Wisconsin Fraternity Hazing Attorneys | $24M Pike Settlements Exposed | Attorney911 — The Attorneys Who Shut Down Pi Kappa Phi | Federal Court | Former Insurance Defense | 1-888-ATTY-911

In the heart of Wisconsin, families gather on chilly autumn evenings, perhaps catching a Green Bay Packers game or enjoying the vibrant community festivals that dot our state. Our college-bound children dream of academic achievements, new friendships, and exhilarating experiences at universities whether here in Wisconsin or at one of the many esteemed institutions across the Midwest and beyond. They envision joining clubs, sports teams, or fraternities and sororities, seeking camaraderie and personal growth. What no parent envisions is that this journey could lead to a harrowing experience with hazing, an ordeal that can turn dreams into nightmares.

Imagine your child, eager to fit in, agreeing to participate in what they believe are harmless initiation rituals. As the nights go on, the activities escalate. Sleep becomes a luxury, not a necessity. Humiliation and grueling physical tasks replace genuine bonding. Pressure to drink to excess mounts, blurring the lines between celebration and coercion. Then, a call late at night – your child is in the emergency room, suffering from injuries or severe alcohol poisoning, too afraid to tell you what truly happened. This isn’t a distant scenario; it’s a chilling reality for families across the nation, and it can happen to students from Wisconsin attending any university, including our local campuses or the major Texas universities we discuss in depth here.

This comprehensive guide aims to shed light on the dark corners of hazing in 2025. We will explore what modern hazing truly looks like, moving beyond outdated stereotypes to reveal its insidious forms. We’ll delve into the legal landscape, outlining both Texas and federal laws, and the path to accountability for victims and their families. While our firm, Attorney911, is based in Texas, the patterns of hazing, the legal strategies, and the urgent need for justice are universal, affecting families in Wisconsin just as profoundly. We’ll offer an in-depth look at major hazing cases that have shaped national conversations, connecting these crucial lessons to the experiences of students at prominent Texas institutions like the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor. For families in Wisconsin, understanding these cases provides a vital framework for recognizing risk and pursuing justice if hazing impacts your child, wherever they may attend college.

This article provides general information and is not specific legal advice. Every case is unique, and we encourage you to contact Attorney911 for a confidential evaluation of your specific situation. We serve families throughout Texas, and while our main offices are in Texas, our expertise and reach extend to supporting families like yours in Wisconsin who may have children attending university in Texas or elsewhere.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

• If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:

  • Call 911 for medical emergencies
  • Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
  • We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™

• In the first 48 hours:

  • Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine”
  • Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
    • Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately
    • Photograph injuries from multiple angles
    • Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects)
  • Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where)
  • Do NOT:
    • Confront the fraternity/sorority
    • Sign anything from the university or insurance company
    • Post details on public social media
    • Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence

• Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:

  • Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses)
  • Universities move quickly to control the narrative
  • We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights
  • Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation

HAZING IN 2025: WHAT IT REALLY LOOKS LIKE

The perception of hazing is often rooted in outdated movie scenes: innocent pranks, shaving heads, or silly scavenger hunts. However, the reality of hazing in 2025 is far more sinister and dangerous. It’s a spectrum of abuse, ranging from subtle psychological manipulation to brutal physical assault, often fueled by excessive alcohol and a culture of secrecy. Understanding its true nature is the first step toward combating it. For families in Wisconsin, whose children may be navigating college life for the first time, recognizing these signs is crucial.

Clear, modern definition of hazing

Hazing is any forced, coerced, or strongly pressured action imposed on an individual as part of joining, maintaining membership, or achieving higher status within any organization. These actions, whether on or off campus, endanger a student’s mental or physical health, humiliate them, or exploit their vulnerability. The critical aspect here is coercion: even if a student “agrees” to participate, the power imbalance, peer pressure, and fear of exclusion often negate true voluntary consent. Hazing is inherently about control and the abuse of power, not authentic bonding or tradition.

Main categories of hazing

Modern hazing takes many forms, often blending into what is deceptively presented as “tradition” or “team-building.” We typically categorize hazing into three escalating tiers, although all forms are damaging:

• Subtle Hazing: This tier involves behaviors that create a power imbalance and psychological discomfort, often setting the stage for more severe acts. Examples include:

  • Deception and secrecy oaths: New members are told to lie about activities to parents, university staff, or outsiders.
  • Assigning derogatory names: Forcing new members to respond to demeaning nicknames.
  • Servitude: Requiring new members to perform chores or services for older members at inconvenient times, irrespective of their academic schedules.
  • Social isolation: Prohibiting interaction with non-members or requiring permission to socialize.
  • Deprivation of privileges: Restricting where new members can sit, what doors they can use, or when they can speak.
  • Mandatory events that interfere with academics: Late-night meetings that cause sleep deprivation before exams.

• Harassment Hazing: These behaviors cause emotional or physical discomfort, often creating a hostile and abusive environment, but may not result in lasting physical injury. Examples include:

  • Verbal abuse: Yelling, screaming, insults, and degrading language.
  • Sleep deprivation: Mandatory late-night activities and early morning wake-ups designed to exhaust new members.
  • Food or water restriction: Limiting access to food or water, or forcing consumption of unpleasant substances.
  • Excessive physical activity: Strenuous calisthenics, forced runs, or “workouts” that exceed safe limits and serve as punishment.
  • Public humiliation: Forcing new members to perform embarrassing acts, wear degrading costumes, or endure verbal “roasts.”
  • Exposure to uncomfortable conditions: Forcing new members into unsanitary environments or covering them in non-harmful but humiliating substances like food or condiments.

• Violent Hazing: This is the most dangerous tier, involving activities that pose a significant risk of physical injury, sexual assault, or death. These acts are often illegal and carry severe criminal and civil consequences. Examples include:

  • Forced or coerced alcohol consumption: “Lineup” drinking games, bottle exchanges (like “Big/Little”), or forced chugging until intoxication or collapse.
  • Forced drug use: Coercing new members into consuming illegal or harmful substances.
  • Physical beatings: Paddling, punches, kicks, or slaps.
  • Dangerous physical tests: Blindfolded tackles, forced fights, jumping from heights, or swimming while intoxicated.
  • Sexualized hazing: Forced nudity, simulated sexual acts, or sexual assault.
  • Kidnapping or restraint: Abducting new members and abandoning them, or physically tying them up.
  • Exposure to extreme environments: Leaving new members in hazardous weather conditions or denying access to basic necessities like bathrooms for extended periods.

For Wisconsin families unfamiliar with modern Greek life, it’s vital to recognize that the term “hazing” encompasses this wide range of behaviors. Many organizations now use euphemisms like “new member education,” “initiation week,” or “team-building,” but the core abusive elements remain.

Where hazing actually happens

Hazing is not confined to any single type of organization. While fraternities and sororities, particularly those involved in Greek life, are often associated with hazing, it occurs across a wide array of campus groups:

• Fraternities and Sororities: This includes those under the Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic Council, National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and multicultural Greek organizations.
• Corps of Cadets / ROTC / Military-Style Groups: The hierarchical structure and emphasis on discipline in these groups can sometimes be twisted into hazing rituals.
• Spirit Squads, Tradition Clubs, and Student Groups: Groups dedicated to school spirit often engage in initiation practices that can escalate into hazing.
• Athletic Teams: From football and basketball to cheerleading and club sports, athletes are often subjected to physically and psychologically demanding hazing as part of team “bonding.”
• Marching Bands and Performance Groups: Even seemingly benign artistic groups can harbor hidden hazing cultures.
• Some Service, Cultural, and Academic Organizations: Any group with an “in-group/out-group” dynamic can be susceptible to hazing.

At its core, hazing persists because of a dangerous mix of social status, tradition, and secrecy. New members are often told that “what happens here stays here,” creating an environment where abusive practices flourish while remaining hidden from oversight. This culture of silence protects perpetrators and perpetuates harm. For Wisconsin parents, understanding that no type of campus organization is entirely immune to hazing is essential when discussing safety with your child.

LAW & LIABILITY FRAMEWORK (TEXAS + FEDERAL)

Navigating the legal landscape of hazing can be complex, but understanding the fundamental laws and precedents is crucial for families seeking justice. Whether your child attends a university in Wisconsin or one of the major institutions in Texas, the principles of accountability hold true. In Texas, a robust legal framework exists to combat hazing, complemented by federal laws that provide additional layers of protection and reporting requirements.

Texas hazing law basics (Education Code)

Texas has specific, comprehensive anti-hazing provisions outlined in its Education Code, particularly Chapter 37, Subchapter F. This legislation defines hazing broadly to encompass a wide range of harmful activities, regardless of their perceived intent or whether they occur on or off campus.

Hazing is defined as any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, committed by one person or a group, against a student for the purpose of pledging, initiation, affiliation, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any student organization. Critically, the act must either:

• Endanger the mental or physical health or safety of a student; OR
• Cause mental or physical discomfort, intimidation, or ridicule.

This definition emphasizes that the impact on the victim, not the perpetrator’s intention, is paramount. Even if an act is dismissed as “just a joke,” if it endangers a student’s well-being or causes significant distress, it constitutes hazing under Texas law. For families in Wisconsin, whose children might be attending school in Texas, it’s vital to know that these protections are in place.

Summarily, Texas law also outlines:

• Criminal penalties: Hazing is a criminal offense in Texas.

  • A basic hazing offense is typically a Class B Misdemeanor.
  • If medically treated injuries occur, it can escalate to a Class A Misdemeanor.
  • Most critically, if hazing causes serious bodily injury or death, it can be prosecuted as a State Jail Felony, carrying significant prison time and fines.
  • Furthermore, those who fail to report hazing when they have knowledge of it, or who retaliate against someone for reporting hazing, can also face misdemeanor charges.

• “Consent” is not a defense: Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that a victim’s consent to participate in hazing activities is not a defense to prosecution. This is a critical provision that prevents perpetrators from escaping accountability by claiming the victim “volunteered.”

• Sovereign Immunity Concerns: While public universities in Texas, like the University of Houston, Texas A&M, and UT Austin, often assert sovereign immunity to limit their liability, this protection is not absolute. Exceptions can apply in cases of gross negligence, when state laws waive immunity, or when federal laws like Title IX are violated. Private institutions such as Southern Methodist University and Baylor University typically have less protection from sovereign immunity claims.

