Red Roof Inn Sex Trafficking Lawsuits: What Survivors Need to Know About the Federal Law That Holds Hotels Accountable
If you are reading this page, something has already gone wrong. Maybe you were trafficked at a Red Roof Inn — in Smyrna, in Buckhead, at a location off an interstate exit somewhere between here and Texas. Maybe the people who ran the rooms have been arrested and the motel is still operating as if nothing happened. Maybe a caseworker, a detective, or a relative handed you a number and said “call a lawyer.” Maybe no one has said that yet, and you found this page because you typed the name of the motel and a word you are not sure you are allowed to type into a search engine.
Whatever brought you here, this page is for you. It is not a news article. It is a working map of the federal civil law that lets a survivor of sex trafficking hold a hotel chain accountable — the law Congress wrote, the cases that have tested it, the evidence the defense will try to destroy, the clock you are racing, and the path our firm walks with survivors and their families from the first phone call to the final resolution. Past results depend on the facts of each case and do not guarantee future outcomes.
We are Attorney911 — The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC. We have spent more than two decades standing beside people who were failed by institutions that should have protected them. We are a contingency-fee trial firm. No fee unless we win. Free consultation. 1-888-ATTY-911. Hablamos Español.
The Federal Law That Lets You Sue: The TVPRA Civil Remedy
“An individual who is a victim of a violation of this chapter may bring a civil action against the perpetrator (or whoever knowingly benefits, or attempts or conspires to benefit, financially or by receiving anything of value from participation in a venture which that person knew or should have known has engaged in an act in violation of this chapter) in an appropriate district court of the United States and may recover damages and reasonable attorneys fees.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 1595(a) (the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act civil-remedy provision).
That single paragraph is the spine of every hotel-trafficking case in the country. In plain English, it does three things that matter to you.
First, you do not have to prove that the hotel chain itself trafficked you. You only have to prove that the hotel, or someone working for it, took money from a venture that was trafficking you, and that the hotel knew — or should have known — what was happening.
Second, the law reaches “whoever knowingly benefits” from the venture. That language is the reason a hotel can be sued at all, even when the people physically locking the doors were pimps and buyers, not hotel employees.
Third, you may recover damages and attorneys’ fees. That second part matters for the practical reason that it allows our firm to take these cases on contingency — we front the cost of the investigation and the litigation, and we are paid from the recovery. You do not pay us by the hour.
The TVPRA also gives survivors something most civil statutes do not: a long clock. Under 18 U.S.C. § 1595(c), you have ten years from the cause of action to bring your case. If you were a minor when the trafficking occurred, the ten years does not even start until your eighteenth birthday. A girl who was trafficked at fourteen can sue until she is twenty-eight. That is not a suggestion. It is the federal statute.
The Four Elements You Have to Prove in a Hotel Trafficking Case
Federal courts have crystallized the TVPRA’s “knowingly benefits” language into a four-part test for non-perpetrator defendants like hotels. The four elements, drawn directly from the controlling appellate decision Doe #1 v. Red Roof Inns, Inc., 21 F.4th 714 (11th Cir. 2021), are:
- Knowingly benefited. The hotel took money — room revenue, franchise royalties, resort fees, “no-show” charges, mandatory “destination fees” — from a venture that was trafficking you.
- Participation in a venture. The hotel’s involvement rose above the level of a passive, unrelated commercial transaction. “Participation” means knowingly assisting, supporting, or facilitating the trafficking operation — for example, renting rooms to the same trafficker on a recurring basis, providing in-room amenities, turning a blind eye to housekeeping refusals and excessive foot traffic, or conditioning brand standards on the continued use of the property for the venture.
- The venture violated the TVPRA as to you. This is your case, your trafficker, your injuries. The venture you were caught in must itself be a sex-trafficking venture as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1591.
- Constructive or actual knowledge. The hotel knew, or in the exercise of ordinary care should have known, that the venture was trafficking. You do not have to show that the hotel knew your specific identity or your specific story. Knowledge that the venture was trafficking is enough.
Element two is where the fight lives. Element four is where the proof lives. We will take each in turn.
