dallas-county-featured-image.png

Dallas County Fraternity Hazing Attorneys | $24M Pi Kappa Alpha Settlements Exposed | Attorney911 — The Attorneys Who Shut Down Pi Kappa Phi | Former Insurance Defense | Federal Court | 1-888-ATTY-911

Dallas County, Earth, North America, Texas, United States

When a child from Dallas County heads off to a Texas university, their parents envision a bright future filled with academic growth, new friendships, and exciting opportunities. They imagine their child thriving, perhaps joining a student organization that will enhance their college experience. They do not imagine a phone call late at night, a hushed emergency room visit, or the devastating news that their child has been seriously injured, hospitalized, or worse, due to hazing.

Yet, this is the reality for too many families in Texas and across the nation. The pressure to belong, to prove oneself worthy of a group, can lead to dangerous situations where the lines between tradition and abuse are blurred, and sometimes, tragically, crossed. Whether it’s excessive drinking, physical endurance tests, or degrading rituals performed in secret, hazing continues to claim lives and shatter families.

This is a comprehensive guide to hazing and the law in Texas, written specifically for families in Dallas County and across Texas who need to understand this serious issue. We will delve into what modern hazing looks like, the Texas and federal laws designed to stop it, and examine patterns from major national cases and how they apply directly to institutions where Dallas County families send their children: The University of Houston (UH), Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin (UT), Southern Methodist University (SMU), and Baylor University. We will also provide practical advice on how to recognize hazing, what to do if it happens, and your legal options.

This article offers general information, not specific legal advice. Every hazing case has unique facts. However, The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, operating as Attorney911, can evaluate individual cases based on their specific facts. We serve families throughout Texas, including Dallas County.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

  • If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

    • Call 911 for medical emergencies
    • Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
    • We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™

  • In the first 48 hours:

    • Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine”
    • Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
      • Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately
      • Photograph injuries from multiple angles
      • Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects)
    • Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where)
    • Do NOT:
      • Confront the fraternity/sorority
      • Sign anything from the university or insurance company
      • Post details on public social media
      • Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence

  • Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

    • Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses)
    • Universities move quickly to control the narrative
    • We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights
    • Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation

HAZING IN 2025: WHAT IT REALLY LOOKS LIKE

For Dallas County families unfamiliar with modern Greek life or student organizations, hazing is often misunderstood. It’s not just “harmless pranks” or movie stereotypes; in 2025, hazing is a serious and insidious problem that constantly evolves to evade detection and accountability.

Clear, Modern Definition of Hazing

At its core, hazing is defined as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, by one person alone or with others, directed against a student, that:

  • Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, AND
  • Occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

This means that if someone makes you do something dangerous, harmful, or degrading to join or stay in a group, and they meant to do it or were reckless about the risk, that’s hazing. Importantly, “I agreed to it” does not automatically make it safe or legal when there is peer pressure and a power imbalance, especially for young students eager to belong. The law accounts for this coercion.

Main Categories of Hazing

Modern hazing manifests in various forms, often escalating or combining tactics:

  • Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This remains the most common and deadliest form of hazing. It involves forced or coerced drinking, often with dangerous “games” or challenges where pledges must consume alcohol rapidly or in excessive amounts. This can include Big/Little exchanges, chugging contests, or being pressured to consume unknown or mixed substances.
  • Physical Hazing: This category covers any act that causes physical discomfort, pain, or injury. Examples include paddling and beatings, extreme calisthenics or “workouts” far beyond normal conditioning (often referred to as “smokings”), and deprivation of sleep, food, or water. Pledges may also be exposed to extreme cold or heat, or forced into dangerous environments. For example, in 2012, David Bogenberger tragically died from alcohol poisoning during a Pi Kappa Alpha event at Northern Illinois University, where pledges were forced to drink large amounts of alcohol.
  • Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: These highly degrading acts include forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts (like “roasted pig” positions), or being made to wear humiliating costumes. Such hazing often has racial, sexist, or homophobic overtones, using slurs or role-playing stereotypes to demean new members.
  • Psychological Hazing: This type of hazing causes significant mental and emotional distress. It can involve verbal abuse, threats, forced social isolation from friends and family, manipulation, or forced confessions. Public shaming, whether in meetings or online, also falls into this category, deeply impacting a student’s mental well-being.
  • Digital/Online Hazing: With the ubiquity of smartphones and social media, hazing has evolved into the digital realm. This includes group chat dares, “challenges,” and public humiliation via platforms like Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and Discord. Pledges may be pressured to create or share compromising images or videos, or be subject to 24/7 digital monitoring and instant response demands. The deletion of content in group chats serves as another layer of secrecy.

Where Hazing Actually Happens

It is a common misconception that hazing is limited to “frat boys.” However, hazing transcends organizational type and can be found almost anywhere that students vie for membership or status:

  • Fraternities and Sororities: This includes Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic, National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and multicultural Greek-letter organizations.
  • Corps of Cadets / ROTC / Military-Style Groups: At universities like Texas A&M, the Corps of Cadets has unique traditions that can sometimes cross into hazing, as seen in tragic incidents.
  • Spirit Squads, Tradition Clubs, and Social Organizations: Groups like the Texas Cowboys at UT Austin, or other campus spirit organizations, have faced sanctions for hazing violations that involve alcohol misuse, forced activities, and humiliating acts.
  • Athletic Teams: Hazing occurs across various sports, including football, basketball, baseball, crew, and swim teams. The Northwestern University athletic hazing scandal in 2023–2025 underscored that such practices can be deeply embedded even in high-profile sports programs.
  • Marching Bands and Performance Groups: The tragic death of Robert Champion in 2011, a Florida A&M University drum major who died after severe physical beatings on a band bus, highlighted that even performance groups can be sites of dangerous hazing.
  • Service, Cultural, and Academic Organizations: While less common, some of these groups can also engage in hazing practices under the guise of “team building” or “bonding.”

The underlying culture of social status, secrecy, and the perpetuation of “tradition” often fuels these practices, allowing them to persist even when everyone “knows” hazing is against the rules and illegal.

LAW & LIABILITY FRAMEWORK (TEXAS + FEDERAL)

For Dallas County families, understanding the legal framework surrounding hazing is crucial for seeking justice and accountability. Texas law, combined with federal regulations, provides a multi-layered approach to addressing hazing.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

Texas has specific, broad provisions against hazing embedded in its Education Code. Hazing is defined as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, by an individual or a group, directed against a student for the purpose of initiation, affiliation, holding office, or maintaining membership in any organization. The key elements are that the act must endanger the mental or physical health or safety of a student. This can include physical beatings, forced exercise, coerced alcohol or drug consumption, or extreme humiliation and intimidation.

