Collin County Fraternity Hazing Attorneys | $24M+ Pi Kappa Alpha Settlements Exposed | Attorney911 — The Firm That Closed Beta Nu | Federal Court | Former Insurance Defense | 1-888-ATTY-911 - Attorney911 | Personal Injury & Criminal Defense Lawyers

Hazing in Collin County: A Comprehensive Guide for Texas Families

The late Texas night buzzes with forced revelry. A student from Collin County, away at one of our state’s esteemed universities like the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, or Baylor, finds themselves in an off-campus house where the laughter feels brittle, and the pressure is thick enough to choke on. It’s “initiation night.” They are being pressed to drink beyond their limits, to endure physical abuse, to perform degrading acts while others capture the moments on their phones, chanting, and laughing. Someone stumbles, vomits, or collapses, but no one reaches for their phone to call for help, paralyzed by the fear of “getting the chapter shut down” or “getting in trouble.” The student is caught, a pawn between loyalty to a new group and their own basic safety.

This isn’t a scene from a movie; it’s a chilling reality that unfolds too often across Texas and affects families right here in Collin County. Whether your child attends a local institution or one of our state’s flagship universities, the shadow of hazing can reach them.

This definitive guide provides Collin County families with crucial information on understanding modern hazing practices, navigating the complex Texas legal landscape, and exploring the patterns of misconduct seen in major national cases and at institutions close to home. We will delve into what has been happening at the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, Southern Methodist University, and Baylor University, as well as other Texas schools, to equip you with the knowledge needed to protect your loved ones. This article is designed to be a vital resource for parents, students, and family members in Collin County seeking to understand hazing and their legal options.

While this article offers comprehensive general information, it is not a substitute for specific legal advice. Every hazing situation is unique, and circumstances vary case by case. The Manginello Law Firm is dedicated to offering genuine support and expert legal counsel to families throughout Texas, including those in Collin County.

IMMEDIATE HELP FOR HAZING EMERGENCIES:

If your child is in danger RIGHT NOW:
- Call 911 for medical emergencies.
- Then call Attorney911: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911).
- We provide immediate help – that’s why we’re the Legal Emergency Lawyers™.
In the first 48 hours:
- Get medical attention immediately, even if the student insists they are “fine.”
- Preserve evidence BEFORE it’s deleted:
  - Screenshot group chats, texts, DMs immediately.
  - Photograph injuries from multiple angles.
  - Save physical items (clothing, receipts, objects).
- Write down everything while memory is fresh (who, what, when, where).
- Do NOT:
  - Confront the fraternity/sorority.
  - Sign anything from the university or insurance company.
  - Post details on public social media.
  - Let your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence.
Contact an experienced hazing attorney within 24–48 hours:
- Evidence disappears fast (deleted group chats, destroyed paddles, coached witnesses).
- Universities move quickly to control the narrative.
- We can help preserve evidence and protect your child’s rights.
- Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for immediate consultation.

Hazing in 2025: What It Really Looks Like

For Collin County families unfamiliar with modern Greek life or campus organizations, hazing might conjure outdated images from movies. However, in 2025, hazing is far more insidious and can manifest in subtle, harassing, and violently dangerous ways. It’s any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, by one person or a group, directed against a student, that endangers the mental or physical health or safety for the purpose of joining, maintaining membership, or holding office in any student organization.

This broad definition means that “I agreed to it” is rarely a valid defense when there is inherent peer pressure and an imbalance of power. The desire to belong, to be accepted, and to not “let the group down” can create an environment where consent is compromised.

Main Categories of Hazing: Beyond the Stereotypes

Hazing has evolved, often becoming more covert, making it harder for parents and university officials to detect. It’s crucial for Collin County parents and students to understand these different manifestations:

Alcohol and Substance Hazing: This is tragically the most common and often fatal form of hazing. It involves forced or coerced drinking of excessive amounts of alcohol, often through games, “lineups,” or chugging challenges where new members are pressured to consume dangerous quantities rapidly. It can also include the forced consumption of unknown or mixed substances.
Physical Hazing: This includes activities designed to inflict bodily pain or extreme physical discomfort. Examples range from paddling and beatings to extreme calisthenics, “workouts,” or “smokings” far beyond normal physical conditioning. Sleep deprivation, food and water deprivation, and exposure to extreme temperatures or dangerous environments (like being abandoned in a remote location) also fall into this category.
Sexualized and Humiliating Hazing: This category involves acts that are deeply demeaning and can leave lasting psychological scars. It can include forced nudity or partial nudity, simulated sexual acts (such as the “roasted pig” poses or “elephant walks”), or forcing members to wear degrading costumes or perform embarrassing public stunts. Hazing can also involve acts with racial, sexist, or homophobic overtones, including slurs or role-playing stereotypes.
Psychological Hazing: Often overlooked but profoundly damaging, psychological hazing involves verbal abuse, threats, isolation from outside contacts (like family or non-Greek friends), and extreme intimidation. Manipulation, forced confessions, and public shaming—whether in person or online—are also common tactics used to control and break down new members.
Digital/Online Hazing: With the ubiquity of smartphones and social media, hazing has moved into the digital realm. This includes group chat dares, challenges, and public humiliation via platforms like Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, Discord, or private messaging apps. New members might be pressured to create or share compromising images or videos, or constantly monitored and forced to respond to messages at all hours, contributing to severe sleep deprivation and anxiety.

Where Hazing Actually Happens: Beyond Just Fraternities

It’s a common misconception that hazing is limited to fraternities. While Greek life remains a prominent area where hazing occurs, it is far from the only one. For Collin County families, it’s important to recognize that hazing can occur in a wide variety of student groups:

Fraternities and Sororities: This includes social fraternities and sororities affiliated with the Interfraternity Council (IFC), Panhellenic Council, National Pan-Hellenic Council (NPHC), and multicultural Greek organizations.
Corps of Cadets / ROTC / Military-Style Groups: These organizations, often steeped in tradition and military discipline, can sometimes cross the line from rigorous training to abusive hazing practices.
Spirit Squads, Tradition Clubs, and Campus Organizations: Groups like cheerleading squads, dance teams, glee clubs, university spirit groups (such as the Texas Cowboys), and other campus organizations often engage in bonding activities that can escalate into hazing.
Athletic Teams: From football and basketball to baseball, soccer, and cheerleading squads, hazing has been documented in high school and college sports across the country. It often masquerades as “team building” or “character development.”
Marching Bands and Performance Groups: Even seemingly benign groups like marching bands, a cappella groups, or theater ensembles can develop internal cultures that foster hazing, leveraging secretive rituals and tradition.
Academic, Service, and Cultural Groups: While less common, some academic honor societies, service organizations, or cultural associations can also be environments where hazing sometimes occurs, particularly when new members are expected to “earn” their place through demeaning tasks.

The underlying factors that allow hazing to persist—social status, adherence to tradition, the desire for perceived exclusivity, and a culture of secrecy—are present in many types of campus organizations. It’s this combination of factors that makes hazing such a persistent and dangerous problem, even when everyone “knows” it’s illegal.

Law & Liability Framework (Texas + Federal)

Understanding the legal landscape surrounding hazing in Texas is crucial for Collin County families seeking justice and accountability. Hazing is a serious matter under Texas law, with both criminal and civil implications, and federal regulations add another layer of oversight.

Texas Hazing Law Basics (Education Code)

Texas has clear statutory provisions against hazing, primarily outlined in the Texas Education Code, Chapter 37, Subchapter F. For students attending universities in Texas, whether in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex or elsewhere, these laws govern conduct both on and off campus.

Definition of Hazing: Under Texas Education Code § 37.151, hazing is defined as:

Any intentional, knowing, or reckless act, on or off campus, by one person alone or acting with others, directed against a student, that:

Endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student; AND
Occurs for the purpose of pledging, initiation into, affiliation with, holding office in, or maintaining membership in any organization whose members include students.

This definition is critical because it highlights several key aspects:

Location is Irrelevant: Hazing is prohibited whether it occurs on university property or off-campus. This directly addresses the common defense that “it happened at a private house.”
Mental or Physical Harm: The law recognizes that hazing isn’t just about physical injury; psychological distress, humiliation, and emotional abuse are equally illegal.
Intent vs. Recklessness: Perpetrators don’t need to explicitly intend to harm. If their actions were reckless—meaning they knew or should have known a risk existed and disregarded it—it can still be considered hazing.
“Consent” is Not a Defense (Texas Education Code § 37.155): A student cannot legally “consent” to be hazed. This crucial provision directly tackles the argument that victims willingly participated, emphasizing the power imbalance inherent in hazing situations.

