If a hotel took money from your trafficking, the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act may give you ten years to make them answer for it
If you are reading this, you may be the survivor, or the parent, sibling, or friend of someone who was trafficked for sex at one or more hotels in the Austin area. You may have walked into a front desk that looked clean, professional, even safe. You may have used a room night after night — or you may have been moved from one to another along the I-35 or US-183 corridor. You may have heard “no fee unless we win” before and not trusted it. We get it. This page is written for the moment you are sitting in right now. We are going to walk you through what the law actually says, what a hotel can be sued for even when the hotel did not commit the trafficking itself, what the deadline is, what evidence exists and how fast it disappears, what the insurance carrier is going to do the moment you call, and what we at Attorney911 actually do to move the case forward. There is no charge to talk to us. There is no fee unless we recover for you. The call is free, the consultation is free, and the only way we get paid is if we win.
What the Trafficking Victims Protection Act actually does for a survivor who wants to sue a hotel
The federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act, or TVPRA, does more than punish traffickers criminally. It creates a private civil cause of action that a survivor can use to sue anyone who knowingly benefited from the trafficking venture. The statute — 18 U.S.C. § 1595(a) — uses these exact words:
“An individual who is a victim of a violation of this chapter may bring a civil action against the perpetrator (or whoever knowingly benefits, or attempts or conspires to benefit, financially or by receiving anything of value from participation in a venture which that person knew or should have known has engaged in an act in violation of this chapter) in an appropriate district court of the United States and may recover damages and reasonable attorneys fees.”
That sentence is doing a lot of work. It is not limited to the trafficker. It explicitly reaches whoever “knowingly benefits” from participation in a venture. It sets the knowledge standard at “knew or should have known.” And it makes attorneys’ fees part of the recovery, which is why firms like ours can take these cases on contingency. For a hotel case, the “benefit” is the room revenue. For a hotel brand, the benefit is the royalty off the top. For a holding company, the benefit is the consolidated profit that never quite reaches the property but would not exist without the property’s rooms.
The four elements that decide whether a hotel is on the hook
A TVPRA hotel case is won or lost on four elements. We plead each one separately because courts have tightened the second element and we need the strongest fact pattern we can build before any motion to dismiss is filed.
1. The defendant knowingly benefited. Hotels run on nightly room revenue. A brand runs on royalty and marketing fees. A holding company runs on the consolidated profit that would not exist without those rooms. Each layer of corporate structure benefited financially — that is the receipt of “anything of value” the statute names.
2. The defendant participated in a venture. This is where the courts have drawn lines, and where the hotels fight hardest. In Doe #1 v. Red Roof Inns — an Eleventh Circuit case from 2021 — the court dismissed the claims against the franchisors because, on the facts pleaded, the brand had not actually taken part in the trafficking operation. The case against the property-level operator was treated differently. We have read that decision carefully. It tells us two things: name the right defendant, and plead facts that show operational entanglement, not just a franchise relationship. We need to show that the brand or its management company did more than collect a fee — that it set the staffing, set the training, set the standards, monitored the cameras, processed the bookings, or otherwise reached into how the property was actually run.
3. The venture violated the TVPRA as to this plaintiff. The underlying conduct must be a sex trafficking violation, not a general negligence claim. We work with federal-case-law-trained investigators and former law enforcement to assemble the evidence of force, fraud, coercion, or the involvement of a minor — whatever makes the conduct a TVPRA violation.
4. The defendant knew or should have known. This is where the red-flag evidence lives. Federal courts have made clear that constructive knowledge is enough. We do not have to prove a particular manager sat down and decided to facilitate trafficking. We have to prove the warning signs were there — cash-by-the-hour payment, refusal of housekeeping, controlled-appearing guests, high-volume short-stay foot traffic, an occupant who never appears at the desk, rooms paid for by a third party, and similar patterns — and that any reasonably attentive operator would have recognized what was happening. We also look for any actual notice: prior incident reports at the property, calls for service to the Travis County Sheriff’s Office or the Austin Police Department, internal complaints, prior claims, training records that confirm the staff was taught to spot exactly these indicators, and the company’s own safety policies.
The four elements are why the case is built carefully and not rushed. A complaint that pleads only the franchise relationship gets dismissed. A complaint that pleads operational control, brand-set training standards, brand-mandated camera systems, and a pattern of ignored warnings survives. The dossier we build before we file is what makes the difference.