  • Criminal Penalties: Hazing is a criminal offense in Texas.

    • By default, hazing is a Class B Misdemeanor, punishable by up to 180 days in jail, a fine of up to $2,000, or both, if no serious injury occurs.
    • It escalates to a Class A Misdemeanor if the hazing causes bodily injury requiring medical attention.
    • Hazing becomes a State Jail Felony if it causes serious bodily injury or death.
    • Additionally, individuals who are members or officers of an organization and know about hazing but fail to report it can face misdemeanor charges. Retaliation against someone who reports hazing is also a misdemeanor.

  • Reporter Protections: Texas law (Education Code § 37.154) provides immunity from civil or criminal liability for individuals who report a hazing incident in good faith to university authorities or law enforcement. This aims to encourage reporting without fear of personal repercussions, and many schools offer similar protections for students who call for help in an emergency, even if underage drinking or other violations were involved.

  • Organizational Liability: Texas Education Code § 37.153 explicitly states that organizations can be held criminally responsible for hazing if the organization authorized or encouraged the hazing, or if an officer or member acting in official capacity knew about it and failed to report it. Penalties can include fines of up to $10,000 per violation, and the university can revoke recognition and ban the organization from campus.

Consent is Not a Defense: Texas Education Code § 37.155 is a critical provision, stating unequivocally that it is not a defense to prosecution for hazing that the person being hazed consented to the activity. This recognizes the inherent power imbalances and coercion present in many hazing situations.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

It’s important to understand the distinct nature of criminal and civil cases related to hazing:

  • Criminal Cases: These are initiated and pursued by the state (prosecutors) against individuals or organizations accused of violating hazing laws. The primary goal is punishment, which can include incarceration, fines, and probation. In addition to direct hazing charges, related criminal offenses might include furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, battery, or even manslaughter in the tragic event of a death.
  • Civil Cases: These are brought by victims or their surviving family members (plaintiffs) against institutions, organizations, and individuals responsible for the harm caused by hazing. The main objectives are monetary compensation for damages suffered and holding the responsible parties accountable. Civil lawsuits often focus on legal theories such as negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, negligent hiring or supervision, and premises liability. Unlike criminal cases, a criminal conviction is not a prerequisite for pursuing a civil hazing claim. Both types of cases can proceed concurrently.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond Texas state law, federal regulations also play a role in addressing hazing, particularly at institutions receiving federal funding:

  • Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This landmark federal legislation mandates that colleges and universities receiving federal assistance must report hazing incidents more transparently and strengthen their hazing education and prevention efforts. By 2026, these institutions will be required to maintain and publicly report hazing data, similar to other crime statistics.
  • Title IX / Clery Act: When hazing involves sex-based discrimination, sexual harassment, or sexual assault, it can trigger obligations under Title IX, which prohibits sex discrimination in education. The Clery Act requires colleges to disclose campus crime statistics, and hazing incidents that result in assault, alcohol, or drug-related offenses may fall under these reporting requirements. This helps paint a broader picture of campus safety and accountability.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

Determining liability in a civil hazing lawsuit involves identifying all parties whose actions or inactions contributed to the harm. Potential defendants often include:

  • Individual Students: Those who actively planned, enforced, or participated in the hazing, supplied dangerous substances, or failed to intervene when a student was in danger.
  • Local Chapter/Organization: The specific fraternity, sorority, club, or team itself if it operates as a legal entity. This can include the leaders and “pledge educators” of the group.
  • National Fraternity/Sorority: The overarching national organization that charters and supervises local chapters. They can be held liable if they failed to adequately train, monitor, or discipline their chapters, especially if they had knowledge of previous hazing incidents within their system.
  • University or Governing Board: The educational institution itself, or its governing board (like the Board of Regents for public universities), can be sued for negligence,
    gross negligence, or even civil rights violations (e.g., under Title IX) if they failed to implement or enforce anti-hazing policies, were aware of hazing and acted with deliberate indifference, or negligently supervised student activities. While public universities in Texas may assert sovereign immunity, exceptions often exist depending on the specific facts and claims.
  • Third Parties: This can extend to landlords or owners of properties where hazing occurred, bars or alcohol vendors that illegally served minors involved in hazing (under dram shop laws), or even event organizers and security companies who failed in their duty of care.

Every case is unique, and the extent of liability for each party depends heavily on the specific facts and prevailing legal standards. For Dallas County families, navigating these complex legal waters requires experienced counsel to identify all potentially liable parties and pursue comprehensive justice.

NATIONAL HAZING CASE PATTERNS (ANCHOR STORIES)

Understanding national hazing cases is crucial because they reveal recurring patterns, establish legal precedents, and demonstrate the severe consequences hazing can inflict. These anchor stories underscore why institutions and national organizations must be held accountable, and why a tragedy in one state can inform legal strategy in another, including in Texas.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

The overwhelming majority of hazing-related deaths are due to forced or excessive alcohol consumption. These cases highlight the pattern of dangerous “traditions” and the fatal consequences of delayed medical intervention.

  • Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017): In one of the most publicized hazing cases in recent history, 19-year-old Timothy Piazza died after a “bid acceptance” night where he was coerced into drinking copious amounts of alcohol. Fraternity security cameras captured him falling repeatedly, sustaining severe head injuries, yet his fraternity brothers delayed calling for medical help for nearly 12 hours. This negligence led to dozens of criminal charges against fraternity members, civil litigation resulting in undisclosed settlements, and the passage of the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law in Pennsylvania. For Dallas County families, this case illustrates that a culture of silence and delayed medical care can turn an already dangerous situation into a fatal one, and that severe consequences can follow.
  • Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): Andrew Coffey, a 20-year-old pledge, died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. Pledges were given handles of hard liquor and pressured to consume them. This tragedy resulted in multiple criminal hazing charges, and FSU temporarily suspended all Greek life and overhauled its policies. This case exemplifies the recurring script of “bottle exchanges” or “Big/Little” drinking contests leading to death.
  • Maxwell “Max” Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017): During a “Bible study” drinking game, Max Gruver was forced to drink if he answered questions incorrectly. He died with a blood alcohol content of 0.495%. His death led to the enactment of the Max Gruver Act in Louisiana, a felony hazing law. The Gruver family later settled for $6.1 million from one of the convicted members’ insurers. This case shows how seemingly innocuous games can become deadly, and how legislative change often follows public outrage fueled by a clear example of hazing.
  • Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): Stone Foltz, an 18-year-old pledge, died after being forced to consume nearly a full bottle of whiskey during a “Big/Little” event. Eight fraternity members faced criminal charges, with multiple convictions for hazing-related offenses. The Foltz family reached an unprecedented $10 million settlement with the national Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity and Bowling Green State University. For Dallas County families, this case is a powerful example of how universities can be held accountable, settling for millions even in public institutions.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Beyond alcohol, physical and psychologically brutal rituals are a recurring pattern in hazing, often leading to severe injury or death.

  • Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): Michael Deng died after being blindfolded, weighted down with a heavy backpack, and repeatedly tackled during a fraternity “glass ceiling” ritual at an off-campus retreat in the Pocono Mountains. His “brothers” waited an hour before calling 911 for his traumatic brain injury. Multiple members were convicted, and, notably, the national Pi Delta Psi fraternity itself was criminally convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, and banned from Pennsylvania campuses for 10 years. This case demonstrates that off-campus hazing and national organizational liability are serious considerations.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing is not exclusive to Greek life; it is a pervasive issue in various student organizations, including high-profile athletic programs.

  • Northwestern University Football Scandal (2023–2025): Former football players alleged widespread sexualized, racist, and dehumanizing hazing within the program spanning multiple years. The scandal led to the firing of head coach Pat Fitzgerald, multiple lawsuits against the university and staff, and a confidential settlement with Fitzgerald. This case highlights that hazing can be deeply ingrained in diverse campus cultures, and that universities face significant institutional accountability for failing to prevent such abuse.

What These Cases Mean for Texas Families

These national cases reveal several common threads: forced or excessive substance consumption, humiliation, physical violence, a dangerous code of silence, and delayed or denied medical care. They underscore that hazing is a systemic problem, not isolated incidents.

For Dallas County families, these anchor stories provide critical context. When a student at a Texas university—whether UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor—experiences hazing, the legal landscape is influenced by these national lessons. Multi-million-dollar settlements, legislative reforms, and enhanced university policies have often followed only after tragic deaths and determined litigation. Families in Dallas County facing such a crisis need legal counsel experienced in navigating these complex, high-stakes situations.

TEXAS FOCUS: UH, TEXAS A&M, UT, SMU, BAYLOR

Dallas County sends its students to universities across Texas, including some of the largest and most prestigious institutions in the state. Regrettably, hazing is a persistent issue at all these campuses, regardless of their size, public/private status, or location. For families in Dallas County, understanding the specific context of these universities is vital.

5.1 University of Houston (UH)

The University of Houston, located in the heart of the bustling city the Manginello Law Firm calls home, is a vibrant and diverse institution. Many students from Dallas County move to Houston for UH’s prominent programs and a dynamic urban college experience. With its active Greek life, numerous student organizations, and a mix of commuter and residential students, UH is a microcosm of the modern American university scene.

5.1.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot (with Dallas County Connection)

UH is a large urban campus with nearly 47,000 students, boasting a diverse student body and a significant presence for Greek life, ROTC, and various student clubs. Dallas County families often choose UH for its engineering, business, and liberal arts programs, and its location provides internship opportunities in a major metropolitan area. While Greek life is a small percentage of students, it is highly visible and influential.

5.1.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting

The University of Houston maintains a strict anti-hazing policy that explicitly prohibits hazing whether on-campus or off-campus. This policy covers actions that endanger mental or physical health, including forced consumption of alcohol/food/drugs, sleep deprivation, physical mistreatment, and mental distress. UH provides various reporting channels through the Dean of Students’ office, Student Conduct, and the University of Houston Police Department (UHPD). The university also posts certain hazing disciplinary information, although the level of detail can vary.

5.1.3 Example Incidents & Responses

UH has faced its share of hazing incidents, leading to disciplinary actions:

  • Pi Kappa Alpha (2016): A well-documented case involved the Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity where pledges were allegedly deprived of food, water, and sleep during an event. One student reportedly suffered a lacerated spleen after being forced against a table or similar surface. The chapter faced misdemeanor hazing charges and a significant university suspension.
  • Other Fraternity Disciplinary Actions: Over the years, other UH fraternities have faced sanctions for hazing behaviors described as “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort,” involving excessive alcohol use and policy violations, leading to suspensions or probations.

These examples highlight UH’s history of addressing hazing, though the depth of public detail on every incident can sometimes be limited compared to other institutions.

5.1.4 How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed (with Dallas County Logistics)

Given UH’s location in Harris County, a hazing case would involve agencies such as UHPD and potentially the Houston Police Department or the Harris County Sheriff’s Office, depending on where the incident took place. Criminal charges would be filed by the Harris County District Attorney. Civil lawsuits could be filed in Houston-area courts. Dallas County families with a child at UH should know that evidence gathering in the Houston area would be swift and thorough, with local legal counsel adept at navigating both university internal processes and the Harris County court system.

5.1.5 What UH Students & Parents Should Do

  • Report Concerns: Utilize UH’s reporting mechanisms via the Dean of Students Office, UHPD, or their online reporting forms.
  • Document Everything: Carefully record dates, times, and details of any suspected hazing, including names and locations.
  • Gather Evidence: Preserve screen recordings or screenshots of any digital communications, photos of injuries, and physical items related to hazing.
  • Seek Legal Advice: Contact experienced hazing attorneys like Attorney911 who are familiar with Houston-based investigations and can help navigate university policies and the local legal system.

5.2 Texas A&M University

Texas A&M University, a storied institution in College Station, boasts a rich history steeped in tradition, military culture, and passionate alumni. Many Dallas County families have deep ties to Aggieland, sending their children to experience its unique spirit and strong academic programs. However, this same tradition-bound culture can, at times, foster environments where hazing is a risk, particularly within the Corps of Cadets and various Greek organizations.

5.2.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot (with Dallas County Connection)

Texas A&M is known for its large size, strong alumni network, and the prominent role of the Corps of Cadets, which influences traditions across the campus. Greek life is also active and growing. Dallas County families are often drawn to A&M for its engineering, agriculture, and veterinary medicine programs, and its vibrant campus community creates strong bonds—sometimes including those formed through challenging, and potentially illegal, initiation rituals.

