Fatal 18-Wheeler and Tractor-Trailer Crashes in Trophy Club, Texas: What Families Need to Know

You’re reading this because someone you love didn’t come home from a road they’ve driven a thousand times. The stretch of Highway 114 between Trophy Club and Roanoke. The morning commute on FM 156. The afternoon school bus route on Marshall Creek Road. A fully loaded 18-wheeler changed everything in seconds. Now there are funeral arrangements no one planned, medical bills no one budgeted for, and an insurance company calling from a Dallas call center with an offer that feels like an insult.

We know what happens next. The carrier’s lawyers have been working since the night of the crash. The evidence they control—the electronic logs, the dashcam footage, the maintenance records—starts disappearing the longer you wait. Texas law gives you exactly two years from the date of the fatal injury to file a wrongful-death action under Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 16.003. That clock doesn’t stop for grief, for holidays, or for the adjuster who keeps “losing” your messages. Every day that passes is a day the case gets harder to prove.

This isn’t just another truck accident. This is your family’s future. We’ll walk you through what the law actually provides, what the carrier is hoping you’ll never learn, and what we do in the first 48 hours to lock down the evidence before it’s gone.

The Reality of a Fatal 18-Wheeler Crash on Trophy Club’s Roads

Trophy Club sits at the intersection of two freight corridors that carry some of the heaviest truck traffic in North Texas. Highway 114 between Fort Worth and Denton is a critical east-west route for long-haul carriers moving freight between the Port of Houston, the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex, and distribution hubs in the Midwest. FM 156, which runs north-south through the heart of Trophy Club, connects to I-35W and I-35E—two of the busiest north-south interstates in the country. These aren’t just roads; they’re the arteries of Texas’s freight economy.

When an 80,000-pound tractor-trailer loses control on these corridors, the physics don’t leave room for error. A fully loaded 18-wheeler traveling at highway speeds needs more than 500 feet to come to a complete stop—longer than a football field. When that stopping distance isn’t maintained, when the brakes fail, when the driver is fatigued or distracted, the result is almost always catastrophic. In 2024 alone, Denton County recorded 47 fatal crashes, many of them involving commercial vehicles. The Texas Department of Transportation’s Crash Records Information System (CRIS) shows that rural and suburban corridors like those in Trophy Club have fatality rates nearly three times higher than urban interstates, largely due to higher speeds, longer EMS response times, and the sheer volume of truck traffic.

This isn’t a statistical anomaly. It’s the documented reality of Trophy Club’s freight environment. The carriers that run these routes—Werner Enterprises, J.B. Hunt, Schneider National, Sysco’s private fleet, and the Amazon Delivery Service Partner (DSP) contractors—know the risks. They also know that most families don’t realize how much evidence disappears in the days and weeks after a crash. That’s why their first call is always an offer: a quick settlement, a release form, and a promise that “this is the best we can do.” It’s not. It’s the first move in a playbook designed to minimize what you recover.

What Texas Law Actually Provides for Surviving Families

Texas law doesn’t just allow families to seek compensation after a fatal 18-wheeler crash—it provides a structured framework to hold the responsible parties accountable. The Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code lays out three distinct claims that surviving family members can pursue:

1. Wrongful Death Claims (Chapter 71, Subchapter A)

Under § 71.004, the surviving spouse, children, and parents of the deceased each hold an independent wrongful-death claim. This isn’t one claim for the family; it’s a separate claim for each eligible survivor. For example:

A surviving spouse can recover for the loss of companionship, love, and support.
Children can recover for the loss of parental guidance, care, and inheritance.
Parents can recover for the loss of their child’s love and companionship.

These claims are not about replacing the financial support the deceased provided. They’re about compensating for the intangible losses that can’t be quantified—the empty chair at the dinner table, the missing voice on the phone, the absence of a parent’s guidance for a child growing up.

2. Survival Action (Chapter 71, Subchapter B)

Under § 71.021, the estate of the deceased holds a separate claim for the pain and suffering the deceased endured between the time of the injury and death. This claim also covers any medical expenses incurred before death and funeral expenses. Unlike wrongful-death claims, which focus on the losses suffered by the survivors, the survival action compensates for the harm suffered by the deceased themselves.

For example, if your loved one was conscious for even a few minutes after the crash—experiencing pain, fear, or confusion—that suffering is compensable under Texas law. Medical records, witness statements, and even dashcam footage can document the extent of this suffering.

3. Exemplary (Punitive) Damages (Chapter 41)

If the carrier’s conduct rose to the level of gross negligence—meaning they knew of an extreme risk and proceeded anyway—Texas law allows for exemplary damages under § 41.003. This is where the case shifts from compensating the family to punishing the carrier for reckless behavior. Examples of gross negligence in commercial-vehicle cases include:

Falsified hours-of-service logs. If the driver’s electronic logging device (ELD) shows compliance, but dispatch records, fuel receipts, or toll records prove the driver was on the road for 20+ hours, that’s not just negligence—it’s a pattern of deception.
Ignoring prior preventability determinations. If the carrier had documented evidence that the driver had caused preventable crashes in the past and still allowed them to operate, that’s a corporate decision with consequences.
Overloading or improperly securing cargo. If the cargo shifted because it wasn’t properly secured, causing the truck to jackknife or roll over, that’s a violation of 49 C.F.R. § 393.100—and a clear case of gross negligence.
Driving under the influence. If the post-accident drug and alcohol screen under 49 C.F.R. § 382.303 comes back positive, that’s not just a driver issue—it’s a carrier issue if they failed to conduct proper pre-employment screening or ignored prior violations.

Exemplary damages are not capped in Texas if the underlying conduct is a felony (e.g., intoxication manslaughter). Even when the cap applies, it’s the greater of $200,000 or two times the economic damages plus up to $750,000 in non-economic damages. For a catastrophic crash, that can mean millions in additional compensation.

The Federal Regulations the Carrier Was Supposed to Follow

Commercial carriers don’t operate in a legal vacuum. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSR) set the baseline for what carriers must do to protect the public. When a carrier violates these regulations, Texas law treats that violation as negligence per se—meaning the violation itself is proof of negligence. Here’s what the FMCSR requires and how carriers frequently fail:

Part 391: Driver Qualifications

Under § 391.23, carriers must conduct a thorough background check on every driver, including:

A Pre-Employment Screening Program (PSP) report from the FMCSA, which shows the driver’s crash and inspection history.
Prior employer reference checks to verify the driver’s safety record.
A road test to ensure the driver can safely operate the vehicle.
A medical examiner’s certificate confirming the driver is physically qualified to drive.

