mountains, pledge Michael Deng was blindfolded, weighted down with a backpack, and repeatedly tackled in a brutal ritual known as the “glass ceiling.” He suffered a fatal brain injury, and his tormentors significantly delayed calling 911. This unprecedented case resulted in multiple members being convicted and the national fraternity itself being criminally convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, and fined over $110,000. Pi Delta Psi was banned from Pennsylvania for 10 years. This showed how off-campus “retreats” can be incredibly dangerous, and national organizations can face severe criminal penalties.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing isn’t confined to Greek letter organizations; it’s a systemic problem that can plague any group in pursuit of perceived status or tradition, including high-profile athletic programs.

  • Northwestern University Football (2023–2025): Former football players came forward with allegations of widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the program over many years. This scandal resulted in multiple players filing lawsuits against Northwestern and its coaching staff. The head football coach, Pat Fitzgerald, was fired (and later confidentially settled a wrongful-termination lawsuit with the university). This case dramatically demonstrated that hazing extends beyond Greek life into major athletic programs, raising critical questions about institutional oversight and accountability at major universities.

What These Cases Mean for Texas Families

These national tragedies reveal disturbing common threads: forced consumption of alcohol and drugs, brutal physical beatings, extreme humiliation and psychological torment, egregious delays in seeking medical attention, and systematic attempts at cover-ups. Reforms and multi-million-dollar settlements often become a reality only after tragedy strikes and determined legal action is pursued.

For families in Baylor County whose children attend, or plan to attend, Texas universities like UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor, these national patterns serve as a sobering warning. The lessons learned from these cases empower families to recognize hazing, understand their rights, and know that they are not alone in seeking justice and accountability. The legal landscape, shaped by these very cases, provides avenues for redress.

Texas Focus: UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor

For Texas families, especially those in Baylor County, understanding the specific hazing dynamics at our state’s major universities is paramount. While some Baylor County students may choose local options like those in nearby Wichita Falls or Abilene, many look to these larger institutions. The Manginello Law Firm is intimately familiar with the unique cultures and challenges at each of these Texas powerhouses.

5.1 University of Houston (UH)

The University of Houston, a vibrant urban campus in the heart of Houston, serves a diverse student body, offering a blend of commuter and residential experiences. Its active Greek life, comprising Interfraternity Council, Panhellenic, National Pan-Hellenic Council, and various multicultural organizations, forms a significant part of student life. For Baylor County families interested in a dynamic city university, UH is a popular choice. Our Houston office gives us firsthand insight into the campus culture and local dynamics, including potential interactions with Houston Police Department or Harris County courts.

5.1.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

The University of Houston (UH) is a Tier One research institution that fosters a dynamic urban environment. With a large student population and a rapidly expanding residential presence, student organizations, including Greek life, play a central role in campus engagement. UH’s Greek system is active and diverse, with dozens of chapters representing various national organizations. The energy on campus is often vibrant, drawing students from across Texas, including from Baylor County, who seek a blend of academic rigor and metropolitan experience.

5.1.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting

UH maintains a strict anti-hazing policy outlined in its Student Code of Conduct. The policy explicitly prohibits hazing, whether on or off-campus, and details a wide range of prohibited behaviors, including forced consumption of alcohol or drugs, physical mistreatment, sleep deprivation, and any act that causes mental distress for the purpose of initiation or membership. Students are encouraged to report hazing through the Dean of Students Office, the UH Department of Public Safety (UHPD), or via online reporting forms. The university is committed to investigating all reports and imposing sanctions, which can range from individual student discipline to organizational suspension or permanent disbandment.

5.1.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

The University of Houston has faced its share of hazing challenges, demonstrating the persistent nature of the problem even with clear policies. One notable incident involved the Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) fraternity in 2016. During a prohibited multi-day pledge event, pledges were allegedly deprived of adequate food, water, and sleep. The hazing culminated in a tragic incident where one student suffered a lacerated spleen, reportedly after being slammed onto a table or similar surface. This severe injury led to criminal misdemeanor hazing charges against individuals and resulted in the chapter’s university suspension.

The Manginello Law Firm / Attorney911 is currently representing Leonel Bermudez in a $10 million lawsuit against the University of Houston, the UH System Board of Regents, Pi Kappa Phi national headquarters, the Pi Kappa Phi Beta Nu housing corporation, and 13 individual fraternity leaders and members. This lawsuit, filed in late November 2025, alleges that Bermudez, a fall 2025 pledge, suffered acute kidney failure and rhabdomyolysis after experiencing severe hazing.

Specific hazing conduct alleged in the Bermudez case includes:

5.1.4 How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed

A hazing case originating at UH, especially involving residents of Baylor County, would typically fall under the jurisdiction of the Harris County district courts for civil matters, given the university’s location in Houston. Criminal charges would be handled by the Harris County District Attorney’s Office, potentially involving the UHPD or Houston Police. Civil suits against the University of Houston or its Board of Regents would navigate the complexities of sovereign immunity under Texas law, though exceptions for gross negligence or Title IX violations may apply. Cases often involve extensive discovery to uncover chapter communications, university documents, and national fraternity records.

