The Complete Guide to Hazing Lawsuits for Williamson County, Texas Families: Your Path to Accountability and Justice

If Your Child Was Hazed at a Texas University, You Are Not Alone

It’s 2 a.m. on a Tuesday. Your phone vibrates on your nightstand in Round Rock. It’s your son, a freshman at Texas A&M University in College Station. His voice is slurred, confused. He says he’s “fine” but mentions being at a fraternity house, that he had to “finish his drink,” and that his legs won’t work right. He’s afraid to call for help because the older members said it would “ruin everything for the brotherhood.” You tell him to stay put, you’re coming—but College Station is 90 minutes away. The panic sets in. This was supposed to be his college experience. What is actually happening to him?

For parents and families across Williamson County—from Georgetown to Round Rock, Cedar Park to Leander—this nightmare scenario is unfolding in dorm rooms, off-campus houses, and remote fields connected to universities throughout Texas. Hazing isn’t a relic of the past or something that “only happens elsewhere.” It’s happening right now, at the very universities where Williamson County families proudly send their children: The University of Texas at Austin, Texas A&M University, Baylor University, and beyond.

This comprehensive guide is written specifically for you—parents, guardians, and students in Williamson County and across Central Texas. We will explain what hazing truly looks like in 2025, your legal rights under Texas law, the patterns of conduct at major Texas universities, and the practical steps you can take if your family has been affected. Our firm, The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC (operating as Attorney911), is actively litigating one of the most serious hazing cases in Texas right now. We represent Leonel Bermudez in his $10 million lawsuit against the University of Houston, the Pi Kappa Phi national fraternity, and 13 individual fraternity leaders after he suffered rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney failure from brutal hazing. We bring that same commitment, investigative depth, and institutional-fighting experience to serve families throughout Texas, including those right here in Williamson County.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES

If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

• Call 911 for medical emergencies
• Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)

In the first 48 hours:

1. Get Medical Attention: Even if your child insists they are “fine,” see a doctor. Injuries like rhabdomyolysis (severe muscle breakdown) may not show symptoms for days.
2. Preserve Evidence: Screenshot all group chats (GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage), text messages, and social media posts. Photograph any visible injuries from multiple angles. Save clothing or objects used in hazing.
3. Document Everything: Write down names, dates, locations, and what your child tells you while memories are fresh.
4. Do NOT:
   • Confront the fraternity, sorority, or university directly.
   • Sign any documents from the university or an insurance company.
   • Post details on public social media.
   • Allow your child to delete messages or “clean up” evidence.

Contact an experienced hazing attorney immediately. Evidence disappears rapidly. We can help you navigate this crisis, protect your child’s rights, and pursue accountability. Call us at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a free, confidential consultation.

Hazing in 2025: What It Really LooksLike Beyond the Stereotypes

If you picture hazing as harmless pranks or simple initiations, understand that the reality in 2025 is far more severe, organized, and dangerous. Hazing is a systematic process of abuse designed to test loyalty through humiliation, pain, and risk. For Williamson County families, whose students often attend large universities with robust Greek systems and tradition-heavy organizations, recognizing the modern face of hazing is critical.

The Three Tiers of Modern Hazing

Tier 1: Subtle Hazing – The “Gateway” Acts
These behaviors establish power imbalances and normalize control, often dismissed as “just tradition.” They include:

• Mandatory Servitude: Acting as a 24/7 on-call driver for members, cleaning members’ apartments, or running personal errands.
• Social Isolation & Control: Being told to cut contact with non-members, family, or romantic partners. Requiring permission to attend class or go home on weekends.
• Psychological Manipulation: Being assigned a derogatory nickname, forced to answer only when spoken to, or subjected to “interviews” designed to break down self-esteem.
• Digital Tethering: Being required to keep location-sharing apps active (Find My Friends, Life360), respond instantly to group chat messages at all hours, or have social media accounts monitored and controlled by members.

Tier 2: Harassment Hazing – Overt Abuse
This tier causes clear emotional and physical distress and creates a hostile environment.