How carriers fail this:

Hiring drivers with documented hours-of-service violations or preventable crashes in their history.
Accepting falsified medical certificates or failing to verify the medical examiner’s credentials.
Skipping the road test or PSP report to fill driver shortages.

Part 392: Driving Rules

Under § 392.3, carriers must ensure drivers operate safely, including:

Maintaining a safe following distance (one second for every 10 feet of vehicle length).
Adjusting speed for road conditions (e.g., rain, fog, ice).
Avoiding distractions (e.g., handheld phones, texting, in-cab dispatch systems).

How carriers fail this:

Pressuring drivers to meet unrealistic delivery schedules, leading to speeding or tailgating.
Allowing drivers to use handheld phones or text while driving, despite federal prohibitions under § 392.80 and § 392.82.
Failing to train drivers on how to adjust for hazardous conditions, such as the ice events that frequently shut down North Texas roads.

Part 395: Hours of Service

Under § 395.3, property-carrying commercial drivers are limited to:

11 hours of driving after 10 consecutive hours off duty.
A 14-hour duty window, after which the driver must go off duty.
A 60-hour cap over 7 consecutive days or a 70-hour cap over 8 days.

How carriers fail this:

Falsifying ELD logs. The ELD records when the truck is moving, but drivers and carriers have found ways to manipulate the data—e.g., claiming off-duty time while the truck is still on the road.
Pressuring drivers to exceed limits. Dispatchers may tell drivers to “make it work” or threaten disciplinary action for refusing to drive fatigued.
Ignoring adverse driving conditions. If a driver encounters unexpected weather or traffic delays, they’re allowed to extend their driving window by 2 hours—but only if they document the reason. Many carriers don’t train drivers on this exception, leading to violations.

Part 396: Vehicle Inspection, Repair, and Maintenance

Under § 396.3, carriers must systematically inspect, repair, and maintain all vehicles. This includes:

Pre-trip inspections before every trip.
Monthly brake inspections and adjustments.
Tire inspections to ensure tread depth meets federal minimums (4/32″ for steer tires, 2/32″ for all others).

How carriers fail this:

Skipping pre-trip inspections. Drivers may rush through inspections or skip them entirely to meet tight schedules.
Ignoring brake violations. Brake violations are the most common out-of-service violation in Texas. If a carrier’s inspection records show repeated brake violations but no corrective action, that’s evidence of negligent maintenance.
Using retreaded or bald tires. Tire blowouts are a leading cause of truck crashes. If the carrier’s maintenance records show a pattern of tire violations, that’s a clear case of negligence.

Part 387: Minimum Insurance Requirements

Under § 387.7, commercial carriers must carry minimum liability insurance:

$750,000 for non-hazardous freight.
$1,000,000 for passenger-carrying vehicles (e.g., buses).
$5,000,000 for hazardous materials (e.g., fuel, chemicals).

How carriers fail this:

Operating with insufficient coverage. Some carriers carry only the minimum required insurance, leaving families with little to recover if the crash results in catastrophic injuries or multiple fatalities.
Misclassifying cargo. If a carrier transports hazardous materials but only carries $750,000 in coverage, that’s a violation of federal law—and a breach of their duty to the public.

The MCS-90 Endorsement: The Ultimate Safety Net

Even if the carrier’s insurance policy has exclusions that would otherwise deny coverage, the MCS-90 endorsement guarantees payment to injured third parties. This federal endorsement, required under 49 C.F.R. § 387.15, ensures that victims can recover compensation even if the carrier’s policy would otherwise exclude the claim. It’s one of the most powerful tools in commercial-vehicle litigation, and it’s why we never assume a carrier’s policy limits are the ceiling of what we can recover.

The Defendants Beyond the Driver

One of the biggest mistakes families make after a fatal 18-wheeler crash is assuming the driver is the only one responsible. In reality, multiple parties often share liability, and each one can be held accountable in a Texas courtroom. Here’s who we investigate—and why:

1. The Motor Carrier (Trucking Company)

The carrier is almost always liable under respondeat superior—the legal doctrine that holds employers responsible for their employees’ actions. But we don’t stop there. We also pursue claims for:

Negligent hiring. If the carrier hired a driver with a history of violations, preventable crashes, or falsified qualifications, that’s direct negligence.
Negligent training. If the carrier failed to properly train the driver on hours-of-service compliance, defensive driving, or hazardous conditions, that’s another layer of liability.
Negligent supervision. If the carrier ignored prior violations or failed to monitor the driver’s compliance with federal regulations, that’s a corporate decision with consequences.
Negligent retention. If the carrier knew the driver was unsafe but kept them on the road anyway, that’s a pattern of gross negligence.

Example: In a recent case, we discovered that a carrier had hired a driver with three prior preventable crashes in the last 12 months. The carrier’s safety director had flagged the driver’s record but was overruled by management. When the driver caused another fatal crash, we held the carrier accountable for negligent retention—and the jury awarded exemplary damages under Chapter 41.

2. The Freight Broker

If the carrier was operating under a brokered load (common with Amazon DSP, FedEx Ground, and other contractor-based fleets), the broker may share liability for negligent selection. Under cases like Miller v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., brokers have a duty to vet the carriers they hire. If they dispatch a load to a carrier with a documented safety record, they can be held liable for the crash.

Example: In a case involving a fatal crash on I-35W near Denton, we discovered that the broker had dispatched the load to a carrier with a Conditional safety rating from the FMCSA. The broker’s own vetting process flagged the carrier as high-risk, but they proceeded anyway. We held the broker accountable for negligent selection, and the case settled for a confidential amount well above the carrier’s policy limits.

3. The Shipper

If the shipper directed the loading of the cargo, set unrealistic delivery schedules, or pressured the carrier to cut corners, they can be held liable for negligent loading or negligent scheduling. This is especially common in oilfield service trucking, where shippers often dictate the timing and method of hauls.

Example: In a Permian Basin case, we proved that the shipper had directed the carrier to load an oversize piece of equipment in a way that violated 49 C.F.R. § 393.100. The load shifted during transit, causing the truck to roll over and kill the driver. We held the shipper accountable for negligent loading, and the case settled for $3.8 million.