Criminal vs civil cases

It is crucial for Wisconsin families to understand that hazing incidents can lead to two distinct, yet often parallel, legal processes:

• Criminal cases: These are initiated and prosecuted by the state. Their primary goal is to punish individuals or organizations found guilty of violating hazing laws or related criminal statutes. In Texas, depending on the severity of harm, criminal penalties can range from fines and probation to significant jail or prison sentences. Criminal charges frequently associated with hazing include simple hazing, assault, furnishing alcohol to minors, and in tragic cases of death, even negligent homicide or manslaughter.

• Civil cases: These are lawsuits filed by the victims of hazing (or their surviving families in wrongful death cases) against individuals, organizations, and institutions involved in or responsible for the hazing. The objective of civil litigation is not punishment but monetary compensation, allowing victims to recover damages for their injuries, financial losses, and emotional distress. Civil claims often involve allegations of negligence, gross negligence, wrongful death, negligent supervision, and premises liability. A successful civil case also serves as a powerful means of accountability, forcing institutions to confront and address systemic issues that perpetuate hazing.

Both criminal and civil actions can proceed simultaneously, and a criminal conviction is not a prerequisite for filing or winning a civil lawsuit. The standards of proof and legal objectives differ in each type of case.

Federal overlay: Stop Campus Hazing Act, Title IX, Clery

Beyond state laws, federal legislation also plays a significant role in combating hazing and holding institutions accountable:

• Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This landmark federal law is designed to increase transparency and strengthen hazing prevention efforts at colleges and universities receiving federal funding. By around 2026, it will require these institutions to:

  • Publicly report all hazing incidents more transparently, including sanctions imposed.
  • Provide enhanced hazing education and prevention programs.
  • Maintain and publicly disclose hazing data annually, offering a clearer picture of the problem nationwide.

• Title IX: Primarily known for addressing gender discrimination, Title IX also applies when hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, or gender-based violence. If a hazing ritual creates a hostile environment based on sex, or involves sexual coercion or assault, the university has a legal obligation under Title IX to investigate and respond. Failure to do so can lead to severe consequences for the institution, including loss of federal funding.

• Clery Act: The Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act requires colleges and universities to disclose information about crime on and around their campuses. Hazing incidents that involve crimes such as assault, sexual assault, or alcohol/drug-related offenses often fall under Clery reporting requirements, compelling institutions to maintain and publicly release crime statistics and safety policies. This transparency is crucial for parents in Wisconsin and elsewhere to make informed decisions about their children’s safety.

Who can be liable in a civil hazing lawsuit

Determining liability in a civil hazing lawsuit involves identifying all parties whose actions or inactions contributed to the harm. The Manginello Law Firm meticulously investigates each case to identify every potential defendant:

• Individual students: Those who actively planned, participated in, encouraged, or covered up the hazing can be held personally liable for their actions. This often includes students who held leadership roles within the organization, such as chapter officers or “pledge educators.”

• Local chapter/organization: The local fraternity, sorority, or student club itself (if it operates as a distinct legal entity) can be named as a defendant. Liability often arises if the chapter formally endorsed the hazing, or if its leadership knowingly permitted it to occur.

• National fraternity/sorority: The national organization that charters and oversees local chapters can be held accountable, particularly if there’s a history of similar incidents across its chapters nationwide, demonstrating a pattern of negligence in supervising its local affiliates. Their liability can hinge on whether they had knowledge of previous hazing, their effectiveness in enforcing anti-hazing policies, and their role in risk management.

• University or governing board: Colleges and universities can be held liable for hazing that occurs on their watch, especially if they:

  • Knew or should have known about hazing and failed to take reasonable steps to prevent it.
  • Negligently supervised student organizations.
  • Failed to adequately enforce their own anti-hazing policies.
  • Violated federal laws such as Title IX.
    While public universities in Texas may enjoy some sovereign immunity, it’s not an impenetrable shield.

• Third parties: Other entities may also bear responsibility:

  • Landlords or property owners: If hazing occurred on property they owned or managed, particularly if they were aware of dangerous activities.
  • Bars or alcohol suppliers: Under “dram shop” laws, establishments that illegally serve alcohol to minors who then become involved in hazing-related incidents can be held liable.
  • Security companies or event organizers: If they were contracted to ensure safety but failed to do so.

Every hazing case involves a unique set of facts, and the determination of liability is always complex. An experienced hazing attorney can thoroughly investigate all angles to identify every responsible party.

NATIONAL HAZING CASE PATTERNS (ANCHOR STORIES)

The tragic stories of hazing victims echo across campuses nationwide, creating a stark pattern of preventable harm. For Wisconsin families, understanding these national precedents is not just about empathy; it’s about realizing the universal nature of hazing’s dangers and the legal accountability that can follow. These aren’t isolated incidents but recurring narratives that highlight systemic failures and the critical need for vigilant advocacy.

Alcohol poisoning & death pattern

Forced alcohol consumption remains the most common and deadliest form of hazing. These cases illustrate the devastating consequences when peer pressure, a misguided sense of tradition, and deliberate indifference lead to tragedy:

• Timothy Piazza – Penn State, Beta Theta Pi (2017): The death of 19-year-old Timothy Piazza shocked the nation. After a “bid acceptance” event involving extreme alcohol consumption, Piazza suffered multiple falls, including one down a flight of stairs. Despite his visible distress, fraternity members delayed calling for medical help for nearly 12 hours. His agonizing final hours were captured on the fraternity’s security cameras, providing irrefutable evidence of the horrific negligence and callous indifference. The aftermath saw dozens of criminal charges filed against fraternity members, extensive civil litigation, and the creation of Pennsylvania’s stringent Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law. This case underscored how extreme intoxication, deliberate delays in seeking aid, and a pervasive culture of silence can be legally devastating for all involved.

• Andrew Coffey – Florida State, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): Just months after Piazza’s death, Andrew Coffey, a 20-year-old Pi Kappa Phi pledge at Florida State University, died from acute alcohol poisoning. Pledges were given handles of hard liquor on “Big Brother Night,” an event that required them to consume large quantities of alcohol quickly. His blood alcohol content was 0.447%, more than five times the legal limit. The tragedy led to criminal hazing charges against multiple members and FSU implementing a sweeping temporary suspension of all Greek life. The Coffey family’s lawsuit against the fraternity and its members resulted in a confidential settlement. This case is a tragically familiar script in hazing: formulaic “tradition” drinking nights often escalate into deadly events.

• Maxwell “Max” Gruver – LSU, Phi Delta Theta (2017): Max Gruver, an 18-year-old LSU freshman, died after a “Bible study” drinking game where pledges were forced to consume massive amounts of hard liquor for correctly or incorrectly answering questions about the fraternity. Max’s blood alcohol content was 0.495% at the time of his death. His death led to Louisiana enacting the Max Gruver Act, a felony hazing law with potential prison sentences, underscoring how legislative change often follows public outrage and clear proof of hazing. Multiple members faced criminal charges, with one convicted of negligent homicide, and the Gruver family secured a confidential civil settlement.

• Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): In one of the most recent high-profile deaths, Stone Foltz, a 20-year-old Pi Kappa Alpha pledge at Bowling Green State University, died after being forced to consume an entire handle of bourbon during a “Big/Little” night off campus. Many members faced criminal charges, and multiple were convicted of hazing-related offenses. The Foltz family reached a $10 million settlement in 2023, with $7 million from the Pi Kappa Alpha national organization and an additional sum from Bowling Green State University itself. This case powerfully demonstrates how universities can face significant financial and reputational consequences alongside fraternities, proving that accountability extends to the institutions hosting these chapters. The tragedy spurred Ohio to enact Collin’s Law, stiffening penalties for hazing.

Physical & ritualized hazing pattern

Not all hazing deaths or severe injuries involve alcohol. Physical abuse and dangerous rituals, often cloaked in secrecy, also contribute to this devastating national pattern:

• Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): At an off-campus retreat in Pennsylvania’s Pocono Mountains, Michael Deng, a 19-year-old pledge, was subjected to a brutal ritual known as “the glass ceiling.” Blindfolded and wearing a heavy backpack, he was repeatedly tackled and body-slammed. The Pi Delta Psi fraternity members delayed calling 911 for over an hour, moving him and searching online for his symptoms before finally seeking help. He died from a traumatic brain injury. The aftermath was unprecedented: multiple fraternity members were convicted of crimes, including involuntary manslaughter, and the national Pi Delta Psi fraternity itself was convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter, and effectively banned from operating in Pennsylvania for 10 years. This landmark case showed how off-campus “retreats” can be prime sites for dangerous hazing and how national organizations can be held criminally liable.

Athletic program hazing & abuse

Hazing extends beyond Greek life, permeating other campus organizations, notably athletic programs and elite student groups.

• Northwestern University football (2023–2025): A cascade of allegations emerged from former Northwestern football players, detailing widespread sexualized and racist hazing within the program over several years. Accusations ranged from forced sexual acts within the locker room (“dry-humping”) to racial discrimination and physical abuse. These revelations led to the firing of long-time head coach Pat Fitzgerald, numerous lawsuits filed by former players against the university and coaching staff, and a subsequent confidential settlement with Fitzgerald. This scandal powerfully illustrated that hazing is not exclusive to fraternities and exists deeply within major athletic programs, raising critical questions about institutional oversight and a culture of silence designed to protect winning teams.

What these cases mean for Texas families

The tragic narratives of these national hazing cases reveal several common and alarming threads crucial for Wisconsin families to understand:

• Predictable Patterns: Many hazing incidents follow similar scripts: forced drinking, physical abuse veiled as “tradition,” degrading rituals, delayed medical care, and attempts at cover-ups. These patterns establish a foreseeability that is central to legal arguments for negligence.
• High Stakes: The financial costs of hazing are immense, with settlements and verdicts often reaching multi-million dollar figures, reflecting the profound loss and suffering endured by victims and their families. Cases like Stone Foltz’s $10 million settlement and Chad Meredith’s $12.6 million jury verdict send a clear message about legal accountability.
• Institutional Accountability: These cases increasingly hold not just individual students but also local chapters, national organizations, and universities responsible. The legal system recognizes that institutions have a duty to protect students and prevent known dangers.
• Legislative Change: Public outcry and determined advocacy from victims’ families have spurred significant legislative reforms, leading to stricter anti-hazing laws, like Pennsylvania’s Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law and Louisiana’s Max Gruver Act.
• Evidence is Critical: Every successful prosecution or civil victory relies heavily on meticulous evidence collection, from digital communications to medical records and witness testimony.

For Wisconsin families facing the devastation of hazing, whether at a local campus or at Texas institutions like UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, or Baylor, these national lessons provide a critical roadmap. You are not alone, and the legal strategies forged in these anchor cases offer a pathway to justice and genuine accountability.

