Paraquat & Diquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuit — Attorney911 Pursues Chemical Manufacturers Like Syngenta and Adama After the Australia APVMA Ruling, We Litigate Failure to Warn and Design Defect Claims Linking Toxic Herbicide Exposure to Parkinson’s Neurological Decline, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Claims Machine Values These Cases, We Secure Application Logs and Purchase Records Before Evidence is Lost, Millions Recovered for Catastrophic Injury Victims — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911
Australia Paraquat Review: Why This Regulatory Decision Impacts Your Parkinson’s Claim If you spent years in the fields of New South Wales, the American Midwest, or the Central Valley of California, you know the smell of Paraquat. You know the blue dye of Gramoxone. And if you are now living with a Parkinson’s disease diagnosis, you likely suspect that the chemical you carried in your backpack or loaded into your spray rig is the reason your hands won’t stop shaking. Recent news from Australia has brought this issue to a boiling point. The Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) just handed down a final decision after a 30-year review. They chose to allow Paraquat and Diquat to remain on the market, albeit with new restrictions like phasing out backpack sprayers and cutting application rates. Most disturbingly, this regulator formally dismissed the link between Paraquat and Parkinson’s disease, a finding that stands in direct opposition to leading neurologists and global health experts. At Attorney911, we see this for what it is: a coordinated effort to protect an industry rather than the people who work in it. We know that the APVMA is majority industry-funded, a structural conflict of interest that…