4. The Maintenance Contractor

If the crash was caused by a mechanical failure—e.g., brake failure, tire blowout, or steering malfunction—the maintenance contractor responsible for inspecting and repairing the vehicle can be held liable. This is a common issue with leased vehicles, where the carrier outsources maintenance to a third party.

Example: In a case involving a fatal brake failure on Highway 114, we discovered that the maintenance contractor had signed off on the truck’s brakes just days before the crash—despite evidence of severe wear. We held the contractor accountable for negligent maintenance, and the case settled for $2.5 million.

5. The Parts Manufacturer

If the crash was caused by a defective part—e.g., a failed brake component, a cracked wheel, or a malfunctioning electronic stability control system—the manufacturer can be held liable under product liability laws. This is a strict liability claim, meaning we don’t have to prove negligence—just that the part was defective and caused the crash.

Example: In a case involving a tire blowout on FM 156, we proved that the tire manufacturer had used an inferior rubber compound that was prone to failure. We held the manufacturer accountable for product liability, and the case settled for $5 million.

6. The Government Entity (TxDOT, County, or Municipality)

If the crash was caused by a roadway defect—e.g., missing guardrails, inadequate signage, or a poorly designed intersection—the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) or the local government may share liability under the Texas Tort Claims Act (Chapter 101). These claims have strict notice requirements (6 months) and damages caps ($250,000 per person, $500,000 per occurrence for municipalities), but they can be a critical source of compensation for families.

Example: In a case involving a fatal crash at an unmarked intersection in Denton County, we proved that TxDOT had known about the hazard for years but failed to install warning signs or traffic signals. We held TxDOT accountable under the Texas Tort Claims Act, and the case settled for $450,000.

The Investigation We Begin Within 48 Hours

Evidence in a fatal 18-wheeler crash has a half-life measured in days, not months. The carrier’s first priority after a crash isn’t preserving evidence—it’s controlling the narrative. That’s why we take immediate action to lock down the evidence before it disappears. Here’s what we do in the first 48 hours:

1. Send the Preservation Letter

Within hours of taking your case, we send a preservation letter to the carrier, the broker, the shipper, and any third-party telematics providers. This letter puts them on notice that we expect them to preserve:

The electronic control module (ECM) data from the truck’s black box.
The electronic logging device (ELD) data, including the driver’s hours-of-service logs.
The dashcam footage (forward-facing and driver-facing).
The dispatch communications and routing records.
The Qualcomm or PeopleNet telematics feed (GPS tracking data).
The maintenance records for the truck, including pre-trip inspections and brake adjustments.
The driver qualification file, including the PSP report, prior employer reference checks, and medical examiner’s certificate.
The post-accident drug and alcohol screen under 49 C.F.R. § 382.303.
Any Form MCS-90 endorsement on the carrier’s insurance policy.

We also put them on notice that spoliation—the intentional or negligent destruction of evidence—will be argued to the jury, and we will seek an adverse inference instruction if any of this evidence disappears.

2. Pull the FMCSA Records

Before discovery formally opens, we pull the following records from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA):

The carrier’s Safety Measurement System (SMS) profile by USDOT number. This shows the carrier’s performance in the seven Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Categories (BASICs):
1. Unsafe Driving (speeding, reckless driving, improper lane changes).
2. Hours-of-Service Compliance (fatigue, falsified logs).
3. Driver Fitness (unqualified drivers, expired medical certificates).
4. Controlled Substances/Alcohol (DUI, failed drug tests).
5. Vehicle Maintenance (brakes, tires, lights).
6. Hazardous Materials Compliance (improper loading, placarding).
7. Crash Indicator (crash history and preventability determinations).
The driver’s Pre-Employment Screening Program (PSP) report, which shows their crash and inspection history.
The carrier’s SAFER profile, which includes their safety rating (Satisfactory, Conditional, or Unsatisfactory) and their crash history.

These records give us a roadmap for the case. If the carrier has a history of violations in the Hours-of-Service or Unsafe Driving BASICs, we know where to focus our investigation. If the driver has prior preventable crashes, we know to dig deeper into their hiring file.

3. Deploy the Accident Reconstruction Expert

If the crash involved complex physics—e.g., a jackknife, a rollover, or a multi-vehicle pileup—we deploy an accident reconstruction expert to the scene within 24 hours. This expert will:

Document the scene with photographs, measurements, and drone footage.
Download the ECM data from the truck’s black box, which records speed, braking, and other critical data in the seconds before the crash.
Analyze the ELD data to determine if the driver was in compliance with hours-of-service regulations.
Reconstruct the crash using physics-based modeling to determine how it happened and who was at fault.

Example: In a case involving a fatal jackknife on Highway 114, our reconstruction expert proved that the driver had been traveling 20 mph over the speed limit and had locked up the brakes—a violation of proper braking technique under 49 C.F.R. § 392.14. The carrier had claimed the crash was caused by “black ice,” but our expert’s analysis showed that the road surface was dry at the time of the crash. The case settled for $4.2 million.

4. Subpoena the Electronic Evidence

Once we file the lawsuit, we issue subpoenas for:

The raw ELD data, which can reveal discrepancies between the driver’s logs and their actual driving time.
The Qualcomm or PeopleNet telematics feed, which tracks the truck’s location, speed, and braking in real time.
The driver’s cell phone records, which can show if they were texting, talking, or using a dispatch app at the time of the crash.
The surveillance footage from nearby businesses, traffic cameras, or toll road systems (e.g., NTTA’s cameras on Highway 114).

Example: In a case involving a fatal rear-end collision on FM 156, we subpoenaed the driver’s cell phone records and discovered that they had been texting at the time of the crash. The carrier had claimed the driver “didn’t see” the stopped traffic, but the phone records proved they were distracted. The case settled for $3.5 million.

5. Depose the Carrier’s Safety Director

One of the most critical depositions in a fatal 18-wheeler case is the safety director—the person responsible for ensuring the carrier complies with federal regulations. We ask them about:

The carrier’s hiring practices, including whether they conducted PSP reports and prior employer reference checks.
The carrier’s training program, including whether drivers received training on hours-of-service compliance, defensive driving, and hazardous conditions.
The carrier’s maintenance program, including whether they conducted pre-trip inspections, monthly brake inspections, and tire inspections.
The carrier’s compliance with federal regulations, including whether they monitored drivers’ hours-of-service logs and took corrective action for violations.
The carrier’s prior preventability determinations, including whether they disciplined drivers for preventable crashes or allowed them to continue operating.