The United Inn Verdict: $40 Million Against a Red Roof-Affiliated Hotel
In July 2025, a federal jury in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (Atlanta) — the same courthouse handling much of the consolidated Red Roof litigation — returned the first civil TVPRA verdict ever to reach a jury in the United States in J.G. v. Northbrook Industries, Inc., Case No. 1:20-cv-05233, before Judge Sarah E. Geraghty. The survivor, identified as “J.G.,” had been trafficked as a minor (age 16) over a roughly 40-day period in 2018–2019 at the United Inn & Suites on Memorial Drive in Decatur/DeKalb County, Georgia — a property affiliated with the Red Roof brand. The jury awarded $10 million in compensatory damages and $30 million in punitive damages, for a total of $40 million, against the motel owner.
The verdict is significant for three reasons beyond the dollar figure.
First, it confirms that a jury in this circuit — the same circuit that decided Doe #1 — will hold a hotel operator accountable when the facts support it. Doe #1 was about what the brand did or did not do. J.G. was about what the operator did. Both rulings can sit alongside each other because the law applies to whoever knowingly benefits from the venture.
Second, the $30 million punitive component signals that the jury concluded the operator’s conduct was not merely negligent. Punitive damages in federal civil cases require a showing that the defendant acted with a conscious, deliberate disregard for the rights and safety of others. The jury concluded the operator made a choice to keep renting rooms to a known trafficker, and that choice was so callous that it warranted punishment beyond compensation.
Third, the verdict is not yet final. Defense post-trial motions and an appeal are likely. A plaintiff’s verdict is not a plaintiff’s recovery until it survives review. We will update the status of this verdict as the appellate process unfolds. Past results depend on the facts of each case and do not guarantee future outcomes.
The Evidence the Defense Will Try to Destroy — and the Clock You Are Racing
The single most important early move in a hotel-trafficking case is the preservation letter — a written demand sent to the hotel and the brand ordering them to preserve every relevant record. We send that letter the same day we are engaged. Here is what it must cover, and how fast each category can disappear.
Hotel surveillance video. This is the fastest-dying record. There is no single federal statute that mandates a uniform surveillance retention period for hotels. Industry practice commonly overwrites on a rolling 30-day loop; some properties cycle even faster. Once the tape rolls over, the hallway and lobby footage that may show the trafficker, the buyer traffic, the housekeeping refusals, and the staff’s reaction is simply gone. A preservation letter freezes it. A company that knowingly destroys evidence after receiving a preservation demand faces an adverse-inference instruction — the court tells the jury to assume the missing evidence was unfavorable to the company.
Key-card and door-access logs. The property’s electronic key-card system captures who entered which room and when. That data is the documentary proof that a single trafficker-controlled room received dozens of entries per night from people who were not registered guests. The data is held on the property’s property-management system and is subject to the property’s own retention policy. Demand it. Preserve it.
Guest folios and reservation records. The folios show who paid, how they paid (cash, debit card, prepaid), how long they stayed, and whether they were a returning guest. A trafficking operation leaves a financial fingerprint: short stays, cash, same-day check-in and checkout, multiple “companions” per room, no second-night housekeeping requests. These records are routinely purged on a rolling cycle. Preserve them.
Housekeeping logs. Housekeeping staff typically record whether a guest refused service, requested additional towels or linens (a trafficking indicator), or left behind unusual trash. These logs are the daily record of what the property knew and when. They die on short retention.
Police call-for-service and incident history. The CAD (computer-aided dispatch) records for the property show whether police were repeatedly called to the same address. This is the public-record backbone of the foreseeability case. Pull it from the local agency or through the state public-records act.
Internal incident reports and complaint records. The hotel’s own internal records — including any prior complaints about the same trafficker or the same room — are the most powerful evidence. Hotels control these records. Preservation is the only protection.
The corporate franchise and management file. The franchise agreement, brand-standards manuals, revenue reports, internal communications about the property, training records, and prior regulatory citations live in the brand’s files indefinitely — but are produced only in litigation. The preservation letter demands them.
The package you need to demand is the same every time: video, key-card logs, folios, housekeeping logs, police history, internal incident reports, and the corporate file. We draft it the day you call.
