MassTort-National

Jul 10, 2026

Roundup Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Product Liability Lawsuits After the Supreme Court’s 7-2 FIFRA Preemption Ruling: Attorney911 Pursues Bayer and Monsanto on the Surviving Negligence and Design-Defect Claims in the MassTort-National Litigation, Where the Glyphosate Cancer Causation Evidence the EPA Label Decision Never Addressed Becomes Central, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, We Secure Exposure Records, Purchase History and Internal Corporate Safety Research Before Spoliation, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How Bayer’s Claims Machine Values and Denies Cancer Cases Against a $7.25 Billion Settlement Frame Where Some Claimants Could Receive as Little as $6,000, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims, the Statute of Limitations Is Running — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

The Supreme Court Just Ruled on Roundup Lawsuits — Here’s What It Means for Your Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Case You heard the news and your stomach dropped. The Supreme Court ruled against the Roundup failure-to-warn claims — the ones about cancer warnings on the label — and now you are sitting at your kitchen table at 2 a.m. wondering whether the case you were counting on just evaporated. We are going to tell you something that most of the coverage buried, missed, or got wrong: your legal options did not disappear. They changed shape. Failure-to-warn claims — the theory that the company should have put a cancer warning on the bottle — are now substantially foreclosed by federal preemption. But negligence claims and design-defect claims survived the ruling, law firms are still accepting and filing new cases, and the $7.25 billion settlement framework that Bayer is pushing may be grossly inadequate for people with serious non-Hodgkin lymphoma diagnoses. If you used Roundup and later developed this cancer, you need to understand what actually happened, what did not happen, and what your next move is — because the window to act under the most favorable remaining legal theories may narrow as lower…

39 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

MassTort-National Glyphosate Cancer & Toxic Tort Claims After the Supreme Court’s Monsanto v. Durnell Ruling — Attorney911 Brings Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice to Roundup Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Litigation, We Pursue Monsanto and Its Bayer AG Corporate Parent Under State-Law Theories That Survive FIFRA Preemption, the IARC “Probably Carcinogenic” Finding Versus the EPA’s Contrary Position on a Chemical Sprayed Across Farmland and Food Crops Nationwide, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How Bayer’s Claims Machine Values and Denies These Cases, We Secure Exposure Records, Purchase Receipts, Work Logs and Oncology Files Before They Degrade — Your Statute of Limitations Runs from Diagnosis, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims & Millions in Wrongful-Death Cases — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

The Supreme Court Just Made Your Roundup Case Harder — But It Did Not Make It Impossible You are reading this because you used Roundup. Maybe for years. Maybe on a farm, maybe on a grounds crew, maybe on your own driveway every summer. And then the diagnosis came back: non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. A cancer of the lymphatic system that changes everything — the treatment schedule, the fear your family lives with, the income that stops while you sit in a chemotherapy chair. And now you are hearing that the Supreme Court just ruled in a case called Monsanto v. Durnell, and the headline says it “unwinds corporate accountability for pesticides.” Your first thought is probably the one every person in your position has: Does this mean I can’t sue? We are Attorney911 — The Manginello Law Firm. We handle toxic tort cases and the catastrophic injuries they cause, and we are writing this page for one reason: to give you an honest, straight answer about what this ruling means for your specific situation. Not a sales pitch. Not false hope. The truth about what survived, what did not, and what you need to do right now to protect whatever rights…

35 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

Roundup Glyphosate Cancer & Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Product Liability Attorneys: For MassTort-National Claims Against Bayer AG and Monsanto, Attorney911 Builds Design-Defect and Fraud-on-the-Agency Theories That Survive FIFRA Preemption After the Supreme Court Shielded EPA-Approved Labels, Where 65,000+ Plaintiffs Allege Chronic Glyphosate Exposure Caused Their Cancer, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Corporate Claims Machine Values and Denies Toxic-Tort Cases, We Secure Monsanto’s Internal Communications and the Retracted Safety Study Before the Evidence Degrades and Deadlines Run, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Catastrophic Injury Victims — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