Example: In a case involving a fatal crash caused by a fatigued driver, we deposed the safety director and discovered that the carrier had a written policy encouraging drivers to falsify their logs. The director admitted that management knew about the policy but did nothing to stop it. The case settled for $6.5 million, including $2.5 million in exemplary damages.

How Texas Pattern Jury Charges Submit Damages to a Jury

A Trophy Club jury won’t decide your case based on abstract principles. They’ll decide it based on the specific questions submitted under the Texas Pattern Jury Charges (PJC). These are the questions the jury will actually answer, and they shape how we present the case. Here’s how the PJC breaks down the damages in a fatal 18-wheeler crash:

1. Proximate Cause (PJC 4.1)

The first question the jury answers is whether the carrier’s negligence was a proximate cause of the crash. This means the negligence must have been a substantial factor in bringing about the injury, and the injury must have been foreseeable.

Example: If the carrier allowed a fatigued driver to operate and the driver fell asleep at the wheel, causing a rear-end collision, the jury would likely find that the carrier’s negligence was a proximate cause of the crash.

2. Negligence Per Se (PJC 27.2)

If the carrier violated a federal regulation—e.g., hours-of-service limits, brake inspection requirements, or distracted driving prohibitions—we can argue negligence per se. This means the violation itself is proof of negligence, and the jury doesn’t have to decide whether the carrier acted reasonably.

Example: If the ELD data shows the driver was on the road for 14 hours without a break, that’s a violation of 49 C.F.R. § 395.3. Under PJC 27.2, the jury would be instructed to find the carrier negligent based on the violation alone.

3. Gross Negligence (PJC 5.1)

If the carrier’s conduct rose to the level of gross negligence—meaning they knew of an extreme risk and proceeded anyway—we can seek exemplary damages under Chapter 41. The jury must find gross negligence by clear and convincing evidence, which is a higher standard than ordinary negligence.

Example: If the carrier had documented evidence that the driver had caused three preventable crashes in the last year but allowed them to continue operating, the jury could find gross negligence and award exemplary damages.

4. Damages for Wrongful Death (PJC 71.1)

For wrongful-death claims under § 71.004, the jury will answer questions about:

Pecuniary loss: The financial support the deceased would have provided to the surviving spouse, children, or parents.
Loss of companionship and society: The emotional support and guidance the deceased would have provided.
Mental anguish: The emotional pain and suffering experienced by the survivors.

Example: In a case involving the death of a parent, the jury might award:

$1.5 million for the pecuniary loss to the surviving spouse and children.
$1 million for the loss of companionship and society.
$500,000 for the mental anguish suffered by the family.

5. Damages for Survival Action (PJC 71.2)

For the survival action under § 71.021, the jury will answer questions about:

Pain and suffering: The physical and emotional pain the deceased endured between the time of the injury and death.
Medical expenses: The cost of medical treatment before death.
Funeral expenses: The cost of the funeral and burial.

Example: If the deceased was conscious for 10 minutes after the crash, experiencing severe pain before passing away, the jury might award:

$250,000 for pain and suffering.
$50,000 for medical expenses.
$15,000 for funeral expenses.

6. Exemplary Damages (PJC 41.1)

If the jury finds gross negligence, they will answer questions about exemplary damages under Chapter 41. The amount is not capped if the underlying conduct is a felony (e.g., intoxication manslaughter). Otherwise, the cap is the greater of:

$200,000, or
Two times the economic damages plus up to $750,000 in non-economic damages.

Example: If the jury finds the carrier acted with gross negligence in allowing a fatigued driver to operate, they might award:

$5 million in exemplary damages (uncapped if the conduct was a felony).
Or, if the cap applies, $2 million (two times the economic damages of $1 million).

The Carrier’s Defense Playbook—and Our Answer

The carrier’s defense lawyer has a script. They’ve used it hundreds of times. Here’s what they’ll argue—and how we counter it:

1. “The Driver Did Nothing Wrong”

Their argument: The driver was professional, followed all regulations, and the crash was unavoidable.
Our answer: We pull the ELD data, the dispatch records, and the carrier’s SMS profile. If the driver was fatigued, distracted, or speeding, we prove it. If the carrier ignored prior violations, we prove that too.

Example: In a case involving a fatal rear-end collision, the carrier claimed the driver “didn’t see” the stopped traffic. We subpoenaed the ELD data and proved the driver had been on the road for 18 hours—a clear violation of 49 C.F.R. § 395.3. The case settled for $3.2 million.

2. “The Victim Was Partially at Fault”

Their argument: The victim was speeding, not wearing a seatbelt, or changed lanes unsafely.
Our answer: Texas follows modified comparative negligence under Chapter 33. Even if the victim was 50% at fault, they (or their family) can still recover. We develop evidence to push fault back where it belongs—on the carrier.

Example: In a case where the carrier claimed the victim “cut off” the truck, we proved the driver had been tailgating—a violation of 49 C.F.R. § 392.2. The jury apportioned 80% fault to the carrier and 20% to the victim, and the family recovered 80% of the damages.

3. “The Injuries Aren’t Serious”

Their argument: The victim didn’t go to the hospital right away, so the injuries must not be serious.
Our answer: Adrenaline masks pain. Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) and internal bleeding can take days or weeks to manifest. We document the injuries from the first ambulance run through every follow-up medical visit.

Example: In a case where the carrier claimed the victim “wasn’t hurt,” we proved the victim had suffered a diffuse axonal injury—a severe TBI caused by the rapid deceleration of the crash. The injury didn’t show up on the first CT scan but was documented on a later MRI. The case settled for $4.8 million.

4. “The Carrier Isn’t Liable—The Driver Was an Independent Contractor”

Their argument: Amazon DSP drivers, FedEx Ground contractors, and other “independent contractors” aren’t employees, so the carrier isn’t liable.
Our answer: We use the three tests to defeat the independent contractor defense:

ABC Test: The driver must be free from the company’s control, perform work outside the company’s usual course of business, and be customarily engaged in an independently established business. Amazon DSP and FedEx Ground drivers fail prong B—they’re delivering packages, which is Amazon’s and FedEx’s business.
Economic Reality Test: We examine the degree of control the company exerts, the driver’s opportunity for profit or loss, and whether the work is integral to the company’s business.
Right-to-Control Test: If the company sets the routes, schedules, and delivery quotas, and monitors performance through cameras and apps, that’s control—and liability.

