Commercial Personal Injury Law

Jul 10, 2026

PFAS Forever-Chemical Water Contamination & New Jersey Toxic Tort Claims: Attorney911 Pursues the Chemical Manufacturers Behind PFAS Pollution of 47 Community Water Systems and the Unregulated Chemical Substitution That Followed State Limits, PFOA Classified Carcinogenic by IARC in 2024, Paulsboro Residents Exposed to PFNA for Four Years Before Public Notification in 2013, We Secure Water-Quality Monitoring Data and Blood Serum PFAS Testing Before Levels Decline Post-Remediation, NJ’s Strict-Liability Regime for Hazardous Substance Discharge and the Tort Claims Act Notice-of-Claim Deadline, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Claims Machine Values and Denies Environmental Cases, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims and Millions in Wrongful-Death Cases, Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

New Jersey PFAS Water Contamination: Forever Chemicals in Your Tap Water — and the Four Years Nobody Told You You are reading this because something about your water — or your health, or your family’s health — stopped making sense. Maybe you live in Paulsboro, or Gloucester County, or one of the dozens of New Jersey towns served by the water systems a team of independent researchers spent nineteen years studying. Maybe you just learned that the water you drank, cooked with, and gave your children contained chemicals that do not break down — not in the environment, not in your body — and that the company or utility that knew about it said nothing for years. Maybe you or someone you love has been diagnosed with cancer, and you are now wondering whether the water had something to do with it. We are Attorney911 — The Manginello Law Firm. We handle toxic tort cases, and we are writing this page because the questions you have right now are the same questions every family in your situation asks, and most of the answers being given to you are incomplete, minimizing, or designed to make you go away. The water levels…

45 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

Roundup Cancer Lawsuits After SCOTUS FIFRA Preemption: Missouri Toxic-Tort Attorneys — Attorney911 Fights for Glyphosate Victims Diagnosed With Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma After Years of Roundup Exposure, We Pursue Bayer and Monsanto Behind the Herbicide That John Durnell Used for 20 Years Before His Cancer Diagnosis, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Corporate Claims Machine Values and Denies Toxic-Exposure Cases, We Secure the EPA Registration Files, Internal Monsanto Toxicology Documents and IARC Group 2A Classification Evidence Before Purchase Records and Product Containers Are Lost, Post-Ruling Design-Defect and Fraudulent-Concealment Theories That May Survive Preemption Alongside the $7.3 Billion Settlement as the Primary Recovery Vehicle, Missouri’s Uncapped Product-Liability Damages and Pure Comparative-Fault Rule, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

Missouri Roundup Cancer Claims After the Supreme Court’s FIFRA Preemption Ruling: What Just Happened, What Survives, and What to Do Right Now You heard the news and your stomach dropped. The Supreme Court sided with Bayer. The headline said something about federal law blocking state lawsuits over Roundup warnings, and the first thought that hit you was: my case is over. Maybe you have non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and you used Roundup for years. Maybe your father did, and he didn’t survive it. Maybe you have a lawyer already, and the phone hasn’t rung yet, and the silence is its own kind of terror. We are going to tell you the truth about what this ruling means — and what it does not mean — because the truth is more complicated and more useful than the headline. The Supreme Court did close a door. It did not close the building. The $7.3 billion settlement that a Missouri state court preliminarily approved in March 2026 was built specifically to provide compensation regardless of how the Supreme Court ruled, and it is still standing. Legal theories that do not depend on the warning label are still under active development. And the question that matters…

22 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

PFAS Forever Chemicals in the Big Sioux River at Sioux Falls, South Dakota: Attorney911 Pursues the AFFF Manufacturers and Facility Operators Behind the 25x EPA-Limit Contamination at Falls Park and the Regional Airport, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Claims Machine Values and Denies Toxic Tort Cases, We Move to Secure Blood Serum PFAS Testing, Well Water Sampling Data and AFFF Use Records Before They Are Lost, EPA Drinking Water Limits and CERCLA Hazardous Substance Designation, PFAS Linked to Kidney and Testicular Cancer That Bioaccumulates in the Human Body for Years, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims, South Dakota’s Discovery Rule Means the Limitations Clock May Already Be Running on Your Exposure — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

