Burleson County Fraternity Hazing Attorneys | We Track Every Fraternity’s Hazing Death Record | Attorney911 — The Firm That Closed Beta Nu, Exposing $24M in Pike Settlements | Federal Court | Former Insurance Defense | 1-888-ATTY-911

For Burleson County Families: Confronting Hazing at Texas Universities – Your Guide to Rights & Accountability

The late Texas night air, thick with anticipation, vibrates as new pledges gather. What starts as an evening of expected camaraderie at a fraternity house near a major Texas university—perhaps one your child traveled from Burleson County to attend—quickly devolves. Forced drinking games escalate, leaving students disoriented and vulnerable. Physical challenges become outright abuse, hidden behind the guise of “tradition.” Phones are out, not for calling for help, but to record humiliating acts or to ensure silence. When one student collapses, alarm overtakes the bravado, but fear of “getting in trouble” or “shutting down the chapter” paralyzes those present. The choice between loyalty and a life hangs precariously.

This isn’t a scene from a movie; it’s the stark reality of modern hazing, a scenario that could unfold at any Texas university, affecting families from here in Burleson County and across the Lone Star State. The line between tradition and abuse is routinely crossed, leaving behind a trail of physical injury, psychological trauma, and, tragically, sometimes death.

This comprehensive guide is created for families in Burleson County and throughout Texas who are grappling with the devastating impact of hazing. Whether your child attends Texas A&M, the University of Houston, UT Austin, SMU, or Baylor, or any other institution, understanding the landscape of hazing, the legal frameworks in place, and your rights is crucial. We’ll explore:

• What hazing truly looks like in 2025, far beyond outdated stereotypes.
• The critical Texas and federal laws designed to combat hazing.
• Lessons from major national hazing cases and their direct relevance to Texas students and institutions.
• Specific insights into the hazing challenges and responses at the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, Southern Methodist University, and Baylor University.
• The vital connection between local chapter conduct and the national histories of Greek organizations.
• Your legal options and how The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, can guide you through the process of seeking accountability and justice.

While this article provides general information and not specific legal advice, it aims to equip you with the knowledge needed to confront this difficult issue. The Manginello Law Firm is dedicated to serving families across Texas, including Burleson County, ensuring that no family has to face the trauma of hazing alone.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

• If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

  • Call 911 for medical emergencies
  • Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
  • We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™

• In the first 48 hours:

  • Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine”
  • Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
    • Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately
    • Photograph injuries from multiple angles
    • Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects)
  • Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where)
  • Do NOT:
    • Confront the fraternity/sorority
    • Sign anything from the university or insurance company
    • Post details on public social media
    • Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence

• Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

  • Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses)
  • Universities move quickly to control the narrative
  • We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights
  • Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation

HAZING IN 2025: WHAT IT REALLY LOOKS LIKE

For families in Burleson County who might still think of hazing as a harmless rite of passage, the reality in 2025 is far grimmer. Modern hazing extends well beyond “a little horseplay” and often involves dangerous, illegal, and psychologically damaging behaviors. It’s crucial for parents and students across Texas to understand the contemporary forms and risks.

Clear, Modern Definition of Hazing

In simple terms, hazing is any forced, coerced, or strongly pressured action connected to joining, maintaining membership in, or seeking status within a group. This includes any activity that:

• Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student.
• Humiliates, degrades, abuses, or exploits an individual.
• Occurs with peer pressure or power imbalance, making “consent” invalid.

The key here is that if an act endangers health or safety, or humiliates, and is tied to group affiliation, it is hazing. A crucial point in Texas law, as we’ll discuss, is that claiming “I agreed to it” does not automatically invalidate a hazing charge, especially when there’s an inherent power imbalance and peer pressure involved.

Main Categories of Hazing

Hazing isn’t monolithic; it manifests in various disturbing forms:

• Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This is by far the most common and deadliest form. It involves:

  • Forced or coerced drinking: Pledges or new members are pressured to consume large quantities of alcohol in a short period. This can happen through drinking games like “lineups” (where multiple shots are consumed in quick succession), “bottle exchanges” on “Big/Little” nights, or as a “punishment” for perceived slights.
  • Pressure to consume unknown or mixed substances: Coercing individuals to ingest dangerous concoctions or illegal drugs, often without their full understanding or consent.
  • Forced consumption of food or liquids: Requiring individuals to eat excessive amounts of unpleasant foods, or to drink non-alcoholic liquids to the point of discomfort or illness.

• Physical Hazing: Directly involves physical abuse or extreme physical stress:

  • Paddling and beatings: Direct physical assault with paddles, belts, or bare hands. In historically Black Greek organizations (NPHC), while these practices are strictly prohibited by national offices, rogue chapters may still engage in them.
  • Extreme calisthenics or “workouts”: Forced strenuous exercise sessions (“smokings”), often to the point of exhaustion, collapse, or injury, disguised as “conditioning.” This also includes forced runs or carrying heavy objects for extended periods.
  • Sleep deprivation: Pledges are often subjected to mandatory late-night meetings, early morning wake-up calls, or continuous activity that severely restricts their sleep, leading to exhaustion and impaired judgment.
  • Food/water deprivation: Restricting access to adequate food or water for extended periods, or forcing consumption of unpleasant substances.
  • Exposure to extreme environments: Leaving pledges in isolated, unfamiliar areas, or forcing them to endure extreme cold or heat without adequate protection.

• Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: These acts attack a person’s dignity and often involve sexual objectification or degradation:

  • Forced nudity or partial nudity: Requiring individuals to parade naked or in compromising attire.
  • Simulated sexual acts: Forcing pledges into sexually suggestive positions (“roasted pig,” “elephant walk”) or to perform simulated sexual acts. This can extend to actual sexual assault.
  • Degrading costumes or behaviors: Making individuals wear embarrassing outfits or engage in demeaning public stunts for the amusement of others.
  • Acts with racial, homophobic, or sexist overtones: Using slurs, stereotypes, or forcing individuals to perform acts that denigrate their identity.

• Psychological Hazing: Designed to inflict emotional distress or manipulate individuals:

  • Verbal abuse and threats: Constant yelling, insults, name-calling, or threats of physical harm, social ostracization, or academic failure.
  • Social isolation: Forbidding new members from interacting with non-group members, or controlling their communication with family and friends.
  • Manipulation or forced confessions: Pressuring individuals to reveal secrets, confess to fabricated wrongs, or engage in dishonesty.
  • Public shaming: Forcing individuals to endure public ridicule, either online or in person.

• Digital/Online Hazing: A newer but increasingly prevalent form, often exploiting technology:

  • Group chat dares or “challenges”: Pledges are pressured to complete tasks or dares communicated through messaging apps like GroupMe, WhatsApp, or Snapchat, often involving humiliation or dangerous acts.
  • Social media humiliation: Forcing individuals to post embarrassing content, participate in online “challenges,” or create demeaning videos (e.g., on TikTok) for others’ amusement.
  • Constant communication demands: Requiring immediate responses to messages at all hours, leading to sleep deprivation and anxiety.
  • Geo-tracking: Requiring pledges to share their live location via apps, giving older members constant surveillance over their movements.

These methods are designed to break down individuality and enforce conformity, often under the false premise of building “unity” or “brotherhood/sisterhood.”

Where Hazing Actually Happens

It’s a common misconception that hazing is limited to “frat boys.” The unfortunate reality is that it permeates various groups across university campuses for students from Burleson County and elsewhere, driven by dynamics of power, tradition, and initiation.

• Fraternities and Sororities: This is where hazing most often makes headlines. It occurs in:

  • Interfraternity Council (IFC) fraternities: Traditional male Greek-letter organizations.
  • Panhellenic sororities: Traditional female Greek-letter organizations.
  • National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC) organizations: Historically Black Greek fraternities and sororities, which officially prohibit hazing but may see rogue chapters engage in it.
  • Multicultural/special interest Greek organizations: Chapters serving specific cultural or academic groups, which may also experience hazing.

• Corps of Cadets / ROTC / Military-Style Groups: At institutions like Texas A&M, the deeply ingrained traditions within military-style organizations can sometimes cross into hazing, with severe physical training, sleep deprivation, and psychological pressure disguised as “discipline” or “bonding.”

• Varsity and Club Athletic Teams: Football, basketball, baseball, track and field, cheerleading, and even club sports teams are not immune. Hazing can involve forced alcohol consumption, physical abuse presented as “team building,” or degrading rituals meant to “earn your place.”

• Marching Bands and Performance Groups: Even seemingly innocuous groups like marching bands, a cappella groups, or theater clubs have reported hazing incidents, often involving social isolation, forced sleep deprivation, or public humiliation.

• Spirit Squads and Tradition Clubs: Organizations tied to specific campus traditions, such as “spirit groups” or social clubs, can also perpetuate hazing, using the shield of “tradition” to justify demeaning or dangerous acts.

• Some Service, Cultural, and Academic Organizations: While less common, any group with an initiation process can breed hazing if unchecked, especially where there’s a strong hierarchy or perceived exclusivity.

The core mechanisms driving hazing—power differentials, the desire to belong, and the perpetuation of “tradition”—are present across all these types of organizations. For Burleson County families, recognizing these diverse environments is key to safeguarding their children.

LAW & LIABILITY FRAMEWORK (TEXAS + FEDERAL)

For families in Burleson County and across Texas, understanding the legal landscape surrounding hazing is essential. Texas has specific laws designed to combat hazing, and federal regulations also add layers of accountability.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

Texas takes hazing seriously, defining it clearly within the Texas Education Code, Chapter 37, Subchapter F. In plain terms:

Hazing is defined as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act conducted by a student, alone or with others, directed against another student, that:

• Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, and
• Occurs for the purpose of initiation, affiliation, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members are primarily students.

This definition is deliberately broad to cover a wide range of harmful activities, regardless of intent. Key aspects include:

• On or Off-Campus: The location of the hazing activity does not matter in Texas law. Whether it happens in a dorm room, a fraternity house, an off-campus retreat, or a remote location, it still falls under the statute.
• Mental or Physical Harm: Hazing isn’t just about physical injury. Acts that cause substantial mental distress, humiliation, or psychological harm are also prohibited.
• Intent and Recklessness: The law doesn’t require malicious intent. If the act was done knowingly or recklessly—meaning the person was aware of the risk or should have been—it can still be considered hazing.
• “Consent” is not a Defense: Critically, Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that it is not a defense to a hazing prosecution that the person being hazed consented to the activity. This recognizes the inherent power imbalance and peer pressure that often negate true consent in these situations.

Criminal Penalties

Individuals found guilty of hazing can face criminal charges:

• Class B Misdemeanor: The baseline charge for hazing, carrying potential penalties of up to 180 days in jail and a fine of up to $2,000.
• Class A Misdemeanor: If the hazing causes bodily injury requiring medical attention, the charge escalates, with potential penalties of up to one year in jail and a fine of up to $4,000.
• State Jail Felony: If the hazing causes serious bodily injury (e.g., broken bones, organ damage, severe brain injury) or death, it becomes a state jail felony. This carries a possible sentence of 180 days to two years in a state jail facility, plus fines.

Additionally, individuals (especially officers or members) who have knowledge of a hazing incident and fail to report it can also face misdemeanor charges. Retaliation against anyone who reports hazing is also a misdemeanor.

Organizational Liability

Organizations themselves (fraternities, sororities, clubs) can also be held criminally responsible for hazing if:

• The organization authorized or encouraged the hazing activity.
• An officer or member, acting in their official capacity, knew about the hazing and failed to report it.

Penalties for organizations can include fines of up to $10,000 per violation, and the university can revoke their official recognition, effectively banning them from campus.

Immunity for Good-Faith Reporting

Texas Education Code § 37.154 provides crucial protection for those who speak up. A person who in good faith reports a hazing incident to university authorities or law enforcement is immune from civil or criminal liability that might result from making the report. This provision aims to lower barriers to reporting and encourage individuals (like fellow students or witnesses) to come forward.