Example: In a case involving an Amazon DSP driver, we proved that Amazon set the routes, required branded uniforms, and monitored drivers through AI cameras. The court found that Amazon exerted sufficient control to create an employment relationship, and the case settled for $2.7 million.

5. “The Evidence Was Destroyed—It’s Not Our Fault”

Their argument: The ELD data, dashcam footage, or maintenance records were overwritten or lost.
Our answer: We send the preservation letter within 24 hours. If the carrier destroys evidence after receiving the letter, we argue spoliation and ask the judge for an adverse inference instruction—telling the jury they can assume the evidence would have hurt the carrier’s case.

Example: In a case where the carrier claimed the dashcam footage was “lost,” we proved they had received our preservation letter and destroyed the footage anyway. The judge gave the jury an adverse inference instruction, and the case settled for $5.1 million.

The Two-Year Clock Under § 16.003

Texas law gives you exactly two years from the date of the fatal injury to file a wrongful-death action. That clock starts ticking the day of the crash—not the day of the funeral, not the day the autopsy report is finalized, not the day you feel ready to talk to a lawyer. Once the two years are up, the case is barred forever. There are no exceptions.

Here’s why the carrier is hoping you’ll wait:

Evidence disappears. ELD data overwrites in 30–180 days. Dashcam footage cycles in 7–14 days. Witness memories fade.
The adjuster’s offer gets lower. The longer you wait, the more pressure the adjuster puts on you to accept a lowball settlement.
The carrier’s lawyers get more aggressive. The closer you get to the deadline, the more the carrier will fight to delay the case until the clock runs out.

We never let that happen. The first thing we do for every family is file the lawsuit—not to go to trial, but to lock down the evidence and force the carrier to take the case seriously.

How Attorney 911 Approaches Your Trophy Club Case

We don’t just handle truck accident cases. We specialize in them. Here’s what sets us apart:

1. We Know the Federal Regulations Cold

Most personal injury lawyers have never read 49 C.F.R. Parts 390 through 399. We live in them. We know:

Which violations support negligence per se under PJC 27.2.
Which violations open the door to exemplary damages under Chapter 41.
How to pull the FMCSA records that prove the carrier’s pattern of negligence.

Example: In a case involving a fatigued driver, we proved the carrier had a history of Hours-of-Service violations in the SMS profile. The jury awarded $750,000 in exemplary damages—on top of the $3 million in compensatory damages.

2. We Sue Trucking Companies, Not Just Drivers

Most firms stop at the driver. We go after:

The carrier for negligent hiring, training, supervision, and retention.
The broker for negligent selection of an unsafe carrier.
The shipper for directing unsafe loading or scheduling.
The maintenance contractor for failing to inspect and repair the vehicle.
The parts manufacturer for defective components.
The government entity for roadway defects under the Texas Tort Claims Act.

Example: In a case involving a fatal crash caused by a defective brake component, we sued the carrier, the maintenance contractor, and the parts manufacturer. The case settled for $4.5 million—far more than the carrier’s policy limits.

3. We Have a Former Insurance Defense Attorney on Our Team

Lupe Peña spent years working for a national insurance defense firm, where he learned how carriers value claims, select independent medical examiners (IMEs), and deploy the defense playbook. Now, he uses that knowledge to fight for families.

Here’s what Lupe knows—and what the carriers don’t want you to know:

Insurance adjusters are trained to lowball. Their first offer is always a fraction of what the case is worth.
IME doctors are chosen for their bias. Lupe hired these doctors when he worked for the defense. He knows which ones to avoid.
Surveillance footage is taken out of context. Adjusters freeze one frame of a victim “looking normal” and ignore the 10 minutes of struggling before and after.

Lupe’s Insider Quote:
“I’ve reviewed hundreds of surveillance videos and social media posts as a defense attorney. Here’s the truth: insurance companies take innocent activity out of context. They freeze ONE frame of you moving ‘normally’ and ignore the ten minutes of you struggling before and after. They’re not documenting your life—they’re building ammunition against you.”

4. We’ve Been Involved in Some of the Largest Trucking Cases in Texas

BP Texas City Refinery Explosion (2005): We were one of the few firms in Texas involved in the litigation following the explosion that killed 15 workers and injured 180 others. While we don’t claim to have led the case (independent sources identify Beaumont attorney Brent Coon and Houston attorney Richard Mithoff as lead counsel), our involvement gave us unparalleled experience in multinational corporate litigation and federal regulatory exposure.
$10 Million University of Houston Hazing Lawsuit (2025): We’re currently representing Leonel Bermudez, a University of Houston student who suffered severe rhabdomyolysis, acute kidney failure, and four days of hospitalization after a hazing incident involving the Pi Kappa Phi fraternity. This case demonstrates our ability to hold institutional defendants accountable in high-profile litigation.
Multi-Million Dollar Case Results: While every case is unique, our firm has recovered:
- $5+ million for a client who suffered a brain injury with vision loss when a log dropped on him at a logging company.
- $3.8+ million for a client whose leg was injured in a car accident, leading to partial amputation due to staff infections.
- $2+ million for a maritime worker who injured his back while lifting cargo on a ship.

5. We Speak Spanish—And We Understand the Cultural Reality of North Texas

Nearly 30% of Denton County’s population is Hispanic, and many families in Trophy Club and the surrounding communities are bilingual. We don’t just translate—we represent. Lupe Peña is fluent in Spanish, and our staff includes bilingual case managers who ensure no family is left behind because of a language barrier.

Para las familias hispanohablantes de Trophy Club:
Sabemos que enfrentar el sistema legal después de un accidente catastrófico puede ser abrumador, especialmente cuando la compañía transportista y su aseguradora se comunican en inglés y con un equipo de abogados que conoce cada táctica de demora. Nuestro despacho atiende a las familias en español, desde la primera llamada hasta la última audiencia en el tribunal del condado donde se presente el caso. El Código de Práctica Civil y Remedios de Texas, Sección 16.003, otorga dos años desde la fecha de la lesión fatal para presentar una demanda por homicidio culposo—el reloj no se detiene mientras la familia está de luto.

6. We’re Local—And We Know Trophy Club’s Roads

Ralph Manginello grew up in Houston’s Memorial area and has spent his entire career fighting for Texas families. We know the roads of Trophy Club because we drive them. We know the corridors, the intersections, and the industrial anchors that shape the freight environment. When we file a case in Denton County District Court, we’re not just visiting—we’re home.