Monsanto v. Durnell: The Supreme Court Preemption Ruling and What Survives for Your Roundup Cancer Case You just heard the news. The Supreme Court ruled against people who sued over Roundup. You have non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. You used Roundup for years — on the farm, in the yard, on the job — and you believed the company when it said the product was safe. Now a 7-2 decision from the highest court in the country feels like it just locked the courthouse door in your face. Take a breath. The door is narrower than it was last month. It is not closed. The decision in Monsanto v. Durnell does eliminate many failure-to-warn claims — the theory that Monsanto should have put a cancer warning on the Roundup label and did not. But the Court did something the headlines missed: it left open entire categories of claims that do not depend on labeling at all. Design defect claims — that Roundup is unreasonably dangerous by its very formulation — may survive. Fraud claims — that Monsanto manipulated the science behind its safety classification — may survive. And the retraction of a decades-old study that Monsanto secretly helped shape has handed plaintiffs the…

44 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

Roundup Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma & Toxic-Tort Attorneys: After the Supreme Court’s 7-2 Monsanto v. Durnell Ruling Preempted Failure-to-Warn Claims Under FIFRA, Attorney911 Pursues the Surviving Theories Against Bayer AG in MassTort-National Roundup Cancer Litigation, Design Defect, Fraudulent Concealment of Glyphosate’s Carcinogenicity, and Breach of Warranty, We Build on the 2022 Federal Court Ruling That Struck Down EPA’s Glyphosate Safety Determination as Unlawful, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, We Preserve Exposure Records, Purchase Receipts and Oncology Charts Before the Statute-of-Limitations Clock Runs on Tens of Thousands of Pending Cases, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How Bayer’s Claims Machine Values and Denies These Cases, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

Roundup Cancer Lawsuits After the Supreme Court: What Monsanto v. Durnell Means for Your Case The news hit today and if you have non-Hodgkin lymphoma from Roundup, you may feel like the floor just dropped out. The Supreme Court ruled 7-2 that people who contract cancer from a pesticide cannot sue the manufacturer for failing to warn them — if the EPA did not require a cancer warning on the approved label. That sounds like the end of your case. It is not. Failure-to-warn was the strongest and most successful theory in the Roundup litigation. It produced verdicts. It drove the roughly $10 billion Bayer has already paid to settle approximately 100,000 cases. It is now preempted — blocked — by federal law for future failure-to-warn claims. But failure-to-warn was one theory, not the only theory. Design defect, fraudulent concealment, negligent testing, and breach of warranty claims target different duties — duties that do not depend on what the label says — and those claims may still survive. The generalist reads “failure-to-warn is preempted” and tells a client their case is over. The expert reads the same decision, sees four surviving paths, and starts building the case around them. We…

45 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

Roundup Cancer Lawsuit & Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Attorneys — Attorney911 Pursues Bayer-Monsanto in the MassTort-National Roundup Product-Liability Litigation, $7.25 Billion Settlement Nears Approval as FIFRA Preemption Narrowed Failure-to-Warn but Design-Defect and Negligence Theories Survive the Supreme Court’s 7-2 Ruling, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider, We Preserve Purchase Records, Pathology Reports and Internal Monsanto Corporate Documents Before They Disappear, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

The Supreme Court Ruled Against Roundup Plaintiffs — But Your Case Is Not Dead You heard the news. The Supreme Court ruled for Bayer in June 2026. Now you are sitting at a kitchen table or in a hospital waiting room, wondering whether the lawsuit you were counting on — or the settlement you were waiting for — just evaporated. The phone has been quiet. The lawyer you spoke to months ago may have called, or may not have. And the headline you read said something about preemption and warning labels, and you do not know what that means for the cancer in your body or the person you lost. Here is what we can tell you right now, before anything else: the litigation is not over. It is not winding down. There are roughly 61,000 active Roundup lawsuits still pending as of July 2026. Bayer has resolved more than 100,000 claims for approximately $11 billion, but the remaining cases — your case — are still very much alive. What the Supreme Court did was take away one legal theory. It did not take away your right to sue. It did not say Roundup is safe. It did not say…