Furthermore, in medical emergencies related to alcohol or drug consumption, Texas law and many university policies include amnesty provisions for students who call 911. This means students seeking help for an intoxicated peer will not face disciplinary action for minor alcohol/drug violations themselves, prioritizing life-saving actions over punishment.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases

It’s important for Burleson County families to understand the distinction between criminal and civil legal actions, both of which can be pursued in hazing cases:

• Criminal Cases: These are initiated by the state (prosecutors) against individuals or organizations suspected of violating criminal laws. The primary goal is punishment, which can include fines, imprisonment, probation, or community service. In hazing, criminal charges might range from misdemeanor hazing to felony assault or even manslaughter, depending on the severity of the harm. A criminal conviction requires proof “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

• Civil Cases: These are initiated by the victims (or their families in cases of wrongful death) against individuals, organizations, and institutions for the harm suffered. The primary goal is compensation for damages (financial and non-financial losses) and holding responsible parties accountable. Civil cases typically rely on a “preponderance of the evidence” standard, which is a lower burden of proof than in criminal cases. This means a civil case can succeed even if no criminal charges are filed or if criminal charges do not result in a conviction.

Both criminal and civil actions can proceed simultaneously, or one can occur independently of the other. For families seeking comprehensive accountability and restitution for injuries or wrongful death, civil litigation is often the primary pathway.

Federal Overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond Texas state law, federal regulations also impact how universities manage and respond to hazing, providing additional avenues for accountability for students from Burleson County and across the nation:

• Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This landmark federal legislation, enacted in 2024, will significantly enhance transparency and prevention efforts at colleges and universities nationwide. By roughly 2026, institutions receiving federal funding will be required to:

  • Disclose Hazing Incidents Publicly: Transparently report all hazing violations and disciplinary actions taken, similar to how crime statistics are reported under the Clery Act.
  • Implement Enhanced Prevention: Strengthen hazing education, awareness programs, and bystander intervention training.
  • Maintain Public Data: Provide easily accessible data on hazing incidents as part of their annual campus safety reports. This will dramatically increase accountability and allow families to make more informed decisions when choosing a school.

• Title IX: This federal law prohibits discrimination based on sex in education programs or activities that receive federal financial assistance. Hazing can intersect with Title IX in several ways:

  • Sexualized Hazing: If hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, forced nudity, or other sex-based degrading acts, it falls directly under Title IX’s purview. Universities have a legal obligation to investigate and respond to such incidents.
  • Gender Discrimination: If hazing disproportionately targets students based on their gender, or creates a hostile environment that limits their educational access, Title IX may apply.

• Clery Act: The Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act requires colleges and universities to disclose information about crime on and around their campuses.

  • Hazing incidents often involve criminal acts such as assault, underage drinking, drug violations, or sexual assault. If such acts occur during hazing, they typically must be reported in the institution’s Annual Security Report, contributing to the overall picture of campus safety.

For families, these federal laws mean that universities cannot simply ignore severe hazing, especially when it involves sexual violence or other serious crimes. These statutes provide a framework for holding institutions accountable for their response, or lack thereof.

Who Can Be Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit

In complex hazing litigation, identifying all potentially liable parties is crucial for achieving full accountability and securing fair compensation. When a student from Burleson County or anywhere in Texas experiences hazing, the list of potential defendants can be extensive:

• Individual Students: The individuals who actively planned, participated in, or directly carried out the hazing acts can be held personally liable. This includes those who supplied alcohol, coerced participation, engaged in physical abuse, or failed to intervene when a peer was in danger. Often, these are the “pledgemasters,” chapter officers, or “big brothers/sisters” who directly supervise new members.

• Local Chapter/Organization: The specific fraternity, sorority, club, or team itself can be sued as a legal entity. Even if the local chapter is incorporated (e.g., a non-profit entity for housing), it can still be held responsible for the actions of its members and for failing to prevent hazing within its ranks.

• National Fraternity/Sorority: Most Greek-letter organizations are part of larger national or international bodies. These national organizations often have extensive anti-hazing policies, risk management guidelines, and educational programs. They can be held liable if:

  • They knew, or should have known (due to a history of similar incidents at other chapters), about the hazing and failed to take adequate steps to prevent it.
  • They negligently supervised the local chapter, failed to enforce their own policies, or tacitly allowed a culture conducive to hazing to persist.
  • They directly benefited from the local chapter’s activities (e.g., through dues or branding).

• University or Governing Board: The educational institution itself, including its board of regents, executives, or relevant departments (e.g., Dean of Students office, Greek Life office), can be a defendant. Universities have a duty to protect their students. Liability can arise from:

  • Negligent Supervision/Failure to Act: If the university knew or should have known about hazing and failed to intervene, enforce its own policies, or provide adequate oversight.
  • Deliberate Indifference: Particularly relevant in Title IX cases, if the university was aware of severe hazing (especially sexualized hazing, harassment, or assault) and showed a clear lack of response or a response that was clearly inadequate.
  • Breach of Contract: If the university failed to uphold promises made in student handbooks or codes of conduct regarding student safety.

• Third Parties: Depending on the specifics of the incident, other entities can also be found liable:

  • Property Owners/Landlords: If the hazing occurred at a privately owned house, property, or event venue, the owner might be responsible for premises liability if they contributed to unsafe conditions or failed to prevent foreseeable harm.
  • Alcohol Providers: If a bar, liquor store, or other entity illegally provided alcohol to minors who were then involved in hazing, they could be liable under “dram shop laws.”
  • Advisors/Alumni: Individuals serving as local chapter advisors or alumni who actively participated in, condoned, or failed to report hazing could also face legal action.

Identifying all potential defendants requires a thorough investigation, and an experienced hazing attorney understands how to navigate these complex layers of liability to ensure all responsible parties are held accountable. For families from Burleson County, this inclusive approach is essential for a comprehensive legal strategy.

NATIONAL HAZING CASE PATTERNS (ANCHOR STORIES)

While hazing incidents often make local news, a pattern of severe injuries and deaths has led to national outcry, landmark legal battles, and significant legislative changes. These anchor stories serve as stark reminders of the high stakes involved and offer crucial insights into the legal landscape for Texas families, including those in Burleson County.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death Pattern

Forced alcohol consumption remains the leading cause of hazing-related fatalities. The common script: pledges are pressured to drink excessive amounts under duress, leading to incapacitation, delayed medical attention, and tragic outcomes.

• Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017):
  Timothy Piazza, a 19-year-old pledge, died after a “bid acceptance” event involving extreme alcohol consumption. Horrifying surveillance footage from the fraternity house revealed Piazza falling multiple times, sustaining severe head and internal injuries, while fraternity brothers delayed calling 911 for nearly 12 hours. This tragic incident led to over 1,000 criminal charges against individual fraternity members, though many were reduced or dismissed in subsequent legal proceedings. Civil litigation resulted in confidential settlements. More importantly, it spurred the enactment of the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law in Pennsylvania, one of the toughest in the nation, making hazing a felony under certain circumstances. Piazza’s death underscored the deadly combination of forced drinking, peer pressure, and a culture of silence.

• Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017):
  Andrew Coffey, another 20-year-old pledge, died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. Pledges were reportedly given handles of hard liquor and pressured to consume them quickly. Multiple fraternity members were charged, with most pleading guilty to misdemeanor hazing. The incident led to a temporary, unprecedented suspension of all Greek life at Florida State University and a major re-evaluation of hazing policies across the state. His family filed a wrongful death suit, the terms of which remain confidential, but the case contributed to a rising statewide anti-hazing movement in Florida.

• Maxwell “Max” Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017):
  Max Gruver, an 18-year-old freshman, died after participating in a “Bible study” drinking game where he was forced to chug hard liquor if he answered questions incorrectly about the fraternity. His blood-alcohol content was a staggering 0.495% at the time of his death. One fraternity member was convicted of negligent homicide, and others faced criminal hazing charges. The Gruver family settled a wrongful death lawsuit, the terms of which were confidential, but the case led to the Max Gruver Act in Louisiana, which significantly strengthened the state’s anti-hazing laws, categorizing felony hazing when death occurs. This case highlighted the lethal nature of “drinking games” embedded in hazing rituals.

• Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021):
  Stone Foltz, 20, died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to consume an entire bottle of alcohol during a “Big/Little Reveal” event. The incident led to multiple criminal convictions for hazing-related charges against fraternity members, including the chapter president. The Foltz family reached a $10 million settlement in 2023, with approximately $7 million from the national Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity and roughly $3 million from Bowling Green State University. This substantial settlement, one of the largest publicly known in hazing history, reinforced the severe financial consequences for both fraternities and universities when hazing proves fatal. It also contributed to Ohio’s “Collin’s Law,” strengthening anti-hazing legislation.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing Pattern

Beyond alcohol, physical abuse and dehumanizing rituals are also recurring themes in hazing tragedies, often with devastating consequences.

• Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013):
  Michael Deng, a 19-year-old pledge, died during a fraternity “retreat” in the Pocono Mountains of Pennsylvania. He was blindfolded, weighted down with a heavy backpack, and repeatedly tackled in a brutal ritual known as “the glass ceiling.” His fraternity brothers delayed calling 911 for an hour, attempting to cover up the incident. Multiple individuals were convicted of varying crimes, and, notably, the national Pi Delta Psi fraternity itself was convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, a rare instance of organizational criminal liability. The fraternity was banned from operating in Pennsylvania for 10 years and fined over $110,000, underscoring that off-campus locations offer no immunity from legal accountability.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse

Hazing is not confined to Greek life; it is a pervasive issue that can manifest in highly competitive environments like collegiate athletics, often shielded by a culture of loyalty and unspoken norms.

• Northwestern University Football (2023–2025):
  In 2023, allegations of widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the Northwestern University football program emerged, spanning years of abuse. Former players came forward, describing practices that ranged from forced sexual acts to public humiliation with racial undertones. This scandal led to the firing of long-time head coach Pat Fitzgerald, who subsequently filed a wrongful-termination lawsuit against the university, which was confidentially settled in August 2025. Multiple players also filed civil lawsuits against Northwestern and its coaching staff. The Northwestern case tragically illustrated that hazing can flourish even in prestigious athletic programs, highlighting profound institutional oversight failures and the enduring power of coercive traditions beyond Greek organizations.

What These Cases Mean for Texas Families

These national anchor stories hold profound implications for Burleson County families whose children attend or plan to attend Texas universities:

• Foreseeability is Key: These cases establish a well-documented national pattern of hazing. When a tragic incident occurs at a Texas university, defendants (whether local chapters, national organizations, or universities) often cannot claim ignorance. They are expected to know the risks associated with certain “traditions” or behaviors, especially forced alcohol consumption and physical abuse. This strengthens arguments for negligence and, in some cases, punitive damages.
• Accountability Extends Beyond Individuals: The successful civil actions and criminal convictions against entire organizations and institutions demonstrate that liability is not limited to the individual perpetrators. Universities and national fraternities are increasingly being held responsible for failing to prevent foreseeable harm and for cultivating environments where hazing can thrive.
• Financial Stakes are High: The multi-million dollar settlements and verdicts in cases like Stone Foltz’s, Max Gruver’s, Chad Meredith’s, and Joseph Snell’s underscore the immense human and financial costs of hazing. This sends a clear message to institutions and organizations: failure to act carries severe financial penalties.
• Legislative Change Follows Tragedy: The Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law in Pennsylvania, the Max Gruver Act in Louisiana, and Ohio’s Collin’s Law exemplify how public outrage, fueled by these tragedies, can drive robust anti-hazing legislation. While Texas already has anti-hazing laws, the national conversation continues to push for stronger protections.
• No “Safe” Organizational Type: Hazing is a problem that cuts across all types of student organizations—Greek life, athletics, bands, and even academic clubs. This means Burleson County parents need to be vigilant regardless of their child’s chosen activities.

For a family in Burleson County grappling with a hazing incident at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, Baylor, or any other Texas institution, these national precedents provide a powerful legal foundation. They reaffirm that serious hazing is not merely a “college prank” but a grave legal and ethical violation with profound consequences.

UNIVERSITIES: BURLESON COUNTY AND TEXAS

For families in Burleson County and throughout the region, understanding the specific environments of Texas’s major universities is crucial. This section provides tailored insights into five prominent Texas institutions: the University of Houston (UH), Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin (UT), Southern Methodist University (SMU), and Baylor University. We will also touch on the broader landscape of higher education in Texas, including institutions in Burleson County and those frequently chosen by Burleson County families.

While Burleson County itself does not host a large four-year university, numerous families from communities like Caldwell, Snook, and Somerville send their children to the major universities across the state, especially Baylor in Waco or Texas A&M in nearby College Station. Therefore, an understanding of the hazing landscape at these institutions is of direct concern to Burleson County parents.