5.1.5 What UH Students & Parents Should Do

For UH students and their families from Baylor County or elsewhere in Texas, specific actions can make a critical difference:

  • Report to UH authorities: Use the Ethics and Compliance Hotline or contact the Dean of Students and the UHPD for formal investigation.
  • Document everything: Keep meticulous records of all incidents, conversations, and communications.
  • Preserve digital evidence: Screenshot group chats, social media posts, and text messages immediately.
  • Seek medical attention: For any physical or psychological distress, visit the UH Student Health Center or local Houston emergency rooms and clearly state that hazing was a factor.
  • Consult a lawyer: Contact an attorney experienced in Houston-based hazing cases, especially one familiar with the local court system, to guide you through reporting, evidence preservation, and potential legal action.

5.2 Texas A&M University

Texas A&M University in College Station holds a unique place in the hearts of many Texans, including those from Baylor County, known for its deep traditions, strong alumni network, and, notably, its storied Corps of Cadets. Baylor County families often send their children to Texas A&M, a major state school that boasts one of the largest Greek life communities in Texas. The university’s culture blends academic excellence with a strong emphasis on tradition, which, when unchecked, can sometimes lead to hazing incidents within various student groups.

5.2.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Deep in the heart of the Brazos Valley, Texas A&M University is steeped in traditions, loyalty, and a strong sense of community. It is home to the venerable Corps of Cadets, a large and influential Greek life system, and a passionate student body. For students from Baylor County and across Texas, A&M offers a distinct collegiate experience. The deep-seated traditions, while often positive, create particularly fertile ground for hazing, especially within the Corps and certain fraternities, often disguised as “rites of passage” or “toughening up.”

5.2.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting

Texas A&M maintains a stringent anti-hazing policy that is explicitly communicated to students and organizations. The university broadly prohibits any hazing act, physical or mental, whether on or off-campus, committed against a student for the purpose of initiation, admission into, affiliation with, or as a condition for continued membership in an organization. Reporting channels include the Dean of Student Life, the Texas A&M University Police Department (UPD), and specific online reporting forms. The university also emphasizes its commitment to transparency and adherence to state law, publishing reports of hazing violations periodically.

5.2.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

Texas A&M has faced multiple hazing allegations across its diverse student organizations over the years. One particularly egregious case involved the Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) fraternity around 2021. Pledges in this chapter allegedly endured forced strenuous activity and were then assaulted with substances including industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit poured on them. This resulted in severe chemical burns requiring skin graft surgeries for some victims. The fraternity was suspended by the university, and lawsuits were filed by the injured pledges seeking over $1 million. This incident tragically highlights the violent and dangerous nature hazing can take when unchecked, showing how a culture of immunity can foster extreme physical abuse.

The Corps of Cadets itself was rocked by a lawsuit in 2023 alleging degrading and dehumanizing hazing. A cadet claimed he was subjected to simulated sexual acts and, in a particularly disturbing account, was bound between beds in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. While Texas A&M asserted it handled the matter under its internal rules, such allegations underscore the challenges of differentiating tradition from abuse within highly structured, hierarchical groups. These patterns, whether in Greek life or the Corps, show a clear foreseeability of harm.

5.2.4 How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing cases at Texas A&M, a public institution, can involve the Texas A&M University Police Department for criminal investigations, with civil suits potentially filed in Brazos County courts. Due to its status as a public university, Texas A&M may invoke sovereign immunity, but exceptions often apply in cases of gross negligence or Title IX violations. Victims from Baylor County pursuing claims would face a complex legal process investigating both the local chapter’s conduct and the national fraternity’s historical patterns of negligence and policy enforcement.

5.2.5 What Texas A&M Students & Parents Should Do

For students and parents linked to Texas A&M, from Baylor County or beyond, these steps are crucial:

  • Report all suspected hazing: Utilize the dedicated Hazing Reporting Form on the Texas A&M Dean of Student Life website or contact the UPD.
  • Document diligently: Photograph injuries, retain text messages, and record any relevant conversations.
  • Prioritize well-being: Seek immediate medical attention for any injuries and mental health support for psychological trauma.
  • Understand your rights: Engage with an attorney experienced in Texas hazing law, particularly those familiar with institutional liability at public universities, to navigate the reporting process and explore legal options.
  • Do not rely solely on campus disciplinary action: While university penalties are important, they do not preclude civil legal action for compensation and accountability.

5.3 University of Texas at Austin (UT)

The University of Texas at Austin, a flagship institution, is a magnet for top students across Texas, including many from Baylor County. Its vibrant campus culture is well-known for spirited traditions, fierce academics, and a very active Greek life system. UT stands out among Texas universities for its level of transparency when it comes to hazing violations, though this transparency also highlights the ongoing struggle the university faces in curbing such practices.

5.3.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

The University of Texas at Austin is a renowned public university, drawing students from every corner of Texas, including Baylor County, to its sprawling campus. Known for its strong academic programs, spirited traditions like the “hook ’em horns” hand sign, and a fiercely independent student body, UT’s Greek system is one of the largest and most influential in the state. Beyond fraternities and sororities, numerous campus organizations, including spirit groups and athletic clubs, cultivate intense loyalty and a deep-seated reverence for their own traditions.