You Just Found Out Your Water Has “Forever Chemicals” in It — Here Is What That Means and What You Can Do You live in Sioux Falls, or somewhere along the Big Sioux River between northeast South Dakota and the Iowa border. You drink the water. Maybe you have for years. Maybe your kids grew up on it. And now a study has confirmed what nobody told you: fifteen different types of PFAS — “forever chemicals” that do not break down in your body — have been sitting in that river, at concentrations that in some places reach twenty-five times what the federal government says is safe to drink. The highest readings are right here in Sioux Falls. One hotspot is at Falls Park, downtown, where families walk and children play near the water. The other is at the Sioux Falls Regional Airport — and that is not a coincidence. The airport shares its property with the South Dakota Air National Guard’s 114th Fighter Wing, and for decades, military and civilian firefighting operations at that dual-use facility used aqueous film-forming foam — AFFF — loaded with PFAS compounds. The foam was used in training, in emergency response, and in equipment…

30 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

Roundup Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Toxic Tort Claims After the Supreme Court’s 7-2 FIFRA Preemption Ruling — Attorney911 Pursues Bayer and Monsanto on Surviving Design-Defect, Negligence and Concealment Theories When Failure-to-Warn Is Foreclosed, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How Bayer’s Claims Machine Having Processed Over $10 Billion in Glyphosate Settlements Now Values and Denies the Remaining Cases, We Secure Exposure Records, Purchase Histories and Pathology Reports Before Evidence Degrades and the Statute of Limitations Runs, California’s Proposition 65 Carcinogen Listing and Strict Product-Liability Framework Still Support Claims Independent of EPA-Approved Label Warnings, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

California Roundup Lawsuit After the Supreme Court Ruling: What the FIFRA Preemption Decision Means for Your Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Case You just heard the news. The Supreme Court ruled against Roundup cancer plaintiffs, and the headline says it is a “major blow” to the lawsuits. If you have non-Hodgkin lymphoma and you used Roundup — on your yard in Pasadena, at a worksite in the San Gabriel Valley, during sediment removal at Devil’s Gate Dam, or anywhere across California — your first thought was probably: Is my case over? The honest answer is: your case is harder, but it is not dead. The ruling closes one door. It does not close the building. What it does is make the specific legal theory your attorney chooses more important than it has ever been — and it makes the evidence of your individual exposure history the foundation everything else is built on. We are Attorney911 — The Manginello Law Firm. We handle toxic tort cases and catastrophic injury claims, and we take California cases. This page is not a press release about the ruling. It is the analysis a senior trial attorney gives a cancer patient who just learned the legal ground shifted…

42 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

Roundup Cancer Claims After the Supreme Court’s FIFRA Ruling: Attorney911 Litigates the Design-Defect Pathway Still Open for St. Louis, Missouri Residents Like John Durnell, Who Developed Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma After 20+ Years Spraying Glyphosate as His Neighborhood’s Groundskeeper, We Pursue Bayer AG and Monsanto on the Theory That a Formulation IARC Classified Probably Carcinogenic Was Unreasonably Dangerous — and Bayer’s Removal of Glyphosate From Residential Roundup Supports That Claim, We Preserve the Exposure Logs, Purchase Receipts and Oncology Charts Before Memories Fade and Product Samples Disappear, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How Bayer’s $16 Billion Claims Reserve Gets Valued and Denied, Missouri’s Pure Comparative-Fault Rule With No Non-Economic Cap in Product Liability, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, Avvo-Rated Excellent, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

The Supreme Court Just Changed the Rules for Roundup Cancer Claims — But It Did Not Close the Courthouse Door If you used Roundup and later developed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, you are reading this at a moment the ground just shifted under your feet. On June 25, 2026, the United States Supreme Court ruled 7-2 that federal law blocks state-court lawsuits claiming the maker of Roundup failed to warn about cancer risks. Thousands of pending cases — roughly 200,000 claims filed nationwide against Bayer AG and its subsidiary Monsanto — just lost their primary legal theory. If you are one of those people, or someone who was about to file, you need to know exactly what the ruling does, what it does not do, and what legal paths remain open. We are going to tell you all of it — straight, without sugarcoating, and with the specificity your decision demands. The ruling blocks one theory: failure to warn. It does not block every theory. The Supreme Court’s own opinion left the door open to design defect claims — the argument that Roundup’s formulation containing glyphosate was unreasonably dangerous as designed, regardless of what the label said. A $7.25 billion class-action settlement…