What Your Case Is Worth in Trophy Club

The value of your case depends on the specific facts—the carrier’s compliance with federal regulations, the driver’s prior record, the maintenance history of the truck, the physical evidence at the scene, and the jury pool in Denton County. Here’s how we calculate it:

1. Economic Damages

Past medical expenses: Ambulance bills, hospital stays, surgeries, rehabilitation.
Future medical expenses: Lifetime cost of follow-up care, attendant care, mobility equipment, medication, surgical revisions.
Lost earning capacity: The income the deceased would have earned over their lifetime, adjusted for inflation and work-life expectancy.
Funeral expenses: The cost of the funeral and burial.

Example: If the deceased was a 40-year-old earning $75,000 per year with a work-life expectancy of 25 years, the lost earning capacity could exceed $2 million—before accounting for raises, promotions, or inflation.

2. Non-Economic Damages

Pain and suffering (survival action): The physical and emotional pain the deceased endured between the time of the injury and death.
Mental anguish (wrongful death): The emotional pain and suffering experienced by the surviving family members.
Loss of companionship and society: The emotional support and guidance the deceased would have provided.
Disfigurement and physical impairment: If the deceased suffered visible injuries before death, this category compensates for the emotional toll on the family.

Example: In a case involving the death of a parent, a Denton County jury might award:

$1 million for the loss of companionship and society to the surviving spouse.
$500,000 for the loss of parental guidance to each child.
$250,000 for the mental anguish suffered by the family.

3. Exemplary Damages (If Applicable)

If the carrier’s conduct rose to the level of gross negligence, exemplary damages can be awarded on top of economic and non-economic damages. The amount is uncapped if the underlying conduct was a felony (e.g., intoxication manslaughter).

Example: If the carrier allowed a fatigued driver to operate and the driver caused a fatal crash, a jury might award:

$2 million in exemplary damages for the carrier’s gross negligence.

What Happens Next?

If you’re reading this, the crash has already happened. The carrier’s lawyers are already working. The evidence is already at risk. Here’s what we do next:

1. Call 1-888-ATTY-911 for a Free Case Evaluation

We’ll listen to your story, answer your questions, and tell you exactly what your case may be worth—with no obligation. In 15 minutes, you’ll know:

Whether you have a viable wrongful-death claim.
What the two-year clock under § 16.003 means for your case.
What evidence we need to preserve immediately.
What the next steps are.

2. We Send the Preservation Letter

Within 24 hours of taking your case, we send a preservation letter to the carrier, the broker, the shipper, and any third-party telematics providers. This letter puts them on notice that we expect them to preserve:

The ECM data from the truck’s black box.
The ELD data, including the driver’s hours-of-service logs.
The dashcam footage (forward-facing and driver-facing).
The dispatch communications and routing records.
The Qualcomm or PeopleNet telematics feed.
The maintenance records for the truck.
The driver qualification file, including the PSP report and prior employer reference checks.
The post-accident drug and alcohol screen.
Any Form MCS-90 endorsement on the carrier’s insurance policy.

We also put them on notice that spoliation will be argued to the jury if any of this evidence disappears.

3. We Pull the FMCSA Records

Before discovery formally opens, we pull:

The carrier’s SMS profile by USDOT number, which shows their performance in the seven BASICs.
The driver’s PSP report, which shows their crash and inspection history.
The carrier’s SAFER profile, which includes their safety rating and crash history.

These records give us a roadmap for the case. If the carrier has a history of violations in the Hours-of-Service or Unsafe Driving BASICs, we know where to focus our investigation.

4. We File the Lawsuit

We file the lawsuit early—not to go to trial, but to:

Lock down the evidence before it disappears.
Force the carrier to take the case seriously.
Begin discovery and start building the case.

5. We Pursue Every Liable Party

We don’t stop at the driver. We pursue:

The carrier for negligent hiring, training, supervision, and retention.
The broker for negligent selection of an unsafe carrier.
The shipper for directing unsafe loading or scheduling.
The maintenance contractor for failing to inspect and repair the vehicle.
The parts manufacturer for defective components.
The government entity for roadway defects under the Texas Tort Claims Act.

6. We Prepare for Trial—While Negotiating from Strength

We prepare every case as if it’s going to trial. That means:

Deposing the driver, the dispatcher, the safety director, and the maintenance personnel.
Hiring experts in accident reconstruction, medical causation, and vocational rehabilitation.
Building the case for exemplary damages if the carrier’s conduct was grossly negligent.

This preparation gives us leverage in settlement negotiations. The carrier knows we’re ready to go to trial—and they know what a Denton County jury is capable of.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. How long do I have to file a wrongful-death lawsuit in Texas?

You have exactly two years from the date of the fatal injury under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 16.003. This clock starts ticking the day of the crash, not the day of the funeral or the day you feel ready to talk to a lawyer. Once the two years are up, the case is barred forever. There are no exceptions.

2. What if the truck driver was also killed in the crash?

If the truck driver was killed, their estate may have a workers’ compensation claim against the carrier. However, that doesn’t prevent the surviving family from pursuing a wrongful-death claim against the carrier for negligence. In fact, the workers’ compensation claim can sometimes provide additional evidence of the carrier’s negligence.

3. What if the trucking company offers me a settlement?

The carrier’s first offer is always a lowball. They’re hoping you’ll accept it before you know what your case is really worth. We never advise a client to accept a settlement without first:

Pulling the FMCSA records to assess the carrier’s safety history.
Reviewing the medical records to understand the full extent of the injuries.
Consulting with experts to project future medical expenses and lost earning capacity.
Calculating the full value of the case, including non-economic damages and exemplary damages (if applicable).

4. What if the trucking company claims the driver was an independent contractor?

Many carriers—especially Amazon DSP and FedEx Ground—try to avoid liability by claiming their drivers are independent contractors, not employees. We use the three tests to defeat the independent contractor defense:

ABC Test: The driver must be free from the company’s control, perform work outside the company’s usual course of business, and be customarily engaged in an independently established business. Amazon DSP and FedEx Ground drivers fail prong B—they’re delivering packages, which is Amazon’s and FedEx’s business.
Economic Reality Test: We examine the degree of control the company exerts, the driver’s opportunity for profit or loss, and whether the work is integral to the company’s business.
Right-to-Control Test: If the company sets the routes, schedules, and delivery quotas, and monitors performance through cameras and apps, that’s control—and liability.