University of Houston (UH)

The University of Houston is one of Texas’s largest and most diverse public universities. Its main campus, located in the heart of Houston—a metropolitan hub frequently visited by or serving residents from Burleson County for various services—is home to a vibrant student body of over 47,000. UH boasts an active Greek life scene, with dozens of fraternities and sororities recognized by the Interfraternity Council (IFC), National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and Multicultural Greek Council, alongside numerous other student organizations and athletic clubs.

Campus & Culture Snapshot (Houston Connection)

UH is a dynamic urban campus, reflecting the diversity and energy of Houston. While many students commute, a significant portion live on or near campus, fostering a lively social and academic environment. Greek life plays a prominent role in the social fabric, offering students opportunities for community involvement, leadership, and philanthropic activities. For Burleson County families, UH represents a diverse and accessible option for higher education, often just a short drive away.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting

The University of Houston maintains a strict, zero-tolerance policy against hazing, applicable to all student organizations, whether on or off campus. The policy broadly defines hazing to include any act that endangers mental or physical health for the purpose of initiation, affiliation, or membership. UH’s hazing policy prohibits specific acts such as forced alcohol/substance consumption, sleep deprivation, physical mistreatment, branding, and any activity causing mental distress.

UH provides several channels for reporting hazing, including the Dean of Students Office, the Office of Student Conduct, and the University of Houston Police Department (UHPD). The university also encourages anonymous reporting. UH has been known to publish some disciplinary actions and findings related to hazing on its website, contributing to a degree of transparency regarding violations.

Documented Incidents & Responses

The University of Houston campus has unfortunately witnessed its share of concerning incidents. The Manginello Law Firm is intimately familiar with the impact of hazing at UH, particularly through our representation of Leonel Bermudez.

Leonel Bermudez v. University of Houston / Pi Kappa Phi: In late 2025, Attorney911 filed a $10 million lawsuit on behalf of Leonel Bermudez against the University of Houston, the UH System Board of Regents, the national Pi Kappa Phi fraternity, its local Beta Nu chapter’s housing corporation, and 13 individual fraternity leaders and members. Bermudez, a transfer student pledging Pi Kappa Phi, suffered acute kidney failure and rhabdomyolysis after weeks of alleged severe hazing.

Specific details from this case, as alleged in the lawsuit represented by Attorney911 (Ralph Manginello and Lupe Peña), include:

• Pledges were forced to carry a “fanny pack” 24/7 containing degrading items like condoms, sex toys, and nicotine devices; failure to comply resulted in threats of punishment or expulsion.
• Hazing activities took place at the Pi Kappa Phi chapter house, a former member’s residence on Culmore Drive, and Yellowstone Boulevard Park in Houston.
• Bermudez and other pledges were subjected to hours-long “study/work” blocks, forced late-night driving duties, sprints, bear crawls, and wheelbarrow races.
• They allegedly endured cold-weather exposure in underwear, being hosed down in a manner “similar to waterboarding,” and threats of actual waterboarding.
• Pledges were forced to consume milk, hot dogs, and peppercorns until vomiting, followed by immediate strenuous sprints.
• On November 3, 2025, a particularly brutal workout included over 100 push-ups and 500 squats, which left Bermudez unable to stand. He later passed brown urine, a classic symptom of rhabdomyolysis, and required a four-day hospitalization for his kidney failure.
• Another pledge was allegedly hog-tied face-down on a table with an object in his mouth for over an hour on October 13.

In response to these allegations, Pi Kappa Phi’s national headquarters suspended the Beta Nu chapter on November 6, 2025, and the chapter subsequently voted to surrender its charter on November 14, permanently shutting down. The University of Houston called the alleged conduct “deeply disturbing” and pledged cooperation with law enforcement and internal disciplinary measures.

As lead attorney Ralph Manginello recently stated, referring to Bermudez’s severe condition, “His urine was brown.” Manginello added, “We’re almost in 2026. This has to stop.” Co-counsel Lupe Peña emphasized the firm’s motivation: “If this prevents harm to another person…Let’s bring this to light. Enough is enough.” These statements, reported by local media outlets like Click2Houston (https://www.click2houston.com/news/local/2025/11/21/only-on-2-lawsuit-alleges-severe-hazing-at-university-of-houstons-pi-kappa-phi-chapter-fraternity/), ABC13 (https://abc13.com/post/waterboarding-forced-eating-physical-punishment-lawsuit-alleges-abuse-faced-injured-pledge-uhs-pi-kappa-phi-fraternity/18186418/), and Hoodline (https://hoodline.com/2025/11/university-of-houston-and-pi-kappa-phi-fraternity-face-10m-lawsuit-over-alleged-hazing-and-abuse/), highlight the severe nature of the alleged hazing and Attorney911’s commitment to justice.

How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed

For a Burleson County family pursuing a hazing claim at UH, the case would likely involve multiple government and private entities. Investigations could be conducted by UHPD or the Houston Police Department, depending on where incidents occurred. Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in Harris County courts, where Attorney911 has deep experience. Potential defendants range from the individual students directly involved, to the local chapter, the national fraternity, and potentially the University of Houston and the UH System Board of Regents, depending on the extent of their knowledge and inaction.

What UH Students & Parents Should Do

• Understand UH’s Policies: Familiarize yourself with the University of Houston’s explicit anti-hazing rules.
• Document Everything: If you suspect or experience hazing, immediately document all details, including dates, times, locations, individuals involved, and specific acts. Screenshot all digital communications (texts, GroupMe, Snapchat, DMs). Photograph any injuries.
• Report Internally if Safe: Utilize UH’s reporting channels (Dean of Students, UHPD). Be prepared for internal university processes, which may not always align with your legal objectives.
• Seek Off-Campus Legal Counsel: Contact a Houston-based hazing attorney immediately. An attorney experienced in Houston’s legal landscape can help navigate complex investigations, preserve crucial evidence, and protect your child’s rights. For Burleson County families, Attorney911’s local presence in Houston means we are readily available to assist.

Texas A&M University

Texas A&M University, located in College Station, is deeply connected to Burleson County, given its relative proximity. Many students from Caldwell, Snook, and Somerville choose Texas A&M, drawn by its strong traditions, academic programs, and the famed Corps of Cadets. Texas A&M is renowned for its immense spirit, unique traditions, and a large, active Greek life alongside its prominent Corps of Cadets. It boasts over 70,000 students, fostering a campus culture that is proud, hierarchical, and fiercely loyal.

Campus & Culture Snapshot (Burleson County Connection)

Texas A&M’s culture is steeped in tradition, often emphasizing loyalty, sacrifice, and belonging. This can create an environment ripe for hazing if not carefully monitored. The Corps of Cadets, a military-rooted student organization, has its own unique traditions and structures that, while fostering leadership and discipline, can also be susceptible to hazing. Greek life is robust, with numerous fraternities and sororities, including both traditional IFC/Panhellenic chapters and NPHC/multicultural groups. Given College Station’s proximity, many families in Burleson County have strong ties to A&M, making hazing incidents there particularly concerning for the local community.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting

Texas A&M publicly states a zero-tolerance policy for hazing under its Student Conduct Code. The university’s definition mirrors state law, prohibiting any act for initiation or membership that causes mental or physical harm, regardless of intent or consent. This applies to all recognized student organizations, including the Corps of Cadets.

Reporting channels at A&M include the Division of Student Affairs, the Corps of Cadets leadership (for Corps-specific incidents), the Texas A&M University Police Department (TAMUPD), and confidential online reporting forms. The university is legally mandated to provide education and transparent reporting on hazing violations.

Documented Incidents & Responses

Texas A&M has faced multiple hazing allegations, often involving both Greek life and the Corps of Cadets:

• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (2021) – Chemical Burns: In 2021, two former pledges of the Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) fraternity filed a $1 million lawsuit against the fraternity, alleging severe physical hazing. The pledges claimed they were forced into strenuous physical activity and then had various substances, including industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit, poured on them, resulting in severe chemical burns that required skin graft surgeries. The university suspended the SAE chapter for two years following this incident. This case highlighted the dangerous and non-traditional methods that can be used in modern hazing.
• Corps of Cadets (2023) – Degrading Rituals: A federal lawsuit filed in 2023 by a former cadet alleged profound and humiliating hazing within the Corps. The allegations included being subjected to simulated sexual acts, duct-taped between beds in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth, and other degrading rituals. The lawsuit sought over $1 million in damages, which the university stated it addressed through its internal conduct processes. This incident underscores that hazing is not confined to Greek organizations but can occur within other tradition-heavy student groups.
• Phi Gamma Delta (2018): In 2018, Joseph Little, an 18-year-old freshman, tragically collapsed and died during pledging activities for the Phi Gamma Delta (FIJI) fraternity. While the cause of death was initially labeled as “medical,” university administrators later determined that hazing had occurred. This was not the first hazing-related death associated with FIJI, as seen in the Max Gruver case at LSU, reinforcing the national pattern of risk.

A historical note for Burleson County families, Texas A&M also has the tragic legacy of the Aggie Bonfire collapse in 1999, which killed 12 students and injured 27. While not traditional hazing, it raised profound questions about student-led, high-risk activities and institutional oversight, leading to structural changes and millions in settlements. This event, visible on national news, was a sobering lesson in the dangers of unmanaged student traditions.

How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed

For a Burleson County family pursuing a hazing claim at Texas A&M, the legal path would involve navigating state agencies. Texas A&M University is a state institution, meaning it is protected by sovereign immunity under Texas law. However, this immunity is not absolute. Exceptions exist for cases of gross negligence, when Title IX is triggered, or when suing individual employees for their own actions. Such cases would likely be filed in Brazos County or a federal court, depending on the claims. TAMUPD is the primary law enforcement agency, and their findings can be crucial for civil cases.

What Texas A&M Students & Parents Should Do

• Be Aware of Tradition vs. Hazing: At A&M, the line between character-building traditions (like “fish camp”) and hazing can be subtle. If an activity compels participation, causes mental/physical harm, or involves secrecy, it’s likely hazing, regardless of its “traditional” label.
• Utilize Reporting Systems: Contact the Dean of Student Life, the Corps of Cadets leadership, or TAMUPD for official reports. Online reporting forms are available.
• Preserve Evidence Meticulously: Given the prevalence of digital communication, screenshots of group chats, photos, and videos are invaluable. Medical documentation from local facilities like Baylor Scott & White Medical Center – College Station, or other nearby hospitals serving Burleson County, should explicitly state the hazing context.
• Consult Legal Expertise: Given A&M’s sovereign immunity and complex internal structures, early legal consultation is paramount. An attorney from Attorney911 can help determine if an exception to immunity applies and guide families through the often-challenging process.

The University of Texas at Austin (UT)

The University of Texas at Austin is one of the nation’s premier public universities, attracting students from across Texas, including many from Burleson County who seek its academic excellence and vibrant campus life. With over 52,000 students, UT Austin boasts a massive Greek system, a dominant athletic culture, and numerous student organizations, all of which can unfortunately become venues for hazing.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

UT Austin has a dynamic, often highly competitive, and diverse campus environment. Its large Greek life community is a powerful force in campus social life, offering a wide array of fraternities and sororities. The university’s strong athletic traditions and numerous student groups also contribute to a complex social ecosystem where hierarchy and initiation rituals sometimes devolve into hazing. For Burleson County families, UT represents a top-tier educational destination, but also one where vigilance against hazing is necessary.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting

UT Austin maintains a robust anti-hazing policy explicitly prohibiting hazing by any student or student organization. The policy is comprehensive, covering both on-campus and off-campus acts that endanger mental or physical health for affiliation purposes. UT’s policy emphasizes that consent is not a defense and obligates all students and employees to report hazing incidents.

A significant aspect of UT’s approach is its public Hazing Violations webpage, which lists organizations, dates of violation, detailed descriptions of misconduct, and sanctions imposed. This high level of transparency is a critical resource for prospective and current students and their families. Reporting channels include the Dean of Students Office, Student Conduct and Academic Integrity, and the University of Texas Police Department (UTPD).