TEXAS FOCUS: UH, TEXAS A&M, UT, SMU, BAYLOR

For families in Wisconsin considering higher education options in the Lone Star State, or simply seeking to understand hazing dynamics on a broader scale, focusing on Texas universities is highly instructive. Texas is a large state with a vibrant, diverse higher education landscape, including some of the largest public universities and prestigious private institutions in the country. The experiences at these schools—the hazing incidents, policies, and responses—offer critical insights into the challenges and efforts to combat campus abuse.

As a firm deeply rooted in Texas, Attorney911 has direct experience with hazing cases at many of these institutions, most notably with our active $10 million lawsuit against the University of Houston and Pi Kappa Phi. The Manginello Law Firm represents Leonel Bermudez, a University of Houston student who suffered acute kidney failure and rhabdomyolysis due to severe hazing at the Pi Kappa Phi fraternity’s Beta Nu chapter. This case, filed in late 2025, vividly illustrates the extreme dangers of hazing and the comprehensive legal approach we take to hold all responsible parties accountable, including the university, the national fraternity, its housing corporation, and individual members.

The details of Leonel’s case are harrowing and shed light on the brutal realities of modern hazing:

• Pledge Fanny Pack Rule: Pledges were forced to carry degrading items, including condoms and sex toys, with threats of punishment for non-compliance.
• “Waterboarding” with a Hose: Bermudez was allegedly sprayed with a hose in a manner “similar to waterboarding” and threatened with actual waterboarding.
• Yellowstone Boulevard Park Workouts: Pledges endured forced physical exertion including sprints, bear crawls, and “save-your-brother” drills at a local Houston park.
• Extreme Calisthenics: On November 3rd, Bermudez was forced to perform over 100 push-ups and 500 squats, leaving him unable to stand.
• Forced Consumption and Vomiting: Pledges were coerced into consuming milk, hot dogs, and peppercorns until they vomited, followed by immediate sprints.
• Severe Medical Outcome: Bermudez developed acute kidney failure and rhabdomyolysis, characterized by brown urine and critically high creatine kinase levels, requiring a four-day hospitalization and risking permanent kidney damage. His attorney, Ralph Manginello, emphasized the severity, stating, “His urine was brown.” (https://www.click2houston.com/news/local/2025/11/21/only-on-2-lawsuit-alleges-severe-hazing-at-university-of-houstons-pi-kappa-phi-chapter-fraternity/)
• Institutional Cover-up: While the Pi Kappa Phi national HQ suspended the Beta Nu chapter on November 6th, and the chapter surrendered its charter on November 14th, the lawsuit alleges a pattern of negligence and foreseeability that extends to the University of Houston and its Board of Regents. The university’s statement called the conduct “deeply disturbing,” but the lawsuit argues for broader institutional accountability (https://abc13.com/post/waterboarding-forced-eating-physical-punishment-lawsuit-alleges-abuse-faced-injured-pledge-uhs-pi-kappa-phi-fraternity/18186418/).

Lupe Peña, Bermudez’s co-counsel, emphasized the firm’s motivation: “If this prevents harm to another person in the future, let’s bring this to light. Enough is enough.” (https://hoodline.com/2025/11/university-of-houston-and-pi-kappa-phi-fraternity-face-10m-lawsuit-over-alleged-hazing-and-abuse/) This case is a testament to Attorney911’s commitment to fighting for justice.

For Wisconsin families, especially those with connections to these schools, or whose children may attend a similar Texas institution, this section provides focused insights into the particular contexts of these major campuses.

5.1 University of Houston (UH)

As our firm is actively litigating the Leonel Bermudez case against UH and Pi Kappa Phi, the University of Houston serves as a stark example of hazing’s prevalence even at seemingly vigilant institutions. Families in Wisconsin should be aware that such incidents can occur at any large public university.

5.1.1 Campus & culture snapshot

The University of Houston (UH) is a bustling urban campus located in the heart of Houston, serving a diverse student body exceeding 47,000. It fosters a vibrant student life with a mix of residential and commuter students. Greek life is a significant component of UH’s social fabric, with a wide array of fraternities and sororities operating under various councils, including the Interfraternity Council and the Panhellenic Council. Beyond Greek organizations, UH has hundreds of student clubs, sports teams, and cultural groups, each contributing to a lively campus atmosphere. For students from Wisconsin attending UH, the sheer size and diversity can be both exciting and overwhelming, making the desire to find a niche—and the vulnerability to hazing—particularly acute.

5.1.2 Hazing policy & reporting

The University of Houston maintains a strict anti-hazing policy, clearly stating that hazing is prohibited whether it occurs on or off campus. Its policy explicitly forbids “any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, occurring on or off the campus…that endangers the mental or physical health or safety” of a student. Prohibited acts detailed in their policy include forced consumption of alcohol, food, or drugs; physical brutality; sleep deprivation; and any acts that cause significant mental distress or humiliation. The university encourages reporting through various channels, including the Dean of Students Office, the Office of Student Conduct, and the UH Police Department. UH also publishes a hazing statement and information on disciplinary actions related to hazing on its website, albeit with varying levels of detail compared to some other institutions.

5.1.3 Selected documented incidents & responses

Beyond the ongoing Leonel Bermudez case, the University of Houston has a documented history of hazing incidents. In 2016, a Pi Kappa Alpha pledge allegedly suffered a lacerated spleen, among other injuries, after being subjected to a brutal hazing ritual involving physical abuse and deprivation. This led to misdemeanor hazing charges and a university suspension for the chapter. While this incident occurred years ago, it foreshadowed the ongoing challenges at UH. Subsequent disciplinary reports have referenced fraternities for conduct “likely to produce mental or physical discomfort,” involving alcohol misuse and policy violations, resulting in suspensions or probationary periods. These recurring incidents highlight that despite policies, the threat of hazing remains a persistent issue at UH, signaling potential systemic issues that warrant scrutiny.

5.1.4 How a UH hazing case might proceed

Given UH’s location in Houston, a hazing case would involve a blend of local and university authorities. The University of Houston Police Department (UHPD) might investigate on-campus incidents, while the Houston Police Department (HPD) would take jurisdiction for off-campus events, particularly those involving assaults or severe alcohol poisoning. Civil lawsuits related to UH hazing would typically be filed in Harris County courts, potentially implicating individual students, the local chapter, the national fraternity or sorority, and the university itself. For Wisconsin families, navigating these multiple jurisdictions can be daunting, but an experienced Texas attorney can seamlessly manage the process.

5.1.5 What UH students & parents should do

For students and parents connected to the University of Houston:

• Understand the policy: Familiarize yourself with UH’s anti-hazing policy available on their website.
• Use reporting channels: Utilize the Dean of Students Office, the Office of Student Conduct ( https://uh.edu/conduct/ ), or the UH Police Department to report concerns.
• Document everything: Keep meticulous records of communications, photos, medical visits, and witness contacts. Our firm’s video on documenting legal cases with your cellphone (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) offers valuable guidance.
• Seek medical attention: Prioritize health. If injured, visit the UH Cougar Health Services or local emergency room.
• Contact local legal counsel: If hazing is suspected, especially if injuries occur, contact a Texas hazing attorney immediately. Our firm, particularly with our active case against UH, possesses an intimate understanding of the legal landscape in Houston and can provide specialized guidance.

5.2 Texas A&M University

Texas A&M University, a storied public institution with deep traditions and a powerful sense of identity, presents a unique context for hazing discussions. For Wisconsin families, A&M’s reputation often precedes it, making it essential to understand the realities of hazing within its distinct culture. Many families from Wisconsin send their children to Texas A&M. Texas A&M is renowned for its spirit and traditions, which are integral to the identity of its students. However, this strong traditional culture can, unfortunately, sometimes provide cover for hazing.

5.2.1 Campus & culture snapshot

Texas A&M, located in College Station, boasts one of the largest student bodies in the nation and is renowned for its fiercely loyal alumni network (“Aggie Network”). Its culture is deeply rooted in military tradition, epitomized by the Corps of Cadets, the largest uniformed student body outside of the national service academies. Beyond the Corps, A&M has a significant Greek life presence and countless student organizations, all contributing to a campus environment often described as “tradition-rich.” This strong emphasis on tradition, loyalty, and hierarchy can, unfortunately, be weaponized in hazing, where “earning your place” becomes a justification for abuse.

5.2.2 Official hazing policy & reporting

Texas A&M University strictly prohibits hazing, adhering to Texas state law and implementing its own detailed policies. The university’s hazing policy draws a clear line against any activity that endangers mental or physical well-being for the purpose of initiation or affiliation. A&M provides various reporting mechanisms, including the Student Conduct Office, the Corps of Cadets chain of command (for Corps-related incidents), and the University Police Department. They also maintain a public record of hazing violations—though the level of detail can vary—underscoring their commitment to transparency and enforcement, aligning with the requirements of Texas Education Code § 37.156.

5.2.3 Selected documented incidents & responses

Texas A&M has faced multiple high-profile hazing allegations across its diverse student organizations:

• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) Lawsuit (around 2021): This highly disturbing case involved two pledges who alleged they suffered severe chemical burns after fraternity members poured substances, including an industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit, on them during forced strenuous activity. The pledges eventually required skin graft surgeries. The incident led to the fraternity’s suspension and a lawsuit seeking damages, highlighting the extreme and dangerous forms hazing can take.
• Corps of Cadets Lawsuit (2023): A former cadet filed a lawsuit alleging degrading hazing within the Corps, including forced simulated sexual acts and being bound in a humiliating pose (a “roasted pig” position with an apple in his mouth). The lawsuit sought over $1 million, exposing how hazing can be deeply embedded even within highly structured, tradition-bound groups and how its victims can suffer lasting emotional and psychological harm.
• Aggie Bonfire Collapse (1999): While not traditional “hazing,” the tragic collapse of the student-constructed Aggie Bonfire, which killed 12 students and injured 27, raised critical questions about student-led, high-risk traditions and institutional oversight. Multiple lawsuits and over $6 million in settlements underscored the university’s ultimate responsibility, leading to the official tradition being discontinued. This incident serves as a powerful reminder of the dangers inherent in unsupervised, high-stakes student-led activities, even those born of good intentions.

