MassTort-National Personal Injury

Jul 10, 2026

MassTort-National Roundup Cancer Lawsuit After the Supreme Court’s 7-2 FIFRA Preemption Ruling — Attorney911 on What the Decision Means for Your Glyphosate Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Claim, We Pursue Monsanto and Its Bayer Parent on Design-Defect, Negligent-Testing and Fraudulent-Marketing Theories That Survive the Labeling Preemption, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Corporate Claims Machine Values and Denies Cancer Cases, We Preserve Exposure Records, Purchase Receipts and Pathology Reports Before They Disappear, the $7.25 Billion Class Settlement Is Pending and Statute-of-Limitations Clocks Are Running, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

The Supreme Court Just Ruled on Roundup Claims — Here Is What It Means for You You heard the news. The Supreme Court ruled that federal pesticide law blocks some state-law claims against Monsanto and Bayer over Roundup weedkiller. If you or someone you love used Roundup and later developed cancer — especially Non-Hodgkin lymphoma — you may be wondering whether the door to compensation just closed. It did not close all the way. But it narrowed, and understanding exactly which doors remain open is now the most important thing standing between your family and a recovery. We are Attorney911 — The Manginello Law Firm. We are writing to you as the trial team that handles toxic-tort and mass-tort cases, and we are going to tell you exactly what this ruling held, what it did NOT hold, which legal theories are still alive, and what you need to do right now to protect your claim. This page is legal information, not legal advice — but it is the information we wish every person diagnosed with cancer after years of Roundup exposure had before they talked to anyone, including us. The ruling was 7-2. Justice Kavanaugh wrote the majority opinion. The…

38 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

AFFF PFAS Toxic Exposure & Cancer Claims Nationwide: Attorney911 Pursues the Department of Defense and AFFF Manufacturers Behind PFAS Drinking Water Contamination at 700+ Military Installations From Joint Base Cape Cod to Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Where ‘Forever Chemicals’ Bioaccumulated in Blood Serum and Linked to Kidney Cancer, Testicular Cancer and Infertility, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, We Secure Blood Serum PFAS Testing Before Levels Decline and Pull the AFFF Use and Environmental Sampling Records via FOIA, CERCLA Hazardous Substance Designation and AFFF MDL in South Carolina Federal Court, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims and Millions in Wrongful-Death Cases, the Toxic Tort Discovery Rule Means Your Filing Deadline May Be Running — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

National AFFF PFAS Toxic Tort: Firefighter Cancer, Military Base Contamination, and the Fight for Accountability If you are reading this, you may be a firefighter who spent years pulling the nozzle on AFFF — the white foam that smothered jet fuel fires so effectively it became the military’s default — and you are now sitting with a cancer diagnosis that came out of nowhere. Or you may live near a base where the water tasted fine for years, and a letter just arrived telling you the aquifer is contaminated. Or you may have buried someone whose kidney cancer or testicular cancer never made sense until the word “PFAS” entered your life. Whatever brought you here, one thing is already true: the companies that made this foam and the institutions that deployed it for decades knew more, and knew it earlier, than they told you. That is where your case begins, and that is what we are built to fight. We are Attorney911 — The Manginello Law Firm. We handle toxic tort claims and the catastrophic-injury and wrongful-death cases that grow out of them. What follows is everything you need to understand about AFFF and PFAS contamination right now: what the…

47 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

FDA Withdraws Asbestos Testing Rule for Talc Cosmetics: Attorney911 Pursues the Manufacturers and Talc Suppliers Behind Asbestos-Contaminated Body Powders in MassTort-National Litigation, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, We Secure Retained Product Containers for TEM and PLM Mineralogical Analysis Before They Are Discarded, MoCRA Section 3505 Mandated Testing Standards the FDA Withdrew November 28, 2025 Leaving No Mandatory Federal Asbestos Screen, Ovarian Cancer and Mesothelioma Claims Where Filing Deadlines Run from Date of Diagnosis, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider, the Firm Has Recovered Millions in Wrongful-Death Cases — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