Documented Incidents & Responses

UT Austin’s public records provide numerous examples of hazing infractions:

• Pi Kappa Alpha (2023): As documented on UT’s Hazing Violations page, the Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity was sanctioned in 2023 for “new members directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics.” This was found to be hazing, leading to chapter probation and mandatory hazing prevention education. This highlights that even practices perceived as “harmless” can violate hazing policies.
• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (2024): In January 2024, a highly publicized incident involving an Australian exchange student and the UT Austin chapter of Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) brought hazing allegations back into the spotlight. The student alleged severe assault by fraternity members, resulting in a dislocated leg, broken ligaments, a fractured tibia, and a broken nose. The civil lawsuit filed against the SAE chapter and individuals sought over $1 million in damages. This occurred while the SAE chapter was already under university suspension for prior hazing and safety violations, demonstrating a pattern of non-compliance.
• Texas Cowboys (2018): The prestigious Texas Cowboys spirit organization faced a significant hazing scandal in 2018, leading to the death of a “new man” after a truck accident. While the university attributed the death to a combination of factors and denied that sleep deprivation was the sole cause, significant hazing was nonetheless confirmed. Hazing activities, including forced calisthenics, excessive alcohol use, and sleep deprivation, led to the suspension of the group and severe disciplinary actions against involved members. The family’s allegations of sleep deprivation highlight the subtle yet dangerous forms of hazing. UT’s public records detail other similar incidents involving various fraternities and spirit groups, often involving forced alcohol consumption, physical activities, and public humiliation.

How a UT Austin Hazing Case Might Proceed

Similar to Texas A&M, the University of Texas at Austin is a public institution protected by sovereign immunity, though exceptions exist. Civil lawsuits against UT or its regents must carefully navigate these limitations. Cases would typically be filed in Travis County, where Austin is located, or potentially in federal court. Investigations might involve UTPD or the Austin Police Department. The availability of UT’s public Hazing Violations log can be a significant advantage for plaintiffs, providing a clear record of prior organizational misconduct that supports arguments of foreseeability and negligent supervision.

What UT Austin Students & Parents Should Do

• Review UT’s Hazing Log: Before joining any organization, Burleson County families and students should thoroughly review UT’s Hazing Violations webpage to understand any past disciplinary actions against student groups (https://deanofstudents.utexas.edu/hazing/).
• Know Your Rights and Resources: UT provides confidential advocacy resources. Students should also understand the amnesty policy for calling 911 in an emergency.
• Engage Legal Counsel: For hazing incidents involving serious harm at UT, consulting an attorney experienced in Texas university hazing cases is critical. Attorney911 can leverage UT’s public records and its experience with sovereign immunity claims to build a compelling case.

Southern Methodist University (SMU)

Southern Methodist University is a private university in Dallas, known for its strong academic programs, vibrant campus life, and a prominent Greek system. SMU attracts many students from affluent backgrounds, and its Greek organizations often play a central role in social activities. For Burleson County families considering private higher education, SMU is a respected choice.

Campus & Culture Snapshot

SMU’s campus culture is dynamic, integrating strong academics with a rich social scene. Greek life is a dominant force, with a high percentage of students participating in fraternities and sororities recognized by the IFC, Panhellenic Council, and NPHC. The pursuit of status and belonging can be intense in this environment, sometimes leading to hazing practices within various student groups. SMU is a private institution, which can affect the transparency of disciplinary records compared to public universities, but also broadens the scope of potential liability claims.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting

SMU maintains clear anti-hazing policies that prohibit any activity that subjects a student to mental or physical abuse, discomfort, or risk in connection with initiation or membership. The policy applies to all student organizations, on or off campus, and emphasizes that any form of consent does not excuse hazing.

SMU provides reporting mechanisms through the Office of Student Conduct and Community Standards, the SMU Police Department, and various dean offices. The university also offers an anonymous reporting function.

Documented Incidents & Responses

While SMU’s internal disciplinary records are not as publicly accessible as those of state universities (due to its private status and differing public disclosure laws), hazing incidents have led to significant disciplinary responses:

• Kappa Alpha Order (2017): In 2017, the Kappa Alpha Order fraternity chapter at SMU was suspended and faced strict restrictions following a hazing investigation. Allegations included pledges being paddled, forced to consume excessive alcohol, and deprived of sleep. The chapter was prohibited from recruiting new members for several years, effectively crippling its operations until 2021. This demonstrates SMU’s capacity for severe organizational sanctions when hazing is discovered.
• Other Greek Chapters: Over the years, other SMU Greek chapters have faced sanctions ranging from probation to suspension for hazing violations, often involving underage drinking, forced activities, and psychological intimidation. Specific details of such cases usually emerge through community reports or confidential investigations rather than public university logs.

How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed

As a private institution, SMU is not shielded by sovereign immunity, which often simplifies the process of filing a civil lawsuit against the university itself, compared to public schools. A civil case involving hazing at SMU would typically be filed in Dallas County courts. Dallas Police or SMU Police might be involved in any criminal investigations. Building a case against a private university or organization often involves extensive discovery to uncover internal records, communications, and prior incident reports that may not be publicly available. For Burleson County families, Attorney911’s experience with such discovery processes is invaluable.

What SMU Students & Parents Should Do

• Investigate Beyond Public Records: Since SMU doesn’t have a public hazing log, Burleson County families should conduct their own research by speaking with current students, alumni, and campus community members about organizational cultures.
• Utilize SMU’s Internal Reporting: Should hazing be suspected, students and parents should use SMU’s official reporting channels, including the Office of Student Conduct. If the hazing involves sexual misconduct, the Title IX Coordinator is the appropriate contact.
• Secure Early Legal Consultation: Due to the private nature of SMU disciplinary processes and the potential for greater legal latitude in civil actions against private universities, early engagement with a hazing attorney is highly recommended. Attorney911 can help families navigate internal investigations and prepare for any potential litigation.

Baylor University

Baylor University, located in Waco, is a private Christian university with a strong emphasis on community, faith, and academic excellence. It is a popular choice for many Burleson County families, being situated relatively close to home. Baylor’s extensive Greek life, alongside its prominent athletic programs, contributes to a distinct campus culture that has, at times, faced scrutiny regarding student safety and misconduct.

Campus & Culture Snapshot (Burleson County Proximity)

Baylor University, known for its Baptist heritage, cultivates a tight-knit community feel. Its Greek life is vibrant and competitive, offering students numerous social and service opportunities. Athletic programs, especially football, hold significant cultural sway. For Burleson County residents, the close ties to Baylor are both geographical and communal, making it a natural choice for many students. However, this strong community ethos can sometimes lead to insular practices within student groups, making hazing a persistent concern.

Official Hazing Policy & Reporting

Baylor’s policies explicitly prohibit hazing, defining it as any intentional or reckless act that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, for the purpose of initiation or membership. Baylor’s Code of Conduct emphasizes “zero tolerance” for hazing, with disciplinary actions ranging from probation to expulsion for individuals and suspension or permanent loss of recognition for organizations.

Reporting is handled through the Dean of Students Office, Baylor Police Department (BUPD), and the university’s Title IX office for sex-based discrimination or harassment. Baylor also offers an anonymous reporting hotline.

Documented Incidents & Responses

Baylor’s history includes periods of intense scrutiny regarding student safety, particularly in the wake of its football and Title IX scandals in the mid-2010s. While these largely focused on sexual assault, they highlighted broader issues with institutional oversight and accountability that are also relevant to hazing.

• Baylor Baseball Hazing (2020): In 2020, the Baylor baseball team faced significant hazing allegations that resulted in the suspension of 14 players. The suspensions were staggered over the early part of the season, indicating that the hazing was serious enough to disrupt the team’s competitive schedule. While specific details of the hazing were not publicly released, the university’s strong disciplinary response underscored their official stance against such practices within athletic programs.
• Greek Life Violations: Like other universities, Baylor’s Greek system has experienced incidents leading to organizational discipline for hazing. These often involve violations related to alcohol, physical activities, and other prohibited initiation practices. As a private university, detailed records of these incidents are not always publicly available, but they are internally investigated.

How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed

As with SMU, Baylor University is a private institution, meaning it does not benefit from sovereign immunity. This can facilitate civil litigation directly against the university for negligence or other claims. Lawsuits would typically be filed in McLennan County (Waco) or relevant federal courts. Given Baylor’s strong institutional identity and past experiences with major litigation, they are known to mount a vigorous legal defense. An experienced hazing attorney is essential to navigate such a complex environment.

What Baylor Students & Parents Should Do

• Question Beyond the Code of Conduct: While Baylor’s hazing policies are strict, Burleson County families should actively inquire about the day-to-day realities of new member processes within specific organizations.
• Prioritize Documentation: Any suspected hazing should be meticulously documented, including details, screenshots, and photos. Medical attention, if needed, should be sought immediately, and providers informed of the hazing context. Local medical facilities in Waco or surrounding areas should report accurately.
• Engage Legal Professionals: Given Baylor’s status as a private university with significant resources, legal consultation from a firm like Attorney911, experienced in confronting powerful university defendants, is crucial for families seeking accountability for hazing injuries or wrongful death.

Where Burleson County Families Send Their Kids (Regional & Statewide)

While Caldwell and Burleson County don’t host major universities, local families send their children to a wide array of Texas institutions. The insights provided for UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor are particularly relevant, as these are common destinations. Other popular choices across the state, such as Texas State University in San Marcos, Sam Houston State University in Huntsville, or smaller private colleges, may also have Greek life, athletic programs, and other student organizations susceptible to hazing. Regardless of the institution, the legal principles of Texas hazing law apply, and the need for vigilance remains constant.

Complete Texas University Directory

Attorney911 tracks every higher education institution in Texas. For reference, here is every four-year degree-granting institution in the state:

