New York Child Sexual Abuse & Clergy Abuse Attorneys: Attorney911 Holds the Diocesan Institutions and the Corporate Structures That Shielded Known Abusers — the New York Child Victims Act Look-Back Window That Revived 440 Time-Barred Claims Against the Albany Diocese, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice and Lead Counsel in the Active $10M+ Institutional-Liability Lawsuit, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Claims Machine Denies and Delays, We Pursue the Diocesan Personnel Files, Assignment Records and Secret Archives That Prove the Concealment and Reassignment Pattern, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims, the Statute of Limitations Is Running for Survivors Who Have Not Yet Filed — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911
New York Child Sexual Abuse Settlement: The Albany Diocese, 440 Survivors, and What Comes Next If you are reading this, you may be one of the hundreds of survivors whose courage made this settlement possible — or someone who survived abuse in a Catholic institution and has not yet come forward. Either way, you need to understand what the $148 million agreement between the Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany and approximately 440 survivors actually means, what happens next, and what your rights still are. We are going to tell you everything we know about this case, this process, and this state’s law — not as a recitation of news, but as trial attorneys who have spent decades in courtrooms fighting for people who were failed by institutions that were supposed to protect them. The settlement is real. It is substantial. And it is not the end of the road. The diocese’s own bishop stood before cameras and said what many survivors waited decades to hear any representative of the Church acknowledge: “It cannot adequately compensate the survivors for the horrors they experienced. [The settlement can] hopefully provide some solace to all those affected by the pain caused by the perpetrators and the failings of those who could have intervened but did not.” That statement — from the institution itself — is a public acknowledgment that the harm was not just the work of individual perpetrators. It was the failings of those who could have intervened but did not. That is…