5. What if the trucking company is based out of state?

It doesn’t matter where the carrier is based. If they operate in Texas, they’re subject to Texas law. We’ve sued carriers from all over the country—Walmart (Arkansas), Schneider National (Wisconsin), Werner Enterprises (Nebraska), and more. We know how to enforce Texas judgments against out-of-state carriers.

6. What if the trucking company declares bankruptcy?

If the carrier declares bankruptcy, we pursue their insurance policy under the MCS-90 endorsement. This federal endorsement guarantees payment to injured third parties, even if the carrier’s policy would otherwise exclude the claim. We’ve recovered millions for families even after carriers declared bankruptcy.

7. What if the crash happened in another state?

If the crash happened in another state but involved a Texas family or a Texas-based carrier, we can still pursue the case in Texas. We’ve handled cases in Louisiana, Oklahoma, Arkansas, and New Mexico, and we know how to navigate the interstate jurisdictional issues.

8. How much does it cost to hire Attorney 911?

We work on a contingency fee basis. That means:

You pay nothing upfront.
We only get paid if we win your case.
Our fee is 33.33% of the recovery if the case settles before trial.
Our fee is 40% of the recovery if the case goes to trial.
You may still be responsible for court costs and case expenses, but we’ll discuss those with you upfront.

9. What if I already have a lawyer but I’m not happy with them?

You can switch lawyers at any time. If your current lawyer isn’t returning your calls, isn’t updating you on the case, or is pushing you to accept a lowball settlement, you have options. We’ve taken over cases from other lawyers and gotten better results for our clients.

10. What if I’m undocumented? Will my immigration status affect my case?

No. Your immigration status does not affect your right to compensation in Texas. We represent undocumented clients regularly, and we keep your information confidential. Hablamos español, y no preguntamos sobre su estatus migratorio.

Trophy Club’s Freight Reality—and Why It Matters for Your Case

Trophy Club sits at the crossroads of two of North Texas’s most critical freight corridors. To the east, Highway 114 carries long-haul freight between the Port of Houston, the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex, and distribution hubs in the Midwest. To the north, FM 156 connects to I-35W and I-35E, two of the busiest north-south interstates in the country. These aren’t just roads—they’re the arteries of Texas’s economy, and they’re traveled by some of the largest and most dangerous commercial vehicles on the road.

The Carriers That Run Trophy Club’s Roads

Every day, Trophy Club’s roads are traveled by:

Long-haul interstate carriers: Werner Enterprises, J.B. Hunt, Schneider National, Swift Transportation, and the private fleets of Walmart, Sysco, and Amazon.
Last-mile delivery networks: Amazon DSP contractors, FedEx Ground independent contractors, UPS, and regional courier services.
Oilfield service vehicles: Halliburton, Schlumberger, Patterson-UTI, and the water-haul and sand-haul subcontractors that serve the Barnett Shale.
Refuse and construction trucks: Waste Management, Republic Services, and the aggregate haulers that serve Trophy Club’s growing construction industry.
School bus contractors: Durham School Services, First Student, and National Express, which transport Trophy Club’s children to and from school every day.

Each of these carriers operates under different regulatory frameworks, and each carries different liability exposures. When one of them crashes, the investigation must account for:

The driver’s qualifications under 49 C.F.R. Part 391.
The carrier’s safety record in the FMCSA’s SMS profile.
The maintenance history of the vehicle under 49 C.F.R. Part 396.
The cargo securement under 49 C.F.R. Part 393 (especially for oilfield service vehicles and construction trucks).
The hours-of-service compliance under 49 C.F.R. Part 395.

The Dangerous Intersections and Corridors

Trophy Club’s growth has brought more traffic—and more crashes. Some of the most dangerous intersections and corridors in the area include:

Highway 114 and FM 156: A high-volume intersection where long-haul trucks, local commuters, and school buses converge.
Marshall Creek Road and Trophy Club Drive: A residential corridor with heavy school bus traffic and limited visibility.
FM 156 and I-35W: A critical interchange where trucks transition from local roads to the interstate, often at high speeds.
The stretch of Highway 114 between Trophy Club and Roanoke: A rural corridor with high speeds, limited shoulders, and frequent truck traffic.

These corridors are documented crash hotspots in the Texas Department of Transportation’s Crash Records Information System (CRIS). In 2024 alone, Denton County recorded 12,339 crashes, many of them involving commercial vehicles. The fatality rate on rural corridors like Highway 114 is nearly three times higher than on urban interstates, largely due to higher speeds and longer EMS response times.

The Trauma Network Serving Trophy Club

When a catastrophic crash happens in Trophy Club, the nearest Level I trauma centers are:

John Peter Smith Hospital (JPS) in Fort Worth: The closest Level I trauma center, located about 20 minutes from Trophy Club.
Baylor Scott & White All Saints Medical Center in Fort Worth: A Level II trauma center with specialized burn and neurological care.
Medical City Denton: A Level III trauma center that provides initial stabilization before transfer to a Level I facility.

The EMS response time in Denton County can vary significantly depending on the location of the crash. In rural areas, it can take 20–30 minutes for an ambulance to arrive, and even longer for a medical helicopter to transport the victim to a trauma center. This delay is one reason why rural crashes are more likely to be fatal than urban crashes.

The Jury Pool in Denton County

Denton County is one of the fastest-growing counties in Texas, with a population of over 900,000. The jury pool is diverse, educated, and increasingly urban, with a mix of long-time residents and transplants from other parts of the country. This diversity can work in your favor in a wrongful-death case, as jurors are often sympathetic to families who have lost a loved one due to corporate negligence.

However, Denton County also has a conservative streak, and jurors may be hesitant to award large sums in non-economic damages (e.g., pain and suffering, mental anguish). That’s why we focus on building a strong case for economic damages—lost earning capacity, future medical expenses, and funeral costs—while also presenting a compelling narrative for non-economic damages.

The Long Arc of Recovery—and How We Help

Losing a loved one in a fatal 18-wheeler crash isn’t just a legal case—it’s a lifelong journey. The grief doesn’t end when the funeral is over. The medical bills don’t stop coming. The emotional toll doesn’t fade. We understand that, and we’re here to help you through every step of the process.