5.2.4 How a Texas A&M hazing case might proceed

Hazing cases at Texas A&M are often complex due to the strong traditional culture and the involvement of the Corps of Cadets, which operates with its own internal disciplinary system. Investigations may involve the Texas A&M University Police Department (UPD) and, if crimes occur, could involve other state or federal agencies. Civil lawsuits would likely be filed in Brazos County courts, targeting individuals, local chapters, national organizations, and potentially the university and its Board of Regents. Claims against A&M would need to contend with sovereign immunity defenses, requiring experienced legal counsel to navigate. For Wisconsin families, understanding these nuances is critical when pursuing justice.

5.2.5 What Texas A&M students & parents should do

For students at Texas A&M and their parents, vigilance and proactive measures are key:

• Review A&M’s Student Rules: Understand the specific hazing policies and behavioral expectations outlined by the university.
• Report all concerns: Promptly report any suspected hazing to the Student Conduct Office, the Corps of Cadets leadership (if applicable), or the Texas A&M UPD. Anonymous reporting options are typically available.
• Document everything: Especially in an institution with strong traditions, meticulous documentation of any concerning behavior, communications, or injuries is crucial. As our firm emphasizes, “Use your cellphone to document a legal case” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs).
• Prioritize medical care: If psychological distress or physical injury occurs, prioritize seeking immediate medical or mental health support, clearly stating the context to medical providers.
• Consult legal professionals: For Wisconsin families, reaching out to an experienced Texas hazing attorney at the first sign of trouble can provide invaluable guidance and protection through university investigations and potential legal actions.

5.3 University of Texas at Austin (UT)

The University of Texas at Austin is the flagship institution of the University of Texas System and a major draw for students nationally, including many from Wisconsin. Its vibrant campus culture and extensive Greek system make it another critical focal point for understanding hazing.

5.3.1 Campus & culture snapshot

The University of Texas at Austin (UT) is a massive public research university, home to over 50,000 students and a rich array of academic, athletic, and social activities. Its campus culture is defined by strong traditions, a passionate fan base for its sports teams, and a sprawling Greek life that includes dozens of fraternities and sororities. UT’s unofficial “spirit groups” also play a significant role in campus life, often engaging in highly traditional initiation rituals. This blend of size, tradition, and a prominent Greek system creates a complex environment where hazing can unfortunately thrive. Many bright students from Wisconsin are drawn to UT Austin’s academic prestige and vibrant atmosphere.

5.3.2 Official hazing policy & reporting

UT Austin has a strict policy against hazing, in accordance with Texas law and the university’s own commitment to student safety. Their policies prohibit any act that “endangers the mental or physical health or safety” of a student during initiation or membership activities. UT is notable for its commitment to transparency, maintaining a publicly accessible Hazing Violations Log on its website. This log details specific organizations disciplined for hazing, the nature of their violations, and the sanctions imposed. Reporting channels include the Dean of Students Office, the Student Conduct and Academic Integrity office, and the University of Texas Police Department (UTPD). This transparency is a valuable resource for Wisconsin parents researching campus safety.

5.3.3 Selected documented incidents & responses

UT Austin’s Hazing Violations Log offers a window into the recurring nature of hazing at the institution:

• Pi Kappa Alpha (2023): The university’s log recently documented an incident where pledges were subjected to “forced consumption of milk and strenuous calisthenics.” UT found this to be hazing, leading to the chapter being placed on probation and mandated to implement new hazing-prevention education. This specific incident illustrates a common pattern of physical and liquid-consumption hazing.
• Texas Cowboys (2018): The prestigious Texas Cowboys spirit organization faced disciplinary action following the death of a “new man” during a traditional rush event which culminated in a pickup truck accident. While UT officials acknowledged serious hazing infractions such as animal abuse and members sleeping around with groupies, some family members alleged sleep deprivation as a factor in the death, although the university did not officially attribute the death to hazing. The organization was severely sanctioned, losing recognition for several years.
• Texas Cowboys Drowning (1995): Many years earlier, Gabriel Higgins, a UT student, drowned in the Colorado River after participating in drinking games during a Texas Cowboys initiation party. While the incident was initially described as accidental, it fit the pattern of alcohol-fueled initiation rituals that characterize hazing.
• Sigma Chi (2024): The death of Sawyer Updike, an 18-year-old UT Austin student, was tragically ruled a suicide, but his parents have initiated civil litigation alleging that hazing by the Sigma Chi fraternity and five of its members was a contributing factor. The lawsuit, being actively pursued by lawyers including Ted B. Lyon, underscores the profound and devastating psychological impact that hazing can have on a victim’s mental health. This case is currently ongoing.

These repeated entries on UT’s public log, covering both Greek life and spirit organizations, demonstrate a clear pattern of hazing. While the transparency is commendable, it simultaneously reveals the persistent challenge faced by universities in eradicating these dangerous practices.

5.3.4 How a UT Austin hazing case might proceed

Hazing cases stemming from UT Austin could involve investigations by the UTPD or the Austin Police Department, depending on whether incidents occur on campus or at off-campus fraternity houses in the vibrant West Campus or North Campus neighborhoods. Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in Travis County courts in Austin. Potential defendants would include individual students, the local chapter, the national organization (like Pi Kappa Alpha national), and the University of Texas System itself. Given UT’s status as a public university, claims might encounter assertions of sovereign immunity, but as discussed, exceptions and strategic legal approaches are available.

5.3.5 What UT Austin students & parents should do

For students attending UT Austin and their families:

• Consult the Hazing Violations Log: Regularly check UT’s official online log for any disciplinary actions taken against organizations your student might consider joining. This is critical public information.
• Report promptly: Use UT’s reporting channels for any suspected hazing, including anonymous report forms, to the Dean of Students or Student Conduct offices.
• Prioritize well-being: If any physical or mental harm occurs, seek immediate professional help from University Health Services or Austin-area medical providers.
• Document rigorously: Screenshots of group chats, photos of injuries, and detailed notes are vital. The public nature of UT’s log makes any additional, private documentation even more powerful.
• Contact experienced legal counsel: Families in Wisconsin with children at UT Austin should immediately contact a Texas hazing attorney at the first sign of hazing to protect their rights and ensure proper legal guidance through the university’s investigative processes and any potential civil litigation.

5.4 Southern Methodist University (SMU)

Southern Methodist University, a distinguished private institution in Dallas, is known for its strong academic programs, beautiful campus, and a prominent Greek life scene. For Wisconsin families, SMU represents a different institutional and cultural environment compared to the large public universities.

5.4.1 Campus & culture snapshot

Southern Methodist University (SMU), situated in the affluent University Park neighborhood of Dallas, is a private university with a comparatively smaller, highly engaged student body. Its campus culture is often characterized by strong social traditions, a close-knit alumni network, and a highly visible Greek life system that boasts a significant percentage of undergraduate participation. SMU’s athletic programs, particularly football, also contribute to a strong sense of community and tradition. This distinctive blend of prestige, social prominence, and strong traditions can sometimes create an environment where hazing, though strictly prohibited, can take root and propagate, often under the guise of “exclusive” or “time-honored” rituals.

5.4.2 Official hazing policy & reporting

SMU has an unequivocal anti-hazing policy that is clearly articulated in its Student Code of Conduct. The university defines hazing in broad terms to include any actions, on or off campus, that cause mental or physical harm, suffering, abuse, humiliation, or degradation for the purpose of initiation, admission, affiliation, or continued membership in an organization. SMU emphasizes a zero-tolerance stance and provides multiple avenues for reporting, including direct contact with the Dean of Students Office, the Office of Student Conduct, and various anonymous reporting platforms such as Real Response, a third-party app designed for confidential safety concerns. As a private institution, SMU prioritizes internal investigations and disciplinary actions, but must still comply with Texas hazing laws.

5.4.3 Selected documented incidents & responses

SMU has taken disciplinary action against several organizations for hazing violations over the years:

• Kappa Alpha Order (2017): The Kappa Alpha Order fraternity chapter at SMU faced significant sanctions after allegations of severe hazing surfaced. Reports included pledges being paddled, forced to consume alcohol to excess, and deprived of sleep. The national organization ultimately suspended the SMU chapter, and the university imposed strict restrictions, including a ban on recruiting for several years until around 2021. This incident gained considerable attention, highlighting hazing behavior even within long-standing, traditional fraternities.
• Other Greek and Student Organizations: While specific details are often less publicly available for private institutions compared to state-mandated public university logs, SMU has historically sanctioned other Greek chapters and even athletic groups for hazing violations involving alcohol misuse, physical endurance challenges, and demeaning activities. These disciplinary actions, often resulting in probation, suspension, or mandated educational programs, reflect SMU’s ongoing efforts to address and prevent hazing within its community.

5.4.4 How an SMU hazing case might proceed

Hazing cases originating from SMU would typically involve investigations by SMU Police and, if crimes are committed, the Dallas Police Department. Civil lawsuits would likely be filed in Dallas County courts. Unlike public universities, SMU, as a private institution, does not benefit from sovereign immunity, making it a more direct target for civil litigation based on negligence, negligent supervision, or other tort claims. Potential defendants would include individual students, the local chapter, the national organization, property owners where incidents occurred, and SMU itself. For Wisconsin families, this means that the path to full accountability against a private university might bypass some of the legal hurdles associated with state-funded institutions.

5.4.5 What SMU students & parents should do

Parents and students involved with SMU should take the following advice:

• Understand the anonymous reporting tools: Utilize SMU’s designated anonymous reporting options like Real Response, which allows for confidential submission of concerns without direct contact.
• Review SMU’s Student Code of Conduct: Thoroughly understand the university’s definitions of hazing and its strict policies.
• Document all incidents meticulously: Even slight concerns should be recorded, noting dates, times, individuals involved, and any specific behaviors.
• Prioritize medical assessment: Any physical injury or sign of psychological trauma must be immediately addressed by medical professionals from the SMU Health Center or Dallas-area hospitals.
• Contact experienced legal counsel: Families from Wisconsin should consult with a Texas hazing attorney promptly. An attorney can help navigate SMU’s internal processes, which can be opaque, and ensure that your child’s rights are protected while pursuing full legal accountability from all responsible parties.

5.5 Baylor University

Baylor University, a private Baptist institution in Waco, is known for its strong religious affiliation, academic rigor, and passionate student body. However, even within this values-driven environment, hazing has presented challenges.

5.5.1 Campus & culture snapshot

Baylor University, located in Waco, is the oldest continually operating university in Texas. As a private Christian university, it prides itself on a faith-based educational experience and strong moral values. Baylor’s campus culture is deeply influenced by its Baptist heritage, emphasizing community, service, and ethical conduct. It features robust academic programs, well-regarded athletic teams (particularly its successful football and basketball programs), and a significant Greek life presence. This unique blend of faith, academic excellence, and traditional campus life creates both opportunities for positive student development and, unfortunately, circumstances where hazing, clashing starkly with the university’s stated values, can occur.

