Life-Threatening Motorcycle Crash at Thomas Street & Midkiff Road: When a Turning Kia SUV Fails to Yield on Midland’s Oil-Boom Arterials and Ejects a Rider, Attorney911 Brings Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice to the Permian Basin, We Pull the At-Fault Driver’s EDR Black-Box Data and Intersection Surveillance Before the Overwrite Cycle Destroys It, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Claims Machine Uses Helmet Non-Use to Minimize Life-Threatening Injury Claims, Texas Comparative-Fault Law Puts Liability on the Driver Who Failed to Yield — the Helmet Is a Mitigation Question Not a Recovery Bar, TBI ($5M+ Recovered) and $50M+ Total Recovered for Injury Victims — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911
Midland Motorcycle Crash at Thomas Street and Midkiff Road: What Happened and What Your Family Needs to Know Now If you are reading this from a waiting room at Midland Memorial Hospital, or you got the phone call nobody is ready for — the one about someone you love thrown from a motorcycle on North Midkiff Road — we need you to hear three things before anything else. First: the Midland Police Department has already determined that the Kia SUV failed to yield the right-of-way to the motorcycle. The at-fault driver violated your loved one’s right-of-way. This is the Kia driver’s fault for causing the collision, not the rider’s fault for being on the road. Second: the fact that the motorcycle operator was not wearing a helmet does not erase the case. We will explain exactly why below — but Texas law is specific about what helmet non-use does and does not do to a personal injury claim, and the short version is this: it does not bar recovery, it does not prove the rider caused the crash, and the defense has to prove a helmet would have prevented each specific injury it wants to argue about. The crash was…