• Abilene Christian University | Abilene, Taylor County | Private Non-Profit
• Abilene Christian University-Undergraduate Online | Addison, Dallas County | Private Non-Profit
• AOMA Graduate School of Integrative Medicine | Austin, Travis County | Private For-Profit
• Amberton University | Garland, Dallas County | Private Non-Profit
• American College of Acupuncture and Oriental Med | Houston, Harris County | Private For-Profit
• American InterContinental University-Houston | Houston, Harris County | Private For-Profit
• Angelo State University | San Angelo, Tom Green County | Public
• Arlington Baptist University | Arlington, Tarrant County | Private Non-Profit
• Austin College | Sherman, Grayson County | Private Non-Profit
• Austin Community College District | Austin, Travis County | Public
• Austin Graduate School of Theology | Austin, Travis County | Private Non-Profit
• Austin Presbyterian Theological Seminary | Austin, Travis County | Private Non-Profit
• Bakke Graduate University | Dallas, Dallas County | Private Non-Profit
• Baptist Health System School of Health Professions | San Antonio, Bexar County | Private For-Profit
• Baptist Missionary Association Theological Seminary | Jacksonville, Cherokee County | Private Non-Profit
• Baptist University of the Americas | San Antonio, Bexar County | Private Non-Profit
• Baylor College of Medicine | Houston, Harris County | Private Non-Profit
• Baylor University | Waco, McLennan County | Private Non-Profit
• Brazosport College | Lake Jackson, Brazoria County | Public
• Brite Divinity School | Fort Worth, Tarrant County | Private Non-Profit
• Chamberlain University-Texas | Houston, Harris County | Private For-Profit
• Chicago School of Professional Psychology at Dallas | Richardson, Dallas County | Private Non-Profit
• Christ Mission College | San Antonio, Bexar County | Private Non-Profit
• College of Biblical Studies-Houston | Houston, Harris County | Private Non-Profit
• College of the Mainland | Texas City, Galveston County | Public
• Collin County Community College District | McKinney, Collin County | Public
• Concordia University Texas | Austin, Travis County | Private Non-Profit
• Criswell College | Dallas, Dallas County | Private Non-Profit
• Dallas Baptist University | Dallas, Dallas County | Private Non-Profit
• Dallas Christian College | Dallas, Dallas County | Private Non-Profit
• Dallas College | Dallas, Dallas County | Public
• Dallas Theological Seminary | Dallas, Dallas County | Private Non-Profit
• Del Mar College | Corpus Christi, Nueces County | Public
• DeVry University-Texas | Irving, Dallas County | Private For-Profit
• East Texas Baptist University | Marshall, Harrison County | Private Non-Profit
• Episcopal Theological Seminary of the Southwest | Austin, Travis County | Private Non-Profit
• Galen Health Institutes-Austin Campus | Austin, Williamson County | Private For-Profit
• Galen Health Institutes-Houston | Houston, Harris County | Private For-Profit
• Galen College of Nursing-San Antonio | San Antonio, Bexar County | Private For-Profit
• Galveston College | Galveston, Galveston County | Public
• Gemini School of Visual Arts & Communication | Austin, Williamson County | Private For-Profit
• Grace School of Theology | Conroe, Montgomery County | Private Non-Profit
• Grayson College | Denison, Grayson County | Public
• Hallmark University | San Antonio, Bexar County | Private Non-Profit
• Hardin-Simmons University | Abilene, Taylor County | Private Non-Profit
• Howard Payne University | Brownwood, Brown County | Private Non-Profit
• Houston Baptist University | Houston, Harris County | Private Non-Profit
• Houston Graduate School of Theology | Houston, Harris County | Private Non-Profit
• Huston-Tillotson University | Austin, Travis County | Private Non-Profit
• Jarvis Christian University | Hawkins, Wood County | Private Non-Profit
• Lamar University | Beaumont, Jefferson County | Public
• Laredo College | Laredo, Webb County | Public
• LeTourneau University | Longview, Gregg County | Private Non-Profit
• Lone Star College System | The Woodlands, Montgomery County | Public
• Lubbock Christian University | Lubbock, Lubbock County | Private Non-Profit
• McLennan Community College | Waco, McLennan County | Public
• McMurry University | Abilene, Taylor County | Private Non-Profit
• Messenger College | Bedford, Tarrant County | Private Non-Profit
• Midland College | Midland, Midland County | Public
• Midwestern State University | Wichita Falls, Wichita County | Public
• North American University | Stafford, Fort Bend County | Private Non-Profit
• National American University-Austin | Austin, Travis County | Private For-Profit
• National American University-Houston | Houston, Harris County | Private For-Profit
• Oblate School of Theology | San Antonio, Bexar County | Private Non-Profit
• Odessa College | Odessa, Ector County | Public
• Our Lady of the Lake University | San Antonio, Bexar County | Private Non-Profit
• Parker University | Dallas, Dallas County | Private Non-Profit
• Paul Quinn College | Dallas, Dallas County | Private Non-Profit
• Prairie View A & M University | Prairie View, Waller County | Public
• Remington College-Dallas Campus | Dallas, Dallas County | Private Non-Profit
• Remington College-Fort Worth Campus | Fort Worth, Tarrant County | Private Non-Profit
• Remington College-North Houston Campus | Houston, Harris County | Private Non-Profit
• Rice University | Houston, Harris County | Private Non-Profit
• RCCGNA Seminary | Greenville, Hunt County | Private Non-Profit
• Saint Edward’s University | Austin, Travis County | Private Non-Profit
• San Antonio College | San Antonio, Bexar County | Public
• San Jacinto Community College | Pasadena, Harris County | Public
• Sam Houston State University | Huntsville, Walker County | Public
• Schreiner University | Kerrville, Kerr County | Private Non-Profit
• South Texas College | McAllen, Hidalgo County | Public
• South Texas College of Law Houston | Houston, Harris County | Private Non-Profit
• Southern Methodist University | Dallas, Dallas County | Private Non-Profit
• Southwestern University | Georgetown, Williamson County | Private Non-Profit
• Southwestern Assemblies of God University | Waxahachie, Ellis County | Private Non-Profit
• Southwestern Christian College | Terrell, Kaufman County | Private Non-Profit
• Stephen F Austin State University | Nacogdoches, Nacogdoches County | Public
• St. Mary’s University | San Antonio, Bexar County | Private Non-Profit
• Strayer University-Texas | Farmers Branch, Dallas County | Private For-Profit
• Sul Ross State University | Alpine, Brewster County | Public
• Tarleton State University | Stephenville, Erath County | Public
• Texas A & M International University | Laredo, Webb County | Public
• Texas A & M University-Central Texas | Killeen, Bell County | Public
• Texas A & M University-College Station | College Station, Brazos County | Public
• Texas A & M University-Commerce | Commerce, Hunt County | Public
• Texas A & M University-Corpus Christi | Corpus Christi, Nueces County | Public
• Texas A & M University-Kingsville | Kingsville, Kleberg County | Public
• Texas A & M University-System Office | College Station, Brazos County | Public
• Texas A&M University-San Antonio | San Antonio, Bexar County | Public
• Texas Chiropractic College Foundation Inc | Pasadena, Harris County | Private Non-Profit
• Texas Christian University | Fort Worth, Tarrant County | Private Non-Profit
• Texas College | Tyler, Smith County | Private Non-Profit
• Texas Health and Science University | Austin, Travis County | Private For-Profit
• Texas Lutheran University | Seguin, Guadalupe County | Private Non-Profit
• Texas Southern University | Houston, Harris County | Public
• Texas Tech University | Lubbock, Lubbock County | Public
• Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center | Lubbock, Lubbock County | Public
• Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center-El Paso | El Paso, El Paso County | Public
• Texas Tech University System Administration | Lubbock, Lubbock County | Public
• Texas Woman’s University | Denton, Denton County | Public
• Texas Wesleyan University | Fort Worth, Tarrant County | Private Non-Profit
• The Art Institute of Austin | Bastrop, Bastrop County | Private For-Profit
• The Art Institute of Houston | Houston, Harris County | Private For-Profit
• The Art Institute of San Antonio | San Antonio, Bexar County | Private For-Profit
• The College of Health Care Professions-Northwest | Houston, Harris County | Private For-Profit
• The King’s University | Southlake, Tarrant County | Private Non-Profit
• The Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary | Fort Worth, Tarrant County | Private Non-Profit
• The University of Texas at Arlington | Arlington, Tarrant County | Public
• The University of Texas at Austin | Austin, Travis County | Public
• The University of Texas at Dallas | Richardson, Dallas County | Public
• The University of Texas at El Paso | El Paso, El Paso County | Public
• The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston | Houston, Harris County | Public
• The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio | San Antonio, Bexar County | Public
• The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center | Houston, Harris County | Public
• The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston | Galveston, Galveston County | Public
• The University of Texas Permian Basin | Odessa, Ector County | Public
• The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley | Edinburg, Hidalgo County | Public
• The University of Texas System Office | Austin, Travis County | Public
• The University of Texas at San Antonio | San Antonio, Bexar County | Public
• The University of Texas at Tyler | Tyler, Smith County | Public
• The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston | Houston, Harris County | Public
• Trinity University | San Antonio, Bexar County | Private Non-Profit
• Tyler Junior College | Tyler, Smith County | Public
• University of Dallas | Irving, Dallas County | Private Non-Profit
• University of Houston | Houston, Harris County | Public
• University of Houston-Clear Lake | Houston, Harris County | Public
• University of Houston-Downtown | Houston, Harris County | Public
• University of Houston-System Administration | Houston, Harris County | Public
• University of Houston-Victoria | Victoria, Victoria County | Public
• University of Mary Hardin-Baylor | Belton, Bell County | Private Non-Profit
• University of North Texas | Denton, Denton County | Public
• University of North Texas at Dallas | Dallas, Dallas County | Public
• University of North Texas Health Science Center | Fort Worth, Tarrant County | Public
• University of North Texas System | Dallas, Dallas County | Public
• University of Phoenix-Texas | Houston, Harris County | Private For-Profit
• University of St Thomas | Houston, Harris County | Private Non-Profit
• University of the Incarnate Word | San Antonio, Bexar County | Private Non-Profit
• Wayland Baptist University | Plainview, Hale County | Private Non-Profit
• Weatherford College | Weatherford, Parker County | Public
• West Coast University-Dallas | Richardson, Dallas County | Private For-Profit
• West Texas A & M University | Canyon, Randall County | Public
• Western Technical College | El Paso, El Paso County | Private For-Profit

FRATERNITIES & SORORITIES: CAMPUS-SPECIFIC + NATIONAL HISTORIES

For families in Burleson County, understanding the connection between local chapters at Texas universities and their national organizations’ hazing histories is critical. Many incidents that occur in Texas mirror what has happened elsewhere, signaling a pattern of behavior that national offices often know about. This “foreseeability” is a crucial aspect of proving negligence in a hazing lawsuit.

Why National Histories Matter

Most fraternities, sororities, and honor societies at Texas universities (including UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor) are chapters of larger national or international organizations. These national bodies typically maintain strict anti-hazing policies, risk management programs, and educational initiatives. However, their very existence—and the reason these policies are so stringent—is often due to a history of severe injuries, deaths, and multi-million dollar lawsuits from hazing incidents at chapters across the country.

When a local Texas chapter engages in hazing that mirrors incidents from other states, it argues powerfully that the national organization knew, or should have known, such dangers were foreseeable. This connection helps establish liability against the powerful national entities, not just the local students.

Mapping Greek Organizations to National Hazing Patterns

Below, we detail some prominent Greek organizations with a presence at major Texas universities, along with their national hazing histories. This is not to imply that every chapter of these organizations engages in hazing, but rather to highlight patterns of risk that have led to tragic outcomes and significant legal accountability nationwide.

• Pi Kappa Alpha (ΠΚΑ / Pike): This fraternity has a significant presence at many Texas campuses, including the University of Texas at Austin and Texas A&M.

  • National Hazing History: Pi Kappa Alpha has been at the center of multiple high-profile hazing cases involving forced alcohol consumption. The most prominent is the 2021 death of Stone Foltz at Bowling Green State University. Foltz died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to consume an entire bottle of alcohol during a “Big/Little Reveal” night. This incident resulted in multiple criminal convictions and a $10 million settlement for his family from both the national fraternity and the university. Another notable case involved the 2012 death of David Bogenberger at Northern Illinois University, also due to alcohol poisoning during a fraternity event, leading to a $14 million settlement to his family. These patterns demonstrate national Pi Kappa Alpha’s long-standing awareness of the dangers of forced drinking rituals.

• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (ΣΑΕ / SAE): SAE chapters are active at Texas A&M, the University of Texas at Austin, and other major Texas schools.

  • National Hazing History: Sigma Alpha Epsilon has been infamously dubbed “America’s deadliest fraternity” due to a string of hazing-related deaths, primarily involving alcohol, which led to a national decision in 2014 to eliminate the traditional pledging process. Incidents include the 2008 death of Carson Starkey at Cal Poly, where he died of alcohol poisoning, leading to confidential but substantial settlements. More recently, in 2021, two pledges at Texas A&M alleged they suffered severe chemical burns after being covered in industrial cleaner, eggs, and spit during forced physical activity, leading to a lawsuit for $1 million against the fraternity. Additionally, in January 2024, an Australian exchange student sued the UT Austin chapter of SAE for over $1 million, alleging severe assault during a party that left him with multiple fractures and dislocations. This indicates a national pattern of physical and alcohol-related hazing, even within Texas chapters.

• Phi Delta Theta (ΦΔΘ): With chapters at almost all major Texas universities, Phi Delta Theta has also faced severe hazing scrutiny.

  • National Hazing History: The most tragic case linked to Phi Delta Theta is the 2017 death of Maxwell “Max” Gruver at Louisiana State University. Max died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to participate in a “Bible study” drinking game. This incident led to criminal convictions, significant civil settlements (including a $6.1 million verdict against the fraternity and individuals), and the enactment of the Max Gruver Act in Louisiana. In 2018, Joseph Little died during hazing activities at the Texas A&M chapter, leading to a university finding of hazing, further cementing a national pattern of risk.

• Pi Kappa Phi (ΠΚΦ): Pi Kappa Phi is a common fraternity at institutions like the University of Houston and others across Texas.

  • National Hazing History: The national organization has a history of hazing incidents, most notably the 2017 death of Andrew Coffey at Florida State University, where he died of acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night.” Multiple members were prosecuted for misdemeanor hazing. This history forms a crucial backdrop to the recent $10 million lawsuit filed by Attorney911 on behalf of Leonel Bermudez against the University of Houston Pi Kappa Phi chapter for acute kidney failure and rhabdomyolysis due to alleged severe hazing. The national’s prior knowledge of such incidents highlights the issue of foreseeability in the Bermudez case.

• Kappa Sigma (ΚΣ): Chapters are found at many Texas universities, including Texas Christian University.

  • National Hazing History: Kappa Sigma has a historical pattern of hazing. One of the earliest landmark cases was the 2001 drowning death of Chad Meredith at the University of Miami, who was coerced into swimming across a lake while intoxicated. This case resulted in a $12.6 million jury verdict against the fraternity for negligence. More recently, Kappa Sigma at Texas Christian University faced scrutiny in 2018 when a member was arrested for allegedly hazing pledges. Allegations of hazing resulting in severe injuries (rhabdomyolysis) have also surfaced at Texas A&M University in 2023, involving Kappa Sigma, leading to ongoing litigation.