5.2.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting

Texas A&M prohibits any hazing act on or off-campus that could endanger mental or physical health, or cause servitude, humiliation, or forced consumption of substances. Reporting is handled through the Department of Student Life, the Corps of Cadets chain of command, or the University Police Department (UPD). A&M has faced external criticism for not always publicly disclosing hazing incidents with the same detail as other Texas universities, making external investigation crucial.

5.2.3 Example Incidents & Responses

Hazing incidents at A&M have drawn significant attention, involving both Greek life and the Corps:

  • Sigma Alpha Epsilon (2021): This case involved two pledges alleging severe hazing including being covered in substances such as industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit, resulting in severe chemical burns requiring skin graft surgeries. The local Sigma Alpha Epsilon chapter was suspended, and the pledges filed a lawsuit seeking over $1 million.
  • Corps of Cadets (2023): A former Air Force ROTC cadet from the Corps sued the university, alleging degrading hazing that included simulated sexual acts and being tied between beds in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. He sought over $1 million for the trauma endured.

The university has taken disciplinary actions in response to these incidents, but they underscore the ongoing challenge of enforcing anti-hazing policies within its deeply ingrained traditions.

5.2.4 How an A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed (with Dallas County Logistics)

Hazing investigations at Texas A&M would involve UPD and often the College Station Police Department or Brazos County Sheriff’s Office. Criminal cases are handled by the Brazos County District Attorney. Civil suits could be filed in Brazos County courts. For Dallas County families, navigating a case against A&M involves understanding its unique culture and the chain of command, particularly within the Corps, which requires specialized legal insight.

5.2.5 What A&M Students & Parents Should Do

  • (Dallas County Specific): Parents of Aggies from Dallas County should be especially vigilant for unexplained changes in behavior, particularly if their child is involved in Greek life or the Corps.
  • Report to Student Life/UPD: Use formal university channels for reporting, emphasizing the severity of the alleged hazing.
  • Document Corps Activities: If hazing is suspected within the Corps, document specific dates, times, and drill/activity names.
  • Do NOT confront: Avoid direct confrontation, as it can accelerate evidence destruction. Instead, contact legal counsel immediately.

5.3 University of Texas at Austin (UT)

The University of Texas at Austin, the flagship institution of the UT System, is a major destination for Dallas County students seeking top-tier academics and a vibrant campus culture. While UT is known for its academic rigor and spirited traditions, it also faces persistent challenges with hazing in both its Greek system and various student organizations. UT has a reputation for some of the most transparent hazing reporting in the state.

5.3.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot (with Dallas County Connection)

UT Austin hosts one of the largest and most active Greek systems in Texas, alongside a multitude of student clubs and spirit groups such as the Texas Cowboys, responsible for firing the cannon during football games. Dallas County families frequently choose UT for its diverse academic offerings, vibrant city life, and strong job prospects after graduation. The blend of tradition and a high-profile social scene can make students vulnerable to hazing.

5.3.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting

UT Austin maintains a clear anti-hazing policy, prohibiting any activity that endangers a student’s mental or physical well-being for organizational affiliation. Critically, UT maintains a publicly accessible Hazing Violations page on its website. This online log details organizations, dates, conduct, and sanctions, offering a rare level of transparency in university hazing enforcement. Reporting can be done through the Dean of Students office, the Office of Student Conduct, or the University of Texas Police Department (UTPD).

5.3.3 Example Incidents & Responses

UT’s public hazing log provides numerous examples of violations:

  • Pi Kappa Alpha (2023): A recent entry indicated that new members were directed to consume milk excessively and perform strenuous calisthenics. The university found this constituted hazing, resulting in disciplinary action for the chapter, including probation and mandatory hazing-prevention education.
  • Texas Cowboys (2018): This spirit organization faced significant sanctions after investigations revealed hazing that contributed to a “new man’s” death (though the university officially stated no hazing was involved in the death itself, it sanctioned for other hazing acts). The Texas Cowboys were suspended for four years, highlighting the university’s willingness to discipline even deeply ingrained campus traditions.
  • Other Student Organizations: Beyond Greek life, various spirit and club organizations have been sanctioned for forced workouts, alcohol-related hazing, social isolation techniques, and other prohibitive behaviors designed to demean new members.

This level of public disclosure allows Dallas County families to research an organization’s history before their child joins, offering a valuable, albeit often concerning, insight into campus culture.

5.3.4 How a UT Austin Hazing Case Might Proceed (with Dallas County Logistics)

Hazing incidents at UT Austin could involve UTPD and the Austin Police Department. Criminal prosecutions would fall under the Travis County District Attorney. Civil lawsuits would likely be filed in Travis County courts. For Dallas County families, an attorney handling a UT hazing case would leverage the university’s public hazing log to establish patterns of violations, knowledge on the part of the university, and foreseeability of harm, which can be critical for strengthening a civil claim.

5.3.5 What UT Austin Students & Parents Should Do

  • (Dallas County Specific): If your child is at UT, regularly check the university’s public Hazing Violations page for any organization they are considering or have joined.
  • Utilize Public Resources: Familiarize yourself with UT’s official anti-hazing website and reporting channels.
  • Document Thoroughly: Given UT’s commitment to transparency, detailed personal records (screenshots, photos, witness accounts) can complement official university records.
  • Consult Legal Experts: An experienced hazing attorney can help interpret UT’s public data and use it effectively to build a case for accountability.

5.4 Southern Methodist University (SMU)

Southern Methodist University, a private institution nestled in Dallas, is a significant draw for many Dallas County families. Known for its strong academics, beautiful campus, and prominent Greek life, SMU’s close proximity makes it a top choice. However, like many private universities with active Greek systems, SMU has had to grapple with hazing incidents, underscoring the universal challenge of ensuring student safety.

5.4.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot (with Dallas County Connection)

SMU is a private, mid-sized university with a highly active Greek scene that plays a central role in campus social life. Many students from Dallas County attend SMU, drawn by its strong academic programs in business, arts, and humanities, and its vibrant campus community right in their backyard. The emphasis on social ties and traditions within some organizations can sometimes create an environment where hazing may occur.

5.4.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting

SMU strictly prohibits hazing, defining it broadly to include any act that causes mental or physical discomfort, servitude, or personal degradation in connection with joining or maintaining membership in a student organization. SMU encourages reporting through the Dean of Students’ office, the Office of Student Conduct and Community Standards, or SMU Police. While private universities typically do not make disciplinary actions as publicly transparent as state-funded institutions, SMU does outline its commitment to investigating all hazing allegations.