• Sleep Deprivation: Mandatory 3 a.m. “meetings,” weekend-long events with no sleep, or being woken repeatedly through the night for “tasks.”
• Forced Consumption: Being made to eat excessive amounts of bland food (like gallons of milk or dozens of hot dogs) or disgusting concoctions until vomiting.
• Extreme Physical “Workouts”: Punitive calisthenics called “smokings”—such as hundreds of push-ups, wall-sits until collapse, or sprints—disguised as “conditioning.”
• Public Humiliation: Being forced to wear degrading costumes in public, perform embarrassing acts, or be verbally “grilled” and insulted in front of peers.

Tier 3: Violent Hazing – Life-Threatening Acts
These are the acts that lead to hospitalization, permanent injury, and death.

• Forced Alcohol Consumption: The most common fatal hazing method. This includes “Big/Little” nights with handles of liquor, drinking games like “Bible study” where wrong answers mean drinking, “lineups” where pledges rapidly consume shots, and forced chugging contests.
• Physical Beatings: Paddling, punching, kicking, or “tackling” rituals like the “glass ceiling” that killed Chun “Michael” Deng.
• Sexualized Violence: Forced nudity, simulated sexual acts (the “elephant walk,” “roasted pig”), sexual assault, or being covered in inappropriate substances.
• Dangerous Environments: Being locked in freezing rooms or trunks, exposed to extreme heat, subjected to chemical burns (as in a Texas A&M SAE case), or forced into dangerous physical challenges while impaired.

The Evolution: How Hazing Has Gone Underground and Digital

Today’s hazing is designed to avoid detection. Chapters have learned from high-profile cases and national headlines. As a result, they:

• Move Activities Off-Campus: Using Airbnbs, remote rental properties, or family-owned land outside university jurisdiction.
• Leverage Digital Tools: Using encrypted apps (Signal, WhatsApp), disappearing messages (Snapchat), and secret social media groups to plan and document abuse.
• Coerce Silence: Framing activities as “voluntary brotherhood/sisterhood bonding” while making it clear that refusal means social exile and failure. They coach members on what to say if questioned.
• Destroy Evidence: Having systematic “digital clean-up” sessions where group chats are deleted and phones are wiped after events.

For a Williamson County parent, this means the warning signs might not be bruises or broken bones, but sudden behavioral changes, secretive phone use, overwhelming fatigue, and a personality shift toward anxiety or withdrawal.

The Legal Framework: Texas Hazing Laws and Your Family’s Rights

Texas has specific laws governing hazing, found in the Texas Education Code, Chapter 37, Subchapter F. Understanding this framework is essential for any Williamson County family considering their options.

Texas Hazing Law (Education Code § 37.151)

The law defines hazing broadly as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act directed against a student for the purpose of pledging, initiation, affiliation, holding office, or maintaining membership in an organization that:

1. Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of the student.
2. This includes, but is not limited to: forced alcohol consumption, physical brutality, forced activities that adversely affect mental health, and forced confinement.

Critical Points for Williamson County Families:

• Location Doesn’t Matter: The law applies to acts “on or off the campus” of an educational institution. An off-campus Airbnb in Travis County or a remote field in Milam County is covered.
• “Consent” Is NOT a Defense: Texas law (§ 37.155) is explicit: “It is not a defense to prosecution that the person against whom the hazing was directed consented to the hazing activity.” The power imbalance and coercion inherent in hazing render consent meaningless in the eyes of the law.
• Criminal Penalties Are Serious:
  • Class B Misdemeanor: Basic hazing (up to 180 days jail, $2,000 fine).
  • Class A Misdemeanor: Hazing that causes injury requiring medical treatment.
  • State Jail Felony: Hazing that causes serious bodily injury or death.
• Organizations Can Be Charged: Fraternities, sororities, and other groups can be fined up to $10,000 per violation if they authorize or encourage hazing or if an officer fails to report known hazing.
• Good-Faith Reporter Protection: Individuals who report hazing in good faith to school officials or law enforcement are immune from civil or criminal liability for their own minor involvement (like underage drinking).

Civil Liability: The Path to Accountability and Compensation

A criminal case, handled by the state, aims to punish. A civil lawsuit, which you can file, aims to achieve justice, financial compensation for damages, and institutional accountability. The burden of proof is different (“preponderance of evidence” vs. “beyond a reasonable doubt”), and the two cases can proceed simultaneously.