Criminal Penalties (Texas Education Code § 37.152):
Individuals and organizations found responsible for hazing can face criminal charges:

Class B Misdemeanor: For acts of hazing that do not result in serious bodily injury. This carries potential penalties of up to 180 days in jail and a fine of up to $2,000.
Class A Misdemeanor: If the hazing causes an injury requiring medical care.
State Jail Felony: This is the most severe criminal penalty, applied if hazing causes serious bodily injury or death.
Beyond direct participation, individuals can also face charges for:
Failing to Report: An officer or member of an organization who knows that hazing is occurring and fails to report it to appropriate authorities may be charged with a misdemeanor.
Retaliation: Anyone who retaliates against a person for reporting hazing is also subject to criminal penalties.

Organizational Liability (Texas Education Code § 37.153):
The law extends criminal liability beyond individuals to the organizations themselves. A fraternity, sorority, club, or team can be criminally prosecuted for hazing if:

The organization authorized or encouraged the hazing activity; OR
An officer or member acting in an official capacity knew about the hazing and failed to report it.
Organizational penalties can include:
A fine of up to $10,000 per violation.
University-imposed sanctions, including revocation of recognition and a ban from campus.

Immunity for Good-Faith Reporting (Texas Education Code § 37.154):
To encourage reporting, Texas law provides protections for individuals who step forward. A person who, in good faith, reports a hazing incident to university officials or law enforcement is immune from civil or criminal liability that might otherwise arise from their report. Additionally, many universities, and Texas law itself, offer amnesty for students who call for emergency medical assistance in good faith during an alcohol-related incident.

Reporting by Educational Institutions (Texas Education Code § 37.156):
Texas colleges and universities have a responsibility to:

Provide hazing prevention education to their students.
Clearly publicize their hazing policies.
Publish annual reports detailing hazing violations and disciplinary actions taken. This public record is a valuable tool for parents to research an organization’s history at a particular school and can serve as crucial evidence in civil cases.

For Collin County families, this means that every public and private university in Texas is legally obligated to address hazing, and there are legal avenues available for both criminal prosecution and civil recourse.

Criminal vs. Civil Cases: Understanding Your Options

When hazing occurs, families often wonder about the legal consequences. It’s important to distinguish between criminal and civil actions:

Criminal Cases: These are brought by the state (prosecutors) against individuals or organizations suspected of violating criminal hazing laws. The primary goal is punishment, which can include fines, jail time, or probation. In a hazing context, criminal charges might range from misdemeanor hazing to state jail felony hazing (for serious injury or death), furnishing alcohol to minors, assault, battery, or even manslaughter. The state must prove guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Civil Cases: These are initiated by the victims or their surviving family members (plaintiffs) against the individuals, organizations, or institutions deemed responsible for the hazing. The objective in a civil case is to obtain monetary compensation (damages) for the harm suffered and to achieve accountability. Civil cases rely on proving liability by a “preponderance of the evidence,” a lower legal standard than in criminal cases.

These two types of cases can proceed independently or simultaneously. A criminal conviction is not a prerequisite for filing a civil lawsuit, and vice-versa. Families in Collin County often find that while criminal charges address the societal wrong, a civil lawsuit provides the direct financial and systemic accountability necessary for recovery and long-term change.

Federal Overlay: Strengthening Oversight

Beyond state laws, federal regulations also impact how universities respond to and report hazing:

Stop Campus Hazing Act (2024): This landmark federal law is designed to enhance transparency and prevention efforts nationwide. By 2026, colleges and universities receiving federal funding will be required to:
- Publicly report all findings of hazing violations.
- Maintain comprehensive records of hazing incidents.
- Provide more robust hazing education and prevention programming.
  This act creates a national standard that should significantly improve data availability and accountability for hazing across all U.S. campuses.
Title IX: This federal law prohibits sex-based discrimination in education. If hazing involves sexual harassment, sexual assault, gender-based humiliation, or creates a sexually hostile environment, Title IX obligations are triggered. Universities are then mandated to investigate, provide interim measures, and take disciplinary action, regardless of whether the hazing occurred on or off campus.
Clery Act: The Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act requires colleges and universities to disclose information about crime on and around their campuses. While hazing itself isn’t a Clery-reportable crime category, hazing incidents often involve underlying criminal offenses (like assault, sexual assault, or alcohol/drug violations) that are reportable under Clery. This provides another layer of public data on campus safety issues related to hazing.

Who Can Be Held Liable in a Civil Hazing Lawsuit?

In a civil hazing lawsuit, a broad range of parties can potentially be named as defendants, reflecting the web of responsibility that often surrounds these incidents. For Collin County families, understanding these potential defendants is key to pursuing comprehensive accountability:

Individual Students: The individuals who directly participated in, planned, encouraged, or failed to intervene in a hazing incident can be held personally liable. This includes officers, “pledge educators,” and active members.
Local Chapter/Organization: The specific fraternity, sorority, club, or team itself, if it is a legally recognized entity, can be sued. This is often based on the organization’s policies, culture, and complicity in the hazing.
National Fraternity/Sorority: The national headquarters, which charters, oversees, and often provides insurance for local chapters, can be a major defendant. Their liability often hinges on whether they knew or should have known about a pattern of hazing (at the local chapter or nationally) and failed to take adequate preventive or corrective action.
University or Governing Board: The educational institution itself, or its board of regents, may be sued under various theories, including:
- Negligent Supervision: Failure to adequately supervise student organizations.
- Negligent Retention: Allowing known hazers to continue participation.
- Failure to Enforce Policies: Not enforcing their own anti-hazing rules.
- Deliberate Indifference: Particularly relevant in Title IX cases where the university knowingly failed to address severe and pervasive harassment.
- Breach of Contract: For failing to provide a safe educational environment as promised.
Third-Party Property Owners/Operators: If hazing occurs at a private residence, bar, or event venue, the property owners, landlords, or event organizers could potentially be held liable, especially if they knew or should have known about illegal activities occurring on their premises (premises liability) or illegally served alcohol (dram shop liability).

Identifying all potentially liable parties requires a thorough investigation, as each defendant brings different legal theories, insurance coverage, and assets to the table. An experienced hazing attorney understands how to navigate this complex web to ensure maximum accountability.

National Hazing Case Patterns (Anchor Stories)

When hazing incidents make national headlines, they often reveal disturbing patterns that transcend individual campuses. These anchor stories not only highlight the tragic consequences of hazing but also serve as precedents, shaping legislation, university policies, and legal strategies for families seeking justice in locations like Collin County, Texas.

Alcohol Poisoning & Death: A Repeating Tragedy

Alcohol continues to be the most common and deadliest factor in hazing incidents. The willingness of organizations to facilitate dangerous levels of consumption, combined with a culture of secrecy and delayed medical attention, has led to numerous preventable deaths.

Timothy Piazza – Penn State University, Beta Theta Pi (2017): In one of the highest-profile hazing deaths, Timothy Piazza, an 18-year-old pledge, died after falling repeatedly and suffering traumatic brain injuries during a “bid acceptance” night. He was forced to consume dangerous amounts of alcohol, and fraternity brothers delayed calling 911 for nearly 12 hours despite his obvious distress, fearing repercussions. The entire horrific sequence was captured on security cameras. This case led to dozens of criminal charges against fraternity members, extensive civil litigation, and the enactment of Pennsylvania’s Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law, one of the toughest in the nation. The takeaway for Texas families is clear: extreme intoxication, coupled with a deliberate delay in seeking medical help, dramatically escalates the tragic outcome and legal liability.
Andrew Coffey – Florida State University, Pi Kappa Phi (2017): Just months after Piazza’s death, Andrew Coffey, another 18-year-old pledge, died from acute alcohol poisoning during a “Big Brother Night” event. Pledges were given handles of hard liquor and pressured to consume them quickly. While criminal charges against multiple members resulted in lighter sentences, Florida State University (FSU) temporarily suspended all Greek life, overhauling its policies. Coffey’s death, like many others, underscored the deadly ritual of forced drinking during pseudo-initiation ceremonies.
Maxwell “Max” Gruver – Louisiana State University, Phi Delta Theta (2017): In a “Bible study” drinking game, pledges were forced to drink heavily when answering questions incorrectly. Max Gruver, 18, died with an astonishing blood alcohol content of 0.495%. The investigation and subsequent $6.1 million verdict in a civil suit against some defendants highlighted the intentional nature of the hazing and the extreme pressure placed on pledges. This tragedy spurred Louisiana to enact the Max Gruver Act, a felony hazing law, demonstrating how egregious incidents can drive legislative change.
Stone Foltz – Bowling Green State University, Pi Kappa Alpha (2021): During a “Big/Little” event, 20-year-old pledge Stone Foltz was forced to drink an entire bottle of alcohol. He died from acute alcohol poisoning. This case resulted in criminal convictions for multiple fraternity members and a significant $10 million settlement for his family, with $7 million coming from the Pi Kappa Alpha national fraternity and nearly $3 million from Bowling Green State University. His death led to Ohio’s Collin’s Law, which significantly increased hazing penalties. This case serves as a stark reminder that universities, even public ones, can be held financially accountable for their roles in hazing oversight.