• Kappa Alpha Order (KA): With a focus on Southern traditions, Kappa Alpha Order has chapters at SMU, Texas A&M, and other Texas schools.

  • National Hazing History: Kappa Alpha Order has frequently faced suspensions and investigations for hazing, often involving forced alcohol consumption, physical abuse, and demeaning rituals. The SMU chapter was suspended in 2017 following allegations of paddling, forced drinking, and sleep deprivation. These incidents are often tied to the perceived demand for strict adherence to “tradition,” which can be a cover for dangerous practices.

• Sigma Chi (ΣΧ): A prominent fraternity with a presence at various Texas universities.

  • National Hazing History: Sigma Chi has been involved in several high-profile hazing cases. In 2024, a family reportedly received more than $10 million in damages from Sigma Chi at the College of Charleston after a pledge alleged physical beatings, forced substance consumption, and psychological torment. The University of Texas at Austin chapter has also faced disciplinary action. These financial outcomes and disciplinary actions demonstrate the severe consequences for chapters and the national organization when hazing occurs.

Complete Texas Greek Organization Directory

Attorney911 tracks every IRS-registered fraternity and sorority in Texas:

• ALPHA OMEGA EPSILON | EIN: 56-2652714 | Beaumont, TX
• ALPHA SIGMA ALPHA SORORITY | EIN: 75-6084812 | Stephenville, TX
• ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 47-5370943 | Houston, TX
• ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 92-1490845 | Huntsville, TX
• ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 83-1418666 | Kingsville, TX
• ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 47-5381060 | San Marcos, TX
• BETA NU PI KAPPA PHI FRATERNITY HOUSING CORPORATION INC | EIN: 46-2267515 | Frisco, TX
• BETA UPSILON CHI | EIN: 74-2911848 | Fort Worth, TX
• BUILDING CORPORATION OF DELTA CHAPTER OF ALPHA DELTA PI | EIN: 74-6047117 | Austin, TX
• CHI EPSILON SIGMA INC | EIN: 45-1677063 | Dallas, TX
• CHI OMEGA FRATERNITY | EIN: 74-0555581 | Austin, TX
• CHI OMEGA FRATERNITY | EIN: 75-6041410 | Nacogdoches, TX
• DELTA ALPHA SIGMA MULTICULTURAL SORORITY | EIN: 36-4806998 | Dallas, TX
• DELTA PHI CHAPTER OF THETA CHI FRATERNITY ALUMNI HOUSING | EIN: 90-0239693 | Dallas, TX
• DELTA PHI UPSILON FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 80-0209640 | Houston, TX
• DENTON-LEWISVILLE GUIDE RIGHT FOUNDATION | EIN: 86-1205340 | Flower Mound, TX
• EPSILON MU CHAPTER OF THE SIGMA CHI FRATERNITY | EIN: 75-6203190 | Fort Worth, TX
• EPSILON PI PHI EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HONOR SOCIETY | EIN: 47-4643399 | Round Rock, TX
• EPSILON TAU CHAPTER OF THETA CHI FRATERNITY | EIN: 75-6053083 | Nacogdoches, TX
• ETA KAPPA CHAPTER OF SIGMA SIGMA SIGMA HOUSE CORPORATION | EIN: 75-2935462 | Frisco, TX
• ETA ALPHA HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA DELTA SORORITY | EIN: 74-2930349 | College Sta, TX
• FIRST COMMAND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION | EIN: 75-1973894 | Fort Worth, TX
• FORT WORTH ALUMNI CHAPTER OF KAPPA ALPHA PSI FRATERNITY INCORPORATED | EIN: 75-2755600 | Fort Worth, TX
• FRANK HEFLIN FOUNDATION | EIN: 20-3507402 | Canyon, TX
• FRISCO TX ALUMNI CHAPTER OF KAPPA ALPHA PSI INCORPORATED | EIN: 92-0575785 | Frisco, TX
• GAMMA IOTA CHAPTER OF GAMMA PHI BETA SORORITY INC | EIN: 75-1225585 | Wichita Falls, TX
• GAMMA PHI DELTA CHRISTIAN FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 74-2893931 | Fort Worth, TX
• GAMMA PHI BETA SORORITY INC | EIN: 16-1675890 | The Woodlands, TX
• GENTLEMEN OF AGGIE TRADITION | EIN: 88-0537463 | College Sta, TX
• GULF COAST ALUMNI ET OF OX INC | EIN: 45-2717861 | Mexia, TX
• HEMIS @ VCU | EIN: 84-2717229 | Richmond, TX
• HELLENIC PROFESSIONAL SOCIETY OF TEXAS | EIN: 74-2020182 | Houston, TX
• HONOR SOCIETY OF PHI KAPPA PHI | EIN: 46-3831593 | Austin, TX
• HONOR SOCIETY OF PHI KAPPA PHI | EIN: 90-0293166 | College Station, TX
• HONOR SOCIETY OF PHI KAPPA PHI | EIN: 26-3170920 | Denton, TX
• HONOR SOCIETY OF PHI KAPPA PHI | EIN: 38-3742830 | El Paso, TX
• HONOR SOCIETY OF PHI KAPPA PHI | EIN: 82-0644459 | Lubbock, TX
• HONOR SOCIETY OF PHI KAPPA PHI | EIN: 35-2335400 | Tyler, TX
• HONOR SOCIETY OF PHI KAPPA PHI | EIN: 90-0293167 | Victoria, TX
• IOTA ALPHA CHAPTER OF KAPPA ALPHA PSI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 51-0225632 | Arlington, TX
• IOTA PHI LAMBDA SORORITY INC | EIN: 51-0194762 | Houston, TX
• KAPPA ALPHA PSI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 45-3325054 | Mansfield, TX
• KAPPA EPSILON CHAPTER OF KAPPA ALPHA PSI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 75-1727080 | Arlington, TX
• KAPPA SIGMA – MU CAMMA CHAPTER INC | EIN: 13-3048786 | College Station, TX
• KAPPA SIGMA – MU GAMMA CHAPTER INC | EIN: 27-3662583 | Lufkin, TX
• KAPPA SIGMA FRATERNITY | EIN: 75-6067776 | Fort Worth, TX
• KAPPA THETA PI – MU CHAPTER CORPORATION | EIN: 33-1294470 | Frisco, TX
• LAMBDA CHI ALPHA FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 74-1130606 | Austin, TX
• LAMBDA NU GAMMA FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 93-2103520 | Conroe, TX
• LAMBDA OMEGA EPSILON SORORITY INC | EIN: 86-1854073 | Conroe, TX
• LELAND COLLEGE PREP PTO | EIN: 47-2160315 | Houston, TX
• NATIONAL PAN-HELLENIC COUNCIL NORTH DALLAS SUBURBIA | EIN: 26-4080411 | Carrollton, TX
• OMICRON GAMMA GAMMA CHAPTER | EIN: 75-2819136 | Arlington, TX
• OMICRON GAMMA SIGMA ALUMNI CHAPTER OF PHI BETA SIGMA FRATERNITY | EIN: 92-1672050 | Irving, TX
• ONE CHAPTER ONE SHIELD | EIN: 92-1743777 | Iowa Colony, TX
• PHI DELTA THETA FRATERNITY | EIN: 90-0927378 | San Antonio, TX
• PHI UPSILON ZETA OF LAMBDA CHI ALPHA FRATERNITY | EIN: 74-1016658 | San Antonio, TX
• PI KAPPA ALPHA FRATERNITY | EIN: 74-6064445 | Nederland, TX
• PI KAPPA PHI DELTA OMEGA CHAPTER BUILDING CORPORATION | EIN: 37-1768785 | Missouri City, TX
• REDWINE HONORS PROGRAM STUDENT COUNCIL | EIN: 84-5090974 | Wichita Falls, TX
• RHO DELTA CHI NATIONAL BOARD | EIN: 93-4247450 | Sugar Land, TX
• 9THD BROTHERS KEEPER | EIN: 93-4008573 | Rowlett, TX
• SIGMA ALPHA OMEGA CHRISTIAN SORORITY INC | EIN: 85-1262394 | Austin, TX
• SIGMA CHI FRATERNITY EPSILON XI CHAPTER | EIN: 74-6084905 | Houston, TX
• SIGMA GAMMA RHO SORORITY INC | EIN: 74-6084912 | Austin, TX
• SIGMA GAMMA RHO SORORITY | EIN: 75-2609909 | Commerce, TX
• SIGMA GAMMA RHO SORORITY | EIN: 36-4091267 | Waco, TX
• SIGMA LAMBDA ALPHA SORORITY INC | EIN: 90-0956019 | Austin, TX
• SIGMA NU CORPORATION OF OKLAHOMA | EIN: 73-6098935 | Colleyville, TX
• SIGMA PHI EPSILON NEW YORK CHI ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC | EIN: 26-2710856 | Houston, TX
• SIGMA PHI EPSILON TEXAS ETA | EIN: 82-4398421 | Richmond, TX
• SIGMA PHI LAMBDA | EIN: 83-3053639 | Corinth, TX
• SIGMA PHI LAMBDA ALPHA CHI CHAPTER | EIN: 86-3999517 | Corinth, TX
• SIGMA PHI LAMBDA ALPHA PSI CHAPTER | EIN: 87-4252223 | Corinth, TX
• SIGMA PHI LAMBDA INC | EIN: 82-3971493 | Corinth, TX
• SIGMA PHI LAMBDA INC | EIN: 20-2203769 | Corinth, TX
• SIGMA PHI LAMBDA INC | EIN: 20-1237505 | Corinth, TX
• SIGMA PHI LAMBDA INC | EIN: 81-4575228 | Corinth, TX
• SIGMA PHI LAMBDA INC | EIN: 26-0805977 | Corinth, TX
• SIGMA PHI LAMBDA INC | EIN: 90-0657756 | Corinth, TX
• SIGMA PHI LAMBDA INC | EIN: 32-0217610 | Corinth, TX
• SIGMA PHI LAMBDA INC | EIN: 46-0766525 | Corinth, TX
• SOCIETY OF HISPANIC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS INC | EIN: 76-0221936 | Houston, TX
• SOUTH TEXAS COTILLON INC | EIN: 26-2378154 | Brownsville, TX
• SOUTHWESTERN REGION OF IOTA PHI LAMBDA SORORITY INCORPORATED | EIN: 51-0194762 | Houston, TX
• TEJAS FOUNDATION | EIN: 74-6062730 | Austin, TX
• TEXAS BETA PSI CHAPTER OF ALPHA DELTA KAPPA SORORITY INC | EIN: 74-6088185 | Shavano Park, TX
• TEXAS EPSILON UPSILON CHAPTER | EIN: 76-0366414 | Needville, TX
• TEXAS KAPPA SIGMA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC | EIN: 74-1380362 | Fort Worth, TX
• TEXASSIGMA PHI EPSILON FRATERNITY TEXAS GAMMA CHAPTER | EIN: 91-1981478 | Fort Worth, TX
• TEXAS RHO CHAPTER OF THE SIGMA PHI EPSILON FRATERNITY | EIN: 74-1942292 | Waco, TX
• TEXAS NU-PHI DELTA THETA FRATERNITY | EIN: 81-4123811 | College Sta, TX
• THE ETHEL HEDGEMON LYLE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS | EIN: 76-0592907 | Spring, TX
• UTSA SIGMA CHI | EIN: 84-2643090 | San Antonio, TX
• ZETA BETA CHAPTER OF KAPPA ALPHA PSI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 23-7098953 | Prairie View, TX
• ZETA OMICRON ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC | EIN: 90-0949447 | Ponder, TX
• ZETA PHI BETA SORORITY INCORPORATED – SIGMA GAMMA CHAPTER | EIN: 39-2352450 | Houston, TX
• ZETA PHI BETA SORORITY INC | EIN: 61-1562040 | Lewisville, TX
• ZETA PHI BETA SORORITY INC | EIN: 52-1345951 | Nolanville, TX
• ZETA PHI BETA SORORITY INCORPORATED NU IOTA CHAPTER BAYLOR UNIVERSITY | EIN: 52-1346485 | Waco, TX
• ZETA UPSILON ZETA CHAPTER | EIN: 75-2615456 | Pearland, TX
• ZETA XI PEARLS EDUCATIONAL FUND INC | EIN: 88-3484848 | Rowlett, TX
• ZETA PHI BETA SORORITY INCORPORATED | EIN: 99-0483761 | Houston, TX
• ZETA PHI BETA SORORITY INCORPORATED – PI TAU ZETA CHAPTER | EIN: 75-2767223 | Houston, TX
• ZETA PHI BETA SORORITY INCORPORATED – RHO ETA ZETA CHAPTER | EIN: 75-2462312 | Missouri City, TX
• ZETA PHI BETA SORORITY INCORPORATED – SIGMA LAMBDA ZETA CHAPTER | EIN: 75-2735756 | Sugar Land, TX
• ZETA PHI BETA SORORITY INCORPORATED – THETA PHI BETA CHAPTER | EIN: 75-2575217 | Dallas, TX
• ZETA PHI BETA SORORITY INCORPORATED – XI ETA ZETA CHAPTER | EIN: 75-2661073 | Denton, TX
• ZETA PHI BETA SORORITY INCORPORATED – ZETA ETA ZETA CHAPTER | EIN: 75-2603892 | Fort Worth, TX
• ZETA PHI BETA SORORITY INCORPORATED – ZETA RHO ZETA CHAPTER | EIN: 75-2713725 | San Antonio, TX
• ZETA PHI BETA SORORITY INCORPORATED – ZETA YPSILON ZETA CHAPTER | EIN: 75-2655513 | Houston, TX
• ZETA SIGMA HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 75-2620706 | Dallas, TX

