Blog

Jul 10, 2026

PFAS Forever-Chemical Water Contamination from Chambers Works in Deepwater, Salem County, New Jersey — Where DuPont Discovered Teflon and Discharged PFOA and PFOS Into the Delaware River for Decades: Attorney911 Pursues the Chemours-DuPont Corporate Successor Chain and the 3M Chemical Suppliers Behind the Contamination, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, We Secure Blood Serum Biomonitoring Data and NPDES Discharge Records Before Consent-Decree Treatment Systems Alter the Exposure Evidence, New Jersey Spill Act Strict Liability and the State’s Medical-Monitoring Doctrine for Kidney Cancer, Blood Disorders, Liver Damage and Developmental Delays, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

Deepwater, NJ PFAS Contamination: Salem County Residents’ Rights After the Chemours Settlement You just heard the news. The company that runs the massive chemical plant down the road — the one that has been part of this community for longer than anyone alive can remember — agreed to pay millions for contaminating your drinking water with chemicals that never break down. Maybe you read the headline and felt relief. Maybe you felt fury. Maybe you felt both at once, and then a third thing underneath: the quiet question you might not have said out loud yet. What about me? What about my family? What about the cancer, the kidney disease, the blood test that came back wrong, the child whose development is not where it should be? Does this settlement fix any of that? It does not. And that is why you are reading this page. The $22.5 million civil penalty and the $90 million treatment program address what the government demanded — penalties for years of permit violations, promises to reduce future discharges, and a clean water supply for residents going forward. Those are real things. But the settlement does not pay for your cancer treatment. It does not pay for the years of anxiety living with elevated disease risk. It does not compensate you for the property you might not be able to sell at full value. It does not create a court-supervised medical monitoring program to catch disease early in the tens of thousands of people who…

40 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

Roundup Cancer Product-Liability Claims After the Supreme Court’s FIFRA Preemption Ruling in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell — Attorney911 Pursues Bayer and Monsanto in the MassTort-National Roundup Docket Where 462 Cases Remain Active in Philadelphia, We Secure Exposure Histories, Oncology Records and Internal Corporate Documents on What the Agrochemical Giant Knew About Glyphosate and Blood Cancer Before the Limitations Clock Runs, Design-Defect and Negligence Theories Survive Even as Failure-to-Warn Falls, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Self-Insured Claims Machine Denies These Cases, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, Avvo-Rated Excellent, Pennsylvania Strict Product Liability With No Cap on Punitive Damages, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

Roundup Cancer Lawsuits in Philadelphia: What the Supreme Court’s FIFRA Preemption Ruling Means for Your Case You used Roundup for years. Maybe you sprayed it around the yard every weekend. Maybe you handled it at work, on a farm, at a greenhouse, on a landscaping crew. You did not think twice about it because the bottle never said it could give you cancer. Then the diagnosis came — Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma — and somewhere in the months of chemotherapy and doctors’ appointments and fear, you heard that the weedkiller might be why. You may have even heard that juries in Philadelphia were awarding enormous verdicts against the company that made it. And then you heard the Supreme Court changed the rules. Now you are sitting at a kitchen table at 2 a.m. wondering whether your case still exists. We are going to tell you, straight, what the ruling did and what it did not do. The short answer is this: the Supreme Court eliminated one legal theory — failure to warn — but it did not eliminate your case. Other claims survive. Design defect. Negligence. Fraudulent concealment. The company that made Roundup is still answerable for the product it put into the world and the way it handled the science behind it. What changed is the shape of the fight, not whether there is one. What the Supreme Court Actually Decided in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell In a 7-2 ruling, the United States Supreme Court held that state courts cannot hear…

38 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

Roundup NHL Toxic-Tort Attorneys: The $7.25B Settlement That May Bind You Through the 2040s and the Imminent Supreme Court FIFRA Ruling on Your Right to Sue — Attorney911 Brings Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice to Glyphosate Cancer Litigation, We Pursue Bayer-Monsanto and the Agrochemical Distribution Chain Behind Roundup’s Failure-to-Warn, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider, We Secure Exposure Receipts, NHL Pathology Records and Internal Corporate Documents Before They Disappear, Missouri Does Not Cap Non-Economic Damages in Product Liability Cases and Permits Punitive Damages on Clear and Convincing Evidence of Outrageous Conduct, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

