MassTort-National Product Liability

Jul 24, 2026

J&J Talc Ovarian Cancer & Mesothelioma Product Liability Attorneys — Johnson & Johnson Moves to Dismiss 67,000 Lawsuits in the MassTort-National Talc MDL Even as Juries Repeatedly Find That Asbestos-Contaminated Baby Powder Caused Ovarian Cancer and Mesothelioma, Attorney911 Brings Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice to Talc Product Liability Cases, We Pursue the Manufacturer and Its Talc-Liability Subsidiary Behind the Contaminated Powder, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Corporate Claims Machine Deploys Bankruptcy Shell Filings and Junk-Science Campaigns to Delay Resolution, We Move to Preserve Talc Product Samples, Pathology Tissue Blocks and the Daubert Expert Record Under FRE 702 Before the Evidence Retention Clock Expires, MDL Consolidation Under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 and Each Transferor State’s Wrongful-Death and Product-Liability Framework, $50M+ Total Recovered and Millions in Wrongful-Death Cases — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

J&J’s Motion to Dismiss 67,000 Ovarian Cancer Talc Lawsuits: What This Means for Your Case You saw the headline. Johnson & Johnson asked a federal judge to throw out all 67,000 ovarian cancer lawsuits in the talc multi-district litigation. Your stomach dropped. Maybe you have a claim already filed. Maybe your mother filed one before she died. Maybe you have been diagnosed with ovarian cancer and you used Johnson’s Baby Powder for decades and you have been putting off calling a lawyer — and now you think the door just closed. It did not close. A motion is not a ruling. A company asking a court to dismiss cases is not a court dismissing cases. What happened is that J&J’s lawyers filed a legal argument — a request — and the lawyers representing the 67,000 women and families filed their response calling it, in their own words, “as breathtaking as it is meritless.” The judge has not ruled. Your case is alive. And the trial record — the verdicts that juries have returned when these cases actually reached a courtroom — overwhelmingly favors the plaintiffs. We are going to explain exactly what this motion is, what it is not, why…

40 min read Read Article

Jul 23, 2026

Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuit: 7,111 Claimants, One Dying Every Three Days, Margaret Manion Dead at 73 From Ovarian Cancer After a Lifetime of Baby Powder Marketed as Pure While J&J’s Internal Testing Knew of Asbestos Contamination Since the 1960s — Attorney911 Takes MassTort-National Product Liability Cases, We Pursue the Manufacturer and Its Supply Chain, Secure Product Samples for TEM Asbestos Fiber Analysis and the Corporate Documents J&J Fought to Bury Through Its Failed Bankruptcy Shell, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Talc Claims Machine Values and Denies, the Discovery Rule Starts Your Filing Deadline at Diagnosis Not Decades of Exposure, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, the Firm Has Recovered Millions in Wrongful-Death Cases — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuit: 7,111 Claimants, Asbestos Contamination, and What It Means for US Families If you are reading this at 2 a.m. because you or someone you love used Johnson & Johnson baby powder for years and then heard the word “cancer,” we want you to know three things before anything else. First: you are not alone — more than 7,000 claimants in a UK case and over 68,000 in the US have made the same connection. Second: the science linking asbestos-contaminated talc to mesothelioma is among the most established in medicine, and the evidence linking perineal talc use to ovarian cancer has produced real plaintiff verdicts in American courtrooms. Third: the clock on your claim may have started the day you were diagnosed, not the day you used the powder — but that clock is real, and the evidence that proves your case is disappearing on its own schedule. We are Attorney911 — The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC. We are writing this page as a resource for anyone who used J&J talcum powder and developed ovarian cancer or mesothelioma, or who lost a family member who did. We are not counsel in the UK case…

44 min read Read Article

Jul 23, 2026

$45M Talc Verdict Affirmed on Appeal: Johnson & Johnson’s Asbestos-Contaminated Talcum Powder, Fatal Mesothelioma and Ovarian Cancer, and the Appellate Expansion of Survival Damages to Include Shortened Life Expectancy — Attorney911 Brings Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice to MassTort-National Products Liability and Wrongful-Death Litigation, We Pursue the Manufacturer and Its Distribution Chain, We Secure the Internal Corporate Testing Records and Tumor-Tissue Fiber Analysis Before Fiber Evidence Degrades and the Statute of Limitations Runs, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Mass Tort Claims Machine Values and Denies Fatal Exposure Cases, the FDA Regulatory Gap That Required No Pre-Market Asbestos Testing for Talc Cosmetics, the Firm Has Recovered Millions in Wrongful-Death Cases — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