5.3.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting

The University of Texas at Austin has an unambiguous anti-hazing policy accessible through its Handbook of Operating Procedures (HOP). The policy prohibits any act that causes or is likely to cause physical or mental harm or degradation for initiation or continued membership in an organization. Critically, UT maintains a publicly accessible Hazing Violations webpage (hazing.utexas.edu), which lists organizations found responsible for hazing, the nature of their violations, and the sanctions imposed. This transparency, stemming from a commitment to state and federal mandates, allows Baylor County families to research an organization’s history before their child joins. Reporting can be made through the Dean of Students Office, UTPD, or anonymously via an online form.

5.3.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

UT Austin’s public database of hazing violations offers a stark, if incomplete, picture of the persistent nature of hazing. For example:

  • Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) in 2023: This fraternity was sanctioned for hazing involving new members being directed to consume large quantities of milk and perform strenuous calisthenics. These acts were deemed to cause mental and physical discomfort, violating the university’s hazing policy. The chapter was placed on probation and mandated to implement new hazing-prevention education.
  • Texas Cowboys (SPIRIT ORGANIZATION) in 2018: This elite spirit organization faced severe repercussions following a hazing investigation that revealed alcohol-related misconduct, forced servitude, and activities causing mental distress. The chapter was temporarily suspended, showcasing that hazing is not limited to Greek letter organizations and that prominent campus groups can face significant disciplinary action. This particular incident also saw allegations of sleep deprivation contributing to an accidental death, emphasizing extreme hazing beyond just alcohol consumption.
  • Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) in 2024: The UT Austin chapter of SAE was sued by an Australian exchange student following an alleged assault at a fraternity party, resulting in severe injuries including a dislocated leg, broken ligaments, fractured tibia, and a broken nose. Notably, the chapter was already under suspension for prior hazing and safety violations at the time of the incident, demonstrating a pattern of disregard for university rules and student safety.
    The presence of explicit details and sanctions on UT’s public log is a critical tool for demonstrating a pattern of misconduct and actual or constructive knowledge in civil litigation.

5.3.4 How a UT Austin Hazing Case Might Proceed

A hazing case at UT Austin would typically involve the UT Police Department (UTPD) for criminal aspects and civil claims filed in Travis County, where Austin is located. Like other public universities, UT Austin may assert sovereign immunity. However, the university’s own public reporting of hazing violations strengthens arguments that the institution had prior knowledge of systemic issues. For Baylor County families whose children attend UT, having an attorney who understands both the local legal landscape in Austin and the nuances of public university policies can be invaluable.

5.3.5 What UT Austin Students & Parents Should Do

Students and parents connected to UT Austin, including those from Baylor County, should take proactive steps:

  • Scrutinize the Hazing Violations Log: Before joining any organization, review UT’s public log to identify groups with a history of hazing.
  • Report all incidents: Use UT’s confidential reporting forms, contact the Dean of Students, or speak directly with UTPD for severe cases.
  • Be a diligent documenter: The public nature of UT’s reporting does not negate the need for personal evidence collection. Screenshot messages, photograph injuries, and keep detailed notes.
  • Understand legal avenues: Consult with a Texas hazing lawyer who can review evidence from UT’s public records and integrate it into a comprehensive legal strategy for compensation and accountability.

5.4 Southern Methodist University (SMU)

Southern Methodist University, nestled in an affluent area of Dallas, is a private institution renowned for its strong academic programs and a vibrant, deeply entrenched Greek life culture. Many Baylor County families are drawn to SMU for its smaller class sizes, strong academic reputation, and competitive social scene. However, this environment, coupled with a strong emphasis on tradition, can sometimes create conditions ripe for hazing incidents.

5.4.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Southern Methodist University (SMU) is a private university in Dallas known for its beautiful campus, strong academic programs, and highly active Greek system. A significant portion of the student body participates in fraternities and sororities, which play a central role in campus social life. The university prides itself on its traditions, creating a tight-knit community among its students, many of whom come from affluent backgrounds. For Baylor County families seeking a private university experience often seen as a direct pipeline to Dallas’s professional and social circles, SMU is a premier destination.

5.4.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting

SMU maintains clear anti-hazing policies for all student organizations, emphasizing that hazing is a direct violation of university rules and state law. The policy explicitly prohibits any act that endangers the mental or physical health and safety of a student for initiation, membership, or affiliation. SMU encourages reporting through its Dean of Students office, the SMU Police Department (SMU PD), and various anonymous reporting avenues, including an ethics hotline. As a private institution, SMU’s internal disciplinary processes are often less publicly visible than those of state universities, though they are subject to legal scrutiny during civil litigation.

5.4.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

SMU has taken disciplinary action against various Greek organizations for hazing violations over the years, demonstrating the university’s efforts to curb the practice. For instance, the Kappa Alpha Order faced a significant suspension in 2017 after allegations of hazing. Reports indicated that new members were subjected to paddling, forced and excessive alcohol consumption, and severe sleep deprivation. The chapter received a lengthy suspension that severely restricted its activities and recruitment for several years. The university also suspended its entire Greek system at one point in an effort to enforce stricter compliance and conduct.

While SMU, as a private university, doesn’t always publicize the granular details of its disciplinary actions to the same extent as some public universities, these documented incidents underscore that hazing is a persistent issue, even on campuses with strong institutional control and high-profile social organizations.

5.4.4 How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing cases at SMU would typically involve the SMU Police Department (SMU PD) for criminal investigations, with civil lawsuits filed in Dallas County state courts. As a private institution, SMU does not benefit from sovereign immunity, making it potentially more vulnerable to direct claims of institutional negligence if prior knowledge of hazing or failure to act can be established. An attorney handling an SMU hazing case, especially for families from Baylor County, would need to navigate the private university’s internal processes alongside civil litigation, often requiring subpoenas to access internal investigative records that are not publicly disclosed.