Missouri Roundup Cancer Lawsuit: The $7.25 Billion Settlement, the Supreme Court, and What Your Rights Look Like Right Now If you used Roundup and later heard the words non-Hodgkin lymphoma from a doctor, you are reading this at a moment unlike any other in the history of this litigation. Three things have converged at once, and each one could change what your claim is worth — or whether you still have one at all. A federal judge just sent the $7.25 billion class action settlement back to a St. Louis courtroom. A deadline you may never have heard of — June 4, 2026 — has already passed, and if you did not opt out by that date, you may be bound by settlement terms that stretch into the 2040s. And the United States Supreme Court is preparing a ruling that could, depending on how it comes down, eliminate the right of people in your situation to sue Bayer in state court at all. We are Attorney911 — The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC, and this page is for one person: someone in Missouri who used a glyphosate herbicide, developed cancer, and needs to understand — right now, today — where they stand and what options remain. We handle toxic tort and product liability cases for people whose lives were changed by products they were told were safe. We are writing to you as the senior trial team that takes these cases — not as commentators on a news story, and not…

30 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

Talc, Depo-Provera & Cartiva 2026 Mass Tort Litigation Update — Product Liability Claims for Ovarian Cancer and Mesothelioma from Talcum Powder Use, Meningioma Brain Tumors from Prolonged Depo-Provera Injection, and Revision Surgeries from Cartiva Implant Failure: Attorney911 Brings Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice to MassTort-National Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Litigation, We Pursue Johnson & Johnson and the Manufacturers Behind Failure-to-Warn and Defective-Product Claims, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Corporate Claims Machine Sets Reserves and Denies These Cases, We Move to Preserve Pathology Specimens, Pharmacy Records and Explanted Devices Before They Are Destroyed, FDA Post-Market Surveillance and MDL Bellwether Proceedings, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ and Millions in Wrongful-Death Cases, the Statute of Limitations Is Running on Latent Injuries — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

2026 Mass Tort Litigation Update: Talc, Depo-Provera, and Cartiva — What Your Case Means Right Now You are reading this at 2 a.m. because someone you love — or you yourself — used a product you trusted, and your body broke in a way no one warned you about. Maybe it was years of talcum powder and a cancer diagnosis that came out of nowhere. Maybe it was the contraceptive injection you got every three months, and now there is a tumor pressing against your brain. Maybe it was a toe implant that was supposed to end the pain and instead made it worse. You found a headline about mass tort litigation, and now you are trying to figure out whether there is a case, where it stands, and whether you are already too late. We are Attorney911 — The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC. We are a trial firm that takes catastrophic-injury and wrongful-death cases, and we are writing this page as the senior trial attorneys who build these cases, not as a marketing office recycling a news wire. Everything below is what we would tell you if you were sitting across our desk in Houston, Austin, or Beaumont — or if we were on the phone with you at 2 a.m., which is when our live staff answers, not an answering service. The call is free. We do not get paid unless we win your case. Three mass torts are moving through the American court system right now at…

48 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

Talc Mesothelioma Verdict in Minnesota: $10.2 Million Against Johnson & Johnson for Asbestos-Contaminated Cosmetic Talc, Attorney911 Pursues the Manufacturer and Its Talc Supply Chain Under Strict Product Liability, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, We Secure the Product Containers for TEM Fiber Analysis and the Pathology Tissue Blocks Before They Degrade, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Claims Machine Values and Denies These Cases, Mesothelioma Is a Universally Fatal Cancer With Decades of Latency From Inhaled Asbestos Fibers in Cosmetic Talc, Minnesota Applies Strict Liability Under the Restatement Framework With No Cap on Compensatory Damages and Punitive Damages for Deliberate Disregard of Consumer Safety, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims and Millions in Wrongful-Death Cases — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

What the Minnesota Jury Decided — and What It Means for Your Family A Minnesota jury looked at the evidence and decided that Johnson & Johnson’s cosmetic talc products contained asbestos, that those products caused a person to develop mesothelioma, and that $10.2 million was what that harm was worth. If you or someone you love has been diagnosed with mesothelioma and used Johnson’s Baby Powder or other talc-based cosmetic products for years, that verdict is not just a headline. It is a door opening. We are Attorney911 — The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC. We handle toxic-tort and wrongful death cases for families across the country, and we are writing this page for one person: the Minnesotan sitting at a kitchen table at 2 a.m., reading about this verdict on a phone, wondering whether the mesothelioma diagnosis in their family could be connected to a powder they used every day for decades. The answer may be yes. And the law in this state gives you tools that many other states do not. Mesothelioma is a death sentence delivered on a delay. The asbestos fibers that cause it were breathed in or absorbed decades ago — sometimes thirty or forty years before the diagnosis. The person who is sick today was exposed when they were young, using a product marketed as pure, gentle, and safe enough for a baby. The science connecting asbestos-contaminated talc to mesothelioma is not speculative. It is geological, it is biological, and it is now confirmed by…