The $45 Million Talc Verdict and What It Means for Your Family’s Right to Recovery If you are reading this at 2 a.m. because someone you love was diagnosed with mesothelioma or ovarian cancer after years of using talcum powder, or because you have already lost them and you just found out this product may be why — you are in the right place. A state appellate court has just affirmed a $45 million jury verdict against Johnson & Johnson for the death of a person who used their talc products and developed a fatal cancer. The court did something more than uphold the number: it expanded what a family can recover. And the dissenting judge who disagreed warned that the ruling will reshape every talc case that follows. We are Attorney911 — The Manginello Law Firm. We handle toxic tort and wrongful death cases with the ferocity of a firm that has spent more than 27 years in courtrooms, and the precision of lawyers who know exactly how the other side operates because one of us used to sit on their side of the table. This page is not a press release. It is the full, honest analysis of…

25 min read Read Article

Jul 23, 2026

Talcum Powder Mesothelioma & Ovarian Cancer Litigation After J&J’s Third Bankruptcy Collapse — Attorney911 Brings Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice to the MassTort-National Talc Docket, We Pursue Johnson & Johnson and the Cosmetic Talc Distribution Chain Including Avon, Colgate-Palmolive and Coty Under Strict Product Liability for Design Defect and Failure to Warn, Asbestos-Contaminated Talc Causing Mesothelioma and Ovarian Cancer Across Decades of Latency, We Secure Pathology Tissue for TEM Asbestos Fiber Analysis and Preserve Exposure Testimony Before Cognitive Decline Claims a Life, MDL-2738 Holds 67,000+ Pending Cases with Over $3 Billion in Mesothelioma Verdicts Since the March 2025 Bankruptcy Dismissal, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Corporate Claims Machine Values and Denies These Cases, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims and Millions in Wrongful-Death Cases — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

The Bankruptcy Wall Is Down — What That Means for Your Talc Case Right Now If you or someone you love was diagnosed with mesothelioma or ovarian cancer after years of using talcum powder, you have probably heard the word “bankruptcy” more times than you can count. For four years, Johnson & Johnson used the bankruptcy system as a wall between your family and a courtroom. Three times they built that wall. Three times a federal judge tore it down. On March 31, 2025, United States Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez of the Southern District of Texas dismissed the Chapter 11 case of Red River Talc LLC — J&J’s third and final attempt to channel tens of thousands of cancer claims into a settlement trust instead of letting juries hear them. J&J announced it would not appeal. The wall is gone. What has happened since is something the company spent four years trying to prevent: juries have returned more than $3 billion in mesothelioma verdicts in the twelve months since the dismissal. The MDL docket in New Jersey holds more than 67,000 pending cases. A court-ordered mediator is working through ovarian cancer claims. And a federal judge’s 658-page Report and Recommendation…

42 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

Philadelphia Talc Trial Defense Verdict Affirmed: What J&J’s Win Means for Your Ovarian Cancer Claim | Attorney911

Philadelphia’s First Talc Trial: The Defense Verdict That Stood — and What It Means for You If you used talc-based body powder for years and later heard the words “ovarian cancer” from a doctor, you may have read about this ruling and felt the floor drop. A Pennsylvania appeals court upheld a defense verdict in Philadelphia’s first talc trial, letting stand a trial judge’s decision to keep key causation testimony away from the jury. The headline makes it sound like the door is closing. We are writing this page so you understand, clearly and honestly, why it is not. This ruling addressed one specific trial’s evidentiary procedure. It did not conclude that talc is safe. It did not conclude that talc cannot cause ovarian cancer. It did not dismiss the thousands of remaining cases pending in the Philadelphia mass tort docket. And one appellate judge disagreed so strongly that she wrote a dissent explaining exactly why the excluded testimony should have reached the jury and why a new trial should have been ordered. That dissent is a roadmap — and it matters. We are Attorney911 — The Manginello Law Firm, PLLC. We handle toxic tort and product liability cases for…

