John Durnell Roundup Cancer Lawsuit & Pursuing Monsanto Design-Defect Claims in MO — Attorney911 & Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice Litigating Glyphosate & Surfactant Toxicity After the 2026 SCOTUS Preemption Ruling, We Move Beyond Failure-to-Warn Theories Blocked by FIFRA, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How the Claims Machine Values and Denies Toxic-Exposure Cases, the Firm Has Recovered $50M+ for Injury Victims, Missouri Strict Product Liability Doctrine — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911
The Supreme Court Just Changed the Rules for Roundup Cases—Here Is Why Your Fight Continues If you or a loved one is battling non-Hodgkin lymphoma after years of using Roundup, you likely woke up to headlines that sound like a door slamming shut. The U.S. Supreme Court’s 7-2 decision in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell is a major shift, but as trial attorneys who move through these complex battles every day, we know that one blocked path is not the end of the road. What the court decided is that you can no longer sue Monsanto in a Missouri court by arguing they should have put a cancer warning on the label. They ruled that because the EPA does not require that warning, federal law overrides—or “preempts”—Missouri’s state laws regarding labels. This ruling is a blow to thousands of families, but it does not erase the harm done to your body. Our trial team is already adapting. While the “failure to warn” theory is currently blocked, the law still allows us to hold corporations accountable for how a product is designed. If the product itself is inherently poisonous regardless of what the sticker says, that is a fight we can still…