5.4.5 What SMU Students & Parents Should Do

For SMU students and parents considering this institution, especially from Baylor County:

  • Review SMU’s policies: Familiarize yourself with the university’s Code of Conduct and hazing policies, readily available on the SMU website.
  • Utilize reporting channels: In cases of suspected hazing, use SMU’s anonymous reporting options or contact the SMU PD and the Dean of Students.
  • Document comprehensively: Since SMU disclosures are less public, thorough personal documentation (screenshots, medical records, witness accounts) becomes even more critical for any potential future claim.
  • Seek legal counsel early: Given the private nature of SMU’s discipline, a Texas hazing lawyer can help uncover vital information through legal discovery and ensure your rights are protected throughout the process.

5.5 Baylor University

Baylor University, a private Baptist university in Waco, is known for its strong Christian values, robust academic programs, and passionate student body. For many Baylor County families, Baylor represents a blend of academic excellence with a faith-based environment. However, the university has faced significant scrutiny over its handling of various misconduct issues in the past, including a major sexual assault scandal involving its football program. This history shapes how hazing, when it occurs, is perceived and addressed by the institution.

5.5.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot

Baylor University—the nation’s largest Baptist university—offers a distinctive educational experience in Waco, Texas. Its campus fosters a strong sense of community rooted in its Christian mission, attracting students from Baylor County and diverse backgrounds who seek a values-based education. While football pride runs deep, the university also maintains a Greek life system and numerous other student organizations that contribute to campus engagement. The emphasis on community and tradition, while a strength, also requires vigilance to ensure that traditions do not devolve into harmful hazing practices.

5.5.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting

Baylor University unequivocally prohibits hazing, articulating an explicit policy against any action that inflicts or intends to inflict physical or mental discomfort, harassment, ridicule, or abuse upon a person. This policy applies to all university-sanctioned organizations, on or off-campus. Baylor’s reporting mechanisms include the Dean of Students Office, the Baylor University Police Department (BUPD), and an ethics hotline. The university’s recent history has spurred an increased focus on student safety and accountability, providing a new lens through which hazing allegations are handled.

5.4.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

Baylor University’s commitment to upholding its anti-hazing policy has been tested. In 2020, the Baylor baseball program faced a significant hazing scandal, leading to the suspension of 14 players. The suspensions were staggered to allow the team to compete, but the incident highlighted that hazing exists across various student groups, including high-profile athletic teams, even within faith-based institutions. The nature of the hazing was not fully disclosed but involved conduct prohibited by university policy.

These incidents, alongside the university’s broader cultural and oversight challenges exposed during its widely publicized sexual assault scandal, demonstrate that despite clearly articulated “zero tolerance” policies and values, misconduct can persist. The university’s response to hazing is now viewed through the critical lens of its past failings regarding student safety, indicating a heightened sensitivity and (hopefully) a more proactive approach to investigations and sanctions.

5.4.4 How a Baylor University Hazing Case Might Proceed

Civil hazing lawsuits at Baylor University would typically be filed in McLennan County district courts. As a private institution, Baylor does not have sovereign immunity, which can simplify some aspects of civil litigation compared to cases against public universities. However, Baylor’s robust legal team and its experience in high-stakes litigation mean that a hazing case would likely be vigorously defended. Evidence gathering would extend beyond publicly available information to include extensive discovery of internal communications, incident reports, and past disciplinary actions by the university.

5.4.5 What Baylor University Students & Parents Should Do

For Baylor students and their parents, including those from Baylor County, understanding the specific context is crucial:

  • Align with Baylor’s values: Review Baylor’s hazing policies and “Christian conduct” expectations, which underscore the seriousness with which the university views such violations.
  • Report through designated channels: Contact the Baylor Dean of Students Office or BUPD if you suspect hazing.
  • Document meticulously: Given the potential for vigorous defense, gather all possible evidence, including digital communications, medical records, and witness statements.
  • Consult a Texas hazing lawyer: An attorney familiar with private university litigation and Baylor’s institutional history can provide invaluable guidance, especially in navigating the university’s internal processes and pursuing civil remedies.

Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories

For Baylor County families, understanding the Greek system means looking beyond the local chapter on a Texas campus to the national organizations that govern them. These national entities, with their vast networks and long histories, carry a weighty legacy—one that often includes documented hazing incidents that predict future tragedies.

6.1 Why National Histories Matter

All of the major universities where Baylor County families send their children—UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor—host chapters of national fraternities and sororities. These national headquarters are not merely symbolic; they are powerful legal entities that set policies, collect dues, and supervise their local chapters. Critically, these national bodies also maintain extensive records of past incidents, violations, and disciplinary actions across their network.

When a Texas chapter of a national fraternity or sorority engages in hazing tactics that mirror those committed by other chapters of the same organization in different states, it establishes a crucial legal concept: foreseeability. This means the national organization likely knew, or should have known, that such hazing was a risk. This foresight can be a powerful argument in civil lawsuits, supporting claims of negligence, gross negligence, and even punitive damages against the national entity for failing to adequately prevent or address known risks.