5.4.3 Example Incidents & Responses

SMU has taken decisive action in response to hazing:

  • Kappa Alpha Order (2017): This fraternity was placed on a three-year suspension after new members were reportedly subjected to paddling, forced consumption of alcohol, and significant sleep deprivation. The chapter faced severe restrictions, including a ban on recruiting, indicating SMU’s willingness to enforce its anti-hazing policies rigorously when violations are confirmed.
  • Other Greek Organizations: SMU has had other instances involving fraternities and sororities placed on disciplinary probation or suspended for various hazing-related violations, including forced activities and inappropriate new member behaviors.

These examples underscore that even in a private university setting, hazing occurs and investigations are conducted, often leading to serious consequences for organizations.

5.4.4 How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed (with Dallas County Logistics)

Given SMU’s location right in Dallas, hazing investigations would primarily involve SMU Police and the Dallas Police Department. Criminal cases would fall under the Dallas County District Attorney. Civil lawsuits against individuals, the local chapter, the national organization, and potentially the university would proceed in Dallas County courts. For Dallas County families, having local counsel experienced with SMU’s specific policies and their handling of past incidents is a significant advantage. The proximity simplifies evidence collection and logistical coordination for families.

5.4.5 What SMU Students & Parents Should Do

  • (Dallas County Specific): Dallas County parents of SMU students should be particularly alert to signs of hazing, knowing the swiftness with which local evidence and witness testimony can be gathered.
  • Utilize SMU Reporting: Use SMU’s internal reporting tools, including anonymous options like “Real Response” if available, to ensure concerns are logged.
  • Understand Private School Dynamics: Be aware that private universities may manage information differently than public ones, making timely legal intervention vital for evidence preservation not publicly displayed.
  • Engage Local Legal Expertise: Contact attorneys like Attorney911 who are familiar with Dallas County legal processes and private university policies to ensure full accountability.

5.5 Baylor University

Baylor University, located in Waco, is a private Christian university with a strong focus on community and faith. It attracts many Dallas County students, offering diverse academic programs and a spirited athletic culture. However, even with its values-based mission and a history of addressing institutional issues, Baylor has not been immune to allegations and findings of hazing, particularly within its athletic programs.

5.5.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot (with Dallas County Connection)

Baylor University is known for its strong community, passionate school spirit, and competitive athletics. Dallas County families appreciate Baylor’s academic reputation and faith-based environment. While Greek life exists, it operates within a broader values-driven framework. The focus on team bonding and shared experiences in athletic programs, however, has sometimes led to hazing incidents that challenge the university’s core values.

5.5.2 Hazing Policy & Reporting

Baylor maintains a comprehensive anti-hazing policy that prohibits any compelled activity that could cause mental or physical harm, discomfort, or humiliation. This policy applies to all student organizations and teams. Reporting channels include the Department of Student Conduct, Title IX Office (if gender-based), and Baylor Police. Baylor emphasizes a “zero tolerance” approach to hazing and provides educational resources to prevent its occurrence.

5.5.3 Example Incidents & Responses

Baylor’s commitment to addressing hazing has been tested, particularly in its high-profile athletic programs:

  • Baylor Baseball Hazing (2020): Following an internal investigation, 14 players from the Baylor baseball team were suspended for hazing. The suspensions were staggered across the early season to mitigate impact on play but underscored the university’s official stance against hazing within its athletic programs.
  • Football Program (Historical Context): While not hazing in the traditional sense, Baylor’s football program faced a major sexual assault scandal in the mid-2010s, which revealed significant institutional failures in oversight and student safety. This history demonstrates the university’s capacity for systemic issues and the importance of holding it accountable for all forms of student abuse.

These incidents highlight the fact that even institutions with strong ethical codes must remain vigilant in actively preventing hazing and ensuring policies are robustly enforced.

5.5.4 How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed (with Dallas County Logistics)

Hazing investigations at Baylor would involve Baylor Police and the Waco Police Department. Criminal matters would be handled by the McLennan County District Attorney. Civil lawsuits potentially involving individuals, organizations, and the university would proceed in McLennan County courts. Dallas County families seeking legal action against Baylor would need specialized legal counsel to navigate the complexities involved in challenging a powerful private university, especially one with a history of addressing institutional misconduct.

5.5.5 What Baylor Students & Parents Should Do

  • (Dallas County Specific): Parents from Dallas County who have children at Baylor should prioritize open communication about their student’s experiences and be aware of any signs of distress or secrecy.
  • Report Internally: Direct concerns to Baylor’s Department of Student Conduct or Title IX Office, ensuring all details are provided.
  • Seek External Counsel: Given Baylor’s private status and prior institutional challenges, consulting an attorney early can help ensure that concerns are taken seriously and thoroughly investigated, independent of internal university pressures.
  • Understand Institutional Dynamics: Be prepared for a comprehensive legal strategy that addresses not just the specific hazing incident but also any pattern of institutional negligence.

FRATERNITIES & SORORITIES: CAMPUS-SPECIFIC + NATIONAL HISTORIES

For Dallas County families, the key takeaway is this: many of the fraternities and sororities at Texas universities, including UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor, are part of national or international organizations. These national entities often have a history of hazing incidents stretching back decades, creating a foreseeable pattern of behavior that can be critical in civil litigation.

Why National Histories Matter

The presence of a rigorous anti-hazing policy in a national organization’s handbook offers little comfort if that policy is routinely ignored or poorly enforced at the local chapter level. National headquarters typically:

  • Maintain extensive anti-hazing manuals and risk management policies. These exist precisely because their chapters have been involved in previous deaths, catastrophic injuries, and significant lawsuits across the country.
  • Are aware of repeating patterns: Forced drinking nights, ritualized paddling, and various forms of degrading and physically demanding hazing are often not “rogue” acts but rather embedded, though officially unsanctioned, “traditions” passed down through pledge classes.

When a Texas chapter—on a campus often attended by Dallas County students—replicates the same dangerous behaviors that led to suspensions, lawsuits, or criminal charges at another chapter in a different state, it provides crucial evidence of foreseeability. This pattern can strengthen arguments for negligence, gross negligence, and even punitive damages against the national organization, demonstrating that they knew or should have known about the risks but failed to act effectively.

Organization Mapping (Synthesized)

Let’s examine some prominent Greek-letter organizations present on Texas campuses and connect them to their national histories of hazing. This is not to say that every chapter of these organizations engages in hazing, but that the national entities have faced scrutiny previously.

Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ / Pike)

  • Presence: Chapters at many Texas universities, including UT Austin and Texas A&M.
  • National History: Pi Kappa Alpha has a particularly tragic national history involving alcohol-related hazing. The 2021 death of Stone Foltz at Bowling Green State University, due to forced alcohol consumption, resulted in multiple criminal convictions and a $10 million settlement for the family, with a significant portion paid by the national fraternity. Another notable case is the 2012 death of David Bogenberger at Northern Illinois University, also from alcohol poisoning during a fraternity event, resulting in a $14 million settlement. These patterns of alcohol-related hazing underscore a foreseeable risk nationwide.

Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ / SAE)

  • Presence: Chapters at virtually all major Texas universities, including UT Austin, Texas A&M, and SMU.
  • National History: Sigma Alpha Epsilon has been infamously dubbed “America’s deadliest fraternity” due to multiple hazing-related deaths and severe injuries across the country.
    • Cal Poly (2008): The death of Carson Starkey from alcohol poisoning during a hazing ritual led to his family establishing a national anti-hazing organization.
    • University of Alabama (2023): A lawsuit alleged a pledge suffered a traumatic brain injury during a hazing ritual.
    • Texas A&M University (2021): As discussed, pledges alleged chemical burns from being doused with industrial-strength cleaner, resulting in a $1 million lawsuit.
    • University of Texas at Austin (2024): A lawsuit was filed after an exchange student was allegedly assaulted at a fraternity event, sustaining multi-million injuries; the chapter was already on suspension for prior violations.
  • Impact: SAE nationally implemented a policy to eliminate pledging (later rescinded), an acknowledgement of its systemic hazing problem.

Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ)

  • Presence: Chapters at numerous Texas institutions, including Texas A&M and SMU.
  • National History: This fraternity is linked to some of the most prominent alcohol-related hazing deaths.
    • Max Gruver (2017): The death of Max Gruver at Louisiana State University from alcohol poisoning during a “Bible study” drinking game led to the Max Gruver Act in Louisiana and a $6.1 million verdict against one of the key individual defendants.

Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ)

  • Presence: Chapters at universities like University of Houston and others.
  • National History: Pi Kappa Phi has faced significant hazing issues, most notably the 2017 death of Andrew Coffey at Florida State University due to acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night,” which resulted in criminal prosecutions and suspension of all Greek life at FSU. Attorney911 is currently litigating a $10 million lawsuit against Pi Kappa Phi (Beta Nu chapter) and the University of Houston on behalf of Leonel Bermudez for severe injuries sustained during alleged hazing in late 2025. This shows a continuing pattern.

Kappa Alpha Order (KA)

  • Presence: Strong at Texas universities, including SMU, UT Austin, and Texas A&M.
  • National History: Kappa Alpha Order has a history of hazing incidents and campus suspensions across the country, often related to alcohol misuse and traditions that cross the line into physical or psychological abuse. The chapter at SMU faced a three-year suspension in 2017 for paddling and forced alcohol consumption.

Sigma Chi (ΣΧ)

  • Presence: Major universities throughout Texas.
  • National History: Sigma Chi has also contended with hazing allegations. For instance, a College of Charleston (2024) case saw a family reportedly receive $10 million+ in damages for severe physical hazing, demonstrating significant liability when injuries occur. The University of Texas at Austin chapter was sued in 2024 by parents alleging their son’s suicide was due to hazing.

Tie Back to Legal Strategy

For Dallas County families, understanding these national histories profoundly impacts a potential legal strategy:

  • Foreseeability: It becomes harder for national organizations to claim ignorance or that a local incident was “unforeseeable” when similar patterns have resulted in death or severe injury across their chapters in other states.
  • Settlement Leverage: This documented history often increases the settlement leverage for victims, as national organizations may be keen to avoid further public scrutiny and large jury verdicts that could set new precedents.
  • Insurance Coverage: Evidence of a national pattern of ignored hazing can be critical in preventing insurance companies from denying coverage based on arguments of “intentional acts” or “rogue behavior.” It supports the argument that the national’s negligent oversight led to the harm.
  • Punitive Damages: In egregious cases, this pattern evidence can support claims for punitive damages, which are designed to punish the defendant and deter similar conduct in the future, if allowed by jurisdiction.

An experienced hazing attorney understands how to meticulously research these national histories, connect them to local incidents involving Texas chapters, and use this powerful pattern evidence to build a compelling case for accountability and compensation.

7. BUILDING A CASE: EVIDENCE, DAMAGES, STRATEGY

Building a strong hazing case for Dallas County families requires a strategic, multifaceted approach, starting with immediate evidence preservation and extending through complex legal arguments for damages. Attorney911 specializes in meticulously gathering crucial evidence and understanding the full scope of harm hazing inflicts.

7.1 Evidence

In today’s digital world, successful hazing cases often hinge on quickly securing and analyzing electronic and physical evidence.

  • Digital Communications: These are the most critical pieces of evidence. Texts, direct messages (DMs), and group chats from platforms like GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, and Snapchat are often treasure troves. They reveal the planning, coercion, participants, and cover-up attempts. Attorney911 highly recommends families watch our video on using your cellphone to document a legal case (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs); it explains how to properly screenshot full conversations, including timestamps and participant names, to preserve this fleeting evidence. Even if messages are quickly deleted, digital forensics experts can often recover them.
  • Photos & Videos: Content filmed by members during hazing events (even if they appear “fun” or are captioned as jokes) is invaluable. This includes footage shared in private chats or posted momentarily on social media. Security camera footage from houses or nearby venues can also corroborate events.
  • Internal Organization Documents: These can include pledge manuals, initiation scripts, “traditions” lists, and emails or texts from officers giving instructions to pledges. National organizations’ anti-hazing policies and training materials, revealing their stated knowledge of hazing risks, are also vital.
  • University Records: Subpoenaed university records often reveal a pattern of negligence. This includes prior disciplinary actions against the same organization, campus police incident reports, student conduct files, and relevant Clery Act reports. These records can establish a history of warnings or a failure to enforce policies.
  • Medical and Psychological Records: Comprehensive medical documentation of injuries, hospitalizations, toxicology reports, and ongoing treatment (like physical therapy or specialist consultations) is critical. Psychological evaluations and therapy records can establish diagnoses such as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), depression, or anxiety, crucial for documenting mental health damage.
  • Witness Testimony: Eyewitness accounts from other pledges, active members, roommates, Resident Assistants (RAs), coaches, or bystanders who observed the hazing are essential. Former members who quit or were expelled can also provide powerful, credible testimony about the organization’s culture.