38 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

Roundup Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma & Toxic Tort Claims After the Supreme Court’s FIFRA Preemption Ruling in Monsanto v. Durnell: Attorney911 Evaluates What Survives for NHL Plaintients Across MassTort-National When the Failure-to-Warn Theory Is Foreclosed, We Pursue Bayer-Monsanto on Design Defect, Fraudulent Concealment and Negligent Testing Theories FIFRA Does Not Preempt, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Agrochemical Claims Machine Values and Denies Cancer Cases, We Move to Preserve Exposure Records, Usage History and NHL Pathology Before Evidence Degrades, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

The Supreme Court Just Rewrote the Roundup Litigation — What It Means for Your Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Claim You are reading this because you used Roundup. Maybe for years — on the farm, in the nursery, along the fence line, at the job site where spraying was just part of the day. And then the diagnosis came: non-Hodgkin lymphoma. A blood cancer you never saw coming. You heard about the lawsuits, the settlements, the billions that Bayer and Monsanto have paid out. Maybe you even signed up with a firm, or you were about to. And now the news has landed: the Supreme Court just ruled, and the headline says the Roundup litigation is finished. It is not finished. But it has changed — dramatically, and in ways that narrow the road ahead. We are going to tell you the truth about what just happened, what this ruling kills, and what still lives. False hope is a disservice to you. But so is walking away from a claim that may still have a path. What you need are facts, and a lawyer who knows the difference between a closed door and a harder one. We are Attorney911 — The Manginello Law…

32 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

Roundup Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Litigation After Bayer’s Ruveon Restructuring & SCOTUS FIFRA Preemption — Attorney911 Pursues Bayer-Monsanto and Its New Glyphosate Subsidiary for Product-Liability Claims Nationwide, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, We Move to Preserve Internal Corporate Communications and Exposure Records Before the Asset Transfer Complicates Discovery, FIFRA Preemption Bars State Failure-to-Warn but Design-Defect and Negligent-Testing Theories Remain, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Claims Machine Values and Denies Toxic-Tort Cases, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

The Ruveon Restructuring: What Bayer’s New Glyphosate Subsidiary Means for Your Roundup Cancer Claim You used Roundup. Maybe for years — on the farm, at the landscaping company, in your own backyard. Then the diagnosis came: non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. And somewhere in the fog of chemotherapy schedules and insurance fights, you started hearing about the lawsuits — thousands of them, billions of dollars in settlements, a Supreme Court case that was supposed to decide everything. Now you’re reading that the Supreme Court ruled in Bayer’s favor. And Bayer just created a brand-new company called Ruveon to run its entire glyphosate business. The stock jumped 8 percent. Analysts are saying it could be the first step toward spinning off the Roundup business entirely — walking away from the liability while keeping the profits. We are writing this for you — the person sitting at a kitchen table at 2 a.m. with a cancer diagnosis and a folder of medical bills, trying to figure out whether you still have a case or whether the door just closed. That door did not close. It changed shape. What walked through it is a more complicated fight, but it is a fight that can still be…

35 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

Roundup Cancer Lawsuits After the Supreme Court’s 7-2 FIFRA Preemption Ruling: Attorney911 Pursues Bayer and the Monsanto Glyphosate Product Line on Design-Defect and Negligence-in-Testing Theories That Survive the Failure-to-Warn Strike, We Secure the Internal Monsanto Research, EPA Submission Files and IARC Carcinogenicity Data Before the Statute of Limitations Runs, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Hematologic Malignancy Claims Across MassTort-National, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Claims Machine Values and Denies Toxic-Tort Cases, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