Who You Can Sue — The Defendant Map
A hotel-trafficking case is rarely a single-defendant case. The full defendant map includes:
- The operating company that owns the specific property where the trafficking occurred. This is the entity that holds the USDOT-equivalent hotel registration, that employs the front-desk staff, that holds the day-to-day insurance. This is the primary defendant.
- The franchisor or brand — Red Roof Inns, Inc. and any related corporate entities — when the facts show operational control, direct revenue participation, and constructive knowledge of trafficking at the specific property.
- The management company that runs the property on behalf of an absentee owner, if different from the franchisor.
- The property owner — the real estate entity that owns the land and building — when the ownership structure contributes to a pattern of neglect.
- The individual employees of any of the above who personally participated in the venture, in their individual capacities.
The full chain matters because a single named defendant is often a judgment-proof shell — a small LLC with no assets. The recovery lives with the parent, the franchisor, the management company, or the insurance tower. Finding the right defendants and the right insurance is part of the work, and it is the difference between a case that pays and a case that does not.
The Damages: What Your Case Is Worth
The value of a hotel-trafficking case depends on the severity and duration of the trafficking, the extent of the hotel’s knowledge and concealment, the quality of the evidence, and the venue. The range is wide.
-
Compensatory damages compensate the survivor for the harm itself: past and future medical and psychological care, lost earnings and lost earning capacity, loss of enjoyment of life, emotional distress, pain and suffering, and the cost of any necessary services the survivor will need going forward. The range in documented cases runs from the high six figures for shorter, less severe trafficking to eight figures and above for extended trafficking of a minor with documented psychological injury.
-
Punitive damages are available under the TVPRA where the defendant’s conduct shows a conscious, deliberate disregard for the rights and safety of others. The $30 million punitive component in the Atlanta United Inn verdict shows what a jury will do when the evidence supports it. Punitive damages are fact-driven and not guaranteed in any case.
-
Attorneys’ fees are recoverable under the TVPRA. This is the mechanism that allows a contingency-fee firm like ours to take these cases without requiring the survivor to pay an hourly retainer. The fees are paid by the defendant, separately from the survivor’s recovery, as a matter of statutory right.
-
Lifetime cost of trafficking-related trauma has been studied in peer-reviewed and CDC literature; the government itself has published lifetime per-victim cost figures that document the medical, psychological, and economic burden of trafficking. We work with retained life-care planners and forensic economists to build a damages model specific to your case, in current-year dollars, rather than relying on a generic national number.
The honest answer to “how much is my case worth” is: it depends on the facts. We can give you a realistic range after we have reviewed the evidence.
How Our Firm Works a Hotel Trafficking Case
We are a contingency-fee trial firm. We front the cost of the investigation, the experts, the depositions, the trial exhibits, and the litigation. We are paid from the recovery, and only from the recovery. No fee unless we win. Free consultation. When you call us, here is what happens.
First, we listen. We do not interrupt. We do not rush. We let you tell the story at your pace. If you are not ready to tell the whole story today, that is fine. We can start with what you are ready to share and build from there.
Second, we send the preservation letter. The same day. To the hotel, to the brand, to the management company, and to any third-party claims administrator we can identify. The letter demands preservation of video, key-card logs, folios, housekeeping records, internal incident reports, and the corporate file. The letter also puts the recipient on notice that spoliation will be met with an adverse-inference instruction.
Third, we begin the evidence preservation in parallel. We retain a forensic firm to image any device or system still in our reach. We pull the police call-for-service history for the property through the appropriate public-records process. We identify and interview prior staff, prior guests, and any witness who can corroborate the red flags.
Fourth, we file the case. The TVPRA claim is filed in federal district court — often in the district where the trafficking occurred or where the defendant is headquartered. We plead the four elements and the supporting facts. We name every defendant the evidence supports, from the operating company to the brand to the management company to the individual employees.
Fifth, we litigate aggressively and negotiate from strength. We do not posture. We do not delay. We prepare each case as if it will go to trial, because the defense takes seriously only the cases that are ready for trial. When the defense makes a settlement offer, we present it to you with our honest assessment. The decision is always yours.