39 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

Roundup Cancer Lawsuits After the Supreme Court’s 7-2 FIFRA Preemption Ruling: Attorney911, MassTort-National Product Liability and Toxic Tort Attorneys, Pursues Bayer AG and Monsanto Through Negligent Design and Corporate Suppression Claims That Survive the Decision — We Pull the Internal Communications, EPA Submissions and Suppressed Glyphosate Research Before Discovery Closes, Long-Term Herbicide Exposure Linked to Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Other Cancers, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Claims Machine Values and Denies Toxic Tort Cases, the Statute of Limitations Is Running Despite the Ruling — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

The Supreme Court Ruled Against Roundup Warning Claims — Your Case Is Not Over You are a farmer. You have sprayed Roundup across your corn and soybean acres for years — maybe decades. You know the smell of it, the way the mist drifted on the days the wind turned, the feel of the sprayer handle in your hand through a full planting season. And now you have cancer. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, maybe — the diagnosis that turned a routine doctor’s visit into a word you were not prepared to hear. You turned on the news on June 25, 2026, and the headline said the Supreme Court ruled for Bayer. Seven justices to two. Roundup users can no longer sue over missing cancer warnings. Your first thought was simple and cold: that is it. My case is over. It is not. And that is the single most important thing you need to hear right now. What the Supreme Court closed was one road — the failure-to-warn road, the argument that Bayer should have put a cancer warning on the label beyond what the EPA approved. What remains open are other roads: that the product itself was defectively designed, that Monsanto knew…

43 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

Roundup Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Mass Tort & Bayer’s $7.25B Settlement Delay: SCOTUS FIFRA Preemption Killed Failure-to-Warn but Design Defect and Negligence Survive — Attorney911 Pursues the Glyphosate Manufacturer and Its Monsanto Subsidiary Behind 67,000 Cancer Claims Where Cumulative Herbicide Exposure Is Linked to Lymphatic Cancer, We Secure Exposure Receipts, Product Containers, Employment Records and Pathology Reports Before They Degrade and the Statute of Limitations Runs, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Corporate Claims Machine Values and Denies NHL Cases, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

The Roundup Settlement Was Just Delayed — and the Supreme Court Just Changed Everything for Your Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Claim If you used Roundup and later heard the words “non-Hodgkin lymphoma” from an oncologist, you already know the feeling — the floor drops, and every decision after that is made in a fog. Now you are hearing about a $7.25 billion settlement that was supposed to get a final approval hearing on July 9, and that hearing has been pushed to August 19. And on top of that, the United States Supreme Court just ruled 7-2 that federal pesticide law blocks the very heart of most Roundup cancer lawsuits — the claim that Monsanto should have warned you about cancer on the label. You probably have two questions right now, and we are going to answer both of them straight: What does the delay mean for me, and does the Supreme Court ruling kill my case? The delay means the judge wants more time to consider objections — it does not kill the settlement, and it does not kill your rights. The Supreme Court ruling is a serious blow to one legal theory — failure to warn — but it does…

40 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

MassTort-National Roundup Cancer Lawsuit After the Supreme Court’s 7-2 FIFRA Preemption Ruling — Attorney911 on What the Decision Means for Your Glyphosate Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Claim, We Pursue Monsanto and Its Bayer Parent on Design-Defect, Negligent-Testing and Fraudulent-Marketing Theories That Survive the Labeling Preemption, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Corporate Claims Machine Values and Denies Cancer Cases, We Preserve Exposure Records, Purchase Receipts and Pathology Reports Before They Disappear, the $7.25 Billion Class Settlement Is Pending and Statute-of-Limitations Clocks Are Running, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