The Legal Ramifications for Texas

When a Burleson County family’s child suffers harm due to hazing at a Texas university, they enter a legal arena where national patterns and local actions converge. The national histories of these organizations, combined with specific incidents at Texas chapters, provide compelling evidence for:

• Foreseeability: Arguing that national organizations and universities should have anticipated the risk of hazing, given known past incidents.
• Negligent Supervision: Demonstrating that national offices failed to adequately oversee or discipline their chapters despite a history of violations.
• Institutional Indifference: Showing that universities, despite their anti-hazing policies, were aware of or deliberately indifferent to a culture of hazing on their campuses.

Attorney911 is experienced in navigating these complex legal arguments, leveraging national hazing patterns to strengthen cases for accountability and justice in Texas.

BUILDING A CASE: EVIDENCE, DAMAGES, STRATEGY

For families in Burleson County facing the aftermath of hazing, understanding how a legal case is built is crucial. It’s a meticulous process of collecting and preserving evidence, quantifying harm, and strategic litigation against often powerful defendants. The Manginello Law Firm approaches these cases with a comprehensive, data-driven strategy, recognizing the unique challenges hazing presents.

Evidence

Modern hazing cases are often won or lost based on the strength and preservation of evidence, particularly digital records. The speed at which evidence can disappear necessitates immediate action.

• Digital Communications: In 2025, group messaging apps are often the most direct pipeline into hazing activity.

  • GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Discord, Snapchat, Instagram DMs, and even fraternity-specific apps are routinely used to organize, direct, and celebrate hazing. These apps often contain direct orders, humiliating photographs, and videos, or discussions revealing the nature of activities.
  • Preservation is key: Immediate and thorough screenshotting of these conversations, ensuring timestamps, sender names, and ample context are visible, is paramount. Attorney911’s video on documenting a legal case with your cell phone (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) provides essential guidance on this process. For disappearing messages (like Snapchat or ephemeral chats), screen recording can capture critical fleeting evidence. Digital forensics experts can often recover deleted messages, but original screenshots are invaluable.

• Photos & Videos: Beyond messaging apps, direct visual evidence is powerful.

  • Content filmed by members: If other students were filming hazing events, these can be subpoenaed.
  • Surveillance footage: Security cameras at fraternity houses (often mandated by national organizations), bars, or event venues can capture key moments.
  • Injury documentation: High-quality photographs of injuries, taken from multiple angles with a ruler or common object for scale, immediately after the incident and routinely during recovery, are critical.

• Internal Organization Documents: These reveal the official structures and internal communications.

  • Pledge manuals, initiation scripts, or “rules” documents, even if euphemistically phrased, can show planned hazing activities.
  • Emails/texts from officers about upcoming “events” or “traditions” can reveal intent.
  • National policies and training materials highlight their awareness of hazing risks and their duty to prevent them.

• University Records: Open records requests and legal discovery can compel universities to provide vital information.

  • Prior conduct files: Record of past hazing violations, probation, or suspensions for the offending organization or individuals. Texas public universities (like UH, Texas A&M, UT) often disclose some of this as public record.
  • Incident reports to campus police (e.g., UTPD, TAMUPD, UHPD) or student conduct offices.
  • Clery Act reports and hazing disclosures mandated by federal law, showing patterns.

• Medical and Psychological Records: These document the extent of the harm.

  • Emergency room and hospitalization records: Crucial for immediate documentation of physical injuries, toxicology reports, and diagnoses like rhabdomyolysis or alcohol poisoning.
  • Ongoing treatment notes: From surgeries, physical therapy, and medication.
  • Psychological evaluations: Diagnoses of PTSD, depression, anxiety, or other mental health impacts are essential for demonstrating emotional distress damages.

• Witness Testimony: Eyewitness accounts provide narrative and corroboration.

  • Pledges, members, and former members: Often the most direct witnesses, their accounts are vital, though fear of retaliation can be a barrier.
  • Roommates, RAs, coaches, or bystanders: Anyone who observed changes in behavior, heard communications, or saw the events unfold.

Damages

The legal system aims to compensate victims for the full spectrum of harm caused by hazing. These damages fall into several categories:

• Economic Damages (Quantifiable Financial Losses): These cover direct, out-of-pocket costs and measurable financial setbacks.

  • Medical Expenses: Including emergency room visits, ambulance transport, hospitalization (ICU, surgery), medications, and adaptive equipment. For severe injuries, future medical care and specialized life care plans (for conditions like permanent brain damage in cases akin to Danny Santulli’s) are calculated.
  • Lost Income & Earning Capacity: Compensation for wages lost due to injury or recovery, and for future earning potential diminished by permanent injuries or the inability to complete education. Delayed graduation directly impacts career trajectory.
  • Educational Costs: Tuition and fees for semesters missed, lost scholarships (academic or athletic), or costs associated with transferring to a new institution.
  • Property Damage: Compensation for personal property destroyed or damaged during hazing.

• Non-Economic Damages (Subjective, Legally Compensable Harm): These address the non-monetary losses that profoundly impact a victim’s life.

  • Physical Pain & Suffering: Covering the actual pain from injuries, discomfort, and ongoing physical limitations.
  • Emotional Distress & Psychological Harm: This includes conditions like Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), severe depression, anxiety, panic attacks, and the profound mental anguish, humiliation, and shame inflicted by hazing. Psychological evaluations and therapy records are critical for documenting these.
  • Loss of Enjoyment of Life: Compensation for the inability to participate in activities once cherished, loss of social life, and the overall reduced quality of life due to injuries or psychological trauma.
  • Reputational Harm: If the hazing incident or the victim’s involvement becomes public knowledge, it can lead to social stigma or difficulties in academic or professional circles.

• Wrongful Death Damages (For Families): In the most tragic cases, when hazing leads to death (as with Stone Foltz, Max Gruver, or Andrew Coffey), surviving family members can pursue a wrongful death claim.

  • Funeral and Burial Costs.
  • Loss of Financial Support: Compensation for the income and financial contributions the deceased would have provided to their family.
  • Loss of Companionship, Love, and Society: This is a vast category covering the emotional void left by the deceased’s absence for parents, siblings, and spouses.
  • Grief and Emotional Suffering: Financial acknowledgement of the profound grief and mental suffering experienced by the surviving family members.

• Punitive Damages: In cases involving particularly egregious recklessness, malice, or deliberate indifference, punitive damages may be awarded. Their purpose is to:

  • Punish the defendants for their wrongful conduct.
  • Deter similar conduct by the defendants and others in the future.
  • In Texas, punitive damages are available but often capped. However, evidence of gross negligence or intentional conduct can bypass some of these caps.

Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

Hazing litigation is complex because multiple parties can be liable, and their respective insurance policies come into play.

• National Fraternities and Universities: These entities typically carry extensive insurance policies designed to cover their liabilities. However, their insurers often argue that hazing, being an “intentional act” or “criminal act,” is specifically excluded from coverage. This leads to fierce battles between plaintiffs, defendants, and their insurers.
• Local Chapters and Individuals: These may be covered by homeowners’ policies, specific chapter insurance, or personal liability policies, depending on the circumstances.
• Experienced Hazing Lawyers: Attorneys like those at The Manginello Law Firm are crucial for:
  • Identifying all potential sources of insurance coverage: From national policies to local chapter or individual policies.
  • Navigating intricate insurance policy language: To challenge exclusions and force insurers to provide defense and indemnity. Lupe Peña’s background as a former insurance defense attorney (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/) is particularly valuable here, as she understands these tactics from the inside.
  • Ensuring the highest possible recovery: By strategically pursuing claims against all liable parties and their insurers, Attorney911 aims to maximize compensation for victims and their families.

Building a strong case requires immediate action, meticulous evidence collection, expert analysis, and aggressive advocacy. For a Burleson County family, understanding this process — from evidence to damages — empowers them to make informed decisions about pursuing justice. Learn more about Texas hazing law directly from a law firm that handles these cases by watching this video on the statute of limitations: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c.

PRACTICAL GUIDES & FAQS

Navigating a hazing crisis is an emotional and complex journey for Burleson County families. This section provides practical, actionable advice for parents, students, and witnesses, empowering them with the knowledge to respond effectively and protect their rights under Texas law.

For Parents

As a parent, your child’s emotional and physical well-being is paramount. Being vigilant and knowing how to respond if you suspect hazing is critical. Every action taken—or not taken—can impact a future case, as discussed in Attorney911’s video on client mistakes (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY).

• Warning Signs of Hazing: Modern hazing is often secretive, but there are red flags:

  • Unexplained Injuries or Illnesses: Bruises, burns, cuts, or frequent illnesses (like dehydration, heat exhaustion, or even broken bones) without a convincing explanation.
  • Sudden Exhaustion/Sleep Deprivation: Your child seems constantly tired, falls asleep during calls, or reports frequent late-night/early-morning “mandatory” activities that disrupt sleep patterns significantly.
  • Drastic Changes in Mood or Behavior: Increased anxiety, depression, irritability, withdrawal from friends/family, or a sudden disinterest in academics. They might become secretive or defensive when asked about their organization’s activities.
  • Obsessive Phone Use or Secrecy: Constantly checking their phone for group chat messages, acting anxious if they miss a notification, or suddenly deleting messages/apps. They might use coded language.
  • Financial Red Flags: Unusual requests for money without clear explanation, unexplained spending, or demands for specific purchases (e.g., alcohol, specific clothes for “pledges”).
  • Emphasizing “Loyalty” and “Secrecy”: Frequent references to “what happens here, stays here,” or being told not to discuss activities with outsiders, including you or university officials.

• How to Talk to Your Child: Approach the conversation with empathy and without judgment.

  • Start with Open-Ended Questions: Instead of accusations, ask “How are things going with [Organization Name]? Are you enjoying it?” or “What’s the process been like?”
  • Reassure Them of Your Support: Emphasize that their safety and well-being are more important than any organization. Let them know you will support them regardless of their choices or what they might reveal.
  • Focus on Their Feelings: Ask “Is there anything about it that makes you uncomfortable?” or “Do you feel like you can leave if you want to, or would there be consequences?”

• If Your Child Is Hurt or Reveals Hazing:

  • Prioritize Medical Care: Immediately seek medical attention for any injuries or significant illness. Ensure medical providers document the full context, explicitly stating it’s related to suspected hazing.
  • Document Everything Meticulously: Write down every detail your child shares: who, what, when, where, and how. Screenshot all relevant digital communications (texts, GroupMe, social media). Photograph any injuries from multiple angles and over several days. Save any physical items like damaged clothing or gifts from hazing.
  • Ask About Prior Complaints: When communicating with the university, ask specifically if there have been prior hazing complaints or incidents involving the same organization. This can be crucial in establishing a pattern of negligence.

• When to Talk to a Lawyer: Do not delay consulting an attorney.

  • If your child suffers any significant physical or psychological harm.
  • If you suspect the university or national organization is minimizing, delaying, or attempting to cover up the incident.
  • If you feel pressured by the university or the organization to keep silent, or to agree to an “internal resolution” that doesn’t feel right.