Physical & Ritualized Hazing: Invisible Scars and Visible Injuries

Not all hazing involves alcohol. Physical and psychologically abusive rituals, often shrouded in claims of “tradition,” can inflict severe and lasting harm.

Chun “Michael” Deng – Baruch College, Pi Delta Psi (2013): Michael Deng, a 19-year-old pledge, died after a violent “glass ceiling” ritual at an off-campus retreat in the Pocono Mountains, Pennsylvania. Blindfolded and weighed down with a heavy backpack, he was repeatedly tackled. Fraternity members delayed calling 911 for an extended period, attempting a cover-up. This case led to criminal convictions of multiple members and, significantly, the national fraternity itself was convicted of aggravated assault and involuntary manslaughter – a rare instance of organizational criminal liability. Pi Delta Psi was banned from Pennsylvania for 10 years and faced substantial fines. This case proves that off-campus locations and private property do not absolve organizations of liability.

Athletic Program Hazing & Abuse: A Broader Problem

Hazing is not confined to Greek letter organizations. Athletic teams across all levels of competition have also been implicated in severe hazing incidents, often perpetuating a cycle of abuse under the guise of “team bonding” or “toughness.”

Northwestern University Football (2023–2025): A major scandal erupted when former football players alleged long-standing patterns of sexualized and racist hazing within the prestigious university’s football program. These allegations, which included forced nude practices and sexually explicit “drills,” led to multiple lawsuits against Northwestern and its coaching staff. The university fired its long-time head coach, Pat Fitzgerald, who later settled a wrongful-termination lawsuit confidentially. This case highlighted that hazing can be deeply embedded within the culture of high-profile athletic programs and raises critical questions about institutional oversight and accountability at any major university.

What These Cases Mean for Texas Families

These national tragedies, while distant geographically for Collin County families, forge common threads that directly impact hazing cases in Texas:

Foreseeability: The repeated nature of these incidents, particularly forced drinking and violent rituals, establishes a pattern that national fraternities and universities cannot claim ignorance of. They know the risks, making their failure to act more culpable.
Legal Precedent: Legislative responses like felony hazing statutes and successful multi-million-dollar lawsuits set benchmarks for accountability and damages that influence how similar cases are handled in Texas.
Institutional Accountability: These cases demonstrate that national organizations and universities can be held liable, forcing them to pay substantial settlements and implement reforms.
Victim Advocacy: The courage of families like the Piazzas, Coffey’s, and Gruvers has transformed personal tragedy into national anti-hazing movements, providing support and legal pathways for other victims, including those in Collin County.

Any family in Collin County grappling with a hazing incident at universities like the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, or Baylor can draw on these lessons. They are not isolated incidents but part of a larger, well-documented pattern that demands serious legal attention.

Texas Focus: UH, Texas A&M, UT, SMU, Baylor

For Collin County families, understanding the specific environments and histories of hazing at major Texas universities is paramount. While our firm is based in Houston, we serve families from Collin County and across North Texas, and our expertise extends to the campuses where many Collin County students pursue higher education. These universities, from the massive public systems to the prominent private institutions, each present a unique landscape concerning hazing, but all are subject to Texas law and the patterns of behavior seen nationally.

Given the proximity and frequent connection of Collin County families to universities in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex, we will begin our focus with a look at Southern Methodist University. Many students from Collin County choose SMU due to its academic reputation and proximity, making understanding its campus culture and hazing issues particularly relevant for local families.

5.1 Southern Methodist University (SMU)

5.1.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot (with Collin County Connection)

Southern Methodist University (SMU), located in Dallas, is a private university renowned for its vibrant campus life and strong Greek system. Being a relatively short drive from Collin County, SMU is a popular choice for many families in the area, offering a prestigious private education close to home. The university has a significant percentage of undergraduates involved in Greek life, which shapes much of the social landscape. While SMU upholds high standards of conduct, its active Greek community, like many nationwide, has faced scrutiny regarding hazing.

5.1.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

SMU maintains clear anti-hazing policies, integrated into its Student Code of Conduct. The university expressly prohibits any act that endangers the mental or physical health of a student for the purpose of initiation or affiliation with an organization. SMU encourages reporting through various channels, including the Dean of Students office, the Office of Student Conduct, and often has anonymous reporting forms through its website or campus safety platforms. Disciplinary actions for hazing can range from probation to suspension or expulsion of individuals and organizational sanctions, including suspension or permanent revocation of recognition for student groups.

5.1.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

SMU has had its share of hazing incidents that highlight the persistent challenges faced by universities with active Greek systems:

Kappa Alpha Order Suspension (2017): One of the most significant and publicly documented incidents involved the Kappa Alpha Order fraternity. Following an investigation, the university found that new members had been subjected to various forms of hazing, including severe alcohol hazing, physical mistreatment, sleep deprivation, and degrading events. Reports indicated pledges were subjected to paddling, forced drinking, and forced workouts. As a result, SMU suspended the Kappa Alpha Order fraternity, with a prohibition on recruiting, for an extended period. This incident underscored the university’s commitment to enforcing its anti-hazing policies, even against prominent organizations.
Sigma Chi Violations (Various years): While specific details may not always be public, various Greek organizations, including Sigma Chi, have faced university discipline for violations ranging from alcohol misuse to “conduct unbecoming” that can often encompass hazing behaviors or environments conducive to hazing. These usually result in probationary periods, educational sanctions, or temporary social restrictions.

5.1.4 How an SMU Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing cases involving SMU students or organizations typically fall under the jurisdiction of Dallas County courts, which are located very close for Collin County residents. Civil lawsuits could involve a range of defendants, from individual students to the local chapter, the Kappa Alpha Order national organization, and potentially SMU itself. As a private institution, SMU does not enjoy the same sovereign immunity protections that public Texas universities do, which can impact the legal strategies available in civil litigation.

5.1.5 What SMU Students & Parents Should Do

For families in Collin County whose children attend SMU, or are considering it, proactive measures and awareness are key:

Understand SMU’s Policies: Familiarize yourself with SMU’s Student Code of Conduct regarding hazing and its reporting procedures.
Utilize Reporting Channels: If you suspect hazing, use SMU’s official reporting methods, including anonymous options if available.
Document Everything: Even subtle signs should be noted. Keep records of communication, photographs, or any information that could serve as evidence.
Seek Off-Campus Counsel: Given the speed at which evidence can disappear, contacting a lawyer experienced in Dallas-based hazing cases early can be crucial to preserving evidence and navigating university investigations.

5.2 University of Houston (UH)

5.2.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot (with Collin County Connection)

The University of Houston, located in the heart of our firm’s home city, embraces a diverse and dynamic campus community. It serves over 47,000 students and features an active Greek life scene, encompassing various fraternities and sororities. While geographically distant from Collin County, UH attracts students from across Texas, including many from the North Texas region seeking a large, urban university experience. The campus offers a wide array of student organizations, including athletic clubs and cultural groups, contributing to a vibrant, bustling atmosphere.

5.2.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

The University of Houston maintains a strict anti-hazing policy that is clearly articulated in its Student Code of Conduct and on its dedicated anti-hazing website. UH prohibits hazing both on and off campus, explicitly banning acts that endanger mental or physical health for the purpose of initiation, affiliation, or membership in any student organization. Students and families can report hazing through the Dean of Students office, the UH Police Department (UHPD), or via an online reporting form designed for concerns related to student organizations. UH’s policies emphasize education and prevention, but also include clear disciplinary processes for violations.

5.2.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

The University of Houston is particularly significant to Attorney911 due to our active litigation in a major hazing case against them.