The Supreme Court Just Ruled for Bayer on Roundup — Here Is What It Means for Your Cancer Case If you used Roundup and later heard the word cancer in the same sentence as your own name, you already know the worst part is not the lawsuit. The worst part is the waiting room. The biopsy. The moment someone who loves you tries to be brave and fails at it. The Supreme Court ruling that just came down is not the thing that keeps you up at night — but it may be the thing that changes whether the company whose product you sprayed for years has to answer for what happened to your body, and on what terms. Here is what the Court held, in plain English: by a 7-2 vote, the Supreme Court ruled that Bayer — which acquired Monsanto, the original maker of Roundup, in 2018 — cannot be held liable under state law for failing to warn consumers that Roundup might cause cancer, because the Environmental Protection Agency reviewed the product under federal pesticide law and decided no cancer warning was required on the label. The Court said that when a federal regulator makes that call,…

37 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

Talcum Powder Mesothelioma & Cancer Product Liability Attorneys, Attorney911 Pursues Johnson & Johnson and the Talc Supply Chain Behind Asbestos-Contaminated Baby Powder Across the MassTort-National Litigation Where Approximately 60,000 Lawsuits Allege Asbestos Contamination Caused Mesothelioma Lung Cancer and Ovarian Cancer, the Journal of Thoracic Oncology Confirms Asbestos Not Talc Is the Carcinogen While The Lancet Retracted a 1977 Safety Paper by an Undisclosed J&J Consultant for Breach of Publishing Ethics, We Preserve Product Containers and Pathology Tissue Blocks for Asbestos-Fiber Testing Before the Evidence Window Closes, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice With Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How Corporate Claims Teams Value and Deny These Cases, the Discovery Rule and Fraud-Based Tolling That Extend Filing Deadlines When a Manufacturer Conceals Contamination Risks, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims and Millions in Wrongful-Death Cases — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

The Study That Headlines Say Kills Talc Cases Actually Strengthens Yours You saw the headline. Maybe a doctor mentioned it. Maybe a family member forwarded it to you with a question that felt like a verdict: “If talc without asbestos isn’t dangerous, does that mean your case is over?” You are sitting with a cancer diagnosis — possibly mesothelioma, possibly ovarian cancer, possibly lung cancer — and you used talcum powder for years, maybe decades. And now a scientific study seems to say the thing you were exposed to is safe. The fear that arrives in that moment is specific and sharp: that the law has already decided against you before you ever walked into a courtroom. Here is the truth, and it is the opposite of what the headline suggests. That study does not weaken your case. It confirms it. The research found that asbestos-free talc does not cause mesothelioma — which means the mesothelioma you developed came from the asbestos that was in the talcum powder you used. The study isolates asbestos as the killer, not talc. And that is exactly what thousands of plaintiffs have alleged in the roughly 60,000 lawsuits currently pending against Johnson & Johnson:…

32 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

MassTort-National Talc-Asbestos Mesothelioma & Product Liability Attorneys: Attorney911 Pursues Johnson & Johnson and the Talc Manufacturers Behind Asbestos-Contaminated Cosmetics, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, the FDA Withdrew Its MoCRA-Mandated Asbestos Testing Rule Leaving Manufacturers on the Honor System, We Preserve Talc Product Samples and Lot Records for TEM and PLM Microscopic Testing Before They Degrade, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Corporate Claims Machine Values and Denies These Cases, the Discovery Rule Tolls the Statute of Limitations Until Diagnosis Given Mesothelioma’s Decades-Long Latency, the Firm Has Recovered Millions in Wrongful-Death Cases — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

The FDA Walked Away from Asbestos Testing in Talc — What That Means for Your Mesothelioma Case If you are reading this at 2 a.m. from a hospital room or a kitchen table covered in medical bills, you already know the hardest part: someone you love has mesothelioma, and you are trying to understand whether a powder you used for decades — a powder you were told was safe — is the reason. Now you are reading that the FDA withdrew the one rule Congress ordered it to write, the rule that would have forced cosmetics companies to test their talc for asbestos before it ever touched a shelf. And the question forming in your mind is the right one: if the government walked away from protecting us, who is left to answer for what happened? We are. The civil justice system is. And the FDA’s failure does not weaken your case — it sharpens it. Here is the first thing you need to hear: the absence of a testing rule does not mean the absence of a legal claim. It means the opposite. When the federal agency Congress charged with protecting consumers acknowledges the asbestos-in-talc risk, proposes a rule…

42 min read Read Article