For Students / Pledges

If you’re a student from Burleson County feeling pressured by an organization, your safety and well-being come first. It’s vital to distinguish between genuine challenges and illegal hazing.

• Is This Hazing or Just Tradition? Ask yourself:

  • Am I being forced or pressured to do something that makes me uncomfortable, feels unsafe, or goes against my values?
  • Would older members of the group do this themselves, or is it exclusively for new members?
  • Am I being told to keep secrets from my family, friends, or the university?
  • Does this activity involve alcohol, physical abuse, sleep deprivation, or humiliation?
  • If the answer to any of these is yes, it’s likely hazing.

• Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story: You might feel obligated or pressured to participate. However, Texas law (and most university policies) recognizes that “consent” is not a defense to hazing. When there’s a power imbalance, fear of retribution, or intense peer pressure, your “agreement” is not truly voluntary. You have the right to say no and to leave.

• Exiting and Reporting Safely:

  • Immediate Danger: If you are in physical danger (e.g., heavily intoxicated, injured, threatened), call 911 immediately. Most universities and Texas law have good-faith reporter protections, meaning you won’t get in trouble for seeking help in an emergency.
  • De-Pledging: You have the legal right to leave any organization at any time, regardless of what they may tell you about “commitment.” If you choose to de-pledge, it’s often best to do so in writing (via email or text to an officer or advisor) and inform a trusted non-member (e.g., parent, RA, non-Greek friend).
  • Protecting Yourself: Save all communications (text messages, GroupMe, Snapchat) that indicate hazing. They are critical evidence. Learn how to effectively document a legal case using your cell phone by watching this Attorney911 video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs.

• Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty: If you report a hazing incident in good faith, Texas law provides immunity from criminal or civil liability related to that report. Additionally, many universities offer amnesty from disciplinary action to students who report actual or suspected hazing or come forward to help peers in distress, even if alcohol or drugs were involved.

For Former Members / Witnesses

You may carry guilt or fear, but your testimony can prevent future tragedies and bring justice.

• Your Role in Accountability: If you have witnessed or participated in hazing, your firsthand account can be invaluable in exposing patterns of abuse and holding individuals and institutions accountable. Your testimony can directly prevent another student from suffering similar harm.
• Seeking Legal Advice: You may fear personal repercussions for reporting past incidents. An attorney can advise you on your legal rights and responsibilities, which may include protections as a witness or reporter.
• Navigating Your Fear: It’s normal to fear retaliation or social ostracization. However, laws protect whistleblowers, and supporting a victim often means standing with them.

Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

For Burleson County families pursuing justice for hazing, avoiding common pitfalls is as crucial as gathering evidence. Many cases are complicated or weakened by preventable errors, as discussed in Attorney911’s video “Client Mistakes That Can Ruin Your Injury Case” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY).

1. Letting Your Child Delete Messages or “Clean Up” Evidence:

   • Mistake: Families, out of a misguided desire to protect their child from “getting in more trouble,” instruct them to delete incriminating text messages, photos, or group chat histories.
   • Why it’s wrong: This destroys crucial evidence. It can be seen as an attempt to obstruct justice or actively conceal wrongdoing, severely undermining the credibility and viability of any legal claim.
   • What to do instead: Preserve everything immediately. Screenshot all relevant digital communications, even if embarrassing. Your legal team can help filter and strategically present evidence; deleting it makes their job impossible.

2. Confronting the Fraternity/Sorority Directly:

   • Mistake: Parents or students, driven by anger or a desire for immediate answers, directly confront the student organization or its leaders.
   • Why it’s wrong: This immediately puts the organization on alert. They will likely lawyer up, destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and prepare their defenses, making it much harder for your legal team to gather unbiased information. Additionally, it could put the complaining individual at risk of retaliation.
   • What to do instead: Document everything in private. Before any direct confrontation, consult with an experienced hazing attorney who can guide the process strategically and safely.

3. Signing University “Release” or “Resolution” Forms Without Legal Review:

   • Mistake: Universities may pressure families to sign waivers, non-disclosure agreements, or “internal resolution” documents relatively quickly after an incident.
   • Why it’s wrong: These documents often require you to waive your right to sue or agree to a settlement that is far below the true value of your claim. They serve the university’s interests, not yours.
   • What to do instead: Never sign anything from the university or an insurance company without having your own attorney review it first.

4. Posting Details on Public Social Media Before Talking to a Lawyer:

   • Mistake: Sharing specific details of the hazing incident, naming individuals, or expressing outrage on platforms like Facebook, Instagram, or TikTok.
   • Why it’s wrong: Anything posted publicly can be used by defense attorneys against you. Inconsistencies between public statements and legal claims can damage credibility. It can also inadvertently waive certain legal protections or make your child vulnerable to further harassment.
   • What to do instead: Document privately. Share information only with your legal counsel. Let your attorney manage any public messaging or strategic communication.

5. Letting Your Child Go Back to “One Last Meeting” or Discussion:

   • Mistake: After hazing is suspected or revealed, the organization may invite the student to a “talk” or “meeting” to “clear things up” or pressure them to stay.
   • Why it’s wrong: These situations are designed to pressure the student, extract statements that may harm their case, minimize the incident, or isolate them from legal counsel. They are not genuinely designed for open dialogue.
   • What to do instead: Once you are considering legal action, all communication from the organization or university should be directed through your attorney.

6. Waiting “to See How the University Handles It” Before Consulting Legal Counsel:

   • Mistake: Relying solely on the university’s internal investigation process, believing they will fully protect your child’s legal interests.
   • Why it’s wrong: University investigations are primarily concerned with compliance with university policy, managing institutional reputation, and minimizing their own legal exposure. They are not advocates for your child’s personal injury claim. Evidence can disappear, witnesses graduate, and statutes of limitations can expire while you wait.
   • What to do instead: Preserve evidence immediately. Consult a hazing attorney to understand your full legal options. The university’s process is separate from a civil personal injury claim.

7. Talking to Insurance Adjusters Without a Lawyer Present:

   • Mistake: Directly engaging with insurance adjusters from the fraternity, national organization, or university who contact you, believing they are there to help.
   • Why it’s wrong: Adjusters work for the insurance company, whose goal is to pay as little as possible. Your recorded statements can be used against you, and early settlement offers are almost always low-ball attempts to quickly close a case.
   • What to do instead: Politely decline to speak with them directly and inform them that all communication should go through your attorney.

Short FAQ

• “Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
  Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities (like UH, Texas A&M, UT) benefit from sovereign immunity, which can limit direct lawsuits against the institution itself. However, exceptions exist for gross negligence, in cases involving Title IX violations (sex-based discrimination or harassment), or if you sue individual employees (e.g., administrators, advisors) in their personal capacity for their own negligence. Private universities (like SMU, Baylor) do not have sovereign immunity, which often makes legal action against them more straightforward for negligence claims. Every case is unique, and Attorney911 (1-888-ATTY-911) can analyze your specific facts.

• “Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
  Yes, it can be. Texas law classifies hazing as a Class B misdemeanor by default. However, if the hazing causes serious bodily injury (e.g., organ damage, severe fractures, head trauma) or death, it is elevated to a state jail felony. Individuals (especially officers or members) who knowingly fail to report hazing can also face misdemeanor charges.

• “Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
  Yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing charges. This is because courts and legislatures recognize that true, free consent is often impossible due to peer pressure, the desire to belong, and the inherent power imbalance in hazing situations. Even if a student initially “agreed,” it doesn’t excuse illegal or harmful acts.

• “How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”
  Generally, in Texas, the statute of limitations for personal injury and wrongful death claims is two years from the date of the injury or death. However, exceptions may apply, such as the “discovery rule,” which can extend this period if the harm or its cause was not immediately apparent. For cases involving cover-ups or fraudulent concealment, the statute of limitations might be “tolled” (paused). Given these complexities, it is critical to contact an attorney immediately to ensure your rights are protected and necessary investigations begin promptly. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 without delay.

• “What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
  The location of the hazing does not necessarily eliminate liability for the university, national organization, or local chapter. Texas law explicitly states that hazing is prohibited whether it occurs on or off campus. Many high-profile hazing cases (like the Pi Delta Psi retreat death in Pennsylvania or deaths in “unofficial” off-campus houses) have resulted in successful litigation against institutions and national organizations because of their sponsorship, control, or foreseeability of harm.

• “Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
  In most hazing cases, especially personal injury claims, efforts are made to seek confidential settlements before trial. Your attorney can work to protect your child’s privacy. While some high-profile cases do gain media attention, the default for most civil cases is to resolve outside of public court, respecting the family’s wishes regarding privacy where possible. We prioritize your family’s needs while pursuing accountability.

ABOUT THE MANGINELLO LAW FIRM + CALL TO ACTION

When your family faces a hazing crisis, particularly one involving a powerful university or national organization, you need more than just a general personal injury lawyer. You need tenacious legal advocates who understand the intricate dynamics of institutional liability and who are not afraid to confront well-funded defense teams—and win. For families in Burleson County, that firm is The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, operating as Attorney911, the Legal Emergency Lawyers™.

The Manginello Law Firm brings unique qualifications to hazing cases:

• Insurance Insider Advantage with Lupe Peña: Associate Attorney Lupe Peña is a former insurance defense attorney for a national law firm. She knows the insurance industry’s tactics from the inside out — how they deny claims, undervalue serious injuries, use delay tactics, and dispute coverage. This intimate knowledge of “their playbook” is invaluable when litigating against the insurance carriers of national fraternities, universities, and their housing corporations. Lupe Peña’s background gives our clients a distinct edge in securing maximum compensation.
• Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions with Ralph Manginello: Our Managing Partner, Ralph Manginello, has a 25-year track record of taking on formidable opponents. He was one of the few Texas attorneys involved in the BP Texas City explosion litigation, a monumental case against a global corporation. His experience in federal court and against billion-dollar defendants means that universities and national fraternities do not intimidate us. We are trial-tested and ready to fight for you. Refer to Ralph Manginello’s complete credentials and case history for more information: https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/.
• Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death & Catastrophic Injury Experience: We have a proven track record of securing multi-million dollar results for families in wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/). This is critical in hazing cases, where injuries can be life-altering (like Leonel Bermudez’s acute kidney failure) or fatal. We understand how to quantify complex damages, including future medical needs, lost earning capacity, and profound non-economic suffering, collaborating with economists and life care planners as needed.
• Dual Civil and Criminal Expertise: Ralph’s membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) underscores our ability to navigate cases with both civil personal injury and criminal hazing aspects. We can advise clients on criminal charges, plea negotiations, and how criminal proceedings may impact a civil lawsuit, ensuring a holistic legal strategy.
• Aggressive Investigative Depth: We don’t wait for evidence to appear. We utilize a network of experts, including digital forensics specialists to recover deleted messages, medical professionals, and psychologists. Our firm knows how to subpoena national fraternity records for prior incidents, compel university disclosures, and conduct thorough investigations to uncover the truth.

From our Houston office, we serve families across Texas, including Burleson County and surrounding areas. We recognize that hazing at Texas universities impacts families in Caldwell, Snook, Somerville, and throughout the region as acutely as it does those in the major metropolitan areas. Our commitment is to ensure accountability and to help prevent these tragedies from occurring again.

Call to Action: Your Next Step for Justice

If you or your child experienced hazing at any Texas campus—whether it’s Texas A&M in nearby College Station, the University of Houston, UT Austin, SMU, Baylor, or another institution—we want to hear from you. Families in Burleson County and throughout the surrounding region have the right to answers, accountability, and justice.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We will listen empathetically to your story, review any evidence you have, explain your legal options under Texas law, and help you decide on the best path forward for your family. There is no pressure to hire us on the spot, and everything you share with us is confidential. We operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning we don’t get paid unless we win your case (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc).

Don’t wait. Evidence disappears quickly, and memories fade. Universities and organizations have legal teams ready to protect their interests. Take advantage of our free consultation to understand your rights and the power of legal action.

Contact Attorney911 Today:

• Emergency Hotline: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
• Direct Line: (713) 528-9070
• Cell: (713) 443-4781
• Website: https://attorney911.com
• Email: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español: Contact Lupe Peña directly for consultation in Spanish at lupe@atty911.com. Servicios legales en español disponibles.

Whether you’re in Burleson County or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com