5.5.2 Official hazing policy & reporting

Baylor University has a clear and explicit anti-hazing policy, strictly prohibiting all forms of hazing both on and off campus. Their policy aligns with Texas state law and reflects the university’s commitment to fostering a safe and respectful environment, explicitly stating that “hazing is inconsistent with the mission, vision, and values of Baylor University.” The policy covers a wide range of prohibited behaviors, from physical and emotional abuse to forced consumption and servitude. Baylor encourages reporting through confidential hotlines, the Multicultural Affairs Office (which oversees Greek life), the Dean of Students Office, and the Baylor University Police Department (BUPD).

5.5.3 Selected documented incidents & responses

Baylor University has, like many institutions, faced its share of hazing allegations and disciplinary actions:

• Baylor Baseball Hazing (2020): In a high-profile incident, the Baylor baseball team faced severe internal discipline after a hazing investigation. Reports indicated that 14 players were suspended, with many serving staggered suspensions over the early part of the season. While specific details of the hazing were not fully released, it was significant enough to disrupt a major athletic program and lead to substantial team penalties. This incident demonstrated that hazing is not limited to Greek life, even at institutions committed to strong ethical conduct.
• Kappa Omega Tau (KOT) Fraternity (2014): Baylor’s internal records and subsequent public reports indicated that the Kappa Omega Tau fraternity (a local organization, not a national chapter) was placed on disciplinary probation for hazing violations in 2014. Details often include forced calisthenics, degrading activities, and excessive demands on new members, reflecting common hazing patterns.
• Historically, Baylor has faced scrutiny beyond hazing, particularly concerning its handling of sexual assault allegations within its football program. While distinct from hazing, these broader issues of institutional oversight and accountability against powerful university programs underscore the importance of robust legal counsel when challenging any form of campus misconduct.

5.4.4 How a Baylor hazing case might proceed

Hazing cases arising from Baylor University would primarily be investigated by the Baylor University Police Department (BUPD) and, if crimes are involved, the Waco Police Department or McLennan County Sheriff’s Office. Civil litigation against Baylor, a private institution, would proceed in McLennan County courts. As a private university, Baylor does not assert sovereign immunity as a defense, potentially simplifying certain aspects of legal claims compared to public universities. Potential defendants would typically include individual students, the local chapter (whether Greek or other organization), and, significantly, Baylor University itself.

5.4.5 What Baylor students & parents should do

For students and parents connected to Baylor University, it is imperative to:

• Understand Baylor’s policies: Thoroughly review the university’s anti-hazing policy and the Student Code of Conduct, which are often stricter than state laws given Baylor’s values.
• Utilize confidential reporting: Baylor offers confidential reporting hotlines and direct contact options through the Multicultural Affairs Office and the Dean of Students. Given Baylor’s emphasis on community, students may feel more comfortable using these internal resources initially.
• Seek immediate support: If any mental or physical harm occurs, utilize Baylor’s Health Services or local Waco-area medical facilities for care.
• Maintain meticulous records: Document everything: specific hazing acts, dates, times, locations, and individuals involved. This evidence is critical for both internal university investigations and any potential legal action.
• Engage experienced legal counsel: Families in Wisconsin with students at Baylor should consult a Texas hazing attorney at the earliest stage possible. An attorney can help navigate internal university processes, which may seek to manage reputation, and protect your child’s rights while exploring all avenues for accountability and compensation.

FRATERNITIES & SORORITIES: CAMPUS-SPECIFIC + NATIONAL HISTORIES

When we talk about hazing, especially deadly hazing, the focus inevitably turns to fraternities and sororities. These organizations, often deeply ingrained in campus life, frequently come with complex national structures. For families in Wisconsin, understanding that a local chapter at a Texas university is part of a larger national “family” is crucial. This connection means that the hazing incidents and patterns seen across the country directly inform the risks and legal strategies relevant to your child’s experience, no matter where they attend college.

6.1 Why national histories matter

Every major fraternity and sorority operating on U.S. campuses, including those at UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, and Baylor, is governed by a national (or international) organization. These national bodies typically:

• Develop comprehensive anti-hazing policies and risk management procedures.
• Conduct educational programs for their chapters.
• Collect dues and maintain a relationship with local chapters.

Why does this matter legally? Because national headquarters have often been involved in litigation stemming from hazing incidents at other campuses. They have witnessed firsthand the tragic deaths and severe injuries that specific hazing practices can cause. This means they have prior knowledge—or should have had prior knowledge—of the dangers associated with their local chapters’ activities.

When a local chapter in Texas, for example, repeats a hazing ritual that has led to death or severe injury at another chapter in Florida or Pennsylvania, it establishes a powerful argument for foreseeability and negligent supervision against the national organization. It demonstrates that the national body had been put on notice about certain dangerous practices but failed to adequately prevent them. An experienced hazing attorney understands this pattern evidence and uses it to hold national fraternities, often well-resourced entities, accountable for the actions of their local affiliates. This strategy is critical, as national organizations often possess significant insurance coverage that can provide the compensation victims and their families deserve.

6.2 Organization mapping (synthesized)

While we can’t list every single fraternity and sorority here, the following outlines organizations with known national hazing histories that commonly have chapters present at major Texas campuses, particularly those attended by students from Wisconsin:

• Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike):

  • National History: Pi Kappa Alpha has a tragic history of hazing fatalities tied to alcohol. The death of Stone Foltz at Bowling Green State University in 2021, who died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to drink an entire bottle of alcohol, led to multiple criminal convictions and a $10 million settlement from the national fraternity and university. Earlier, David Bogenberger at Northern Illinois University died from alcohol poisoning in 2012, again highlighting the national organization’s ongoing struggles with dangerous drinking rituals.
  • Relevance to Texas Campuses: Chapters of Pi Kappa Alpha are present at Texas A&M, UT Austin, and other schools. These national patterns demonstrate a severe, repeated risk.

• Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE):

  • National History: SAE has been labeled “America’s deadliest fraternity” by some media outlets due to a disproportionate number of hazing-related deaths, many involving alcohol and physical abuse. A civil lawsuit filed in 2023 alleged a pledge suffered a traumatic brain injury during hazing at the University of Alabama, echoing claims from other campuses. In 2021, two pledges at Texas A&M University allegedly suffered severe chemical burns from industrial cleaner and other substances poured on them during a hazing ritual, leading to a lawsuit seeking $1 million. In January 2024, an Australian exchange student sued an SAE chapter at the University of Texas at Austin for over $1 million after an alleged assault left him with severe leg injuries.
  • Relevance to Texas Campuses: SAE has a strong presence at Texas A&M, UT Austin, and other institutions, making its national pattern of incidents acutely relevant to families in Wisconsin whose children attend these schools.

• Phi Delta Theta (Phi Delt):

  • National History: Phi Delta Theta is linked to the tragic death of Max Gruver at Louisiana State University in 2017. Gruver died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to participate in a “Bible study” drinking game where wrong answers led to forced consumption of liquor. This incident led to the Max Gruver Act in Louisiana, making hazing a felony.
  • Relevance to Texas Campuses: Phi Delta Theta has chapters at many Texas universities, including UT Austin and Baylor. This national incident demonstrates the extreme risks associated with enforced drinking games.

• Pi Kappa Phi (Pi Kapp):

  • National History: Pi Kappa Phi has faced severe scrutiny following hazing fatalities. Andrew Coffey died from acute alcohol poisoning during “Big Brother Night” at Florida State University in 2017, leading to multiple criminal prosecutions. Our firm is currently litigating a $10 million lawsuit against the University of Houston and Pi Kappa Phi for the acute kidney failure suffered by Leonel Bermudez in 2025.
  • Relevance to Texas Campuses: With chapters at UH (the site of the Bermudez case) and other Texas schools, Pi Kappa Phi’s national history of alcohol-related hazing is a direct concern for Wisconsin families.

• Kappa Sigma (Kappa Sig):

  • National History: Kappa Sigma has a troubling national history, including the 2001 drowning death of Chad Meredith at the University of Miami, who was coerced into swimming across a lake after heavy drinking. A jury awarded his family $12.6 million, and Florida enacted the Chad Meredith Law. More recently, allegations of physical hazing and subsequent rhabdomyolysis at a Texas A&M chapter (2023) highlight ongoing issues.
  • Relevance to Texas Campuses: Kappa Sigma chapters are active at many Texas universities, and its national pattern of physical and alcohol-related hazing is a significant concern for parents.

• Phi Gamma Delta (FIJI):

  • National History: Phi Gamma Delta is notoriously linked to the catastrophic injury of Danny Santulli at the University of Missouri in 2021. Santulli suffered severe, permanent brain damage after being forced to drink excessive alcohol during a “pledge dad reveal” night, rendering him unable to walk, talk, or see. His family secured multi-million dollar settlements with over 20 defendants.
  • Relevance to Texas Campuses: FIJI has chapters at Texas A&M and other major universities, making the Santulli case a chilling reminder of the potential for life-altering injury.

6.3 Tie back to legal strategy

The recurring themes in these national hazing cases-forced alcohol consumption, physical abuse, psychological torment, delayed medical attention, and subsequent cover-ups-are not isolated incidents; they represent a dangerous blueprint. When a local chapter at a Texas university, perhaps involving a student from Wisconsin, engages in similar conduct, it strengthens the argument that the national organization and the university were on notice about the risks.

In civil litigation, a defendant’s foreseeability of harm is key. If a national fraternity has seen multiple alcohol-related deaths in its various chapters, and a Texas chapter then has another such incident, it becomes harder for the national to claim ignorance or that it was an “unforeseeable accident.” This pattern evidence is crucial for:

• Establishing negligence: Arguing that the national organization failed in its duties to adequately supervise, warn, and educate its local chapters.
• Securing punitive damages: Demonstrating a reckless disregard for student safety, which juries may award to punish extreme misconduct and deter future harm.
• Navigating insurance disputes: Insurers for national organizations or universities may attempt to deny coverage based on “intentional acts” exclusions. However, demonstrating a pattern of negligent supervision, rather than just the intentional acts of individuals, can compel insurers to cover the claim.

Our firm, Attorney911, systematically uses these national histories and patterns to build comprehensive cases against all responsible parties. We investigate whether institutions and national organizations:

• Meaningfully enforced their anti-hazing policies, or if they were merely “paper policies.”
• Responded to prior incidents with strong enough measures to prevent recurrence.
• Had actual or constructive knowledge of dangerous practices but failed to intervene effectively.