Why Austin and why the I-35 / US-183 corridor
Austin sits on a piece of interstate highway that runs from the Mexican border through San Antonio, Austin, Dallas-Fort Worth, and on up through Oklahoma. Law enforcement has long referred to that stretch — and its junction with US-183 north of downtown — as part of the trafficking pipeline between San Antonio and the DFW metroplex. The reason is simple: cheap hotels, a transient population, and the constant flow of commercial and personal traffic along the highway make it possible to move a person from one property to another without raising the kind of alarm that would follow a stranger lingering at the same motel for weeks. The Rundberg Lane area, the I-35 frontage north of downtown, the US-183 corridor toward the airport, and the cheap motel strips along both routes have all been places where survivors have told us they were housed. We name corridors, not properties, and we speak in category about what happened, because the survivors we represent did not choose to be in those places and we owe them the dignity of not dramatizing where they were hurt.
If you are trying to figure out whether the place where you or someone you love was trafficked is the kind of place a TVPRA case can reach, the answer is almost always yes. The statute does not require a national chain. It reaches any business that knowingly benefited from a trafficking venture. Budget motels, extended-stay properties, roadside inns — all of them qualify. The size of the company does not decide the case. The proof that they took money from what they knew or should have known was a trafficking operation is what decides it.
The 10-year federal clock — and why you should not let the deadline lull you to sleep
Under 18 U.S.C. § 1595(c), the federal claim must be filed not later than the later of:
- Ten years after the cause of action arose, or
- Ten years after the victim reaches 18 years of age, if the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged offense.
The Texas framework for trafficking survivors is parallel. Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Chapter 98 provides a civil cause of action against a person who knowingly engages in trafficking or knowingly benefits from it. Texas also recognizes common-law claims like negligence and premises liability that may run alongside a Chapter 98 claim. Those common-law claims are generally subject to Texas’s two-year statute of limitations under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003, but the trafficking-specific claims under Chapter 98 carry their own, longer deadline that runs in parallel with the federal TVPRA clock.
“A victim of trafficking has a cause of action against a person who: (1) knowingly engages in trafficking; or (2) knowingly benefits from trafficking, including by receiving anything of value.” — Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 98.002 (Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code).
That is a generous clock. If the trafficking happened to you as a child when you were fifteen, your federal and Texas trafficking-specific clock does not start running until you turn eighteen — which means you have until you are twenty-eight to file. If the trafficking happened to you as an adult, you have ten years from the date it occurred. The clock is plaintiff-favorable.
But the plaintiff-favorable clock is the slowest trap in the case. The evidence that proves the case dies far faster than ten years. The cameras overwrite. The folio records age out. The housekeeping logs get recycled. The manager who knew the trafficker by name moves on. The longer the case sits, the more the proof evaporates, until all that is left is a survivor’s memory against a hotel’s lawyers. We move at the speed of the evidence clock, not the speed of the statute of limitations, because the case that wins is the case that locks the proof down while it still exists.
What records exist, who holds them, and how fast they can legally die
The case lives or dies on records the hotel controls. Each of these has its own clock, and our first move on any new case is a preservation letter to the operator, the management company, the brand, and any third-party data vendor who holds the relevant systems.
CCTV and lobby cameras. This is the fastest-dying record. There is no federal statute that dictates how long a hotel keeps security video, and industry practice commonly overwrites on a rolling thirty-day loop. Some properties run shorter. If a survivor or family member calls us on day thirty-one, the video may already be gone. The preservation letter has to go out the same week, and in the most serious cases we file a civil action promptly so a court order can attach.
Property management system records. Electronic key-card access logs, guest folios, reservation records, payment records, and housekeeping logs are the documentary spine of a constructive-knowledge case. They show the by-the-hour cash rentals, the rooms that refused housekeeping for days, the same person paying for a room with different companions night after night, and the stream of male visitors to a single room. Retention is governed by the property’s own policy and by state recordkeeping rules. They do not last forever. We demand them in the preservation letter alongside the video.
Police call-for-service and incident history at the property. Prior calls for service, arrests, and incident reports tied to the property establish the foreseeability backbone of any claim, and they corroborate constructive knowledge for the TVPRA case. We pull these through Texas’s Public Information Act. Travis County and the City of Austin each maintain their own records systems, and the request has to be made correctly and quickly because agencies have their own retention schedules.