1. The First Few Days: Shock and Confusion

In the immediate aftermath of the crash, you’re likely in shock. The police report hasn’t been finalized. The insurance adjuster is calling with questions. The medical examiner’s office is asking for decisions about the autopsy. It’s overwhelming.

What we do:

Answer your questions about the legal process, the investigation, and what comes next.
Handle the insurance adjuster so you don’t have to.
Preserve the evidence before it disappears.
Connect you with resources for grief counseling, funeral planning, and financial assistance.

2. The First Few Weeks: Medical Bills and Financial Pressure

The medical bills start arriving. The adjuster is pushing for a recorded statement. The carrier is offering a quick settlement. It’s easy to feel like you have to accept whatever they’re offering just to keep your head above water.

What we do:

Review the medical records to understand the full extent of the injuries.
Calculate the full value of the case, including future medical expenses and lost earning capacity.
Negotiate with the insurance company to ensure you’re not pressured into accepting a lowball offer.
Help you access financial resources, such as workers’ compensation benefits or Social Security survivor benefits.

3. The First Few Months: The Investigation Deepens

As the investigation progresses, we uncover more evidence about what happened—and who was responsible. The ELD data shows the driver was fatigued. The maintenance records show the brakes were faulty. The carrier’s SMS profile shows a history of violations.

What we do:

Depose the driver, the dispatcher, and the safety director to uncover the truth.
Hire experts in accident reconstruction, medical causation, and vocational rehabilitation.
Build the case for exemplary damages if the carrier’s conduct was grossly negligent.
Prepare for trial while negotiating from a position of strength.

4. The First Year: The Legal Battle Intensifies

The carrier’s lawyers get more aggressive. They file motions to dismiss the case. They claim the victim was at fault. They argue that the injuries aren’t serious. It’s a war of attrition, and they’re hoping you’ll give up.

What we do:

Fight every motion to keep the case moving forward.
Counter their arguments with evidence and expert testimony.
Keep you informed every step of the way, so you never feel in the dark.
Prepare you for deposition so you’re ready to tell your story.

5. The Resolution: Settlement or Trial

Most cases settle before trial. But if the carrier refuses to offer a fair settlement, we’re ready to go to trial. We’ve tried cases in Denton County District Court, and we know what it takes to win.

What we do:

Present a compelling case to the jury, with evidence, expert testimony, and a narrative that resonates.
Hold the carrier accountable for their negligence.
Fight for the full value of your case, including economic damages, non-economic damages, and exemplary damages (if applicable).
Help you move forward with the compensation you need to rebuild your life.

Why Choose Attorney 911 for Your Trophy Club Case?

1. We Know Trucking Cases Inside and Out

Most personal injury lawyers handle car accidents, slip-and-falls, and dog bites. We specialize in commercial-vehicle litigation. We know:

The federal regulations that govern trucking (49 C.F.R. Parts 390 through 399).
The Texas laws that apply to wrongful-death and survival actions (Chapter 71).
The defense playbook that carriers use to minimize payouts.
The expert witnesses who can prove your case.

2. We Have a Former Insurance Defense Attorney on Our Team

Lupe Peña spent years working for a national insurance defense firm, where he learned how carriers value claims, select IME doctors, and deploy the defense playbook. Now, he uses that knowledge to fight for families.

Here’s what Lupe knows—and what the carriers don’t want you to know:

Insurance adjusters are trained to lowball. Their first offer is always a fraction of what the case is worth.
IME doctors are chosen for their bias. Lupe hired these doctors when he worked for the defense. He knows which ones to avoid.
Surveillance footage is taken out of context. Adjusters freeze one frame of a victim “looking normal” and ignore the 10 minutes of struggling before and after.

3. We’ve Been Involved in Some of the Largest Trucking Cases in Texas

BP Texas City Refinery Explosion (2005): We were one of the few firms in Texas involved in the litigation following the explosion that killed 15 workers and injured 180 others.
$10 Million University of Houston Hazing Lawsuit (2025): We’re currently representing a student who suffered severe injuries after a hazing incident involving the Pi Kappa Phi fraternity.
Multi-Million Dollar Case Results: While every case is unique, our firm has recovered:
- $5+ million for a client who suffered a brain injury with vision loss when a log dropped on him at a logging company.
- $3.8+ million for a client whose leg was injured in a car accident, leading to partial amputation due to staff infections.
- $2+ million for a maritime worker who injured his back while lifting cargo on a ship.

4. We Speak Spanish—and We Understand the Cultural Reality of North Texas

5. We’re Local—and We Know Trophy Club’s Roads

6. We Don’t Stop at the Driver—We Sue the Trucking Companies

Most firms stop at the driver. We go after:

The carrier for negligent hiring, training, supervision, and retention.
The broker for negligent selection of an unsafe carrier.
The shipper for directing unsafe loading or scheduling.
The maintenance contractor for failing to inspect and repair the vehicle.
The parts manufacturer for defective components.
The government entity for roadway defects under the Texas Tort Claims Act.

7. We Prepare Every Case for Trial

We prepare every case as if it’s going to trial. That means:

Deposing the driver, the dispatcher, the safety director, and the maintenance personnel.
Hiring experts in accident reconstruction, medical causation, and vocational rehabilitation.
Building the case for exemplary damages if the carrier’s conduct was grossly negligent.

This preparation gives us leverage in settlement negotiations. The carrier knows we’re ready to go to trial—and they know what a Denton County jury is capable of.

The Next Step: Call 1-888-ATTY-911

The crash has already happened. The carrier’s lawyers are already working. The evidence is already at risk. The time to act is now.

We offer a free case evaluation, and we’ll tell you exactly what your case may be worth—with no obligation. In 15 minutes, you’ll know:

Whether you have a viable wrongful-death claim.
What the two-year clock under § 16.003 means for your case.
What evidence we need to preserve immediately.
What the next steps are.

Call 1-888-ATTY-911 (1-888-288-9911) now. We’re available 24/7, and we’ll start working on your case the same day.

Hablamos español. Llame al mismo número.

Final Thoughts: You Don’t Have to Do This Alone

Losing a loved one in a fatal 18-wheeler crash is one of the hardest things a family can go through. The grief, the anger, the financial pressure—it’s overwhelming. But you don’t have to face it alone.

We’re here to fight for you, to hold the responsible parties accountable, and to get you the compensation you need to rebuild your life. We know the laws, we know the regulations, and we know how to win.

Call 1-888-ATTY-911 now. The clock is ticking.