This meticulous approach is designed to maximize accountability and secure the maximum possible compensation for victims and their families, ensuring that the lessons from past tragedies are not ignored.

BUILDING A CASE: EVIDENCE, DAMAGES, STRATEGY

Building a successful legal case after a hazing incident requires meticulous attention to detail, a deep understanding of the law, and strategic litigation experience. For Wisconsin families navigating these complex issues, especially if the incident occurred at a Texas university, knowing what goes into constructing a strong case is empowering. Attorney911 approaches each hazing case with the same rigor and investigative depth as any catastrophic injury or wrongful death claim, focusing on uncovering every piece of evidence and pursuing every avenue for compensation.

7.1 Evidence

In the digital age, evidence is abundant, but it can also disappear quickly. Our firm prioritizes the immediate preservation and collection of both digital and traditional evidence:

• Digital communications: These are often the most crucial pieces of evidence in modern hazing cases. We seek to preserve and analyze:

  • Group messaging apps: Platforms like GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage, Signal, Telegram, Discord, and others are frequently used by pledges and active members. These chats often contain direct instructions for hazing, discussions about illegal activities, and frantic messages during or after incidents. Screenshots must capture the full thread, including sender, timestamps, and context.
  • Social media: Posts, stories, comments, and direct messages on Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and Facebook can reveal hazing in progress, evidence of humiliation, or the extent of participation.
  • Emails and texts: Official and unofficial communications between members, pledges, and leadership often provide insight into hazing plans, expectations, and cover-up attempts. If messages were deleted, our firm works with digital forensics experts to attempt recovery. Our video “Use Your Cellphone to Document a Legal Case” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs) provides essential tips for immediate preservation.

• Photos & videos:

  • Content filmed by members: It’s a sad reality that participants often film hazing activities. This footage, if secured, is irrefutable proof.
  • Injuries: High-resolution photos taken immediately after an incident, and then over several days, document the progression of physical injuries (e.g., bruises, burns, cuts). Including a ruler or common object for scale enhances credibility.
  • Locations: Photographs or videos of the premises where hazing occurred, including any objects or props used (e.g., paddles, alcohol bottles, degrading costumes).
  • Surveillance footage: Security cameras from campus buildings, off-campus houses (Ring/doorbell cams), or nearby businesses can capture critical events. We work quickly to secure this before it is overwritten.

• Internal organization documents:

  • Pledge manuals/initiation scripts: These documents, sometimes obtained through discovery, can explicitly detail hazing activities or subtly encourage them under other names.
  • National policies: National fraternity/sorority anti-hazing policies, codes of conduct, and risk management guidelines are crucial for showing what the organization should have done.
  • Chapter communications: Minutes from chapter meetings, emails discussing “new member education,” and disciplinary records can reveal knowledge of hazing.

• University records:

  • Prior conduct files: Records of past hazing violations, probation, or suspensions against the same chapter are vital for establishing a pattern and institutional knowledge.
  • Campus police reports: Incident reports filed with university police can document prior conflicts or suspicious activities.
  • Annual hazing reports: Many universities, under state laws like in Texas and the upcoming federal Stop Campus Hazing Act, must publish annual reports of hazing violations, which can demonstrate a campus-wide issue.
  • Title IX complaints: If hazing involved sexual misconduct, Title IX investigation records become relevant.

• Medical and psychological records:

  • Emergency room and hospitalization records: Detailed accounts of physical injuries, diagnoses (e.g., rhabdomyolysis, alcohol poisoning), and treatments are critical. It is essential for victims to explicitly state to medical providers that their injuries are hazing-related.
  • Toxicology reports: Confirming the presence and levels of alcohol or drugs.
  • Psychological evaluations: Records from therapists or psychiatrists diagnosing PTSD, depression, anxiety, or other mental health impacts are crucial for documenting emotional distress damages.

• Witness testimony:

  • Other pledges/members: Their accounts, though often initially reluctant, can corroborate details, establish a pattern, and identify perpetrators.
  • Former members: Individuals who have left the organization or were expelled can provide invaluable insider perspectives.
  • Bystanders: Students, RAs, or community members who observed suspicious activities.

7.2 Damages

In a hazing lawsuit, the goal is to fully compensate the victim and their family for every aspect of their loss. Damages can be broadly categorized into economic and non-economic, with specific provisions for wrongful death. For Wisconsin families, understanding what can be recovered helps provide a clearer picture of justice. Our firm’s resources on compensation are deep, and we’re willing to explain them every step of the way (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ApiyjLLG1M8).

• Economic damages (quantifiable financial losses):

  • Medical expenses: This includes past medical bills (ER visits, hospital stays, surgeries, rehabilitation, medications) and projected future medical costs, especially for catastrophic injuries requiring long-term care or specialized therapies.
  • Lost income & earning capacity: Compensation for wages lost due to injury or recovery, and for future income diminished if hazing leads to permanent disability or significantly impacts educational attainment and career potential.
  • Educational costs: Reimbursement for lost tuition, fees, or scholarships due to withdrawal or academic setbacks caused by hazing.

• Non-economic damages (subjective compensation for suffering):

  • Physical pain & suffering: Compensation for the immediate and ongoing physical pain caused by injuries.
  • Emotional distress & psychological harm: This includes trauma, anxiety, depression, PTSD, humiliation, and loss of dignity. Psychological evaluations are key to substantiating these claims.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: Compensation for the inability to participate in activities, hobbies, and social life due to injuries or trauma, and for the overall diminished quality of life.

• Wrongful death damages (for families): In tragic cases where hazing results in death, surviving family members (parents, spouses, children) can recover:

  • Funeral and burial costs.
  • Loss of financial support: If the deceased would have contributed financially to the family through their lifetime.
  • Loss of companionship, love, and society: Compensation for the profound emotional void left by the deceased.
  • Grief and emotional suffering: For the severe mental anguish experienced by family members.
    Our firm has extensive experience in wrongful death claims across Texas (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/wrongful-death-claim-lawyer/), including cases involving young people.

• Punitive damages: These are not intended to compensate the victim but to punish particularly egregious conduct and deter others. Punitive damages may be awarded when the defendants’ actions demonstrate gross negligence, malice, or a reckless disregard for the safety of others, particularly if they ignored known risks or warnings.

7.3 Role of different defendants and insurance coverage

Hazing litigation often involves powerful institutional defendants—national fraternities and universities—who are adept at defending themselves. A key aspect of our strategy at Attorney911 is identifying all potential defendants and understanding their insurance coverage.

• Insurance as a target: National fraternities, their local chapters, and universities typically carry substantial insurance policies that can cover claims arising from hazing incidents. These policies are designed to protect them financially, but securing payment from them requires aggressive legal action.
• Challenging exclusions: Insurers often attempt to deny coverage by arguing that hazing constitutes “intentional acts” or “criminal conduct,” which may be excluded under their policies. However, experienced hazing attorneys can argue that the claim stems from the defendants’ negligent supervision or failure to implement adequate risk management policies, which are typically covered. This is where the patterns of national hazing incidents become critical—proving that the national organization or university had foreseeable knowledge of the danger but negligently failed to prevent it. Lupe Peña’s background as a former insurance defense attorney (https://attorney911.com/attorneys/lupe-pena/) is invaluable here; she knows their tactics from the inside out.
• Multiple layers of coverage: Beyond the primary insurance of the national organization and university, there may be liability policies covering local chapter entities, individual officers, or even personal homeowner’s policies of individual members. Identifying and accessing all possible layers of coverage is crucial to maximize recovery for victims.
• Joint and several liability: In many cases, multiple defendants may be found liable. This means that a victim can potentially recover the full amount of damages from any one of the liable parties, even if others are also found partially responsible. This principle is particularly important when some defendants may have limited assets.

Building a hazing case is a complex legal endeavor that requires specialized knowledge and resources. Our firm’s approach is methodical and relentless, aiming to secure justice and compensation for families while compelling institutions to implement genuine, lasting change.

PRACTICAL GUIDES & FAQS

For parents and students in Wisconsin, navigating the aftermath of a hazing incident or trying to prevent one requires practical, actionable information. This section provides immediate guidance for parents, vital decision-making tools for students, and crucial advice for those who may witness hazing.

8.1 For parents

Your role as a parent is often the first line of defense. Here’s what you need to know:

• Warning signs of hazing: Be alert to sudden, unexplained changes in your child’s behavior or physical appearance.

  • Physical: Look for unexplained bruises, burns, cuts, extreme fatigue, drastic weight changes, or obvious sleep deprivation. Pay attention if your child’s excuses for injuries seem vague or change.
  • Behavioral: Notice increased secrecy about their organization’s activities, withdrawal from family or old friends, sudden anxiety or irritability, or an unusual obsession with their phone (especially group chats). If they mention needing to “earn their place” or “get through this,” it’s a red flag.
  • Academic: A sudden drop in grades, missed classes, or prioritizing group activities over academics are serious indicators.

• How to talk to your child: Approach the conversation with empathy, not accusation.

  • Ask open-ended questions like, “How are things going with [Organization Name]? Are you truly enjoying it?”
  • Emphasize that their safety and well-being are your top priority, not their membership in any group.
  • Reassure them that you will support them regardless of their choices and that they can confide in you without judgment.

• If your child is hurt: Your child’s health is paramount.

  • Seek immediate medical care. Go to the nearest emergency room or urgent care clinic. Insist that the medical staff document the full context of their injuries, including any mention of hazing, in their records.
  • Document everything. Take detailed photos of all injuries, from multiple angles and with a scale reference (like a coin). Jot down notes of what your child tells you, including dates, times, locations, and names of individuals involved.
  • Preserve evidence. Help your child screenshot all relevant group chats, messages, and social media posts before they can be deleted. Save any physical items like clothing worn during the incident.

• Dealing with the university: Document every interaction with university officials, including dates, times, names, and what was discussed.

  • Ask administrators specific questions about the organization’s disciplinary history and any prior hazing violations.
  • Understand that university investigations are separate from criminal or civil legal actions and may prioritize institutional reputation.

• When to talk to a lawyer: Contact a lawyer immediately if your child has suffered significant physical or psychological harm.

  • If you perceive that the university or the organization is attempting to minimize, deflect blame, or suppress information.
  • An experienced attorney can protect your child’s rights from the outset, preserve critical evidence, and guide you through the complex legal process.

8.2 For students / pledges

This advice is for you directly. Your safety and well-being are more important than any organization.