Sixth, we see it through. If the defense refuses to offer a fair number, we try the case. We have trial-ready TVPRA experience. The United Inn verdict shows that juries in this circuit will hold hotels accountable when the evidence is there.
Our Firm
Attorney911 — The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC — has spent more than 24 years representing people who were failed by institutions that should have protected them. Our roots are in Texas, but we work cases nationwide and have the relationships and local-counsel network to litigate in any U.S. jurisdiction.
Ralph P. Manginello is the Managing Partner. He was born in New York in 1971, moved to Texas at age five, and was raised in the Memorial area of Houston. He attended UT Austin as a journalism and public-relations undergraduate before earning his J.D. from South Texas College of Law Houston in 1998. He has been licensed in Texas for 27+ years and is admitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. Before law school he was a journalist — a career that taught him how to investigate, how to ask the question no one else asked, and how to tell a story that wins in a courtroom. Ralph is rated “Excellent” on Avvo, has been named to the Million Dollar Trial Lawyers Association, and serves on the Pro Bono College of the State Bar of Texas. He has spent his career taking on insurance companies, corporations, and institutional defendants — and winning verdicts in cases that other firms declined.
Lupe Peña is our Associate Attorney. He is a third-generation Texan with deep South Texas roots — his family goes back to the King Ranch — and he is a former insurance-defense attorney who worked inside a national defense firm before joining us. That background matters. Lupe knows how insurance carriers value claims, how Colossus and reserve-setting software is used to lowball injury victims, how IME doctors are selected, and how defense firms run surveillance. He uses that insider knowledge on the other side of the table now. Lupe is fluent in Spanish and conducts full client consultations in Spanish without an interpreter — Hablamos Español. He graduated from Saint Mary’s University in San Antonio with a B.B.A. in International Business in 2005, then earned his J.D. from South Texas College of Law Houston in 2012. He has been licensed in Texas for 13+ years and is admitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas.
We do not work on hourly billing in these cases. No fee unless we win. The TVPRA provides for the recovery of attorneys’ fees from the defendant, which is what allows a contingency-fee trial firm like ours to take the case. We invest the time, the cost, and the risk. You provide the story and the courage to tell it. We bring the rest.
Our Track Record, Our Resources, Our People
We are a trial firm. We try cases. The defense takes seriously only the cases that are ready for trial, and our cases are ready for trial. Our founder, Ralph P. Manginello, has been in courtrooms for more than 27 years, including federal court. He is a journalist by training — a fact that matters in an investigative case like a trafficking matter, where the story matters as much as the law. Our associate, Lupe Peña, spent years inside a national insurance-defense firm before joining us; he knows how the other side prices a case, selects a doctor, and runs a defense, and he uses that knowledge to beat the defense at its own game. Together we bring the full weight of a contingency-fee trial firm to a case type the defense hopes survivors will not have the resources to pursue.
We work with retained life-care planners, forensic economists, trauma-informed therapists who consult on case presentation, and human-trafficking specialists who can testify to the red flags the defense will say it never saw. We have a network of local counsel in every U.S. jurisdiction, so we can litigate a TVPRA case in any federal district. We have preserved evidence in cases that were weeks old. We have tried cases that were years old. We have taken defense verdicts and we have taken plaintiff verdicts and we have taken settlements — and we will tell you honestly which path your case is most likely to take. Past results depend on the facts of each case and do not guarantee future outcomes.
Free Consultation. No Fee Unless We Win. 1-888-ATTY-911. Hablamos Español.
If you or someone you love was trafficked at a Red Roof Inn — in Atlanta, in Smyrna, in Buckhead, or anywhere in the 39 states where these cases have been filed — you have a right to hold the hotel accountable. The federal law is on your side. The evidence exists, at least for now, and we know how to preserve it. The clock is running, but it has not run out.
Call us. 1-888-ATTY-911. Free consultation. No fee unless we win. Hablamos Español. You can also visit our contact page to send a confidential message, review our practice areas, and learn more about how our firm works.
You are not alone. The motel may have tried to make you invisible. We will not.