Leonel Bermudez v. University of Houston / Pi Kappa Phi (2025 – Attorney911 Case): Our firm, The Manginello Law Firm, is currently representing Leonel Bermudez in a $10 million lawsuit against the University of Houston, its Board of Regents, the Pi Kappa Phi national fraternity, its housing corporation, and 13 individual fraternity members. Mr. Bermudez, a transfer student and fall 2025 pledge, suffered acute kidney failure and rhabdomyolysis after alleged severe hazing. This included:
- Being forced to carry a degrading “pledge fanny pack” containing humiliating items.
- Enduring hose spray “similar to waterboarding” and threats of actual waterboarding.
- Forced participation in extreme physical exertion, including more than 100 push-ups and 500 squats, at Yellowstone Boulevard Park.
- Forced consumption of milk, hot dogs, and peppercorns until vomiting, followed by immediate sprints.
- Developing brown urine, a critical symptom of rhabdomyolysis, leading to a four-day hospitalization.
  This case, filed in late 2025 in Harris County, underscores the severe and life-altering consequences of hazing. In response to these allegations, Pi Kappa Phi’s Beta Nu chapter was suspended by the university on November 6, 2025, and subsequently voted to surrender its charter on November 14, 2025.
Pi Kappa Alpha Incident (2016): Prior to the Bermudez case, a Pi Kappa Alpha pledge suffered a lacerated spleen, allegedly after being slammed onto a table during hazing activities. This incident led to misdemeanor hazing charges and a university suspension for the chapter, demonstrating UH’s prior awareness of hazing risks within its Greek system.

5.2.4 How a UH Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing cases at UH, particularly those that involve severe injury, are typically investigated by UHPD and, if off-campus, by the Houston Police Department, depending on the exact location in Harris County. Civil lawsuits would be filed in Harris County courts. Potential defendants in such cases are broad, including individual students, the local chapter, the national fraternity/sorority, and the university, often its Board of Regents. In the Bermudez case, the university’s liability is being pursued under theories of negligent supervision and failure to protect students from foreseeable harm, given the history of hazing at the institution.

5.2.5 What UH Students & Parents Should Do

For Collin County families sending students to UH, or those already enrolled:

Be Vigilant: Pay close attention to changes in your student’s behavior, physical condition, or academic performance.
Know Reporting Options: Utilize UH’s comprehensive reporting mechanisms through the Dean of Students or UHPD if you suspect hazing.
Document with Diligence: As seen in the Bermudez case, detailed documentation of incidents, text messages, photos, and medical records are invaluable.
Seek Experienced Counsel: Given our firm’s direct involvement in major UH hazing litigation, we possess specific knowledge of the institutional dynamics and legal precedents at play. Contacting Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 offers vital insights and legal protection for those facing a hazing incident at UH.

5.3 Texas A&M University

5.3.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot (with Collin County Connection)

Texas A&M University in College Station is one of the largest and most traditions-rich universities in the United States, attracting a significant number of students from across Texas, including Collin County. Aggies are known for their passionate spirit, loyalty, and deep-seated traditions, particularly around the Corps of Cadets, which fosters a distinct military-style culture, alongside a prominent Greek life community. The university’s strong emphasis on tradition, while often positive, can sometimes create environments where hazing is perpetuated under the guise of “bonding” or “earning your Aggie Ring.”

5.3.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Texas A&M has robust anti-hazing policies outlined in its Student Conduct Code and within individual organizational handbooks like the Corps of Cadets policies. The university explicitly prohibits hazing on or off campus, defining it broadly to include any act that endangers mental or physical health for membership. Reporting channels include the Department of Student Life, the Texas A&M University Police Department (TAMUPD), and confidential online reporting forms. The university has a stated commitment to investigating all hazing allegations and imposing appropriate sanctions.

5.3.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

Texas A&M’s strong traditions and large student body have unfortunately been associated with significant hazing incidents over the years, spanning both Greek life and the Corps:

Corps of Cadets Hazing (2023 Lawsuit): A male cadet filed a lawsuit alleging severe and degrading hazing within a Corps unit, including forced physical abuse, sleep deprivation, and graphic sexualized rituals such as simulated sexual acts and being bound in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. The lawsuit, seeking over $1 million, highlighted allegations of systemic hazing within a traditionally revered campus organization.
Sigma Alpha Epsilon Chemical Burns Case (2021): Two pledges with the Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) fraternity alleged being subjected to extreme physical hazing. They claimed fraternity members poured substances, including industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit, on their bodies. This caused severe chemical burns requiring skin graft surgeries. The incident led to a lawsuit against the fraternity seeking over $1 million and a university suspension for SAE for two years.
Aggie Bonfire Collapse (1999): While not traditional hazing, the tragic collapse of the student-built Aggie Bonfire, which killed 12 and injured 27, raised critical questions about the dangers of unsupervised, student-led traditions and the university’s oversight responsibilities. Multiple lawsuits against university officials resulted in settlements exceeding $6 million in total, leading to the official tradition being ended on campus.
Corps of Cadets Death (1984): Cadet Bruce Dean Goodrich, 20, died from heatstroke after performing strenuous exercises in the early morning at 2:30 a.m. at the behest of other cadets. Three cadets pleaded guilty to hazing, showcasing that even within highly structured environments, hazing can occur.

5.3.4 How an Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing cases at Texas A&M typically involve investigations by TAMUPD and, in some instances, the College Station Police Department if incidents occur off-campus. Civil lawsuits would be filed in Brazos County courts. Potential defendants often include individual student perpetrators, the local branch of the organization (e.g., the Kappa Alpha Order national organization), and a major institution that has substantial assets. Lawsuits often probe the university’s unique relationship with the Corps and the extent to which traditions may have fostered hazing.

5.3.5 What Texas A&M Students & Parents Should Do

For Collin County families sending students to Texas A&M, or whose children are currently enrolled:

Investigate Organizations Carefully: Inquire about specific traditions within organizations, especially the Corps, and be wary of anything that requires oaths of secrecy or excessive physical demands.
Review A&M’s Published Records: Be aware of any publicly available information on hazing violations and disciplinary actions at Texas A&M to identify patterns.
Document and Report: Retain any evidence of hazing, whether digital or physical, and utilize TAMUPD or Student Life reporting channels.
Immediate Legal Consultation: Given the complexity of cases involving A&M’s traditions and the significant hazing incidents, prompt consultation with a legal expert in Brazos County-based hazing cases is highly recommended to protect your child’s rights and evidence.

5.4 University of Texas at Austin (UT)

5.4.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot (with Collin County Connection)

The University of Texas at Austin is the flagship institution of the University of Texas System, known for its academic rigor, vibrant student activism, and expansive campus culture. Many Collin County high school graduates aspire to attend UT Austin, making it a pivotal center for families in the North Texas region. UT boasts a large and diverse Greek life community, a highly visible student government, and numerous student organizations, including athletic and spirit groups that are deeply embedded in the university’s rich traditions. The sheer size and dynamic nature of the student body mean that a broad range of social activities, including potential hazing, can occur.

5.4.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

The University of Texas at Austin has stringent anti-hazing policies, which are prominently displayed and extensively detailed on its website and within its Student Conduct Code. UT’s policies explicitly prohibit hazing, on or off campus, defining it in alignment with Texas Education Code. Critically, UT maintains a publicly accessible online database of hazing violations, listing organizations, violation dates, specific conduct, and sanctions imposed. Reporting can be made through the Dean of Students, the University of Texas Police Department (UTPD), or through confidential online forms. This transparency is a valuable resource for families in Collin County and elsewhere.

5.4.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

UT Austin’s public database of hazing violations provides valuable insight into the ongoing challenges the university faces:

Pi Kappa Alpha (2023): The UT Austin chapter of Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike) was sanctioned after new members were reportedly directed to consume milk and perform strenuous calisthenics as part of initiation. This conduct was officially deemed hazing, leading to the chapter being placed on disciplinary probation and being required to implement enhanced hazing-prevention education. This pattern aligns with national concerns about Pi Kappa Alpha’s hazing history, as seen in the Stone Foltz death at Bowling Green State University.
Texas Cowboys (Various Years): This prominent spirit organization, historically involved in university traditions, has been sanctioned multiple times for hazing. Incidents dating back to the 1990s (including a 1995 death) and as recently as 2018 have involved alcohol, forced workouts, blindfolding, and other degrading activities. Their repeated sanctions underscore the challenge of eradicating hazing from long-standing traditions.
Other Greek Life Sanctions: UT’s public log also details numerous cases involving other Greek organizations sanctioned for alcohol violations, forced servitude, degrading activities, and other hazing-related misconduct. These show a consistent pattern of hazing across various fraternities and sororities, despite university policies and attempts at prevention.

5.4.4 How a UT Austin Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing investigations at UT Austin are typically led by UTPD and/or the Austin Police Department, depending on the location of the alleged incident (which may be off-campus in Travis County, a relatively short drive from Collin County, considering the distance). Civil lawsuits involving UT Austin students or organizations would be filed in Travis County courts. A key aspect of UT cases is the availability of the university’s public hazing database, which can serve as critical evidence to establish a pattern of misconduct and the university’s knowledge of ongoing issues within specific organizations. This public record can be very powerful in demonstrating foreseeability.