43 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

Talc Mesothelioma & Wrongful Death Attorneys — After a Los Angeles Jury Returned a $966M Verdict for Mae Moore’s Fatal Mesothelioma from Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder and the Judge Eliminated $950M in Punitive Damages, Attorney911 Pursues the Manufacturer and the Talc Supply Chain When Asbestos-Contaminated Talcum Powder Causes Mesothelioma After Decades of Latency, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, We Secure the Internal Testing Records and Corporate Communications Before They Are Sealed or Destroyed, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Corporate Claims Machine Values and Denies Toxic Tort Cases, FDA Does Not Require Asbestos Testing in Cosmetic Talc, California Strict Products Liability and Wrongful Death Doctrine, the Statute of Limitations Is Running, the Firm Has Recovered Millions in Wrongful-Death Cases — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

Los Angeles Talc Mesothelioma Verdict — Judge Tosses $950M in Punitive Damages While J&J Product Liability Finding Stands If you are reading this because someone you love developed mesothelioma after years of using baby powder, or because you yourself received a diagnosis and you are sitting at a kitchen table at 2 a.m. trying to understand what a $966 million verdict with $950 million reversed actually means for your family — keep reading. We are going to explain exactly what happened in that Los Angeles courtroom, what the judge’s ruling does and does not undo, and what it means for anyone who suspects talc caused their cancer. Here is the first thing you need to hear, and it matters more than any headline: the jury’s finding that Johnson & Johnson’s talc product caused a woman’s mesothelioma was not overturned. The judge struck down the punishment portion of the award — the $950 million in punitive damages — but the liability finding, the causation finding, and approximately $16 million in compensatory damages remain on the books. The fight is not over. It has moved to a different phase. A Los Angeles Superior Court jury returned a $966 million verdict against Johnson & Johnson on October 6 in a talc litigation matter brought by the children of a woman who died of mesothelioma in 2021 after allegedly using J&J baby powder contaminated with asbestos. The judge subsequently threw out $950 million of that verdict — the punitive damages portion — concluding the…

38 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

Johnson & Johnson Talc Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer & Wrongful Death: Attorney911 Pursues the Manufacturer and Its Distribution Chain for Cosmetic Talc Marketed Without Warning Labels in Los Angeles, Three Women Dead From Ovarian Cancer Allegedly Linked to Asbestos-Contaminated Talc Used for Perineal Hygiene, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, California Strict Product Liability Under the Greenman Doctrine With No Caps on Compensatory or Punitive Damages, We Secure Internal Corporate Documents and Pathology Evidence Before the Preservation Clock Runs, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Self-Insured Corporate Claims Machine Values and Denies These Cases, the FDA Cosmetics Gap That Required No Pre-Market Safety Review, the Firm Has Recovered Millions in Wrongful-Death Cases — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

Los Angeles Talc Ovarian Cancer Trial: Johnson & Johnson Faces a Jury of Three Families’ Grief If you are reading this page, you may be a woman who used Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder for years — maybe decades — and then heard a doctor say the word “ovarian cancer.” Or you may be sitting with a family member’s death certificate on the table, wondering whether the powder on the bathroom shelf had anything to do with it. You may have just seen the news about a trial happening in downtown Los Angeles and typed a search with hands that were not quite steady. We are going to tell you exactly what is happening in that courtroom, what the law says, what the science is fighting over, and what it means for you — plainly, without legal jargon, and without asking anything of you before we give you the information you need. A California state court jury at the Spring Street Courthouse in downtown Los Angeles is hearing opening statements in the second bellwether wrongful death trial against Johnson & Johnson over its cosmetic talc-based Baby Powder. Three women died from ovarian cancer. Their families say J&J knew for decades that asbestos contaminated the talc it mined and sold, and that the company sold the powder without a single warning label because warning the public would have cost the brand money. J&J says its talc never contained asbestos, that no asbestos was found in these women’s ovarian tissue, and that…

40 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

A Georgia Appellate Panel Affirmed a New Trial in the J&J Talc Baby Powder Cancer Death Case After Finding the Defense Verdict Unsupported by Sufficient Evidence — Attorney911 Pursues Johnson & Johnson and the Distribution Chain Behind the Powder Linked to a Woman’s Fatal Cancer, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, We Secure the J&J Internal Safety Documents, Asbestos-Contamination Findings and Exposure-Reconstruction Evidence Before Family Memories of Talc-Use Routines Fade and the Statute of Limitations Runs, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Self-Insured Claims Machine Values and Denies Toxic-Tort Cases, Wrongful-Death Full-Value-of-Life Recovery and the Product-Liability Punitive-Damages Framework, the Firm Has Recovered Millions in Wrongful-Death Cases — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