Internal incident reports and prior claims. Every chain keeps a log of complaints, internal investigations, and prior lawsuits or claims. These documents are often maintained by corporate risk management rather than at the property. They can be the most decisive evidence in the case, because they show what the company knew before this survivor ever walked in. They are also the documents the company is most motivated to “lose.” A preservation letter is the single most important early act in the case.
Personnel and training files. If the company trained its staff to recognize trafficking indicators, the training records corroborate constructive knowledge. If the company trained its staff on nothing, the absence is equally probative.
Bank records and the booking platform. Credit-card records, online-booking records, third-party platform records (Expedia, Booking.com, Hotels.com), and the hotel’s own revenue management system show who paid for what room, on what card, and on whose reservation. These are pulled from the defendants in discovery.
Each of these records dies on its own timer. The single most important thing any survivor or family can do is call us quickly so the preservation letter goes out while the proof still exists. We do not need a fully formed case to send it. We need the name of the property, the rough dates, and the names of any people involved.
Who we actually sue — the corporate shell game that hides the real defendant
Hotels do not present themselves as one defendant. They present themselves as a stack of separately incorporated entities. The stack almost always looks like this: the local operator LLC that owns or leases the building; the property management company that runs the front desk and housekeeping; the brand franchisor that licenses the flag and collects a royalty; the brand’s parent holding company; the insurance carrier that issued the general liability policy; and often a separate management company, staffing company, or revenue-management vendor. Each one of those entities has a different role in the operation and a different insurance tower behind it.
We do not pick a defendant and hope for the best. We trace the corporate chain through Secretary of State filings, the franchise agreement, the management agreement, the certificate of insurance, and the additional-insured endorsements on the underlying policies. We identify the local operator, the management company, the franchisor, and the parent holding company. We plead all of them. We plead them because the law lets us, because the case may turn on what one of them did while another was ignorant, and because the judgment needs to reach the deepest pocket with the clearest operational role.
The franchisor-versus-operator fight is the one to watch. Federal appellate courts have split on when a brand becomes a participant in the venture rather than just a licensor. The Eleventh Circuit’s decision in Doe #1 v. Red Roof Inns dismissed claims against the franchisors on the facts pleaded there, but signaled that claims against the property-level operator would be treated differently. Other federal trial courts have allowed claims to proceed against brands and holding companies where the operational entanglement was documented. The split matters, and the right defendant depends on the specific facts. That is why the first hours of any new case are spent on corporate-structure work, not on sympathetic storytelling. Sympathetic storytelling matters. It is also necessary. It is not sufficient.
What damages we pursue — the full measure of what was taken
A TVPRA hotel case recovers the full measure of what trafficking cost the survivor. There is no artificial cap on that recovery. The recoverable categories fall into three buckets.
Past and future medical care. Trauma-focused therapy for complex PTSD, depression, anxiety, and substance use is medically necessary care. Residential treatment programs cost what they cost. Anti-anxiety and sleep medications, treatment for the physical injuries from beatings, treatment for the sexually transmitted infections that came from the abuse, prenatal care and obstetric care if pregnancy occurred during the trafficking, dental care, and any future reconstructive or specialty care are all part of the medical damages.
Past and future lost earnings. If the survivor had a job before the trafficking, the lost wages from the period of captivity and the diminished earning capacity afterward are recoverable. If the survivor was a minor, the claim focuses on what their earning capacity would have been but for the trafficking. If the survivor was a student, the claim focuses on the disruption to their education and the career path they would have pursued.
Pain, suffering, mental anguish, and loss of dignity. This is the largest category in any TVPRA case, and it is the one that resists easy proof. We build it with the treating clinician’s testimony, the diagnostic record, the forensic exam record if one exists, the contemporaneous outcry evidence, and the survivor’s own voice when they are ready to give it.
Punitive damages. A TVPRA case is one of the rare categories in which punitive damages are routinely available. They are designed for the conduct the statute most directly targets — taking money from a venture you knew was trafficking — and they exist to punish and deter. Punitive damages are not awarded automatically, but they are available, and they can substantially increase the total recovery.