• Is this hazing or just tradition?: Ask yourself critical questions:

  • Am I being forced or pressured to do something I genuinely don’t want to do?
  • Does this activity make me feel unsafe, humiliated, or exploited?
  • Would I be able to refuse without facing social exclusion or negative consequences for my membership?
  • Would the university or my parents approve if they knew exactly what was happening?
  • Am I being told to keep secrets, lie, or hide these activities from outsiders?
  • If you answer yes to any of these, it’s likely hazing. Your “consent” under pressure doesn’t make it right or legal.

• Why “consent” isn’t the end of the story: Understand that the pressure to join or belong to a group creates a power imbalance. Your “agreement” under these conditions is often not true consent, and state laws (like in Texas) specifically invalidate consent as a defense in hazing cases. Do not let anyone tell you otherwise.

• Exiting and reporting safely: You have the legal right to leave any organization or situation at any time, regardless of what you’ve been told about “commitment” or “loyalty.”

  • If in immediate danger: Call 911 immediately. Your life is not worth risking.
  • If you want to leave: Inform someone you trust outside the organization (a parent, university official, close friend). You can send an email or text (for a record) to the chapter president stating you are resigning your pledge or membership immediately. Do not attend any “exit” meetings where you might be pressured or intimidated.
  • Good-faith reporting & amnesty: Laws in Texas and many university policies protect individuals who call for medical help in an emergency, even if they were drinking underage or involved in hazing themselves. Your safety is prioritized over minor infractions.

• Where to report:

  • University channels: Dean of Students, Student Conduct Office, Title IX Coordinator (if sexual harassment involved), Campus Police, or anonymous hotlines.
  • National Anti-Hazing Hotline: Call 1-888-NOT-HAZE (1-888-668-4293) for anonymous reporting.
  • Local law enforcement: If you believe a crime has been committed.
  • Attorney911: For confidential legal advice and protection of your rights.

8.3 For former members / witnesses

If you are a former member, or a witness to hazing, your voice can be crucial in preventing future harm and holding those responsible accountable.

• Your unique position: You possess firsthand knowledge that can be invaluable in exposing hazing. While you may fear retaliation or legal repercussions, your testimony can bring justice to victims and protect others.
• Cooperating with authorities: Lawyers can help you understand your legal position as a witness, and whether any protections are available. In some cases, cooperating with an investigation might mitigate your own potential liabilities, especially if you were coerced into participating.
• Importance of your testimony: Your accounts can corroborate a victim’s story, provide context, expose patterns, and identify perpetrators. This is powerful evidence for both criminal prosecutions and civil lawsuits.
• Legal consultation: If you witnessed or participated in hazing and are now reconsidering your involvement, it is wise to seek independent legal advice. A lawyer can explain your rights, potential risks, and options for providing information safely and responsibly. Your knowledge could save lives.

8.4 Critical mistakes that can destroy your case

Families in Wisconsin, like any family dealing with hazing, often make critical mistakes in the emotional aftermath of an incident. These mistakes, though understandable, can severely damage a potential legal case. Attorney911 urges families to educate themselves on these pitfalls:

MISTAKES THAT CAN RUIN YOUR HAZING CASE:

1. Letting your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence:

   • What parents think: “I don’t want them to get in more trouble.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Destroying evidence not only looks like a cover-up but can also be obstruction of justice and makes building a case significantly harder, sometimes impossible.
   • What to do instead: Preserve everything immediately, even embarrassing content.

2. Confronting the fraternity/sorority directly:

   • What parents think: “I’m going to give them a piece of my mind.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Such action invariably causes the organization to immediately “lawyer up,” destroy evidence, coach witnesses, and solidify their defenses.
   • What to do instead: Document everything you can, then call a lawyer before any confrontation.

3. Signing university “release” or “resolution” forms:

   • What universities do: Institutions may pressure families to sign waivers or “internal resolution” agreements to resolve the matter quietly.
   • Why it’s wrong: You may inadvertently waive your right to pursue a civil lawsuit, and any settlement offered will likely be a fraction of the full value of the case.
   • What to do instead: Do NOT sign anything without an attorney reviewing it first.

4. Posting details on social media before talking to a lawyer:

   • What families think: “I want people to know what happened.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Defense attorneys scour social media for information; inconsistencies or premature statements can severely damage credibility or inadvertently reveal privileged information.
   • What to do instead: Document all evidence privately; let your lawyer advise on public messaging.

5. Letting your child go back to “one last meeting”:

   • What fraternities say: “Come talk to us before you do anything drastic.”
   • Why it’s wrong: These meetings are often designed to pressure, intimidate, or extract statements that can be used against your child later.
   • What to do instead: Once you are considering legal action, all communication should go through your lawyer.

6. Waiting “to see how the university handles it”:

   • What universities promise: “We’re investigating; let us handle this internally.”
   • Why it’s wrong: While university investigations are important, they often prioritize institutional interests. Crucial evidence can disappear, witnesses graduate, and the statute of limitations can expire while you wait.
   • What to do instead: Preserve evidence NOW; consult a lawyer immediately. University processes are not the same as full legal accountability.

7. Talking to insurance adjusters without a lawyer:

   • What adjusters say: “We just need your statement to process the claim.”
   • Why it’s wrong: Adjusters are trained to protect the insurance company’s interests. Any statement you give can be used against you, and their initial offers are almost always lowball.
   • What to do instead: Politely decline to speak and state, “My attorney will contact you.”

8.5 Short FAQ

• “Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
  Yes, under certain circumstances. Public universities, like the University of Houston, Texas A&M, and UT Austin, often assert sovereign immunity, which can limit their liability. However, exceptions exist for gross negligence, certain state law violations, and federal claims such as Title IX. Private universities, such as SMU and Baylor, generally do not have sovereign immunity protections. The specifics depend on the unique facts of each case. Contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a case-specific analysis.

• “Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
  It can be. While a basic hazing offense is typically a Class B misdemeanor, Texas law escalates hazing to a State Jail Felony if it results in serious bodily injury or death. Those who fail to report hazing when they have knowledge of it can also face misdemeanor charges.

• “Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
  Yes. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that consent is not a defense to hazing. The law recognizes that true voluntary consent is compromised by the intense peer pressure, power imbalances, and fear of exclusion inherent in hazing environments.

• “How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”
  In Texas, you generally have two years from the date of injury or death to file a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit. However, this period, known as the “statute of limitations,” can be complex. The “discovery rule” might extend this period if the harm or its cause was not immediately apparent. In cases involving deliberate cover-ups or fraud, the statute may be “tolled” (paused). Given the critical importance of evidence, time is of the essence. It is crucial to contact an attorney immediately to protect your rights. Our video on the statute of limitations (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRHwg8tV02c) provides more information.

• “What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
  The location of the hazing does not necessarily absolve organizations or institutions of liability. Universities and national fraternities can still be held accountable based on their sponsorship, knowledge of off-campus activities, failure to enforce policies, and the foreseeability of hazing occurring in such settings. Many significant hazing cases, including those ending in tragic deaths, have occurred at off-campus residences.

• “Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
  Many hazing cases resolve through confidential settlements before going to trial. Our firm prioritizes your family’s privacy and works to ensure that confidential settlement terms are part of any resolution. While some cases, particularly those involving public criminal charges, may attract media attention, a civil lawsuit can often be navigated with discretion while still achieving accountability and compensation.

ABOUT ATTORNEY911 + CALL TO ACTION

When your child’s well-being is at stake due to hazing, you need more than just legal representation; you need a team that possesses an intimate understanding of this complex legal landscape and the resolve to stand against powerful institutions. For families in Wisconsin, navigating a hazing incident, especially one that occurred in Texas, requires specialized expertise. This is precisely what Attorney911, the Legal Emergency Lawyers™, offers.

At Attorney911, we approach hazing cases with a unique blend of empathy, strategic insight, and aggressive litigation experience. We understand how fraternities, sororities, Corps programs, and athletic departments often operate behind closed doors. Our firm is uniquely positioned to handle these challenging cases:

• Insurance Insider Advantage: Lupe Peña, one of our skilled attorneys, formerly worked as an insurance defense attorney at a national firm. This invaluable experience means she understands the defense’s playbook inside and out. She knows how fraternity and university insurance companies evaluate (and undervalue) hazing claims, their delay tactics, and their strategies for trying to avoid payouts. “We know their playbook because we used to run it,” she affirms, giving our clients a critical edge. Her background is a direct asset when navigating complex insurance coverage disputes.

• Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions: Our managing partner, Ralph Manginello, has a decorated career taking on formidable opponents. He was one of the few Texas firms involved in the BP Texas City explosion litigation, a monumental case against a multi-billion dollar corporation. This experience in federal court, including the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, means we are not intimidated by national fraternities, universities, or their well-funded defense teams. “We’ve taken on billion-dollar corporations and won. We know how to fight powerful defendants,” says Ralph, whose extensive credentials can be reviewed at https://attorney911.com/attorneys/ralph-manginello/.

• Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: We have a proven track record in complex wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases, working with economists and medical experts to accurately value cases involving severe brain injuries, organ damage, or lifelong care needs. Our $10 million lawsuit on behalf of Leonel Bermudez against the University of Houston and Pi Kappa Phi exemplifies our commitment to demanding full accountability. “We don’t settle cheap. We build cases that force accountability,” highlights our dedication.

• Dual Civil & Criminal Expertise: Ralph Manginello’s active membership in the Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) provides us with a nuanced understanding of how criminal hazing charges interact with civil litigation. This dual expertise is crucial for clients facing both civil claims and potential criminal investigations, allowing us to offer comprehensive advice. Our criminal defense experience is critical in these sensitive cases (https://attorney911.com/law-practice-areas/criminal-defense-lawyers/).

• Investigative Depth: We employ a network of experts, including digital forensics specialists, medical professionals, and psychologists, to uncover hidden evidence. We are highly proficient in obtaining deleted group chats, social media evidence, subpoenaing national fraternity records, and compelling universities to release internal files. “We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it does,” is our promise.

Located in Houston, with offices in Austin and Beaumont, Attorney911 serves families throughout Texas, including Wisconsin, and every location across the state. We understand that hazing at Texas universities can devastate families in Wisconsin and far beyond. While we appreciate the geographic distance, our firm has the resources and capability to represent you, often working with local co-counsel when necessary to ensure seamless legal proceedings while we drive the strategy.

We recognize that facing a hazing incident is one of the hardest things a family can endure. It’s not just a legal battle; it’s an emotional one. Our job is to seek answers, hold all responsible parties accountable, and fight to prevent future tragedies. We are passionate about thorough investigation and achieving real, lasting accountability.