In a civil hazing case, you can seek damages from a universe of potentially liable parties:

1. The Individual Perpetrators: The students who planned, executed, or facilitated the hazing.
2. The Local Chapter: As an entity, if it is incorporated or has assets.
3. The National Fraternity/Sorority Headquarters: Often the deepest pockets. They can be liable for negligent supervision—failing to adequately train, monitor, or control their chapters despite knowing the risks from a history of incidents nationwide.
4. The University: Public universities like UT Austin and Texas A&M have some sovereign immunity, but exceptions exist for gross negligence. They can be liable if they knew or should have known about a pattern of hazing and failed to take reasonable steps to prevent it. Private universities like Baylor and SMU have fewer immunity protections.
5. Housing Corporations & Alumni Associations: These entities own fraternity houses and provide funding and oversight.
6. Third Parties: Landlords of off-campus houses or bars that furnished alcohol to minors.

Federal Law Overlay: Title IX, Clery, and the Stop Campus Hazing Act

• Title IX: If hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, or gender-based discrimination, your child’s school has specific federal obligations to investigate and respond under Title IX.
• The Clery Act: Requires universities to report certain crimes, including aggravated assault and liquor/drug law violations, which often accompany hazing.
• The Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This new federal law requires colleges receiving federal aid to publish more transparent hazing data and strengthen prevention programs, increasing institutional accountability.

National Hazing Cases: The Patterns That Predict Texas Tragedies

The tragic cases that make national news are not anomalies; they are the predictable result of repeated patterns. These patterns matter for your Texas case because they establish what national fraternities and universities knew or should have known was likely to happen—a legal concept called foreseeability.

The Alcohol Poisoning Pattern

• Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): A 20-year-old pledge died after being forced to drink an entire bottle of alcohol during a “Big/Little” night. The $10 million settlement ($7M from Pi Kappa Alpha national, ~$3M from BGSU) shows the severe financial liability.
• Max Gruver – LSU, Phi Delta Theta (2017): Died from alcohol poisoning after a “Bible study” drinking game. Led to Louisiana’s Max Gruver Act, a felony hazing statute.
• Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): Died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night.” His death led to a temporary suspension of all Greek life at FSU.

Takeaway for Texas Families: The forced drinking “Big/Little” or “bid acceptance” night is a standardized, deadly script used by multiple fraternities. When it happens at a Texas school, the national organization cannot claim it was an unforeseeable accident.

The Physical Brutality Pattern

• Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): Pledge died from traumatic brain injury after a violent, blindfolded “glass ceiling” tackling ritual at a remote retreat. The national fraternity was criminally convicted and banned from Pennsylvania for 10 years.
• Texas A&M SAE Chemical Burns Case (2021): Pledges were allegedly doused with industrial-strength cleaner and other substances, causing severe chemical burns requiring skin graft surgeries. The chapter was suspended, and lawsuits followed.

Takeaway: Ritualized physical abuse, even when framed as “tradition” or “team building,” creates extreme liability. Moving activities to off-campus retreats does not shield organizations from responsibility.

The Institutional Knowledge Pattern

• Timothy Piazza – Penn State, Beta Theta Pi (2017): His death, captured on fraternity house cameras, revealed a culture of extreme drinking and delayed medical care. It resulted in the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law in Pennsylvania and demonstrated how a university’s prior knowledge of a chapter’s dangerous culture can lead to massive liability.
• Northwestern University Football (2023-2025): Allegations of widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the athletic program led to multiple lawsuits, the firing of the head coach, and confidential settlements, proving hazing extends far beyond Greek life.

These national precedents create a powerful legal backdrop for Texas cases. They show judges and juries that hazing deaths and catastrophic injuries are not “freak accidents” but the direct, foreseeable result of known, dangerous practices that organizations failed to stamp out.

Texas University Focus: Where Williamson County Students Are at Risk

Williamson County is in the heart of Texas’s educational corridor. Our children attend major universities across the state. Understanding the specific landscape, policies, and histories at these schools is crucial.

A Guide for Williamson County Families: The Universities That Matter Most

1. Texas A&M University (College Station)

For Williamson County Families: Many students from Round Rock, Cedar Park, and Georgetown make the drive down State Highway 35 to become Aggies. The combination of a massive Greek system and the unique, tradition-heavy Corps of Cadets creates a significant hazing risk environment.