The Supreme Court Just Ruled on Roundup Claims — Here Is What It Means for You You heard the news. The Supreme Court ruled that federal pesticide law blocks some state-law claims against Monsanto and Bayer over Roundup weedkiller. If you or someone you love used Roundup and later developed cancer — especially Non-Hodgkin lymphoma — you may be wondering whether the door to compensation just closed. It did not close all the way. But it narrowed, and understanding exactly which doors remain open is now the most important thing standing between your family and a recovery. We are Attorney911 — The Manginello Law Firm. We are writing to you as the trial team that handles toxic-tort and mass-tort cases, and we are going to tell you exactly what this ruling held, what it did NOT hold, which legal theories are still alive, and what you need to do right now to protect your claim. This page is legal information, not legal advice — but it is the information we wish every person diagnosed with cancer after years of Roundup exposure had before they talked to anyone, including us. The ruling was 7-2. Justice Kavanaugh wrote the majority opinion. The…

38 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

Miyoshi America $20M Cosmetic Talc Asbestos Trust: MassTort-National Mesothelioma & Ovarian Cancer Product Liability Attorneys, Attorney911 Pursues the Full Talc Supply Chain From the Ingredient Supplier to the Downstream Manufacturers and Retailers, the Geological Co-Occurrence of Talc and Asbestos Fibers That Causes Mesothelioma and Ovarian Cancer Across a 20-to-50-Year Latency Period, We Secure Product Samples for TEM Analysis, Batch Records, Corporate Testing Files and Pathology Blocks Before They Degrade or Are Lost in the Bankruptcy Transition, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Trust Claims Machine Pays a Fraction of Full Tort Value While the Real Recovery Lives in the Supply Chain, the Discovery Rule That Starts the Statute of Limitations at Diagnosis Not Exposure, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, Avvo-Rated Excellent, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ Total and Millions in Wrongful-Death Cases — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

The Miyoshi America $20 Million Talc Trust: What Mesothelioma and Ovarian Cancer Patients Need to Know You are reading this because you, or someone you love, has been diagnosed with mesothelioma or ovarian cancer, and you have learned that a company called Miyoshi America just created a twenty-million-dollar trust through bankruptcy court to pay people like you. You may be sitting at a kitchen table at two in the morning with a pathology report in one hand and a phone in the other, trying to understand whether this trust is your answer or a trap. We are going to tell you the truth about both — because the most important thing you can learn right now is that this trust is probably not your only option, and in many cases it should not be your first one. The trust is real. A Texas bankruptcy judge confirmed it, ninety-nine percent of existing claimants voted to accept it, and not a single objection was filed by the deadline. It is historic — the first prepackaged talc reorganization in United States bankruptcy history. But twenty million dollars, split among every current and future person who files a claim against Miyoshi America for asbestos-contaminated…

43 min read Read Article

Jul 10, 2026

MassTort-National Roundup Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Product Liability Attorneys — Attorney911 Pursues Bayer and Monsanto Behind the Glyphosate Herbicide Linked to Cancer, Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, We Preserve Exposure Records, Purchase Receipts and NHL Treatment Charts Before They Degrade, the 7-2 Supreme Court FIFRA Ruling Blocked Failure-to-Warn Claims But Design-Defect and Fraudulent-Concealment Theories Survive, the Bipartisan Congressional Amendment That Could Revive Your Lawsuit, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How Bayer’s $7.25 Billion Settlement Machine Pays Some Claimants as Little as $6,000, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911

Roundup Lawsuits After the Supreme Court: Your Case Is Not Over You used Roundup for years. You sprayed it on your yard, your farm, your property, your jobsite. Then you were diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and someone told you there was a lawsuit. Maybe you signed up. Maybe you have a claim pending. Maybe you have been waiting for years, watching from the sidelines, hearing about verdicts and settlements. And now you just heard the news: the United States Supreme Court ruled against Roundup plaintiffs. You are reading this at 2 a.m. because you think your case is dead. We need you to hear this clearly before you read another word: it is not. The Supreme Court’s 7-2 decision blocked one legal theory — the failure-to-warn claim that said Monsanto should have put a cancer warning on the Roundup label. That theory was the engine that drove most of the headline verdicts. But it was never the only theory. Design-defect claims, fraudulent-concealment claims, and negligent-testing claims survived. A bipartisan amendment introduced in Congress the same week the ruling came down could rewrite the law and restore the failure-to-warn theory entirely. And Bayer’s $7.25 billion settlement — the one offering some…

39 min read Read Article