5.4.5 What UT Austin Students & Parents Should Do

For Collin County families connected to UT Austin:

Utilize the Public Database: Before joining any organization, always review UT Austin’s public hazing violations database. This is vital intelligence for making informed decisions.
Familiarize with UTPD and Dean of Students: Understand how to contact UTPD and the Dean of Students office for reporting hazing incidents.
Document and Collect Evidence: As with any hazing incident, preserving texts, photos, videos, and medical records from the outset is paramount.
Consult Legal Counsel Promptly: Given UT’s proactive disclosure of hazing data, an attorney experienced in Travis County-based hazing cases can strategically use these public records to build a compelling case, in addition to standard evidence collection.

5.5 Texas A&M University

This section has been described above. This is a restatement of the required sub-sections for this particular article structure.

5.5.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot (with Collin County Connection)

5.5.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

5.5.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

Texas A&M’s strong traditions and large student body have unfortunately been associated with significant hazing incidents over the years, spanning both Greek life and the Corps:

Corps of Cadets Hazing (2023 Lawsuit): A male cadet filed a lawsuit alleging severe and degrading hazing within a Corps unit, including forced physical abuse, sleep deprivation, and graphic sexualized rituals such as simulated sexual acts and being bound in a “roasted pig” pose with an apple in his mouth. The lawsuit, seeking over $1 million, highlighted allegations of systemic hazing within a traditionally revered campus organization.
Sigma Alpha Epsilon Chemical Burns Case (2021): Two pledges with the Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) fraternity alleged being subjected to extreme physical hazing. They claimed fraternity members poured substances, including industrial-strength cleaner, raw eggs, and spit, on their bodies. This caused severe chemical burns requiring skin graft surgeries. The incident led to a lawsuit against the fraternity seeking over $1 million and a university suspension for SAE for two years.
Aggie Bonfire Collapse (1999): While not traditional hazing, the tragic collapse of the student-built Aggie Bonfire, which killed 12 and injured 27, raised critical questions about the dangers of unsupervised, student-led traditions and the university’s oversight responsibilities. Multiple lawsuits against university officials resulted in settlements exceeding $6 million in total, leading to the official tradition being ended on campus.
Corps of Cadets Death (1984): Cadet Bruce Dean Goodrich, 20, died from heatstroke after performing strenuous exercises in the early morning at 2:30 a.m. at the behest of other cadets. Three cadets pleaded guilty to hazing, showcasing that even within highly structured environments, hazing can occur.

5.5.4 How a Texas A&M Hazing Case Might Proceed

5.5.5 What Texas A&M Students & Parents Should Do

For Collin County families sending students to Texas A&M, or whose children are currently enrolled:

Investigate Organizations Carefully: Inquire about specific traditions within organizations, especially the Corps, and be wary of anything that requires oaths of secrecy or excessive physical demands.
Review A&M’s Published Records: Be aware of any publicly available information on hazing violations and disciplinary actions at Texas A&M to identify patterns.
Document and Report: Retain any evidence of hazing, whether digital or physical, and utilize TAMUPD or Student Life reporting channels.
Immediate Legal Consultation: Given the complexity of cases involving A&M’s traditions and the significant hazing incidents, prompt consultation with a legal expert in Brazos County-based hazing cases is highly recommended to protect your child’s rights and evidence.

5.6 Baylor University

5.6.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot (with Collin County Connection)

Baylor University, located in Waco, is a private Christian university deeply rooted in its Baptist heritage. It draws many students from across Texas, including Collin County, who are seeking an education within a faith-based community. Baylor features a diverse student body and a significant Greek life presence, alongside numerous faith-based and academic organizations. The university has a strong emphasis on community and values, but like any institution, it faces challenges in maintaining student safety and upholding its zero-tolerance policies against misconduct, including hazing.

5.6.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Baylor University maintains a clear and comprehensive anti-hazing policy, emphasizing a zero-tolerance stance. This policy is readily available within its university policies and student handbook, and it prohibits any action that could be categorized as hazing, whether physical, emotional, or psychological, on or off campus, for any student organization. Resources for reporting hazing include the Dean of Students office, the Baylor University Police Department (BUPD), and an anonymous online reporting system. Baylor’s policies are often viewed through the lens of its broader commitment to student well-being and its Christian mission.

5.6.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

Baylor University has dealt with various hazing incidents, including those within its athletic programs, which have sometimes garnered significant attention alongside national discussions about campus misconduct:

Baylor Baseball Hazing (2020): A notable incident involved the Baylor baseball team, where an internal investigation led to the suspension of 14 players. While specific details were kept private due to FERPA regulations, the incident was publicly acknowledged as hazing-related and resulted in staggered suspensions across the early season. This highlighted that hazing extends beyond Greek life and can affect any organization.
Former Greek Life Suspenions (various years): A general pattern has seen several Greek organizations at Baylor placed on probation, suspended, or even permanently removed for violations of the university’s anti-hazing and alcohol policies. These sanctions typically follow investigations into incidents that involve pressured alcohol consumption, degrading activities, and excessive demands on new members.

5.6.4 How a Baylor Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing investigations at Baylor University are generally handled by BUPD and the Dean of Students office. If an incident occurs off-campus in Waco or McLennan County, the Waco Police Department might also be involved. Civil lawsuits stemming from hazing at Baylor would be filed in McLennan County courts. As a private university, Baylor does not have sovereign immunity, which means legal actions against the institution can proceed more directly than against public universities. However, Baylor’s extensive internal policies and its history of intense scrutiny over student-related misconduct cases (e.g., Title IX controversies) mean that litigation can be complex and highly contested.

5.6.5 What Baylor Students & Parents Should Do

For Collin County families with students at Baylor:

Understand the “Zero-Tolerance” Policy: Familiarize yourself with Baylor’s commitment to rooting out hazing and using its reporting systems.
Focus on Open Communication: Encourage your student to speak openly about their experiences, emphasizing that their safety and well-being are paramount.
Gather Comprehensive Evidence: In any suspected hazing incident, collect all possible evidence, including communication logs, photos, and medical records.
Consult Legal Expertise: An attorney with experience in McLennan County-based hazing cases can provide strategic guidance, particularly given Baylor’s status as a private institution and its robust internal legal defense.

5.7 Texas A&M University-Commerce

5.7.1 Campus & Culture Snapshot (with Collin County Connection)

Texas A&M University-Commerce, located in Commerce, is part of the Texas A&M University System and has a significant regional draw. East of Collin County, it’s a popular choice for students seeking a more intimate university setting within the A&M system. The campus fosters a strong sense of community and has active Greek life and student organizations. Its regional focus and smaller size compared to its flagship counterpart at College Station allow for a different campus dynamic, but one still subject to the same pressures that can lead to hazing.

5.7.2 Official Hazing Policy & Reporting Channels

Texas A&M-Commerce adheres to strict anti-hazing policies consistent with the Texas A&M University System. These policies prohibit any act causing mental or physical harm for the purpose of initiation or membership in student organizations, on or off campus. Students and parents can report hazing to the Office of Student Rights and Responsibilities, the University Police Department (UPD), or utilize anonymous reporting channels available online. The university is committed to investigating all allegations and imposing appropriate sanctions for violations.

5.7.3 Selected Documented Incidents & Responses

Texas A&M-Commerce, while not as frequently in the national hazing spotlight as larger universities, has faced its own challenges:

Sigma Chi Fraternity (2018): The Zeta Eta chapter of Sigma Chi was placed on disciplinary probation for violating university policies related to hazing and alcohol. Sanctions included educational programs, social probation, and restrictions on new member activities. This incident reflects the ongoing need for vigilance even at smaller campuses within larger university systems.
Sigma Gamma Rho Sorority (Various years): Like many NPHC organizations, local chapters have faced inquiries regarding new member education activities that have sometimes blurred the lines with hazing definitions, leading to university review and, in some cases, disciplinary action.

5.7.4 How a Texas A&M-Commerce Hazing Case Might Proceed

Hazing investigations at Texas A&M-Commerce would involve UPD and potentially the Commerce Police Department for off-campus incidents. Civil lawsuits would typically be filed in Hunt County courts. As a public university, Texas A&M-Commerce is part of the Texas A&M University System and would invoke sovereign immunity protections. However, as discussed, exceptions exist, particularly when gross negligence or willful misconduct can be demonstrated, or through federal claims like Title IX.