Georgia Appellate Court Orders New Trial in J&J Talc Baby Powder Cancer Wrongful Death Case If you are reading this page, someone you love used talcum powder for years — maybe decades — and then developed cancer, and now you are trying to understand what a court ruling out of Georgia means for your family. Maybe you heard about this decision and wondered whether it opens a door. Maybe you are sitting at a kitchen table at 2 a.m. with a death certificate and a bathroom cabinet that still has a bottle of baby powder in it, and you are trying to figure out whether anyone can be held accountable. We are going to tell you exactly what this ruling means, what it does not mean, and what it changes for families in Georgia who lost someone to cancer after long-term use of talc-based products. This page is legal information, not legal advice. Contacting our firm is free and confidential, and we do not get paid unless we win your case. Call us at 1-888-ATTY-911, any hour, any day. What the Georgia Appellate Panel Actually Decided A Georgia appellate panel affirmed a trial judge’s order granting a new trial in a wrongful death lawsuit alleging that Johnson & Johnson’s talc-based baby powder caused a woman’s fatal cancer. The panel agreed with the trial judge that the original defense verdict — meaning the jury’s decision in favor of J&J — was not supported by sufficient evidence. Here is what that sentence…

41 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuit: Asbestos-Contaminated Baby Powder Linked to Ovarian Cancer, Mesothelioma & Peritoneal Cancer After the Court of Session Clears Scotland’s First Group Action of 300 Claimants — Attorney911 Brings Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice to Product Liability Litigation Against the Manufacturers and Distribution Chains Behind Asbestos-Tainted Talc, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Corporate Claims Machine Values and Denies These Cases, We Move to Preserve Retained Product Containers and Pathology Tissue for TEM Asbestos-Fiber Analysis Before Consumer-Held Samples Disappear and Hospital Retention Policies Permit Disposal, Talc Geologically Co-Located With Asbestos Deposits So Contamination Is Inherent to the Mineral Source, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims and Millions in Wrongful-Death Cases — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

What the Scotland Court of Session Ruling Means for Talc Cancer Victims — and What It Means for You You are reading this because you used Johnson & Johnson baby powder for years — maybe decades — and now you or someone you love has cancer. Ovarian cancer. Mesothelioma. Peritoneal cancer. A diagnosis that came out of nowhere, or so it seemed. And then you heard the news: a court in Scotland just ruled that hundreds of people who used the same powder and got the same kinds of cancer can bring their cases together against the company that sold it. That ruling is real, and it matters. But what matters more is what it means for you, right now, in your state, under your law. Because the Court of Session in Edinburgh did not find Johnson & Johnson liable for anything. It found that the claims are strong enough and similar enough to proceed together as a group — a threshold ruling, not a verdict. The real fight, the fight that produces answers and compensation, still has to be fought case by case, evidence piece by evidence piece, in whatever court has your claim. We are Attorney911 — The Manginello Law Firm. We handle product liability and toxic exposure cases. Ralph Manginello has spent 27-plus years in courtrooms, including federal court, building cases against companies that sold products they should not have sold. Lupe Peña spent years inside a national insurance-defense firm — the rooms where claims like yours…

41 min read Read Article

Jul 9, 2026

George Walter Taylor Died of Cancer After 31 Years as a Maryland Firefighter — the Law Bearing His Name Banned the PFAS Foam That Killed Him, Yet Over 10,000 Gallons of Forever-Chemical AFFF Still Sit in Firehouses Across the State: Attorney911 Litigates the Chemical Manufacturers Behind the Foam in the Federal AFFF MDL, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Claims Machine Values and Denies Toxic-Tort Cases, We Secure Foam Samples, PFAS Blood-Serum Biomonitoring and Department Purchase Records Before MDE’s Cleanup Destroys the Chain of Custody, Maryland’s Wrongful-Death Doctrine and Discovery Rule for Latent Cancer Exposure, No General Non-Economic Damage Cap, the Firm Has Recovered Millions in Wrongful-Death Cases — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

Maryland Firefighters Exposed to Cancer-Causing PFAS Foam: Your Legal Rights After the AFFF Ban If you are a firefighter in Maryland — career or volunteer — and you have been diagnosed with cancer, or you are watching a family member fight it, and you are reading this at 2 a.m. wondering whether the foam you trained with, fought fires with, and stored in your firehouse for decades has anything to do with what is happening to your body, the answer is: it very well may. And the fact that the State of Maryland banned this foam in 2022 but has done nothing to remove it from your firehouse for four years is not a footnote. It is the center of the case. We are Attorney911 — The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC. We handle toxic tort cases and wrongful death claims for people who were exposed to something that was supposed to protect them and instead made them sick. We are writing this for the Maryland firefighter who trusted the foam, the family who is living with the diagnosis, and the surviving spouse who is wondering whether it is too late to do anything about it. Here is the first thing you need to hear: the manufacturers of this foam — the chemical companies that formulated it, sold it, and put it into the hands of firefighters across Maryland — are being sued right now in a consolidated federal litigation that has produced multi-billion-dollar settlements. Maryland’s legislature recognized the danger and…

7 min read Read Article