Think of it this way: if a national organization has seen repeated instances of severe alcohol hazing at various chapters leading to hospitalizations or deaths, and they fail to implement effective, enforced prevention measures, they can be held accountable when a similar incident occurs at a Texas chapter.

6.2 Organization Mapping (Synthesized)

Many of the most commonly found Greek organizations at Texas universities are also those with national histories of hazing. Here is a brief look at some of these organizations and relevant national incidents:

  • Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike): A prevalent fraternity on many Texas campuses, Pike nationally has a troubling history. The death of Stone Foltz at Bowling Green State University in 2021, who died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to drink a bottle of liquor, resulted in a $10 million settlement and multiple criminal convictions. Another case involved David Bogenberger at Northern Illinois University in 2012, who also died from alcohol poisoning, leading to a $14 million settlement. These incidents confirm a national pattern of dangerous alcohol hazing within Pike chapters.
  • Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE): Often referred to as “America’s deadliest fraternity” due to a string of hazing-related deaths, SAE has faced widespread scrutiny. The national organization famously banned pledging in 2014 due to its hazing problem, but incidents persist. Notably, a traumatic brain injury case was filed against SAE at the University of Alabama in 2023, while chapters at Texas A&M and UT Austin have also faced lawsuits relating to chemical burns and assault during hazing. This history strongly suggests that SAE, nationally, is well aware of the risks within its chapters.
  • Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ): This fraternity, present at many Texas schools, was at the center of the tragic death of Max Gruver at LSU in 2017. Gruver died from alcohol poisoning during a “Bible study” drinking game, leading to criminal convictions and a $6.1 million verdict from an individual member’s insurer.
  • Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ): This national fraternity has faced scrutiny, particularly after the death of Andrew Coffey at Florida State University in 2017, who died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night.” This pattern of dangerous “bottle exchanges” and forced consumption is now central to the $10 million lawsuit Attorney911 filed against Pi Kappa Phi (Beta Nu chapter) and the University of Houston following the severe hazing and rhabdomyolysis suffered by Leonel Bermudez in 2025.
  • Kappa Alpha Order (KA): With a significant presence across Southern campuses, including SMU, KA chapters have periodically faced sanctions for hazing, often involving physical activities and alcohol misconduct.
  • Sigma Chi (ΣΧ): A prominent fraternity involved in various Texas Greek systems. Sigma Chi faced a lawsuit at the College of Charleston in 2024, resulting in over $10 million in damages for physical beatings, forced drug/alcohol consumption, and psychological torment. Cases at UT Arlington in 2020 also involved alcohol poisoning from hazing.
  • Kappa Sigma (ΚΣ): Another widespread fraternity nationally and in Texas, Kappa Sigma was involved in the death of Chad Meredith at the University of Miami in 2001, resulting in a $12.6 million verdict for the family after he drowned during a hazing ritual involving alcohol and peer pressure. More recently at Texas A&M in 2023, allegations of hazing led to severe rhabdomyolysis in pledges, demonstrating ongoing risks.

6.3 Tie Back to Legal Strategy

The documented national histories of these organizations are not mere footnotes; they are fundamental to building strong legal cases in Texas. When a local chapter in Baylor County or at a major Texas university engages in hazing tactics that mirror a national pattern, it allows experienced attorneys to argue that:

  • Foreseeability: The national organization, due to its knowledge of prior incidents, could and should have foreseen the risk of similar hazing occurring at any of its chapters, including those in Texas.
  • Negligent Supervision: The national organization may have failed in its duty to adequately supervise, educate, and enforce anti-hazing policies across its chapters, despite clear warnings from past tragedies.
  • Punitive Damages: In especially egregious cases where a national organization shows reckless disregard for student safety despite repeated warnings, a court may award punitive damages to punish the organization and deter similar future conduct.

These patterns significantly affect settlement leverage and can often strengthen a plaintiff’s position in complex insurance coverage disputes. It demonstrates the importance of choosing a legal team that understands not just local laws, but the intricate national landscape of hazing litigation.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

Successfully pursuing a hazing case requires a meticulous approach to evidence collection, a deep understanding of the types of damages victims can claim, and a strategic legal plan. For families in Baylor County, or anywhere in Texas, facing the aftermath of hazing, this process can feel overwhelming. Attorney911 is dedicated to guiding you through every step.

7.1 Evidence

In modern hazing cases, evidence is key, and much of it lives in the digital realm. The rapid pace at which digital evidence can disappear makes immediate action crucial.