42 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

Forever Chemicals at 2.8x the Federal Limit in Missouri Drinking Water: PFAS Contamination Across St. Robert, Camdenton, St. James, St. Peters and Beaufort — Attorney911 Pursues the Chemical Manufacturers, the AFFF Firefighting-Foam Producers and the Sludge Companies That Resold Biosolids as Fertilizer, We Secure the EPA Testing Data and Blood Serum PFAS Results Before the Bioaccumulation Half-Life Erodes the Proof, Cancer, Thyroid Disease and Fertility Harm from Forever-Chemical Exposure, Missouri’s Discovery Rule Governs When Your Toxic Tort Claim Begins, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, Millions Recovered in Catastrophic Cases — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

Missouri PFAS Water Contamination: Your Legal Rights When “Forever Chemicals” Exceed Federal Limits in Your Drinking Water You just learned that the water you have been drinking, cooking with, and giving your family may contain chemicals the federal government says are unsafe at any measurable level. Maybe you live in St. Robert, where the testing showed PFOS at nearly three times the federal limit. Maybe you are in Camdenton, St. James, St. Peters, or Beaufort Circle C Mobile Home Park — all systems where the 2024 EPA data detected “forever chemicals” above the legal ceiling the government set in April of that year. Or maybe you live near Coldwater Creek in north St. Louis County, where independent testing in 2022 found the highest total PFAS concentration in the entire Midwest. You are reading this at a kitchen table, probably late at night, probably afraid. You want to know three things: what this means for your health, whether anyone is going to be held accountable, and whether you have legal rights before the clock runs out. We are going to answer all three, in plain language, with nothing held back. This is what we do — we are Attorney911, The Manginello…

44 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

PFAS Forever-Chemical Drinking Water Contamination: Attorney911 Pursues Solvay and the Fluoropolymer Manufacturers Behind the Contaminated Water Supplies in Willingboro and Paulsboro, New Jersey — Where Ratepayers Shoulder Millions in Cleanup Costs While the Polluters Who Discharged PFAS Linked to Cancer and Thyroid Disease Face No Accountability Without Litigation, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, We Secure Blood Serum PFAS Testing Before the Compounds’ Biological Half-Life Erases Your Biomarker Evidence, the Safe Drinking Water Act and the State’s Strict-Liability Spill Act with the Discovery Rule for Latent Disease, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

New Jersey PFAS Contamination: Your Tap Water, Your Health, and Your Right to Hold the Polluters Accountable You opened the mail, or you saw the news, or you got the letter from your water utility — and now you know. The water you drank, cooked with, and gave your children for years contained chemicals that do not break down. They are in your blood right now. They have been there for years. And the same companies that put them there are counting on you not understanding what that means or what you can do about it. We are Attorney911 — The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC. We handle toxic tort claims for people who were poisoned by someone else’s business decision, and what happened to New Jersey’s drinking water is exactly that kind of case. A Rutgers University study, published in a peer-reviewed environmental science journal in 2026, analyzed 19 years of water testing data from 47 water providers serving roughly 45% of New Jersey’s population. The study found that concentrations of PFAS — “forever chemicals” — in the state’s public drinking water dropped 55% after New Jersey became the first state in the nation to restrict them in 2018. PFOA,…

48 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

PFAS Forever-Chemical Water Contamination Above EPA Limits in Whitefish, Flathead County, Montana: Attorney911 Pursues Big Mountain Water Co. and Every Entity Behind the PFOA and PFOS in Your Drinking Water, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, Well #3 at 10 ng/L — More Than Double the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level of 4 ng/L — We Pull the Well-Sampling Records, AFFF Usage Logs and DEQ Correspondence Before the Email Retention Clock Purges Them, Montana’s Constitutional Right to a Clean and Healthful Environment as an Enforceable Claim, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Claims Machine Values and Denies Toxic-Exposure Cases, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