Attorneys’ fees. The TVPRA makes reasonable attorneys’ fees part of the recovery. That is what allows firms like ours to take these cases on contingency — the survivor does not pay us by the hour, and the statute puts our fee on the wrongdoer.
The total recovery varies case by case. Based on the type of case, the duration of the trafficking, the severity of the harm, the strength of the documentary record, and the depth of the corporate defendant’s pocket, our cases in this space typically resolve in the seven-figure range, with some reaching into the lower eight figures. We will give you a candid range when we have the facts. We will not quote you a number before we have the facts.
What the insurance carrier is going to do — and how we counter each play
The moment you or your family identifies a hotel and starts the conversation about a TVPRA case, an insurance carrier enters the picture. The carrier’s job is to pay as little as possible. Their playbook has predictable moves. Here are the ones we see most often.
Play one: the assault-and-battery exclusion. Many commercial general liability policies contain exclusions for bodily injury arising from assault, battery, or other intentional torts. The carrier will argue that trafficking is a series of intentional acts and therefore excluded from coverage. The counter is twofold. First, the trafficking is not the survivor’s conduct — it is the conduct of a third party whose acts the hotel enabled by taking money and looking the other way. Second, many policies contain an exception to the assault-and-battery exclusion for negligent hiring, negligent supervision, negligent retention, and the insured’s own negligence. We fight the exclusion head-on, and we preserve the parallel claims that survive it.
Play two: “you were not our insured.” When the property operator is the named insured, the franchisor’s carrier will argue that the franchisor is not the insured and that there is no coverage for claims against the franchisor under the operator’s policy. The counter is the additional-insured endorsement, which almost every franchise agreement requires the operator to carry naming the brand as an additional insured. We demand the certificate of insurance, the additional-insured endorsement, and the underlying policy. If the endorsement is in place, the brand has direct rights against the operator’s policy and may have rights against the brand’s own insurance tower.
Play three: the recorded statement. A carrier adjuster, often within days of the incident, will call and ask for “a quick statement” about what happened. The call sounds friendly. The call is being recorded. The call is engineered to get the survivor to lock in a version of events before counsel and before the survivor has had a chance to heal, to remember, and to assemble the proof. The counter is simple: do not give a recorded statement. Refer the carrier to us. We will handle the conversation.
Play four: the quick settlement with a broad release. A carrier may offer a small settlement within weeks, often before the survivor has counsel. The offer comes with a release of all claims, often in language broad enough to cover not just the hotel but the brand, the parent, the management company, and any future claims the survivor has not yet identified. The counter is to refuse the offer and to wait until the full picture of the harm and the full set of defendants are known.
Play five: “we need more time.” The carrier will delay. The carrier will ask for extensions. The carrier will request additional documentation. The carrier will not say yes and will not say no. The delay is designed to push the survivor toward accepting whatever is offered. The counter is to set a firm response deadline and to file the lawsuit when the carrier fails to respond.
Play six: the “you should not blame the hotel” framing. The carrier will argue that the survivor should pursue the trafficker, not the hotel. The argument confuses criminal prosecution with civil recovery. The survivor can pursue both. The TVPRA explicitly allows the survivor to pursue anyone who knowingly benefited from the venture, which includes the hotel.
Every one of these plays is a tactic, not a legal conclusion. We anticipate each one before it lands and we counter it before the carrier has a chance to dig in.
What we do at Attorney911, in the order we do it
We do not start with a press release. We start with the evidence clock. The first day we are retained, we send preservation letters to the property operator, the management company, the brand, the parent, and any third-party data vendor whose systems hold the records we need. We serve litigation-hold demands. We open the Texas Public Information Act requests for the police call-for-service history at the property. We retain a forensic accountant to follow the money if the property operator’s books are accessible. We retain a trafficking-investigation expert — often a former federal agent or a former state law-enforcement investigator with deep experience in hotel trafficking cases — to walk us through what the surveillance footage, the booking records, and the staff testimony would have shown if they had been preserved.
We build the corporate-structure map next. We trace the operating LLC, the management company, the franchisor, the parent, and the insurance carriers through Secretary of State filings and the franchise agreement. We identify every additional-insured endorsement. We map the insurance tower. We do not file a complaint until we know who we are suing and why.