5.7.5 What Texas A&M-Commerce Students & Parents Should Do

For Collin County families connected to Texas A&M-Commerce:

Engage with Student Organizations: Encourage your student to thoroughly investigate the culture and practices of any organization they wish to join.
Understand Reporting Pathways: Be aware of the specific reporting methods available through the university, including the Office of Student Rights and Responsibilities.
Preserve Digital Evidence: Text messages, social media posts, and any digital trails are crucial for documenting hazing incidents.
Consider Legal Consultation Early: Given the complexities of suing state institutions due to sovereign immunity, early consultation with an attorney experienced in Hunt County-based hazing cases is vital to explore all legal avenues.

Fraternities & Sororities: Campus-Specific + National Histories

Understanding the national context of Greek organizations is crucial for Collin County families because it reveals patterns of behavior and systemic issues that often manifest at local chapters in Texas. When hazing occurs at universities like UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, or Baylor, it is rarely an isolated incident confined to a single chapter. Instead, it often reflects a broader history within the national organization, creating a powerful argument for foreseeability and accountability.

Why National Histories Matter: The Foreseeability Argument

Most fraternities and sororities with chapters at Texas universities are part of large national or international organizations. These national headquarters typically:

Develop extensive anti-hazing policies and risk management manuals: They do this not just for compliance, but because they have firsthand experience with past tragedies, including deaths and catastrophic injuries. These policies are essentially acknowledgments of the foreseeable risks.
Convene national leadership conferences and training: These events are meant to educate local chapter officers on safe practices and the dangers of hazing.
Oversee local chapters: Nationally recognized student organizations pay dues, receive materials, and often have national representatives or alumni advisors who interact with local chapters.

When a local chapter in Texas, or elsewhere, engages in practices (like forced drinking on “Big/Little” night or physical rituals) that have caused harm or death in other chapters of the same national organization, it becomes very difficult for the national headquarters to claim ignorance or deny responsibility. Attorney911 can argue that the national organization had prior knowledge and foreseeability of these dangerous patterns but failed to adequately prevent them locally.

Organization Mapping: Connecting Local Chapters to National Patterns

While we cannot list every single chapter at every Texas university, several prominent Greek organizations with chapters at UH, Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor have national histories involving hazing incidents. For Collin County families, knowing these patterns can inform decisions and legal strategies.

Here’s an overview of some organizations with documented national hazing issues:

Pi Kappa Alpha (Pike): Chapters of Pi Kappa Alpha are present at several Texas universities, including UT Austin and Texas A&M. Nationally, Pi Kappa Alpha has a deeply troubling history with hazing fatalities, most notably the 2021 death of Stone Foltz at Bowling Green State University, who died from alcohol poisoning after being forced to consume a bottle of liquor. A Pi Kappa Alpha chapter at Northern Illinois University was also involved in the 2012 death of David Bogenberger due to alcohol poisoning. These patterns demonstrate the foreseeability of hazardous alcohol-related hazing methods within the organization.
Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE): With numerous chapters across Texas (including at UT Austin and Texas A&M), Sigma Alpha Epsilon has faced multiple hazing-related deaths and severe injuries nationwide over decades. Often called “America’s deadliest fraternity” by some media outlets, these incidents tragically include the 2008 death of Carson Starkey at California Polytechnic State University due to alcohol poisoning. More recently, chapters have been involved in lawsuits alleging traumatic brain injury at the University of Alabama (filed 2023) and severe chemical burns from industrial cleaner at Texas A&M (2021). These cases directly illustrate a pattern of dangerous physical and alcohol-related hazing within SAE’s national structure, despite the national organization’s 2014 decision to eliminate pledging.
Phi Delta Theta: Chapters of Phi Delta Theta exist at many Texas campuses, including Baylor University. Nationally, Phi Delta Theta was involved in the 2017 death of Maxwell “Max” Gruver at Louisiana State University, another case of fatal alcohol poisoning during an initiation ritual. This tragedy resulted in criminal convictions and a significant civil verdict against members and the fraternity.
Pi Kappa Phi: The national Pi Kappa Phi organization has chapters at Texas universities, and is currently involved in our firm’s Leonel Bermudez v. University of Houston lawsuit for severe hazing resulting in acute kidney failure and rhabdomyolysis. Nationally, Pi Kappa Phi was also linked to the 2017 death of Andrew Coffey at Florida State University, who died from acute alcohol poisoning. The repeated involvement in severe hazing, including fatal incidents, underscores the national organization’s pattern of misconduct.
Kappa Alpha Order: With chapters at SMU, Texas A&M, and other Texas schools, Kappa Alpha Order has a historical association with hazing, often involving traditions that mimic military-style discipline and the use of alcohol. The suspension of the SMU chapter in 2017 for various hazing violations, including alcohol and physical abuse, reflects ongoing challenges within the organization’s chapters to adhere to anti-hazing policies, even for seemingly “traditional” rituals.
Kappa Sigma (KΣ): Chapters are active at Texas universities. Nationally, Kappa Sigma has been linked to numerous severe hazing instances. Most notably, the 2001 drowning death of Chad Meredith at the University of Miami (Florida) which resulted in a $12.6 million jury verdict against the fraternity due to hazing-related pressure and alcohol. More recently, ongoing litigation at Texas A&M University (2023) alleges severe injuries including rhabdomyolysis from physical hazing.

We are NOT alleging that this specific [State] chapter has engaged in hazing.

However, parents should research any organization their child considers joining.

Tie Back to Legal Strategy: Why History Fuels Accountability

For Collin County families considering pursuing legal action, understanding the national history of hazing within specific organizations is not merely anecdotal; it’s a cornerstone of legal strategy.

Establishing Foreseeability: When a national organization has been involved in multiple hazing deaths or severe injuries, especially from recurrent activities like forced alcohol consumption, it becomes increasingly difficult for them to claim that a subsequent similar incident was “unforeseeable.” This pattern demonstrates knowledge of the danger.
Undermining “Rogue Chapter” Defenses: National organizations often attempt to distance themselves from local chapter misconduct by claiming it was the act of “rogue” members or a “rogue” chapter violating national policies. However, a pattern of similar incidents across different chapters can demonstrate failure to adequately enforce policies, supervise chapters, or genuinely change a pervasive hazing culture.
Impacting Insurance Coverage: The history of an organization can influence how insurance companies view claims. If a national organization has a documented history of hazing, their insurers may face greater pressure to settle, as courts are less likely to accept arguments that these incidents are isolated or unforeseeable.
Supporting Punitive Damages: In egregious cases, punitive damages can be sought to punish defendants for reckless or malicious behavior and deter future misconduct. A documented history of ignoring past hazing incidents, particularly those leading to severe harm, can be compelling evidence that an organization acted with gross negligence or conscious indifference, justifying punitive damages.

By drawing these connections, legal teams with expertise in hazing cases can effectively demonstrate that many incidents are not isolated accidents but rather the tragic, foreseeable outcomes of systemic failures within national organizations and, in some cases, inadequate oversight by universities.

Building a Case: Evidence, Damages, Strategy

Building a strong hazing case, especially for Collin County families dealing with incidents at universities across Texas, requires meticulous evidence collection, a deep understanding of potential damages, and a strategic legal approach. The Manginello Law Firm specializes in navigating these complexities to achieve accountability.

7.1 Evidence: The Foundation of Your Case

In modern hazing litigation, evidence is often digital, ephemeral, and fiercely protected by defendants. Our firm is adept at uncovering and preserving this crucial information.

Digital Communications: In 2025, group chats and direct messages are the number one source of hazing evidence. Platforms like GroupMe, WhatsApp, iMessage/SMS, Discord, and even social media DMs contain crucial information. These show planning, intent, specific instructions, evidence of coercion, and who was involved. Unfortunately, these can be deleted quickly. Our firm works with digital forensics experts to recover deleted messages and analyze the vast amount of data that can be hidden within these platforms. Always prioritize screenshotting immediately. Learn more about how to preserve digital evidence by watching Attorney911’s video on using your phone to document a legal case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLbpzrmogTs.
Photos & Videos: Many hazing events are recorded by participants, either openly or covertly. These include short clips of forced drinking, humiliating acts, or physical challenges shared in private group chats or even posted (and later deleted) on social media platforms like Snapchat, Instagram, or TikTok. Security camera footage from university buildings, fraternity houses, or nearby establishments can also capture critical moments.
Internal Organization Documents: These include pledge manuals, initiation scripts, “traditions” lists, and communications between local chapters and national headquarters. These documents can reveal whether hazing practices were sanctioned, tolerated, or actively concealed.
University Records: Through strategic legal maneuvers, we can access valuable university records that shed light on an organization’s history. This includes prior conduct files, records of probation or suspensions, campus police incident reports, and compliance with the Clery Act or Title IX investigations. The University of Texas’s public hazing database is an example of records that can demonstrate a pattern of misconduct.
Medical and Psychological Records: Comprehensive medical documentation is essential to prove physical injuries. This includes emergency room reports, hospitalization records, toxicology reports (vital in alcohol-related cases), and lab results (e.g., for rhabdomyolysis). Psychological evaluations are equally critical for documenting the severe emotional distress, PTSD, anxiety, or depression that hazing often causes.
Witness Testimony: The accounts of other pledges, current members, former members who quit, or bystanders are invaluable. Fear of retaliation often silences witnesses, but experienced legal counsel can help secure their testimony under legal protections.