The FDA Withdrew the Asbestos Testing Rule for Talc Cosmetics — Here Is What It Means for Your Talc Cancer Case You used baby powder for years. Maybe decades. You used it the way millions of people did — after a shower, on your children, as part of a daily routine that felt safe because it was ordinary. Now you have an ovarian cancer diagnosis, or someone you love has mesothelioma, and you are sitting at a kitchen table at 2 a.m. reading that the FDA just pulled back the one rule that would have forced cosmetic companies to test their talc for asbestos. The question burning through your mind is simple: does this mean the companies get away with it? No. It does not. And we will explain exactly why. We are Attorney911 — The Manginello Law Firm. We handle toxic tort and catastrophic injury cases, including the kind of talc litigation that this FDA action touches. Ralph Manginello has spent 27-plus years in courtrooms, including federal court, and before he was a lawyer he was a journalist — which means he learned early that the story is never what the press release says, it is what the documents…

46 min read Read Article

Jul 9, 2026

$32M Talc-Mesothelioma Verdict Against Johnson & Johnson in Los Angeles — MassTort-National Talc Product Liability Attorneys at Attorney911 Pursue the Manufacturer and Its Supply Chain for Asbestos-Contaminated Products That Cause an Invariably Fatal Cancer, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, We Move to Preserve Pathology Tissue Blocks and Product Containers for TEM Fiber Analysis Before Remaining Products Are Discarded and Hospital Retention Policies Expire, California Strict Liability With No Damage Caps and Punitive Damages for Decades of Corporate Concealment, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Claims Machine Values and Denies These Cases, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

A $32 Million Jury Verdict in Los Angeles — and What It Means If Talcum Powder Caused Your Cancer If you are reading this page, someone you love has been diagnosed with mesothelioma — or you have received that diagnosis yourself — and you have learned that the talcum powder you used for decades may be the reason. You are sitting with a folder of medical records, a treatment plan that uses words like “pemetrexed” and “cisplatin,” and a prognosis that no one should have to hear spoken aloud. You may have seen the news: a Los Angeles Superior Court jury awarded $32 million against Johnson & Johnson in a mesothelioma trial tied to asbestos-contaminated talc. In the same courthouse, on the same docket, a different jury could not agree — and that case ended in a mistrial. Those two outcomes, side by side, tell you something important about these cases. They are winnable. A jury of twelve people in Los Angeles heard the evidence, saw the internal corporate documents, and concluded that Johnson & Johnson’s talc products caused a person’s mesothelioma — and that $32 million was the right number. But the companion mistrial tells you the other side…

40 min read Read Article

Jul 9, 2026

Talc Mesothelioma & Asbestos-Contaminated Baby Powder Lawsuits: Attorney911 Holds Johnson & Johnson and the Talc Product Manufacturers That Marketed Asbestos-Tainted Powder as Pure and Safe for Decades, MassTort-National Claims Where 4 in 10 Mesothelioma Filings Now Cite Talc and Victims Are Younger and Disproportionately Female, We Pull the Pathology Tissue Blocks for TEM Fiber Analysis Identifying Tremolite and Anthophyllite Asbestos Fibers Tied to Cosmetic Talc Exposure, We Demand the Corporate Internal Documents Showing Knowledge of Contamination Before the Records Are Destroyed, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Attorney Who Knows How the Talc Manufacturers’ Claims Machine Values and Denies These Cases, the Discovery Rule Starts the Filing Clock at Diagnosis Not Exposure So Every Day Matters, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims and Millions in Wrongful-Death Cases — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

Talc Is Now Cited in 4 of 10 Mesothelioma Lawsuits — What the 2025 Data Means for You You are reading this because someone you love — or you yourself — has been diagnosed with mesothelioma. And now you are holding a question that feels impossible: how could a powder you trusted, a product you used on your children, on yourself, for years or decades, be connected to the rarest and most aggressive cancer of the lung lining there is. The 2025 data says you are not alone. You are part of a wave that has rewritten who gets this disease and why. A report released in 2025 by KCIC — a Washington, D.C. consultancy that tracks every asbestos and mesothelioma filing in the United States — revealed that talc exposure was cited in 4 out of 10 mesothelioma lawsuits filed in 2025. In 2021, that number was 1 in 6. Talc-only mesothelioma filings grew 47% year over year — more than eight times faster than traditional asbestos filings. And the face of the disease has changed: 57% of talc-only victims are women, up from 7% in 2019. The average age dropped from 74 to 67. The youngest plaintiff in…

