MassTort-National, New Jersey

AFFF & PFAS Firefighting Foam Cancer Lawsuits: New Jersey’s Collection of 150,000 Gallons of Cancer-Causing Foam From 400+ Fire Departments Confirms What Firefighters Know — Attorney911 Pursues the Fluorochemical Manufacturers Behind the Design Defect and Failure-to-Warn Claims in the MassTort-National AFFF Litigation, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider, We Secure Serum PFAS Blood Testing and AFFF Usage Records Before the 2027 Transition Erases the Evidence, PFAS Forever Chemicals Persist in the Body for Decades — the Discovery Rule May Govern Your Filing Window, the Firm Has Recovered Millions in Wrongful-Death Cases — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

New Jersey Is Pulling 150,000 Gallons of Cancer-Causing Foam From Its Firehouses — If You Used It, You Need to Read This You spent years pulling on turnout gear and hauling lines of aqueous film-forming foam into training burns, fuel-fire calls, and hazmat scenes. Nobody told you the foam was loaded with chemicals that never leave the body. Nobody told you it was designed with fluorosurfactants — the same “forever chemicals” that the federal government has now classified as hazardous substances. Nobody told you that the state of New Jersey would eventually call what you were spraying “cancer-causing” and spend $16.6 million to collect and destroy it. Now you have a diagnosis, or someone you served with has one, and you are reading this at a kitchen table at 2 a.m. trying to understand whether the foam and the cancer are connected — and whether anyone can be held accountable for what was done to you. We are Attorney911. We are a trial firm that handles toxic exposure and mass tort cases for people who were given a dangerous product and told it was safety equipment. Ralph Manginello has spent 27-plus years in courtrooms, including federal court, and before he…

MassTort-National Talc Powder Ovarian Cancer Product Liability Claims: Johnson & Johnson Faces 67,000+ Consolidated Lawsuits After a New Jersey Federal Court Disqualifies Lead Plaintiff Counsel, Attorney911 Brings Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice to Women Diagnosed With Ovarian Cancer From Talc-Based Body Powder, We Pursue the Manufacturer and Its Corporate Subsidiaries for Design Defect, Failure to Warn and Decades of Fraudulent Concealment, the Perineal Talc Exposure Pathway and Carcinogenic Inflammation Mechanism, We Secure J&J Internal Safety Testing Communications and Laboratory Records Before They Vanish, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How Corporate Claims Teams Value and Deny Cancer Cases, the Firm Has Recovered Millions in Catastrophic Injury and Wrongful-Death Cases, FDA Cosmetic-Product Oversight and Products-Liability Doctrine, Your State’s Statute of Limitations Is Running — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

The Talc Verdict Is Still Coming — What the Federal Court’s Disqualification Ruling Means for Your Ovarian Cancer Claim You just read the headline. A federal court kicked a major plaintiff firm off the biggest talc litigation in the country — more than 67,000 women’s claims against Johnson & Johnson, consolidated in a New Jersey federal courtroom, and the firm that was helping steer those cases has been barred from representing them. The ruling came down March 26, 2026, in a 41-page opinion that described a decade of litigation turned bitter and a collaboration that crossed an ethical line. If you are a woman who used talc-based body powder for years and was later diagnosed with ovarian cancer, that headline landed in your chest like a bad scan result. You are thinking: Does this mean my case is dead? Did the court just say the science was wrong? Did J&J win? No. No. And no. What the court did was punish a law firm for how it handled a specific ethical question — not question whether Johnson & Johnson’s talc caused cancer, not question whether the women’s claims are valid, and not dismiss a single plaintiff’s case. The underlying litigation…

J&J Talc Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits: Johnson & Johnson Moves to Dismiss the MassTort-National MDL With Prejudice in the District of New Jersey After a Decade of Failure-to-Warn and Asbestos-Contamination Claims, Attorney911 Brings Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice to Talc Product Liability Cases, We Pursue the Manufacturer and Its Corporate Successor for Design Defect, Failure to Warn and Fraudulent Concealment, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Corporate Claims Machine Values and Denies These Cases, We Preserve Product Containers With Lot Numbers, Pathology Reports and Internal Testing Documents Before They Disappear — J&J Discontinued Talc Baby Powder in North America, Making Remaining Samples Finite and Irreplaceable, Perineal Talc Exposure Classified as Possibly Carcinogenic Under IARC Standards While FDA Cosmetic Rules Left Safety Testing to the Manufacturer, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims and Millions in Wrongful-Death Cases, the Statute of Limitations Is Running — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

J&J Talc Cancer MDL: What Johnson & Johnson’s Motion to Dismiss Means for Your Claim You used a product your whole life that was sold to you as safe — pure, gentle, meant for babies — and now you are sitting with an ovarian cancer diagnosis, or you are sitting where your mother used to sit, and she is gone. You heard that Johnson & Johnson just filed something in court that sounds like it could end everyone’s case at once. You are reading this at 2 a.m. because you cannot sleep, and you need to know whether your case — or your mother’s case — just disappeared. It did not. Here is what actually happened, what it means, and what you should do about it. We are Attorney911 — The Manginello Law Firm. Ralph Manginello has spent 27-plus years in courtrooms, including federal court, and before he was a lawyer he was a journalist, which means he reads a court filing and tells you what it actually says, not what someone wants you to hear. Lupe Peña sat on the other side of the table for years inside a national insurance-defense firm — the rooms where claims are valued,…