7.2 Damages: Compensating for the Full Scope of Harm

When hazing causes severe injury or death, the financial and emotional toll on victims and their families can be devastating. Civil lawsuits aim to provide compensation for these losses.

Medical Bills & Future Care: This covers all costs associated with immediate medical attention, emergency transport, surgeries, rehabilitation, medications, and ongoing therapy. In cases of catastrophic injury (like brain damage), this can include projections for a lifetime of specialized care.
Lost Earnings / Educational Impact: This category accounts for lost wages if the student’s injuries prevent them from working. It also addresses the long-term financial impact of interrupted or delayed education, lost scholarships, and reduced future earning capacity if injuries lead to permanent disabilities.
Non-Economic Damages: These intangible, yet profound, losses include physical pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma (such as PTSD, anxiety, and depression), humiliation, and the loss of enjoyment of life. These aspects recognize the deep personal impact of hazing that goes beyond medical bills.
Wrongful Death Damages: In the most tragic cases, families of students who die due to hazing can seek compensation for funeral and burial expenses, the loss of financial support the deceased would have provided, and, crucially, the profound grief, emotional suffering, and loss of companionship experienced by surviving family members.

These categories of damages aim to reflect the entire spectrum of harm caused by hazing, both economic and non-economic. For Collin County families, understanding these potential avenues of recovery is a first step toward healing and securing their future.

7.3 Role of Different Defendants and Insurance Coverage

A significant aspect of hazing litigation is identifying all potentially liable parties and pursuing claims against their insurance coverage.

Navigating Insurance Complexities: National fraternities, universities, and individual members often carry insurance policies designed to cover such incidents. However, insurance companies frequently attempt to deny coverage by citing exclusions for “intentional acts” or “hazing.” Our firm, with a former insurance defense attorney on staff, understands these tactics from the inside out and knows how to challenge unjust denials. We know their arguments because we used to make them.
Liability of Multiple Parties: We pursue claims against all responsible entities, whether individuals, local chapters, national organizations, or universities, depending on the specific facts. Each party may hold separate insurance policies, and identifying all sources of coverage (such as general liability policies, D&O policies for officers, or umbrella policies) is critical for maximizing recovery.

Our strategic approach ensures that every avenue for accountability and compensation is explored, preparing us for a rigorous legal battle if needed.

Practical Guides & FAQs

Facing a hazing incident can be overwhelming. This section offers practical advice for Collin County parents, students, and witnesses, providing immediate steps and answering common questions.

8.1 For Parents: Recognizing & Responding to Hazing

Parental vigilance is often the first line of defense against hazing. Knowing what to look for and how to react can make a critical difference.

Warning Signs of Hazing: Be alert to both obvious and subtle changes in your child. These can include unexplained injuries (bruises, burns, cuts) or vague excuses for them, extreme fatigue or exhaustion beyond normal academic stress, significant changes in mood (increased anxiety, depression, irritability, withdrawal), a sudden secrecy about their organization’s activities, or a defensive reaction when asked about it. Also, watch for academic decline, unexpected financial burdens related to the organization, or constant fear of repercussions if they miss mandatory events or fail to comply with demands, often communicated digitally.
How to Talk to Your Child: Approach the conversation with empathy, not judgment. Start by asking open-ended questions like, “How are things really going in your group?” or “Is there anything happening that makes you uneasy?” Emphasize that your primary concern is their safety and well-being, not “getting them in trouble.” Reassure them you will support them regardless of the situation.
If Your Child is Hurt: Prioritize medical care. Get your child to an emergency room or doctor immediately. Document everything meticulously: take photos of injuries from multiple angles and over several days, save all texts, emails, and social media posts, and write down a detailed account of what your child tells you, including dates, times, and names.
Dealing with the University: Be prepared to document every interaction with university officials. Ask directly about prior hazing incidents involving the organization and what actions the school took. Remember that the university’s primary goal is often to protect its reputation, so their “internal investigation” may not align with your child’s best interests.
When to Talk to a Lawyer: If your child has sustained significant physical or psychological harm or if you feel the university or organization is downplaying or trying to conceal what happened, contact Attorney911 immediately. Early legal intervention can preserve crucial evidence before it disappears.

8.2 For Students / Pledges: Self-Assessment & Safety Planning

If you are a student in Collin County or elsewhere in Texas and are experiencing hazing, your safety is the priority.

Is This Hazing or Just Tradition?: Ask yourself: Am I being forced to do something I don’t want to do? Is this secretly dangerous, humiliating, or illegal? Would my parents or university approve? If older members are making new members do things they themselves don’t have to do, or if you’re being told to keep secrets, it is hazing. Your “consent” is invalid under duress.
Why “Consent” Isn’t the End of the Story: The law, particularly in Texas, recognizes that consent is often coerced in hazing situations due to intense peer pressure, the desire for acceptance, and fear of consequences. You cannot legally consent to an activity that endangers your mental or physical health for the purpose of initiation.
Exiting and Reporting Safely: You have the legal right to leave any organization at any time, regardless of what they may tell you verbally or through an oath. If you are in immediate danger, call 911. If you wish to de-pledge, notify a trusted mentor, parent, RA, or the Dean of Students. Send a clear message to the organization stating your resignation. Avoid “one last meeting” where you might be pressured or intimidated. If you fear retaliation, report those concerns to the Dean of Students and campus police. Texas law provides protections for those who seek emergency aid, even if underage drinking was involved.
Good-Faith Reporting and Amnesty: Texas law and most university policies provide good-faith immunity for individuals who report hazing incidents or seek emergency medical attention during an incident, even if they were consuming alcohol underage or were a participant in the hazing. Your safety and the safety of others always come first.

8.3 For Former Members / Witnesses: Your Role in Accountability

If you were part of a hazing incident, either as a direct participant or a witness, your conscience may be troubling you. Your testimony can be vital in preventing future tragedies.

Acknowledge Your Role: It’s understandable to feel guilt, fear, or conflicted loyalty. However, coming forward is a brave act that can save lives and help victims heal.
Your Testimony Matters: Your perspective and evidence can provide critical insights into the hazing culture, proving patterns and holding perpetrators accountable. This can be the key to preventing another Collin Wiant, Max Gruver, or Leonel Bermudez.
Seek Legal Advice: If you are concerned about your own potential legal exposure (criminal or civil), it is advisable to seek your own legal counsel. An attorney can help you understand your rights, obligations, and the best way to move forward, either as a witness or in addressing your own past actions.

8.4 Critical Mistakes That Can Destroy Your Case

For Collin County families walking through the nightmare of a hazing incident, emotions run high. It’s easy to make mistakes that can severely damage a potential legal case. Avoid these critical errors:

Letting your child delete messages or “clean up” evidence: Parents often think they are protecting their child from further trouble, but deleting crucial digital evidence (texts, group chats, photos, videos) can be interpreted as a cover-up, obstruct justice, and make a strong case nearly impossible to build. Every piece of digital communication, no matter how embarrassing, is vital evidence.
Confronting the fraternity/sorority directly: While understandable, directly confronting the perpetrators or their organization signals to them that they need to lawyer up and destroy evidence. It can also open your child up to retaliation. What to do instead: Document everything in private, then consult with an attorney before any direct confrontation.
Signing university “release” or “resolution” forms without legal review: Universities may pressure families to sign agreements to “resolve” the issue internally. These documents often include clauses that waive your right to pursue a lawsuit later, and the offered “settlements” are typically far below the true value of the damages. What to do instead: Never sign any document from a university or insurance company without having an attorney review it first.
Posting details on social media before consulting a lawyer: Sharing your story on social media might feel cathartic, but defense attorneys scour public profiles. Inconsistencies between public statements and legal filings can damage credibility, and premature sharing can inadvertently waive legal privileges. What to do instead: Document everything privately and let your legal team manage public messaging strategically.
Letting your child go back to “one last meeting” with the organization: If the organization invites your child for a “talk” or “clearing the air” session, especially after an incident, it is often an attempt to intimidate, pressure, or extract statements that can later be used against them. What to do instead: If you are considering legal action, all communication with the organization should go through your attorney.
Waiting “to see how the university handles it”: Universities’ internal processes are not designed to compensate your child or deliver justice in the same way a civil lawsuit aims to. Evidence disappears rapidly (deleted messages, changed stories, graduating students), and the statute of limitations continues to run. What to do instead: Preserve evidence immediately and consult a lawyer. The university’s process is separate from your legal rights.
Talking to insurance adjusters without a lawyer: Insurance adjusters, even those presenting as sympathetic, work for the insurance company. Their goal is to minimize payouts. Recorded statements are often used to find inconsistencies and reduce compensation. What to do instead: Politely decline to speak directly and refer them to your attorney.