We work with the survivor and the family at the survivor’s pace. We do not push a deposition on a survivor who is not ready. We do not push a press conference. We do not push a public statement. The case moves at the speed the survivor is comfortable with, and the survivor makes the decisions. Our role is to build the strongest case the facts allow and to put it in front of the right decision-maker, whether that is a defense carrier, a mediator, or a jury.
We do this work on contingency. We charge 33.33% of the recovery if the case resolves before trial and 40% if it resolves at or after trial. We pay the case expenses out of our share. We do not get paid unless we recover for the survivor. The free consultation is genuinely free, and the 1-888-ATTY-911 line is answered by a person, not a machine.
Ralph Manginello has been a Texas trial lawyer for 27-plus years, admitted to the Texas Bar on November 6, 1998, and admitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. He leads the firm. He has built a career on cases that defendants thought they could outlast, and he has spent his professional life in Texas courtrooms including federal court.
Lupe Peña is a former insurance-defense attorney — the rare lawyer who has sat on the other side of the table and watched claims get priced, delayed, surveilled, and devalued by the same playbook we now dismantle from the survivor’s side. He is licensed in Texas since December 6, 2012, and admitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. He is fluent in Spanish, and he conducts full client consultations in Spanish without an interpreter. Hablamos Español.
If you would like to read about the firm’s broader practice areas, you can see the full set at our practice areas page, including our work on wrongful death claims and our personal injury practice. If you would prefer to read more about how contingency fees work in a case like this, we wrote a plain-language guide at how contingency fees work. And if you would like to understand more about whether hiring a personal injury lawyer is worth it in a case this serious, see are personal injury lawyers worth it.
Why talking to us early changes the case
The longer you wait, the more the evidence dies and the more the defense is in control of the narrative. We are not asking you to file a lawsuit today. We are asking you to give us the chance to lock down the proof before it disappears. The call is free, the consultation is free, and the conversation is confidential. If we take your case, we do not get paid unless we recover for you. If we cannot take your case, we will tell you why, and we will point you toward someone who can.
Past results depend on the facts of each case and do not guarantee future outcomes.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long do I have to sue the hotel?
Under the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act, you generally have ten years from the date the cause of action arose. If you were a minor when the trafficking occurred, the ten-year clock does not start running until you turn eighteen, which means you have until you are twenty-eight. Texas’s parallel trafficking-specific framework under Chapter 98 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code gives you a similar window. Common-law claims like negligence and premises liability in Texas are subject to a separate two-year statute of limitations under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003. We map every applicable deadline against the specific facts of your case on the first call so we do not lose any of them.
Can I sue a hotel even if I was not physically restrained or locked in the room?
Yes. Federal law recognizes that trafficking can occur through force, fraud, coercion, or any combination, and that the commercial-sex-act element can be satisfied in many different ways. A hotel case does not require proof of physical restraint. It requires proof that the hotel knowingly benefited from a venture that violated the TVPRA as to you, and that the hotel knew or should have known what was happening. The constructive-knowledge standard — what a reasonably attentive operator would have recognized — is enough. Cash-by-the-hour payment, refusal of housekeeping, the stream of male visitors to a single room, the occupant who never appears at the desk — those are the kinds of facts that make the constructive-knowledge case.
Do I have to identify the specific trafficker to sue the hotel?
No. You have to prove the underlying trafficking venture existed and that the hotel knowingly benefited from it. You do not have to name the trafficker to make that proof, and you do not have to obtain a criminal conviction first. The civil case and the criminal case are separate proceedings, and the TVPRA expressly allows the civil case to proceed against anyone who knowingly benefited from the venture.
What if I used drugs or alcohol during the trafficking?
Substance use does not bar the claim. Federal law recognizes that traffickers frequently use drugs and alcohol as tools of control, not as evidence of consent. Texas’s modified comparative fault rule generally allows recovery even when the plaintiff is partly at fault, and comparative fault is rarely a successful defense in intentional-tort or trafficking cases. Your use of any substance during the trafficking does not give the hotel a defense. We work with treating clinicians who can testify to the role of substance use as a tool of the trafficker’s control.
How is a TVPRA civil case different from a criminal prosecution?