• Notable Incidents:
  • Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) Chemical Burns Lawsuit (2021): As reported, pledges suffered severe chemical burns from being doused with substances including industrial cleaner. The case underscores the extreme physical dangers present.
  • Corps of Cadets “Roasted Pig” Lawsuit (2023): A lawsuit alleged a cadet was subjected to degrading hazing, including being bound in a simulated sexual position with an apple in his mouth. Texas A&M stated it addressed the matter internally.
• University Response & Your Strategy: A&M handles hazing through its Student Conduct office and Corps-specific regulations. For families, the key is recognizing that both Greek and Corps traditions can foster abuse. Evidence collection must be immediate, as the culture emphasizes loyalty and silence.

2. The University of Texas at Austin

For Williamson County Families: As the flagship university just a short drive south, UT Austin is a top destination. Its large, prominent Greek life and countless student organizations mean hazing risks are widespread.

• Transparency Tool: UT publishes a public Hazing Violations page, a resource few universities offer. Recent entries include:
  • Pi Kappa Alpha (2023): Sanctioned for hazing involving forced milk consumption and strenuous calisthenics.
  • Various Spirit & Service Groups: Documented violations for forced activities, alcohol hazing, and psychological abuse.
• University Response & Your Strategy: UT’s relative transparency is a double-edged sword. It shows a pattern of violations, which can help prove a chapter’s dangerous culture, but also indicates ongoing issues despite sanctions. Immediate reporting to the UT Dean of Students and UTPD is critical, but families should consult an attorney to ensure the university’s internal process doesn’t compromise a civil case.

3. Baylor University (Waco)

For Williamson County Families: Baylor’s strong academic and religious draw brings many Central Texas students to Waco. Its Greek system and athletic programs have faced scrutiny.

• Notable Incident: Baylor Baseball Hazing (2020): Resulted in the suspension of 14 players, revealing that hazing permeates athletic programs.
• University Response & Your Strategy: Following major Title IX scandals, Baylor has implemented stricter conduct policies. However, its private, religious identity can affect internal investigations. Families need an attorney who can navigate both the university’s process and the potential for civil litigation against the organization and individuals.

4. Southern Methodist University (Dallas)

For Williamson County Families: SMU’s private, affluent campus attracts Williamson County students. Its strong Greek life carries inherent risks.

• Notable Incident: Kappa Alpha Order (2017): The chapter was suspended for hazing involving paddling, forced drinking, and sleep deprivation.
• University Response & Your Strategy: As a private institution, SMU has fewer public reporting requirements. Hazing investigations may be kept internal. An attorney can use discovery in a civil lawsuit to obtain internal SMU reports and correspondence that would otherwise remain secret.

Southwestern University (Georgetown)

For Williamson County Families: This is your local campus. While smaller, hazing can occur in its Greek organizations, athletic teams, and other clubs. Jurisdiction for any incident would involve Georgetown police and Williamson County courts, making legal navigation more local and accessible for families.

The Texas Hazing Intelligence Engine: Mapping the System Behind the Letters

Our firm doesn’t start from scratch. We maintain a proprietary data engine built from public records to track the complex web of organizations behind fraternity and sorority life in Texas. For Williamson County families, this means we already know the entities that may share liability.

Public Records: Fraternity, Sorority & Greek Organizations Connected to Texas Campuses
The following are real entities recorded in IRS and state filings, illustrating the network behind campus Greek life:

• Beta Upsilon Chi Fraternity, EIN 74-2911848, Fort Worth, TX 76244 (IRS B83 Filing)
• Texas Kappa Sigma Educational Foundation Inc, EIN 74-1380362, Fort Worth, TX 76147 (IRS B83 Filing)
• Pi Kappa Alpha Fraternity – Epsilon Kappa Chapter Alumni, Beaumont, TX (Cause IQ Beaumont Metro Listing)
• Sigma Gamma Rho Sorority – Beta Sigma Chapter, Houston, TX (Cause IQ Houston Metro Listing)
• Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi – Lamar Univ. Chapter, Beaumont, TX (Cause IQ Beaumont Metro Listing)
• Building Corporation – Alpha Delta Pi (Delta Chapter), Austin, TX (Cause IQ Austin Metro Listing)
• Frank Heflin Foundation (Phi Delta Theta Alumni), Amarillo, TX (Cause IQ Amarillo Metro Listing)
• Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity – Beaumont Alumni Chapter, Beaumont, TX (Cause IQ Beaumont Metro Listing)

What This Means for Your Case:
When hazing occurs, liability doesn’t stop with the college students in the room. It can extend to the local chapter housing corporation that owns the house, the alumni chapter that provides funding and advice, the national headquarters that collects dues and sets policy, and the educational foundations that manage assets. Our data engine helps us identify every potential defendant and insurance policy from day one.