44 min read Read Article

Jul 9, 2026

Roundup Cancer & Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Claims: Attorney911 Brings MassTort-National Representation to Glyphosate Litigation, Pursuing the Manufacturer Behind the Herbicide Linked to NHL, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Corporate Claims Machine Values and Denies Toxic-Exposure Cases, We Move to Preserve Exposure History and Purchase Records Before the Evidence Window Closes, FIFRA Preemption and EPA Registration Now in Play After the Supreme Court Ruling as the Manufacturer Moves to End the Federal Litigation, the Statute of Limitations Is Running, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

Roundup Cancer Lawsuits After the Supreme Court Preemption Ruling — What Bayer’s Move to End Federal Litigation Means for You You used Roundup for years. Maybe you sprayed it on your property every weekend. Maybe you mixed it by the drum at work. Maybe you were a farmer, a landscaper, a groundskeeper, a maintenance worker — someone whose hands knew the plastic feel of that pump bottle or the metal of that spray rig long before a doctor said the word lymphoma. Now you are reading that Bayer — the company that owns Roundup, that owns Monsanto, that has spent years fighting tens of thousands of people who say this weedkiller gave them cancer — is telling a federal court the fight is over. That a Supreme Court ruling means your case, and thousands like it, should be thrown out. Take a breath. The news is real, but the headline is not the last word. What Bayer is doing is a legal move, not a locked door. And the difference between those two things is exactly why you need to understand what the ruling actually changed, what it did not, and what your deadline is — because the clock on…

36 min read Read Article

Jul 9, 2026

PFAS Forever Chemicals Detected in Antarctic Penguin Feathers: The Global Contamination Finding Behind MassTort-National Toxic-Tort Claims — Attorney911 Brings Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, We Pursue the Chemical Manufacturers and Industrial Dischargers Behind PFAS Water Contamination, We Secure Biomonitoring Data and Water-Sampling Records Before the Preservation Window Closes, PFAS Exposure Linked to Cancer, Thyroid Disruption and Immune-System Harm, EPA Drinking-Water Health Advisories and CERCLA Hazardous-Substance Designation, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Claims Machine Values and Denies These Cases, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims, the Statute of Limitations Is Running — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

PFAS “Forever Chemicals” Reached Antarctica — And They Reached Your Water, Your Workplace, and Your Blood You read the headline and something clicked. Scientists found per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances — PFAS, the “forever chemicals” — in penguin feathers in Antarctica, one of the most remote places on Earth. If these chemicals crossed oceans and settled into the feathers of birds that never left the ice, you already know what the real question is: if it reached there, what is it doing in you? That question is the beginning of a toxic-tort case. Not the penguin finding itself — that is a scientific data point that confirms what regulators and plaintiffs’ lawyers have been arguing for years: PFAS does not break down, it does not stay where it was put, and it accumulates in living tissue. The caseable question is whether you were exposed to PFAS through a identifiable domestic pathway — contaminated drinking water, occupational contact with firefighting foam, industrial discharge into your community — and whether that exposure caused a diagnosable disease. We are Attorney911 — The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC. We handle toxic-tort and catastrophic-injury cases, and this page is written for the person who just read about…

48 min read Read Article

Jul 9, 2026

Roundup Cancer Claims After Supreme Court Warning-Label Ruling — Attorney911’s MassTort-National Toxic-Tort Attorneys Pursue the Manufacturer and Distribution Chain Behind Glyphosate Herbicides Linked to Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Claims Machine Values and Denies Cancer Cases, We Preserve Exposure Histories and Diagnostic Records on the Litigation Clock, FIFRA Registration, IARC Classification & Failure-to-Warn Liability, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims and Millions in Wrongful-Death Cases — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