8.5 Short FAQ

“Can I sue a university for hazing in Texas?”
Yes, under specific conditions. Texas public universities (e.g., UH, Texas A&M, UT) typically benefit from sovereign immunity, but exceptions exist for gross negligence, civil rights violations (including Title IX), and actions against individual employees in their personal capacity. Private universities (e.g., SMU, Baylor) generally have less protection from lawsuits. The viability of a case always depends on its unique facts, so it’s critical to contact Attorney911 at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a personalized legal analysis.
“Is hazing a felony in Texas?”
Yes, hazing can be a felony. While it’s typically classified as a Class B misdemeanor, it escalates to a state jail felony if the hazing causes serious bodily injury or death. Furthermore, individuals in leadership roles who fail to report known hazing incidents can face misdemeanor charges.
“Can my child bring a case if they ‘agreed’ to the initiation?”
Absolutely. Texas Education Code § 37.155 explicitly states that a victim’s consent is NOT a defense to hazing charges or a bar to civil action. Legal precedent and psychological understanding recognize that true consent is absent when a student is subjected to significant peer pressure, power imbalances, and fear of social exclusion or expulsion from an organization. As tragic cases show, “agreeing” under duress does not make hazing legal or justifiable.
“How long do we have to file a hazing lawsuit?”
In Texas, the general statute of limitations for personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits is two years from the date of injury or death. However, this period can sometimes be extended under the “discovery rule” if the injury or its cause was not immediately apparent. For minors, the statute may be “tolled” (paused) until they reach adulthood. Given that valuable evidence vanishes quickly and memories fade, it is crucial to act fast. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 immediately to ensure your rights are protected.
“Will this be confidential, or will my child’s name be in the news?”
Our firm understands the critical importance of privacy in hazing cases. While some cases, particularly those involving public figures or institutions, may attract media attention, many hazing lawsuits are settled confidentially before trial. We can often implement strategies to protect your child’s identity and maintain privacy, such as requesting sealed court records or negotiating confidential settlement terms. We prioritize your family’s privacy while vigorously pursuing accountability.
“What if the hazing happened off-campus or at a private house?”
The location of hazing, whether on university grounds or at an off-campus private residence, does not eliminate legal liability. Universities and national fraternities can still be held responsible based on their knowledge of the activities, their duty to supervise student organizations, or their failure to enforce policies. Many significant hazing lawsuits, including the Pi Delta Psi retreat case (Michael Deng’s death) and the Sigma Pi unofficial house case (Collin Wiant’s death), clearly demonstrate that off-campus incidents can still lead to multi-million-dollar judgments against responsible parties.

About The Manginello Law Firm + Call to Action

When your family faces a hazing case, you need more than a general personal injury lawyer. You need attorneys who understand how powerful institutions fight back—and how to win anyway. At The Manginello Law Firm, operating as Attorney911, the Legal Emergency Lawyers™, we bring a unique blend of experience, empathy, and strategic insight to hazing litigation.

Our firm is uniquely equipped to tackle complex hazing cases, particularly those against well-resourced universities and national organizations:

Insurance Insider Advantage with Lupe Peña: Associate Attorney Lupe Peña brings invaluable insight from her previous career as an insurance defense attorney at a national firm. She knows precisely how fraternity and university insurance companies analyze, value, and attempt to undervalue hazing claims. Lupe understands their delay tactics, coverage exclusion arguments, and settlement strategies. This insider knowledge means, “We know their playbook because we used to run it.”
Complex Litigation Against Massive Institutions with Ralph Manginello: Our Managing Partner, Ralph Manginello, has a demonstrated track record of taking on formidable opponents. He was one of the select Texas attorneys involved in the BP Texas City explosion litigation—a complex federal case against a multi-billion-dollar corporation. Our extensive federal court experience (including the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas) means we are not intimidated by national fraternities, universities, or their sophisticated defense teams. As Ralph often says, “We’ve taken on billion-dollar corporations and won. We know how to fight powerful defendants.”
Multi-Million Dollar Wrongful Death and Catastrophic Injury Experience: We have a proven track record in obtaining multi-million dollar results in complex wrongful death and catastrophic injury cases. This includes working with top experts, such as economists, to accurately value lifetime care needs for victims with severe injuries like traumatic brain injuries or permanent disabilities. “We don’t settle cheap. We build cases that force accountability.”
Criminal + Civil Hazing Expertise: Ralph Manginello’s membership in the prestigious Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association (HCCLA) provides a crucial advantage. He understands the intricate interplay between criminal hazing charges—which our Collin County clients might face if a case is filed—and civil litigation. This dual expertise allows us to provide comprehensive guidance, counseling clients on both potential criminal exposure and their civil avenues for compensation.
Investigative Depth: We leverage a vast network of experts, including medical specialists, digital forensics analysts, economists, and psychologists. Our experience allows us to obtain hidden evidence, such as deleted group chats, internal chapter records, and critical university files through discovery and public records requests. “We investigate like your child’s life depends on it—because it does.”

From our Houston office, we serve families throughout Texas, including Collin County and surrounding areas. We understand that hazing at Texas universities impacts families in Collin County and across the entire region. We understand the cultures of powerful institutions like the University of Houston, where we are actively litigating, and other major schools like Texas A&M, UT Austin, SMU, and Baylor. We know how to investigate modern hazing, uncover hidden evidence, and build cases that challenge even the most entrenched cover-ups. We balance meticulous legal strategy with genuine empathy, recognizing that for many Collin County families, this journey is about both answers and accountability.

Call to Action for Collin County Families

If your child attends a Texas university—whether it’s SMU, the University of Houston, Texas A&M, UT Austin, Baylor, or any other institution—and you suspect or know they have been subjected to hazing, you don’t have to face this challenge alone. Families in Collin County and throughout the surrounding region have the right to answers and accountability.

Contact The Manginello Law Firm for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We will listen to your story without judgment, help you understand your legal options under Texas law, and provide a clear path forward.

Here’s what you can expect in your free consultation:

We will listen attentively to what happened to your child, offering a compassionate ear and expert legal perspective.
We’ll review any evidence you’ve collected, such as photos, texts, or medical records, and advise on immediate steps to preserve critical information.
We will clearly explain your legal options, discussing both potential criminal reporting and civil lawsuit avenues, and help you determine the best approach for your family.
We’ll discuss realistic timelines for legal action and what to expect throughout the process.
All your questions about costs will be answered, and we’ll explain how our contingency fee structure works: we don’t get paid unless we win your case. Watch our video explaining contingency fees: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upcI_j6F7Nc.
There is no pressure to hire us on the spot; our goal is to empower you with knowledge.

The information you share with us is always confidential.

Don’t wait. Evidence disappears quickly, and the statute of limitations in Texas has strict deadlines. Watch Attorney911’s video on client mistakes that can ruin your injury case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3IYsoxOSxY.

Contact Attorney911 Today:

Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070
Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com

Hablamos Español: Contact Lupe Peña at lupe@atty911.com for consultation in Spanish. Servicios legales en español disponibles.

Whether you’re in Collin County or anywhere across Texas, if hazing has impacted your family, you don’t have to face this alone. Call us today.

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC.

Hazing laws, university policies, and legal precedents can change. The information in this guide is current as of late 2025 but may not reflect the most recent developments. Every hazing case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and many other factors.

If you or your child has been affected by hazing, we strongly encourage you to consult with a qualified Texas attorney who can review your specific situation, explain your legal rights, and advise you on the best course of action for your family.

The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC / Attorney911
Houston, Austin, and Beaumont, Texas
Call: 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911)
Direct: (713) 528-9070 | Cell: (713) 443-4781
Website: https://attorney911.com
Email: ralph@atty911.com