What Was Found in Your Water — And Why It Changes Everything You opened a letter from your water company, or you heard it from a neighbor, or you saw the notice posted somewhere near where you live on Big Mountain. It said two of the six wells that supply your drinking water tested positive for “forever chemicals.” One of them — Well #3 — registered PFOA at 10 parts per trillion. The federal limit is 4. That single number — 10 — is more than double what the Environmental Protection Agency says is safe. And the company that sent you that notice has already said, in writing, that it does not plan to shut that well off because it cannot meet summertime demand without it. We are going to tell you everything we know about what this means for your family, what your legal rights are in Montana, and what to do in the next 72 hours. None of what follows is guesswork. Every number, every rule, every deadline comes from the federal regulations that govern your water supply and the law of the state you live in. Our firm handles toxic tort and environmental contamination cases — and…

45 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

Roundup Product Liability & Glyphosate Cancer Litigation After the Supreme Court’s 7-2 FIFRA Preemption Ruling Overturned a Missouri Jury’s $1.25 Million Verdict for John Durnell — Attorney911 Brings Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice to the 65,000-Plaintiff Mass Tort Where the $7.25 Billion Bayer Settlement Is Pending, We Pursue Bayer and Monsanto on the Surviving Negligence, Design-Defect and Misrepresentation Theories Now That Failure-to-Warn Is Preempted, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Corporate Claims Machine Values and Denies Cancer Cases, We Secure Exposure Records, Pathology and Internal Corporate Safety Documents Before the Opt-Out Deadline, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

Missouri Roundup Lawsuit After the Supreme Court — What Bayer’s Win Really Means for Your Cancer Case You heard the news and your stomach dropped. The Supreme Court sided with Bayer. Your Roundup case — the one built on years of spraying that weedkiller in your yard, at your job, on the farm, and then hearing a doctor say the words “non-Hodgkin lymphoma” — feels like it just vanished in a 7-2 vote. Take a breath. It did not vanish. One legal theory is gone. Three others survived. And Bayer is still paying $7.25 billion to settle thousands of cases — a company does not write a check that size if it believes the remaining claims have no teeth. We are Attorney911 — The Manginello Law Firm. We handle toxic-tort and catastrophic-injury cases, and we take cases in Missouri. What follows is the honest, complete picture of where Roundup litigation stands after June 25, 2026, what the ruling took away, what it left alive, and what you should do about it — whether you have a pending case, think you might have one, or are staring at a settlement opt-out deadline that already passed. What the Supreme Court Actually Did…

40 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

Roundup Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Product Liability Lawsuits After the Supreme Court’s 7-2 FIFRA Preemption Ruling: Attorney911 Pursues Bayer and Monsanto on the Surviving Negligence and Design-Defect Claims in the MassTort-National Litigation, Where the Glyphosate Cancer Causation Evidence the EPA Label Decision Never Addressed Becomes Central, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, We Secure Exposure Records, Purchase History and Internal Corporate Safety Research Before Spoliation, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How Bayer’s Claims Machine Values and Denies Cancer Cases Against a $7.25 Billion Settlement Frame Where Some Claimants Could Receive as Little as $6,000, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims, the Statute of Limitations Is Running — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

The Supreme Court Just Ruled on Roundup Lawsuits — Here’s What It Means for Your Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Case You heard the news and your stomach dropped. The Supreme Court ruled against the Roundup failure-to-warn claims — the ones about cancer warnings on the label — and now you are sitting at your kitchen table at 2 a.m. wondering whether the case you were counting on just evaporated. We are going to tell you something that most of the coverage buried, missed, or got wrong: your legal options did not disappear. They changed shape. Failure-to-warn claims — the theory that the company should have put a cancer warning on the bottle — are now substantially foreclosed by federal preemption. But negligence claims and design-defect claims survived the ruling, law firms are still accepting and filing new cases, and the $7.25 billion settlement framework that Bayer is pushing may be grossly inadequate for people with serious non-Hodgkin lymphoma diagnoses. If you used Roundup and later developed this cancer, you need to understand what actually happened, what did not happen, and what your next move is — because the window to act under the most favorable remaining legal theories may narrow as lower…

39 min read Read Article