The Supreme Court Just Ruled for Monsanto — and You Need to Know What That Means for Your Roundup Cancer Case You used Roundup. You got non-Hodgkin lymphoma. You may have been reading about the lawsuits for months or years, wondering whether to call a lawyer, waiting to see how the big legal questions would shake out. Now the headline says the Supreme Court ruled in Monsanto’s favor, and your first thought is probably: that’s it — they killed my case. Maybe. Maybe not. And the difference between those two answers is exactly why you need to read this page carefully and then call us at 1-888-ATTY-911 for a free consultation. Because the Supreme Court ruling — which centers on whether federal pesticide law blocks state-law failure-to-warn claims — does not automatically end every Roundup case. It changes the legal terrain. Some claims are in serious trouble. Others may still have a path. And the deadline clock on your case may still be running even if you think you waited too long. We are Attorney911 — The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC. We build toxic-exposure and product-liability cases. This page is not a news recap. It is a straight, detailed explanation…

40 min read Read Article

Jul 9, 2026

Bayer’s Ruveon Glyphosate Consolidation and the National Roundup Cancer Docket: Attorney911 Pursues the Manufacturer and Its Distribution Chain for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma from Glyphosate Exposure, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Corporate Claims Machine Values and Denies These Cases, We Secure Exposure Histories and Diagnostic Evidence Before the Statute of Limitations Runs, Failure-to-Warn Products Liability Under the IARC Probable Carcinogen Classification, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

The Bayer Ruveon Restructuring and Your Roundup Cancer Rights If you used Roundup and later heard the words “non-Hodgkin lymphoma” from a doctor, the news that Bayer is reorganizing its glyphosate business into a new subsidiary called Ruveon LLC probably caught your eye — and you may be wondering whether it changes anything about your right to hold the company accountable for what happened to you. The short answer is: it does not. The lawsuits over Roundup and cancer are a completely separate legal track from the trade petitions and corporate restructuring you may have read about, and your claim — if you have one — runs against the same entity it always has. We are Attorney911 — The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC. We built this page because when a company as large as Bayer reshuffles its business structure, the people who were hurt by its products get confused, and confusion is what the other side counts on. So we are going to tell you exactly what the Ruveon restructuring is, what it is not, what the Roundup cancer litigation looks like right now, and what it means for you if you were exposed to glyphosate and diagnosed with non-Hodgkin…

31 min read Read Article

Jul 9, 2026

Pennsylvania Superior Court Affirms Defense Verdict Clearing the Talc Manufacturer in a Fatal Mesothelioma Lawsuit — MassTort-National Talc Cancer Wrongful-Death Attorneys, Attorney911 with Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, We Pursue the Talc Manufacturer and Its Distribution Chain for the Asbestos-Contaminated Products Behind Decades-Long Latency Mesothelioma, We Move to Preserve Pathology Tissue Blocks, Product Containers and Exposure Histories Before They Vanish and the Statute of Limitations Runs, Pennsylvania Strict Liability Under the Consumer-Expectation and Risk-Utility Tests, the Frye Standard Governing Expert Causation Testimony in Toxic-Tort Trials, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Corporate Claims Machine Values and Denies These Cases, the Firm Has Recovered Millions in Wrongful-Death Cases — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

National Talc Mesothelioma Lawsuit: Pennsylvania Superior Court Upholds J&J Defense Verdict — What It Means for Your Family If you are reading this page, someone you love has either been diagnosed with mesothelioma or has already died from it — and you used talc-based products for years, maybe decades. You just learned that the Pennsylvania Superior Court upheld a verdict clearing Johnson & Johnson of liability in a talc mesothelioma wrongful death case. Your first question is probably the one that keeps families up at 3 a.m.: does this mean my case is over before it starts? It does not. And we are going to tell you exactly why — in plain English, with the law, the science, and the corporate strategy laid bare — so you can make the decision that is right for your family with your eyes open. We are Attorney911 — The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC. We handle toxic tort claims and wrongful death cases for families across the country, working with local counsel where state rules require it. Ralph Manginello has spent 27-plus years in courtrooms, including federal court. Lupe Peña sat inside a national insurance-defense firm before he joined our side of the table…

51 min read Read Article