CALL TO ACTION

If you or your child has experienced hazing at any Texas campus—whether it’s the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, Baylor, or any other institution—we want to hear from you. Families in Wisconsin, and throughout the surrounding region, deserve answers, accountability, and justice.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm today for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We will listen to your story with compassion, explain your legal options, and help you determine the best path forward.

What you can expect in your free consultation:

• We will listen to your story without judgment, providing a safe space to share what happened.
• We’ll review any evidence you may have—photos, texts, medical records—to assess the strength of your case.
• We’ll explain your legal options clearly, whether that involves a criminal report, a civil lawsuit, both, or other avenues.
• We’ll discuss realistic timelines and what the legal process may entail.
• We’ll answer all your questions about costs, explaining our contingency fee basis: we don’t get paid unless we win your case (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc).
• There’s no pressure to hire us on the spot; we encourage you to take the time you need to decide if we’re the right fit for your family.
• Everything you share with us during your consultation is strictly confidential.

Whether you’re in Wisconsin or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Don’t let valuable evidence disappear, and don’t let institutions control the narrative. The time to act is now.

Call us today.

The Manginello Law Firm / Attorney911
Emergency Hotline: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct Line: (713) 528-9070
Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com

Spanish Language Services:
Hablamos Español – Contact Lupe Peña at lupe@atty911.com for consultation in Spanish. Servicios legales en español disponibles para mejor servir a nuestra comunidad.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com

COMPLETE WISCONSIN UNIVERSITY DIRECTORY

Attorney911 tracks every higher education institution in Wisconsin. For reference:

• Alverno College | Milwaukee, Milwaukee County | Private Non-Profit
• Bellin College | Green Bay, Brown County | Private Non-Profit
• Beloit College | Beloit, Rock County | Private Non-Profit
• Bryant & Stratton College-Wauwatosa | Wauwatosa, Milwaukee County | Private Non-Profit
• Carroll University | Waukesha, Waukesha County | Private Non-Profit
• Carthage College | Kenosha, Kenosha County | Private Non-Profit
• College of Menominee Nation | Keshena, Menominee County | Private Non-Profit
• Concordia University-Wisconsin | Mequon, Ozaukee County | Private Non-Profit
• Edgewood College | Madison, Dane County | Private Non-Profit
• Herzing University-Brookfield | Brookfield, Waukesha County | Private Non-Profit
• Herzing University-Kenosha | Kenosha, Kenosha County | Private Non-Profit
• Herzing University-Madison | Madison, Dane County | Private Non-Profit
• Lac Courte Oreilles Ojibwe University | Hayward, Sawyer County | Public University
• Lakeland University | Plymouth, Sheboygan County | Private Non-Profit
• Lawrence University | Appleton, Outagamie County | Private Non-Profit
• Madison Area Technical College | Madison, Dane County | Public University
• Marian University | Fond Du Lac, Fond du Lac County | Private Non-Profit
• Maranatha Baptist University | Watertown, Jefferson County | Private Non-Profit
• Marquette University | Milwaukee, Milwaukee County | Private Non-Profit
• Medical College of Wisconsin | Milwaukee, Milwaukee County | Private Non-Profit
• Midwest College of Oriental Medicine-Racine | Racine, Racine County | Private For-Profit
• Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design | Milwaukee, Milwaukee County | Private Non-Profit
• Milwaukee School of Engineering | Milwaukee, Milwaukee County | Private Non-Profit
• Mount Mary University | Milwaukee, Milwaukee County | Private Non-Profit
• Nashotah House | Nashotah, Waukesha County | Private Non-Profit
• Northland College | Ashland, Ashland County | Private Non-Profit
• Ottawa University-Milwaukee | Brookfield, Waukesha County | Private Non-Profit
• Ripon College | Ripon, Fond du Lac County | Private Non-Profit
• Saint Norbert College | De Pere, Brown County | Private Non-Profit
• Sacred Heart Seminary and School of Theology | Franklin, Milwaukee County | Private Non-Profit
• University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire | Eau Claire, Eau Claire County | Public University
• University of Wisconsin-Green Bay | Green Bay, Brown County | Public University
• University of Wisconsin-La Crosse | La Crosse, La Crosse County | Public University
• University of Wisconsin-Madison | Madison, Dane County | Public University
• University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee | Milwaukee, Milwaukee County | Public University
• University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Flex | Milwaukee, Milwaukee County | Public University
• University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh | Oshkosh, Winnebago County | Public University
• University of Wisconsin-Parkside | Kenosha, Kenosha County | Public University
• University of Wisconsin-Parkside Flex | Kenosha, Kenosha County | Public University
• University of Wisconsin-Platteville | Platteville, Grant County | Public University
• University of Wisconsin-River Falls | River Falls, Pierce County | Public University
• University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point | Stevens Point, Portage County | Public University
• University of Wisconsin-Stout | Menomonie, Dunn County | Public University
• University of Wisconsin-Superior | Superior, Douglas County | Public University
• University of Wisconsin-System Administration | Madison, Dane County | Public University
• University of Wisconsin-Whitewater | Whitewater, Walworth County, Wisconsin | Public University
• Viterbo University | La Crosse, La Crosse County | Private Non-Profit
• Wisconsin Lutheran College | Milwaukee, Milwaukee County | Private Non-Profit
• Wisconsin School of Professional Psychology | Milwaukee, Milwaukee County | Private Non-Profit
• Wright Graduate University for the Realization of Human Potential | Elkhorn, Walworth County | Private Non-Profit
• Rasmussen University-Wisconsin | Green Bay, Brown County | Private For-Profit

COMPLETE WISCONSIN GREEK ORGANIZATION DIRECTORY

Attorney911 tracks every IRS-registered fraternity and sorority in Wisconsin. Complete directory:

• ALPHA KAPPA CHAPTER OF ZETA BETA TAU FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 39-1994749 | MADISON, WI
• ALPHA OMEGA EPSILON SORORITY XI CHAPTER | EIN: 20-0197493 | MADISON, WI
• ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 47-4086325 | MADISON, WI
• ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 81-2494179 | MILWAUKEE, WI
• ALPHA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 45-5118475 | WHITEWATER, WI
• BETA OMICRON CHAPTER OF KAPPA ALPHA PSI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 20-5992536 | MILWAUKEE, WI
• CARROLL UNIVERSITY | EIN: 80-0633795 | BROOKFIELD, WI
• CERES FRATERNITY FOUNDATION INC | EIN: 83-0322028 | BELLEVILLE, WI
• CHI OMEGA FRATERNITY | EIN: 39-1866500 | KENOSHA, WI
• DELTA CHAPTER OF ALPHA OMEGA EPSILON | EIN: 39-1803359 | MILWAUKEE, WI
• DELTA KAPPA CHAPTER OF KAPPA ALPHA PSI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 23-7279587 | MT PLEASANT, WI
• DELTA SIGMA PHI FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 39-6095411 | OSHKOSH, WI
• ESTELLE@CORRY TRUST FBO MARINETTE CATHOLIC CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL | EIN: 39-6572369 | MARINETTE, WI
• FARM HOUSE FRATERNITY INC | EIN: 39-1544113 | PLATTEVILLE, WI
• GAMMA GAMMA GAMMA CHAPTER | EIN: 46-1139981 | MADISON, WI
• HONOR SOCIETY OF PHI KAPPA PHI | EIN: 39-1712523 | MADISON, WI
• KAPPA ALPHA PSI FRATERNITY | EIN: 39-1361428 | MADISON, WI
• KAPPA BETA GAMMA SORORITY THE ALPHA MU CHAPTER | EIN: 81-2141982 | GREEN BAY, WI
• KAPPA BETA GAMMA INTERNATIONAL INC | EIN: 46-2754433 | MADISON, WI
• KAPPA ALPHA PSI- PI OMEGA | EIN: 47-5372778 | MILWAUKEE, WI
• OMICRON ALPHA CHAPTER OF SIGMA GAMMA RHO SORORITY INC | EIN: 26-0640525 | MILWAUKEE, WI
• PHI SIGMA KAPPA | EIN: 39-1687257 | MENOMONEE FLS, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 47-1115109 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 74-3121404 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 74-3121398 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 74-3121400 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 82-4987282 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 74-3121396 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 81-1572376 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 82-4429914 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 74-3121386 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 74-3121388 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 47-4661270 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 73-1701892 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 74-3121390 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 47-4282075 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 74-3121397 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 74-3121393 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 74-3121394 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 86-1721097 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 87-3584311 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 84-4168044 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 83-4004411 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 83-4049811 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 90-0298084 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 90-0728001 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 90-0298081 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 87-3632023 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 87-3888278 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 83-0391310 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 83-0391312 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 83-0391303 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 83-0391300 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 83-0391301 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 83-0391317 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 83-1993634 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 83-0391315 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 83-0391313 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 83-0391314 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 41-2188064 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 41-2188063 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 30-0520049 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 41-2188065 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 30-0520045 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 27-0747193 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 27-1150428 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 27-0089711 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 27-0193484 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 26-0085558 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 41-2188054 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 47-3872043 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 47-3519665 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 35-2357574 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 47-1540283 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 46-1955291 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC | EIN: 26-0085557 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC – ALPHA LAMBDA CHAPTER | EIN: 27-1473308 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC – ALPHA RHO | EIN: 33-1354754 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC – ALPHA THETA | EIN: 92-1173212 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC – EPSILON OMICRON | EIN: 82-4461298 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC – THETA ALPHA | EIN: 33-1378093 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC – ZETA KAPPA CHAPTER | EIN: 45-2257683 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PI SIGMA EPSILON INC – ZETA ZETA CHAPTER | EIN: 27-0449760 | GREENFIELD, WI
• PSA PROPERTIES INC | EIN: 83-2016474 | JANESVILLE, WI
• SIGMA GAMMA RHO SORORITY INC EPSILON XI CHAPTER MADISON WI | EIN: 93-0813691 | FITCHBURG, WI
• SIGMA DELTA TAU SOCIETY | EIN: 92-0241656 | MADISON, WI
• TRIANGLE FRATERNITY NATIONAL COUNCIL | EIN: 39-6078091 | MADISON, WI
• WISCONSIN THETA ALUMNI CORPORATION OF THE SIGMA PHI EPSILON FRATERNIT | EIN: 11-3713669 | PLATTEVILLE, WI
• WISCONSIN CHAPTER OF TRIANGLE MILWAUKEE INC | EIN: 39-6105583 | MILWAUKEE, WI