7.2 Damages

Hazing causes profound and lasting harm. A civil lawsuit seeks to compensate victims and their families for these losses, which fall into several categories:

  • Medical Bills & Future Care: This covers all past medical expenses, from emergency room visits and ambulance transport to hospital stays, surgeries, and rehabilitation. For long-term injuries, such as traumatic brain injury or organ damage, it includes projected future medical care, therapy, and, in severe cases, extensive life care plans.
  • Lost Earnings / Educational Impact: This includes wages lost if the victim or a parent had to take time off work, as well as the significant impact on a student’s education. This can manifest as missed semesters, lost scholarships, delayed graduation, and ultimately, a reduced future earning capacity if permanent injuries affect their ability to work.
  • Non-Economic Damages: These subjective, but legally compensable, damages address the intangible suffering caused by hazing. They include physical pain and suffering, intense emotional distress, humiliation, and trauma. For victims, this can mean a loss of enjoyment of life—the inability to participate in hobbies, sports, or social activities as before—and the development of severe anxiety, depression, or PTSD.
  • Wrongful Death Damages (for Families): In the most tragic hazing cases, families can seek compensation for the wrongful death of their child. This includes funeral and burial costs, loss of financial support the deceased would have provided, and profound non-economic losses such as the loss of companionship, love, and society, as well as the family’s grief and emotional suffering. Attorney911 has extensive experience with wrongful death claims (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/), helping families recover millions in catastrophic cases.
  • Punitive Damages: In cases where defendants acted with extreme recklessness, malice, or deliberate indifference, punitive damages may be sought. These are designed to punish egregious conduct and deter others from similar actions, sending a strong message of accountability.

7.3 Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

Hazing litigation is often complex due to the number of potential defendants and the intricate world of insurance coverage.

  • National fraternities, local chapters, and universities typically carry various insurance policies. However, insurers frequently attempt to deny coverage, arguing that hazing or “intentional acts” are excluded from their policies.
  • This is where experienced hazing lawyers excel. With an “insurance insider” advantage from attorneys like Lupe Peña, who previously defended insurance companies (as detailed on https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/), Attorney911 understands how to identify all potential sources of coverage, challenge wrongful denials, and strategically navigate these disputes to ensure victims and families receive the compensation they deserve. We understand how to argue that even if a hazing act was intentional, the national or university’s negligent supervision or failure to act on prior warnings allows for coverage.

8. PRACTICAL GUIDES & FAQS

For Dallas County families, navigating the aftermath of a hazing incident can feel isolating and overwhelming. Knowing what to watch for, how to react, and what legal pathways exist is crucial.

8.1 For Parents

Parents are often the first to notice changes in their child that may signal hazing. Vigilance and informed action are key.

  • Warning Signs of Hazing: Be alert to:

    • Unexplained injuries: Bruises, burns, cuts, or repeated “accidents” with inconsistent stories.
    • Sudden exhaustion: Extreme fatigue, severe sleep deprivation, or constant late-night “mandatory” events impacting academics.
    • Drastic mood changes: Increased anxiety, depression, irritability, withdrawal from normal activities, or unusual secrecy about their organization.
    • Obsessive phone use: Answering calls/texts immediately, fear of missing messages from group chats, or deleting phone content.
    • Changes in academics/finances: Sudden drop in grades, missed classes, unexplained requests for money, or excessive spending on organizational duties.

  • How to Talk to Your Child: Approach any conversation with empathy and without judgment. Emphasize that your child’s safety and well-being are paramount, far more important than any organizational affiliation. Ask open-ended questions like, “How are things really going?” or “Is there anything making you uncomfortable?” Reassure them you will support them regardless of their decision to stay or leave.

  • If Your Child is Hurt: Prioritize immediate medical attention, even if your child downplays their injuries. Document everything meticulously: take photos of injuries from multiple angles, screenshot any relevant texts or social media messages, and compile a detailed timeline of events.

  • Dealing with the University: Document all communications with university administrators. Ask specific questions about the organization’s disciplinary history and the university’s plan for investigation and remediation. Be cautious with university-led “internal resolutions,” as they may not align with your child’s best interests for accountability.

  • When to Talk to a Lawyer: If your child has suffered significant physical or psychological harm, or if you feel the university or organization is minimizing or covering up the incident, it is time to consult with an experienced hazing attorney.

8.2 For Students / Pledges

If you are a student experiencing hazing, remember that you have rights and options.

  • Is This Hazing or Just Tradition?: Ask yourself: Are you being forced to do something you don’t want to do? Is it humiliating, dangerous, or illegal? Would you do it if there were no social consequences for refusing? If older members are making new members do things they don’t do themselves, or if you’re told to keep secrets from parents or the university, it is very likely hazing.
  • Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story: Despite what organizations may claim, your “consent” in a hazing situation is often not legally valid. The law recognizes that power dynamics, intense peer pressure, and the fear of exclusion or retribution can make “agreeing” to hazing an act of coercion, not true voluntariness.
  • Exiting and Reporting Safely: You have the legal right to leave a pledging process or organization at any time. If you feel unsafe, remove yourself from the situation immediately and contact a trusted friend, family member, or university official. Report hazing privately or anonymously through campus channels, national hotlines (1-888-NOT-HAZE), or directly to a lawyer.
  • Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty: Many university policies and state laws, including in Texas, offer protections to students who call for help in an emergency, even if underage drinking or other minor rule violations occurred. Your safety is always the priority.

8.3 For Former Members / Witnesses

If you were previously involved in hazing, either as a victim or a perpetrator, your actions can make a profound difference.

  • Your Role in Accountability: Even if you feel regret or fear repercussions, your testimony and evidence can be crucial in preventing future harm and saving lives. Your unique perspective can expose systemic hazing that external investigators might miss.
  • Seeking Legal Counsel: While cooperating with authorities can lead to criminal or civil consequences depending on your involvement, consulting your own attorney can help you understand your legal options and potential protections. An attorney can guide you through the process, balancing cooperation with your own legal interests.