Building a Hazing Case: Evidence, Strategy, and the Attorney911 Advantage

Filing a lawsuit is a strategic decision. Building a winning hazing case requires a meticulous, evidence-driven approach that anticipates the defenses wealthy institutions will deploy.

The Evidence That Wins Cases

1. Digital Communications: Group chats are the modern smoking gun. We work with digital forensics experts to recover deleted messages from GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, and Discord that show planning, bragging, threats, and cover-up attempts.
2. Photo & Video Evidence: Photos of injuries over time, videos of hazing events shared on social media or in private chats, and location data embedded in digital files.
3. Medical Documentation: ER records, lab tests (like creatine kinase levels proving rhabdomyolysis), psychiatric evaluations for PTSD, and future treatment plans from life-care planners.
4. Institutional Records: Through discovery, we subpoena the national fraternity’s prior incident reports, the university’s conduct file on the chapter, and internal emails showing what officials knew and when.
5. Witness Testimony: Other pledges, former members who left, roommates, and RAs can provide crucial accounts. We know how to approach potential witnesses to secure truthful testimony.

Overcoming the Standard Defenses

We know the playbook because our attorney, Mr. Lupe Peña, used to work on the defense side for insurance companies. Here’s how we counter their arguments:

• Defense: “The pledge consented.” Our Response: Texas law states consent is no defense. We demonstrate the coercion and power imbalance.
• Defense: “This was a rogue chapter; national didn’t know.” Our Response: We use our data engine and discovery to show the national organization’s history of identical incidents at other chapters, proving foreseeability and negligent supervision.
• Defense: “It happened off-campus; we’re not responsible.” Our Response: We establish that the organization sponsored, funded, or controlled the event, and that moving hazing off-campus is a predictable tactic to avoid detection.
• Defense: “Our insurance doesn’t cover intentional acts like hazing.” Our Response: We argue that the negligent supervision by the national or university is a covered occurrence, and we pursue all available policies, including umbrella coverage.

The Damages We Fight to Recover

• Economic Damages: All medical bills (past and future), lost wages, costs of psychological care, and diminished future earning capacity if injuries are permanent.
• Non-Economic Damages: Compensation for physical pain, emotional trauma, humiliation, and loss of enjoyment of life.
• Wrongful Death Damages: In the unthinkable event of a death, families can seek funeral costs, loss of financial support, and damages for grief and loss of companionship.
• Punitive Damages: In cases of extreme recklessness or cover-ups, courts may award punitive damages to punish the defendants and deter future conduct.

Practical Guides & FAQs for Williamson County Parents and Students

A Parent’s Action Plan

1. Recognize the Signs: Unexplained injuries, extreme fatigue, personality changes (anxiety, withdrawal), secretive phone use, sudden academic decline, and fear of talking about the organization.
2. Have the Conversation: Ask open-ended questions: “Are you ever asked to do things that make you uncomfortable?” “What happens if someone says no?” Listen without judgment.
3. In a Crisis: Prioritize medical safety first. Then, help your child preserve evidence—screenshot everything. Do not contact the fraternity/sorority.
4. Document Communications: Keep a log of all interactions with the university, noting names, dates, and what was said.
5. Consult an Attorney Early: Before making statements to school officials or police, understand your legal options. We provide free, confidential consultations.

A Student’s Guide to Safety and Rights

• Is This Hazing? If you feel pressured, unsafe, humiliated, or forced to do something to belong, it likely is. Trust your instinct.
• How to Exit Safely: You have the right to quit. Tell a trusted person outside the group first. Send a simple text/email to the leadership: “I resign my membership/pledgeship effective immediately.” Do not go to a “final meeting.”
• Reporting: You can report anonymously through university hotlines or the National Anti-Hazing Hotline (1-888-NOT-HAZE). Texas law protects good-faith reporters.
• Preserve Evidence: Take screenshots, photos of injuries, and save any physical objects. Do not delete anything.