  • Digital Communications: These are often the most critical pieces of evidence. Group chat apps like GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Signal, and Discord are frequently used to plan, command, and document hazing activities. These messages can reveal pressure, threats, instructions, and even admissions of hazing. Even a seemingly innocuous text can establish context or timing. Email communications, both official and unofficial, can also provide valuable insight into an organization’s knowledge or practices. Attorney911’s video on using your cellphone to document a legal case (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) explains best practices for preserving screenshots and photos.
  • Photos & Videos: Visual evidence captures the reality of hazing. This includes photos or videos taken by members or pledges during events, content shared on platforms like Instagram, Snapchat, or TikTok, and even security camera footage from houses or venues. This evidence can clearly demonstrate the nature of the hazing, the individuals involved, and any injuries sustained.
  • Internal Organization Documents: These can include pledge manuals, initiation scripts, “tradition” lists, rules for new members, and communications among chapter officers or with national leadership. Such documents can expose planned hazing activities or a culture that condones them.
  • University Records: A victim’s attorney can often access university records, including prior discipline for the same chapter (hazing violations, probation, suspensions), incident reports filed with campus police or student conduct offices, Clery Act reports on campus crime statistics, and internal emails that shed light on a university’s awareness or response to hazing. As we’ve seen with UT Austin’s public log, this can be invaluable.
  • Medical and Psychological Records: Comprehensive medical records are crucial for documenting physical injuries, intoxication levels (through toxicology reports), and the extent of any rhabdomyolysis or traumatic brain injury. Equally important are psychological evaluations that diagnose and document the emotional distress, PTSD, depression, or anxiety resulting from hazing. These records establish the full scope of harm.
  • Witness Testimony: The accounts of other pledges, current or former members, roommates, Resident Advisors (RAs), coaches, or other bystanders are invaluable. While some witnesses may be reluctant to speak initially, their statements can corroborate events and provide critical details.

7.2 Damages

Hazing can inflict severe and lasting harm, affecting victims physically, emotionally, academically, and financially. Civil lawsuits aim to recover damages to compensate for these losses.

  • Medical Bills & Future Care: This category covers all past and anticipated medical expenses, from emergency room visits and ambulance transport to surgeries, ongoing therapy (physical, occupational, speech), medications, and mental health counseling. For catastrophic injuries like permanent brain damage or organ failure (e.g., in rhabdomyolysis cases), a life care plan is often developed by experts to project long-term medical and care costs.
  • Lost Earnings / Educational Impact: This includes lost wages due to time missed from work, as well as the significant impact on a student’s education. This could mean covering tuition for missed semesters, lost scholarships, or compensation for a delayed entry into the workforce. For permanent injuries, economists can calculate the diminished future earning capacity over a lifetime.
  • Non-Economic Damages: These compensate for subjective but very real harms, including physical pain and suffering (both past and future), emotional distress, trauma, humiliation, and loss of enjoyment of life. Psychological injuries like PTSD, severe anxiety, and depression are often significant components of non-economic damages.
  • Wrongful Death Damages (for Families): In the tragic event of a hazing death, surviving family members (parents, spouses, children) can recover damages for funeral and burial costs, loss of financial support the deceased would have provided, and profound emotional suffering, loss of companionship, and grief.
  • Punitive Damages: These are intended to punish defendants for particularly reckless, malicious, or grossly negligent conduct and to deter similar behavior in the future. In Texas, punitive damages may be capped depending on the nature of the conduct, but they can significantly increase the accountability imposed on organizations that demonstrate blatant disregard for safety. The $6.5 million ordered for Daylen Dunson, the Pi Kappa Alpha president in the Stone Foltz case, demonstrates the potential for staggering individual liability.

7.3 Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

Defendants in hazing cases—including individual students, local chapters, national organizations, and universities—often carry various types of insurance policies. These policies, such as general liability, directors and officers (D&O), or even homeowner’s policies (for individuals), are critical sources of compensation. However, insurance companies commonly attempt to deny coverage by citing policy exclusions for “intentional acts” or “criminal conduct.”

Experienced hazing lawyers, like Lupe Peña of Attorney911 (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/), who previously worked as an insurance defense attorney, are adept at navigating these complex disputes. They understand how to:

  • Identify all potential sources of insurance coverage, including local chapter, national fraternity, and university policies.
  • Argue that even if the hazing involved intentional acts, the defendants’ negligent supervision or failure to prevent known risks should be covered by insurance.
  • Challenge wrongful denials of coverage and, if necessary, pursue bad faith claims against insurers.

This expertise is crucial, as securing full and fair compensation often involves a sophisticated battle with multiple insurance carriers and their legal teams.

Practical Guides & FAQs

In our firm’s experience, families in Baylor County and across Texas who are touched by hazing often feel isolated and unsure of what to do next. This section offers practical advice for parents, students, and witnesses, aiming to empower you with knowledge and a clear path forward.

8.1 For Parents

As a parent, your instinct is to protect your child. Hazing can make you feel helpless, but by recognizing the signs and knowing what to do, you can become your child’s most powerful advocate.

  • Warning Signs of Hazing: Be alert for a combination of these indicators:
    • Unexplained injuries: Bruises, burns, cuts, or “accidents” that don’t add up.
    • Sudden exhaustion: Your child seems constantly sleep-deprived, fatigued, or unable to focus.
    • Drastic mood swings: Increased anxiety, depression, irritability, or withdrawal from family and friends.
    • Secrecy about group activities: “I can’t talk about it,” or unusual vagueness when asked about their organization.
    • Obsessive phone use: Constantly checking group chats, responding to demands at odd hours, or anxiety when their phone receives a notification.
    • Sudden financial strain: Requests for money for unexplained “fines” or mandatory group expenses.
  • How to talk to your child: Approach the topic with empathy, not judgment. Start with open-ended questions like, “How are things going with [Organization Name]? Are you enjoying it?” Emphasize that their safety and well-being are your top priorities, far above any group affiliation. Reassure them you will support them, no matter what.
  • If your child is hurt:
    • Seek immediate medical attention: Do not delay. Go to the nearest emergency room or urgent care clinic. Insist that the medical provider document that injuries may be hazing-related.
    • Document everything: Take clear, well-lit photos of any injuries from multiple angles, dating them. Keep all relevant text messages, social media screenshots, or emails. Write down a detailed account of what your child tells you, including dates, times, locations, and names.
    • Save physical evidence: If applicable, preserve damaged clothing, receipts for forced purchases, or any objects used in a hazing incident.
  • Dealing with the university: If your child reports hazing, notify the university’s Dean of Students office. Document all your communications with university administrators. Ask specific questions about their investigation process, disciplinary actions, and if there have been prior incidents involving the same organization.
  • When to talk to a lawyer: If your child has sustained significant physical or psychological harm due to hazing, or if you feel the university or organization is minimizing or actively hiding what happened, consult with a Texas hazing attorney immediately. An attorney can help preserve evidence before it disappears and protect your family’s legal rights.