8.4 Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

Hazing cases are frequently undermined by common mistakes made by victims and their families. Avoid these pitfalls:

  1. Letting Your Child Delete Messages or “Clean Up” Evidence: The instinct to hide embarrassing or incriminating content is strong, but deleting messages, photos, or social media posts can destroy crucial evidence. It can also appear as obstruction of justice or a cover-up, severely damaging the credibility of a future claim. What to do instead: Preserve everything immediately, even if it feels uncomfortable.
  2. Confronting the Fraternity/Sorority Directly: While your anger is justified, directly confronting the organization or its members will likely lead them to destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare their defenses. What to do instead: Document everything, then contact a lawyer before any direct engagement.
  3. Signing University “Release” or “Resolution” Forms: Universities may pressure families to sign waivers or internal resolution agreements. These documents often require you to give up your right to sue or settle for far less than your case is worth. What to do instead: Do NOT sign anything without an attorney reviewing it first.
  4. Posting Details on Social Media Before Talking to a Lawyer: Sharing your story on social media can feel empowering, but defense attorneys actively monitor these platforms. Inconsistencies or comments can hurt credibility and potentially waive legal privilege. What to do instead: Document privately and let your lawyer control any public messaging.
  5. Letting Your Child Go Back to “One Last Meeting”: Once you’re considering legal action, allowing your child to return to “one last meeting” with the organization can expose them to pressure, intimidation, or lead to statements that damage your case. What to do instead: All communication should go through your lawyer.
  6. Waiting “To See How the University Handles It”: Universities have a vested interest in managing their public image and limiting liability. Their internal processes are often designed to resolve issues in-house, not necessarily to achieve full justice for victims. Evidence disappears rapidly, witnesses graduate, and the statute of limitations can expire while waiting. What to do instead: Preserve evidence NOW and consult a lawyer immediately.
  7. Talking to Insurance Adjusters Without a Lawyer: Insurance adjusters are trained negotiators whose goal is to minimize payouts. They may appear sympathetic but are collecting information to use against you. Recorded statements and early lowball offers are common tactics. What to do instead: Politely decline to speak with them directly and refer them to your attorney.

8.5 Short FAQ

  • “Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
    Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities (like UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin) typically assert sovereign immunity but exceptions exist for gross negligence, willful misconduct, and violations of federal laws like Title IX. Private universities (like SMU, Baylor) generally have fewer immunity protections. Every case depends on its specific facts; contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a case-specific analysis.
  • “Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
    It can be. While basic hazing is a Class B misdemeanor, Texas law escalates hazing to a state jail felony if it causes serious bodily injury or death. Individuals who are members or officers and fail to report hazing can also face misdemeanor charges.
  • “Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
    Yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. The law recognizes that true voluntary consent cannot be given under duress, coercion, or extreme peer pressure within an imbalance of power.
  • “How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”
    Generally, there is a 2-year statute of limitations from the date of injury or death in Texas. However, the “discovery rule” may extend this period if the harm or its cause was not immediately apparent. In cases involving deliberate cover-ups or fraud, the statute may be “tolled” (paused). Time is absolutely critical—evidence disappears, witnesses move on, and memories fade. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately to protect your legal rights.
  • “What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
    The location of the hazing does not necessarily eliminate liability. Universities and national fraternities can still be held responsible based on their sponsorship of the organization, their knowledge of off-campus activities, their control over members’ conduct, and the foreseeability of hazing. Many major hazing cases nationally, such as the fatal Pi Delta Psi retreat, occurred off-campus and still resulted in significant legal consequences.
  • “Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
    While some high-profile cases do receive media attention, most hazing lawsuits are resolved through confidential settlements long before a public trial. We prioritize your family’s privacy and work to minimize public exposure while pursuing justice and accountability.

ABOUT THE MANGINELLO LAW FIRM + CALL TO ACTION

When your family in Dallas County faces a hazing crisis, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand how powerful institutions fight back—and how to win anyway. The stakes are too high to choose anything less than legal emergency specialists.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, operating as Attorney911, is a Houston-based Texas personal injury firm with deep experience in serious injury, wrongful death, and institutional accountability cases. We understand that hazing at Texas universities affects families in Dallas County and across the entire region.

We bring unique qualifications to hazing cases:

  • Insurance Insider Advantage: Our associate attorney, Lupe Peña, previously worked as an insurance defense attorney at a national firm (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/). She knows exactly how fraternity and university insurance companies value (and undervalue) hazing claims, understands their delay tactics, and can effectively counter their coverage exclusion arguments. We know their playbook because we used to run it.
  • Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions: Our managing partner, Ralph Manginello (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/), possesses extensive federal court experience (U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas) and was one of the few Texas firms involved in the BP Texas City explosion litigation. We are not intimidated by national fraternities, universities, or their well-resourced defense teams. We’ve taken on billion-dollar corporations and won, and we know how to fight powerful defendants.
  • Mutli-Million Dollar Wrongful Death & Catastrophic Injury Experience: We have a proven track record in complex wrongful death cases, including collaborating with economists to value lifetime care needs for brain injury or permanent disability cases. Our approach is not about quick, lowball settlements, but about building cases that force full accountability for the devastating impact of hazing.
  • Criminal + Civil Hazing Expertise: Ralph’s membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) ensures we understand how potential criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation. This dual expertise allows us to provide comprehensive guidance for families caught in situations with both criminal and civil implications.
  • Investigative Depth: We leverage our network of medical, digital forensics, and economic experts. We have the experience to uncover hidden evidence—from deleted group chats and social media content to subpoenaing national fraternity records and university files. We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it does.

We approach every case with empathy and a fierce commitment to victim advocacy. We know this is one of the hardest things a family can face, and our job is to get you answers, hold the right people accountable, and help prevent this from happening to another family.

Call to Action for Dallas County Families:

If you or your child experienced hazing at any Texas campus—whether UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, Baylor, or another institution—we want to hear from you. Families in Dallas County and throughout the surrounding region have the right to answers and accountability.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We’ll listen to what happened, explain your legal options, and help you decide on the best path forward.

What to expect in your free consultation:

  • We will listen to your story without judgment and discuss the specific facts of your case.
  • We’ll review any evidence you have, such as photos, texts, or medical records.
  • We will explain your legal options, including criminal reporting, civil lawsuits, or both, and discuss realistic timelines.
  • We’ll answer your questions about costs and legal fees. Our firm works on a contingency fee basis, meaning we don’t get paid unless we win your case (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc).
  • There’s no pressure to hire us on the spot—we want you to make an informed decision. Everything you tell us is confidential.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm / Attorney911 Today:

  • Call Anytime for Legal Emergency Lawyers™: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
  • Direct Line: (713) 528-9070
  • Cell (for urgent matters): (713) 443-4781
  • Visit our Website: https://attorney911.com
  • Email Ralph Manginello directly: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español: Contact Lupe Peña at lupe@atty911.com for consultation in Spanish. Servicios legales en español disponibles.

Whether you’re in Dallas County or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com