A criminal prosecution is brought by the government against the trafficker. The survivor is a witness. The survivor does not control the case. A TVPRA civil case is brought by the survivor against anyone who knowingly benefited from the venture, including the hotel. The survivor controls the case. The survivor makes the decisions about settlement, trial, and whether to proceed at all. The standard of proof is different — civil cases are decided on the preponderance of the evidence, not beyond a reasonable doubt. The remedies are different — civil cases recover money damages, criminal cases impose prison sentences. We do not bring criminal cases. We bring civil cases. The survivor can pursue both, and often does.
What if the hotel chain is headquartered in another state?
The hotel chain can almost always be sued in federal court in the district where the trafficking occurred, which in our cases is the Western District of Texas, Austin Division, or in Travis County state court. Federal diversity and federal-question jurisdiction typically give us a clear path. We file where the survivor’s case will be heard by a jury drawn from the community where the trafficking happened.
How much is my case worth?
It depends on the facts. Past and future medical care, lost wages and diminished earning capacity, pain and suffering, mental anguish, loss of dignity, and punitive damages are all recoverable, and attorneys’ fees are recoverable on top. Cases in this space commonly resolve in the seven-figure range, with some reaching into the lower eight figures. We will give you a candid range when we have the facts. We will not quote a number before we have the facts. We will never promise a result.
What about confidentiality?
The case can be filed under seal in appropriate circumstances, particularly while law-enforcement investigations are ongoing, and we routinely file motions to seal sensitive information about the survivor, the family, and the underlying investigation. The defendant and the insurance carrier do not get to use discovery to publicize the survivor’s identity or history. We protect the survivor’s privacy as a default position, not an afterthought.
What if I do not remember everything clearly?
Trauma affects memory. Substance use affects memory. Time affects memory. None of those facts defeat the case. We work with clinicians and forensic interviewers trained in trauma-informed techniques who can elicit a survivor’s memory without re-traumatizing them, and we work with documentary evidence — records, surveillance video, financial records, prior incident reports — that does not depend on perfect recall. A case is built from records and corroboration, not from a perfect narrative.
Do you take these cases on contingency?
Yes. We charge 33.33% of the recovery if the case resolves before trial and 40% if it resolves at or after trial. We pay the case expenses out of our share. We do not get paid unless we recover for the survivor. The free consultation is genuinely free, the 1-888-ATTY-911 line is answered by a person, and we will tell you on the first call whether we can help.
What if I am not ready to file a lawsuit right now?
You do not have to be ready. The first step is the preservation letter, which we send the day you retain us, regardless of whether you are ready to file. The preservation letter freezes the evidence. The filing decision happens later, at a pace that feels right to you. We do not push. We build.
What if the trafficking happened a long time ago?
The federal TVPRA gives you up to ten years, or up to ten years after you turn eighteen if you were a minor at the time. Texas’s parallel trafficking-specific framework under Chapter 98 carries a similar window. Common-law claims have a separate two-year window. We will tell you on the first call which deadlines apply to your case and how much time you have. If you are inside the window, we have time to build a careful case. If you are approaching a deadline, we move now.
What to do right now, in this order
The order matters.
First, write down what you remember, while you remember it. Not a polished statement. A stream of consciousness. Dates, places, names, vehicles, license plates, the layout of any rooms you were held in, the names of any hotels or motels where the trafficking occurred, the names of any individuals who helped or hurt you, the names of any witnesses, the names of any staff at the properties you remember. Handwritten is fine. Phone notes are fine. Do not edit. Do not worry about whether a fact is admissible. Write it down.
Second, preserve the evidence you control. Save text messages, voicemails, social media messages, photos, and any documents. Do not delete anything. Do not forward anything to anyone except us, after you have retained us.
Third, contact us at 1-888-ATTY-911 or through our contact page. The call is free. The consultation is free. We will tell you what deadlines apply, what evidence exists, and what the realistic next steps are. If we can help, we will explain how. If we cannot help, we will tell you why, and we will point you toward someone who can. If you would like to read more about how contingency fees work in cases like this, see how contingency fees work.
The trafficking took something from you that no verdict can fully return. The TVPRA was written to make sure that the businesses which profited from it, and the insurance carriers which defended it, are held to account for the rest of your life. We do that work. We do it on contingency. We do it without any fee unless we recover for you. We do it in English and in Spanish. We do it now.
Hablamos Español.
1-888-ATTY-911
Free consultation. No fee unless we win.
Past results depend on the facts of each case and do not guarantee future outcomes.