8.2 For Students / Pledges

As a student or pledge, you might be caught in a difficult position, caught between the desire to belong and deeply uncomfortable or dangerous demands. You are not alone, and it’s important to recognize that your safety comes first.

  • Is this hazing or just tradition? Ask yourself: Would my parents or a university official approve of this? Am I afraid to say no? Am I being asked to lie, hide, or keep secrets? Does this activity make me feel unsafe, humiliated, or coerced? If you answer yes to any of these, it’s hazing. Texas law, and most university policies, explicitly consider these acts illegal hazing.
  • Why “consent” isn’t the end of the story: You might feel like you “agreed” to participate, but if that “agreement” came under pressure, fear, or the desire to belong, it’s not true consent. The law recognizes the power dynamics at play during initiation periods.
  • Exiting and reporting safely: You have the legal right to leave any organization at any time. If you feel unsafe, get to a safe place immediately and tell a trusted adult (parent, residential advisor, professor). You can report hazing anonymously through university hotlines or the National Anti-Hazing Hotline: 1-888-NOT-HAZE (1-888-668-4293).
  • Good-faith reporting and amnesty: In Texas, if someone calls 911 or seeks medical attention for a hazing victim (even if they were involved in the hazing or underage drinking), they are typically protected from prosecution for minor offenses under good-faith reporting policies. Your well-being and life are always the priority.

8.3 For Former Members / Witnesses

If you were once part of a hazing incident, either as a participant, a witness, or a former member who left due to hazing, your experience can be critical.

  • Your insight can save lives: Your testimony and evidence can help prevent future harm, bring justice to victims, and lead to meaningful change. While it can be daunting, cooperating with legal investigations or victims’ attorneys can be an important step towards accountability and healing.
  • Navigating your involvement: It’s understandable to fear repercussions for your past actions or knowledge. However, an attorney can help you understand your legal position as a witness, and advise on any potential criminal exposure versus the legal protections available. In Texas, you cannot be compelled to incriminate yourself, but your cooperation can be voluntary and invaluable.

8.4 Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

Dealing with hazing is emotionally charged, and it’s easy to make missteps that can severely undermine a potential legal case. Attorney911 has seen many such errors. Watching Attorney911’s video on client mistakes that can ruin your injury case (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY) provides crucial information.

MISTAKES THAT CAN RUIN YOUR HAZING CASE:

  1. Letting your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence:
    • What parents think: “I don’t want them to get in more trouble.”
    • Why it’s wrong: Deleting evidence can be conceived as a cover-up, may constitute obstruction of justice, and makes proving your case virtually impossible.
    • What to do instead: Preserve everything immediately, even embarrassing content. Screenshotting rapidly and backing data up to a secure cloud is paramount.
  2. Confronting the fraternity/sorority directly:
    • What parents think: “I’m going to give them a piece of my mind.”
    • Why it’s wrong: Direct confrontation will cause the alleged perpetrators to immediately “lawyer up,” destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare their defenses, often with professional legal support.
    • What to do instead: Document everything in private, then call a lawyer before initiating any confrontation.
  3. Signing university “release” or “resolution” forms:
    • What universities do: They may pressure families to sign waivers or “internal resolution” agreements.
    • Why it’s wrong: You may inadvertently waive your right to pursue a civil lawsuit, and early settlements from universities are often far below the true value of the case.
    • What to do instead: Do NOT sign anything from the university without having an attorney review it first.
  4. Posting details on social media before talking to a lawyer:
    • What families think: “I want people to know what happened.”
    • Why it’s wrong: Defense attorneys will screenshot every post, and any inconsistencies can hurt your credibility. Such posts can also waive your legal privilege.
    • What to do instead: Document your story privately. Let your lawyer control if or how public messaging happens.
  5. Letting your child go back to “one last meeting”:
    • What fraternities say: “Come talk to us before you do anything drastic.”
    • Why it’s wrong: These “meetings” are often designed to pressure, intimidate, or extract statements from your child that could later harm your case.
    • What to do instead: Once you are considering legal action, all communication from your child to the organization or university should go through your lawyer.
  6. Waiting “to see how the university handles it”:
    • What universities promise: “We’re investigating; let us handle this internally.”
    • Why it’s wrong: Evidence disappears quickly, witnesses graduate, the statute of limitations continues to run, and the university’s internal process will always prioritize its own reputation.
    • What to do instead: Preserve evidence NOW and consult a hazing lawyer immediately. The university’s disciplinary process is separate from, and does not replace, your rights to civil accountability.
  7. Talking to insurance adjusters without a lawyer:
    • What adjusters say: “We just need your statement to process the claim.”
    • Why it’s wrong: Any statements you make can be used against you, and initial settlement offers are almost always lowball.
    • What to do instead: Politely decline to speak with them and inform them that your attorney will contact them.