Critical Mistakes That Can Damage a Case

• Deleting Evidence: This looks like a cover-up and destroys your claim.
• Confronting the Organization: This triggers their defense lawyers and leads to evidence destruction.
• Signing University Papers: Do not sign any “resolution” or “release” forms without an attorney’s review.
• Posting on Social Media: Defense investigators monitor everything. Inconsistencies can be used against you.
• Waiting Too Long: Evidence vanishes, witnesses graduate, and the two-year statute of limitations in Texas continues to tick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Can we sue a public university like UT or Texas A&M in Texas?
A: Yes, but there are hurdles like sovereign immunity. We can sue for gross negligence or sue individual employees in their personal capacity. Often, the threat of discovery and public trial leads to settlement.

Q: How long do we have to file a lawsuit?
A: Generally, two years from the date of injury in Texas. However, if the injury or its cause was hidden (like a cover-up), the clock may start later. Do not wait; call us to understand your specific deadline.

Q: Will our name be public?
A: Most cases settle confidentially before trial. We can request sealed court records and always prioritize your family’s privacy.

Q: How much does it cost to hire your firm?
A: We work on a contingency fee basis for personal injury and hazing cases. This means you pay no upfront fees or hourly costs. We only get paid if we successfully recover money for you.

Why Attorney911 Is the Right Firm for Williamson County Hazing Cases

When your family is in crisis, you need advocates who combine compassion with relentless, strategic competence. You need attorneys who aren’t intimidated by powerful institutions because they’ve defeated them before.

Our Proven Track Record in Complex Institutional Litigation

• The BP Texas City Explosion Litigation: Our managing partner, Ralph Manginello, was one of the few Texas plaintiff attorneys involved in litigating against BP after the catastrophic 2005 refinery explosion. We know how to build cases against billion-dollar defendants with unlimited legal resources—the same model used by national fraternities and large universities.
• Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death Results: We have recovered millions for families who have lost loved ones, working with economists and life-care planners to fully value a life and secure futures for survivors.
• Active Leadership in a Major Texas Hazing Case: Right now, we are lead counsel for Leonel Bermudez in his $10 million lawsuit against the University of Houston and Pi Kappa Phi. We are in the trenches, actively fighting the discovery battles, countering insurance defenses, and pursuing justice in a high-stakes hazing matter. This isn’t theoretical expertise; it’s current, proven capability.

Our Unique Dual Advantage

1. Insurance Insider Knowledge (Mr. Lupe Peña): Mr. Peña is a former insurance defense attorney for a national firm. He spent years on the other side, learning exactly how insurance companies for fraternities and universities value claims, deny coverage, and drag out cases to pressure families. We know their tactics because we used to execute them. Now, we use that knowledge to dismantle their defenses and maximize your recovery.
2. Criminal & Civil Dual Expertise (Ralph Manginello): Ralph is a member of the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA). This means we understand the criminal hazing charges that may be filed by prosecutors. We can strategically advise families and witnesses navigating both criminal and civil proceedings, ensuring one doesn’t jeopardize the other.

Our Commitment to Williamson County and Texas Families

We are a Texas-based firm with offices in Houston, Austin, and Beaumont. We serve families across the state, and we understand the specific dynamics of Central Texas and the Williamson County community. Whether your child was hurt at Texas A&M, UT Austin, Baylor, or any other campus, we have the resources, the data-driven strategy, and the trial-tested experience to help.

We believe in accountability, not just settlements. We fight to expose the truth, to force institutions to change their policies, and to prevent the next family from suffering the same pain. We listen with empathy, investigate with tenacity, and advocate without fear.

Your Next Step: A Free, Confidential Consultation

If you suspect your child has been hazed, time is of the essence. Evidence disappears, witnesses are coached, and institutions begin building their defense narratives immediately.

We offer a no-cost, no-obligation consultation to every family. In this meeting, we will:

• Listen carefully to your story.
• Review any evidence you have gathered.
• Explain the legal landscape and your family’s rights in plain English.
• Outline the potential strategies, timelines, and what you can realistically expect.
• Answer every question you have about the process and our firm.

There is no pressure. Our goal is to ensure you have the information and support you need to make the best decision for your family’s future.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911 Today:

Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com | lupe@atty911.com
Se habla Español: Mr. Lupe Peña provides fluent Spanish-language legal services.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC. Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors. If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation. Contact us for a free, confidential case evaluation.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Legal Emergency Lawyers™
Houston | Austin | Beaumont, Texas