8.5 Short FAQ

  • “Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?” Yes, under specific circumstances. Public universities in Texas (like UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin) generally have sovereign immunity. However, this immunity can be waived in cases of gross negligence, Title IX violations, or when suing individual employees in their personal capacity. Private universities (like SMU and Baylor) typically have fewer immunity protections. Every case’s viability depends on its unique facts. Contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a case-specific analysis.
  • “Is hazing a felony in Texas?” It can be. While hazing is a Class B misdemeanor by default, it escalates to a state jail felony if it results in serious bodily injury or death. Individuals who know about hazing and fail to report it can also face misdemeanor charges.
  • “Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?” Yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. Courts and juries understand that “agreement” given under duress, peer pressure, or fear of exclusion is not true voluntary consent.
  • “How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?” In Texas, the general statute of limitations for personal injury claims, including those related to hazing, is two years from the date of injury or death. However, complexities like the “discovery rule” (when the harm or its cause was discovered) or fraudulent concealment can affect this timeline. Since evidence disappears rapidly, time is of the essence. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately. Watching our video, Is There a Statute of Limitations on My Case? (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c), can offer more detail.
  • “What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?” The location of hazing does not necessarily eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities can still be held liable based on their knowledge, sponsorship of the organization, their policies, and their failure to prevent foreseeable harm, even if it occurred off-campus. Many prominent hazing cases, such as the Michael Deng case involving Pi Delta Psi, happened at remote off-campus locations but still resulted in significant legal judgments.
  • “Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?” No hazing attorney can guarantee confidentiality, particularly if criminal charges are involved. However, many civil hazing cases are settled confidentially before trial. Attorneys can often work with families to request sealed court records and negotiate confidentiality clauses in settlements. At Attorney911, we prioritize your family’s privacy interests while aggressively pursuing accountability.

Attorney911: Why We Fight Hazing

When your family faces a hazing crisis, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need Legal Emergency Lawyers™ who understand the complex web of institutional power, Greek life culture, and aggressive defense tactics—and know how to win anyway. Attorney911 is that firm, bringing unparalleled experience and a relentless commitment to justice for families in Baylor County and across Texas.

From our Houston office, we serve families throughout Texas, including Baylor County and surrounding areas. We understand that hazing at Texas universities impacts families in Baylor County and across the region, making our comprehensive statewide reach crucial.

Our unique qualifications set us apart in hazing litigation:

  • The Insurance Insider Advantage: Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/), previously worked as an insurance defense attorney for a national firm. This invaluable experience means we know the insurance companies’ playbook because we used to be on their side. We understand their tactics for delaying claims, arguing policy exclusions, and trying to undervalue serious injuries. This insight is critical in battling national fraternity and university insurance carriers.
  • Complex Litigation Against Massively Funded Institutions: Managing Partner Ralph Manginello (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/) has spent over 25 years taking on powerful defendants. Our firm was one of the few Texas firms involved in the BP Texas City explosion litigation, a testament to our ability to handle complex federal cases against billion-dollar corporations. We are not intimidated by the resources of national fraternities, universities, or their high-powered defense teams. We know how to fight powerful defendants and secure multi-million dollar results in wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases.
  • Dual Criminal and Civil Expertise: Hazing often involves both criminal charges against individuals and civil lawsuits for damages. Ralph Manginello’s membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) underscores our deep understanding of the criminal justice system. This dual capability means we can advise on both criminal exposure and civil liability, offering our clients a holistic legal strategy.
  • Aggressive Evidence-Based Strategy: We recognize that hazing cases are won or lost on evidence. We employ a rigorous investigative approach, working with digital forensics experts to recover deleted group chats and social media, collaborating with medical experts and psychologists to document the full scope of harm, and leveraging discovery tools to uncover national fraternity records and university files. We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it does.
  • Empathy and Relentless Advocacy: We know that experiencing hazing, especially death or severe injury, is one of the hardest things a family can face. Our approach balances authoritative legal representation with genuine compassion. We are here to listen, to fight, and to ensure that your family’s voice is heard.

Attorney911 is committed to getting you answers, holding the responsible parties accountable, and helping prevent future harm. We believe every family deserves justice, and we have the proven track record to pursue it.

Your Call to Action

If you or your child has experienced hazing at any Texas campus—whether the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, Baylor, or elsewhere—we want to hear from you. Families in Baylor County and throughout the surrounding region have the right to answers and accountability.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm / Attorney911 for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We will listen to what happened without judgment, thoroughly review your case, explain your legal options (criminal reporting, civil lawsuit, both, or neither), and help you decide on the best path forward. We understand the financial strain that can accompany such tragedies, which is why we operate on a contingency fee basis – we don’t get paid unless we win your case. You can learn more about this by watching our video explaining contingency fees (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc).

You don’t have to face this alone. Everything you share with us is confidential.

Contact Attorney911 Today:

Hablamos Español: Contact Lupe Peña at lupe@atty911.com for consultation in Spanish. Servicios legales en español disponibles.

Whether you’re in Baylor County or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC. Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors. If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com