Inside the First Forty-Eight Hours After the White House Ambush: What the Families of Specialist Sarah Beckstrom and Guardsman Andrew Wolfe Are Actually Facing
Two families. Two very different kinds of pain. One spent Thanksgiving Day lowering a twenty-year-old daughter into the ground. The other spent it in an intensive care unit, watching a ventilator breathe for someone whose brain is no longer reliable. Both families woke the next morning to headlines about a federal death-penalty prosecution — and to a question almost no one around them was equipped to answer: does any of that pay our bills?
It does not. The criminal case against Rahmanullah Lakanwal — even if it ends in a capital sentence — is not designed to compensate the people he wounded and the family of the person he killed. It is designed to punish him. The compensation has to come from somewhere else, and finding it is the work of a civil case built quickly, before the federal evidence pipeline decides what survives and what disappears.
This page is the legal analysis those families need and that anyone touched by this case — or by the next one like it — deserves to read. It is written by a federal-court trial team that has spent twenty-seven years inside courtrooms, including federal court, and that has worked both sides of the insurance machine. It explains what the law permits, what it forbids, where the money actually lives, and what the family can do in the days they have. The consultation costs nothing. There is no fee unless we recover.
What Happened Near the White House, and Why the Families Should Read About It Differently Than Everyone Else
On the day before Thanksgiving, near the most heavily surveilled perimeter in the United States, a thirty-year-old Afghan national who had once worked as a CIA contractor allegedly drove a Toyota Prius twenty-eight hundred miles from Bellingham, Washington, to the District of Columbia. He carried a .357 Smith & Wesson revolver that had been reported stolen in Seattle in 2023. When he reached the area where West Virginia National Guard members were deployed in support of federal law enforcement operations, he allegedly opened fire. Specialist Sarah Beckstrom, twenty years old, was struck in the head and died of her injuries. Guardsman Andrew Wolfe was struck in the head as well and survived with severe, life-altering wounds. Two other Guard members subdued the suspect at the scene.
A federal grand jury returned a seventeen-count superseding indictment charging first-degree murder, assault with intent to kill while armed, and related firearms offenses. The case became death-penalty eligible. The U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia announced the prosecution personally.
That is the public story. For the Beckstrom family, it is the story of how their daughter died. For the Wolfe family, it is the story of how their son was nearly killed and now lives with the consequences no news camera will follow home. The legal system is now running on two tracks. The criminal track is moving fast — and it does not pay them. The civil track is the one that pays them, and it requires deliberate, early action before evidence is processed, summarized, archived, or simply overwritten by federal agencies that have thousands of other cases ahead of it in line.
The Civil Case Is Not the Criminal Case — and That Is Why the Civil Case Exists
Americans who watch criminal trials often leave the courtroom assuming justice has been done because a defendant was convicted. What they do not see is that criminal conviction is a question of punishment. It does not write a check to the victim’s family. It does not pay for a funeral. It does not pay for a decade of neurological rehabilitation. It does not replace a twenty-year-old’s future military career. It does not compensate a mother for the lifetime of holidays her daughter will not be at the table.
Compensation is what civil courts do. Wrongful-death and personal-injury claims against the perpetrator and against any third parties whose negligence contributed to the harm are how a family recovers financially for what was taken. Criminal punishment and civil recovery are not competing tracks. They run on parallel rails, and the family needs both to reach any kind of complete outcome.
\p>
There is also a deeper reason a civil case matters even when the criminal case is winning: the perpetrator in this matter is, by every available indication, not a person of means. A civil judgment against him will be largely uncollectible. The money — if there is to be any — has to be found through the third parties whose conduct contributed to the harm. And identifying those third parties, before the evidence trail cools, is exactly why speed matters.
Who Can Be Sued After an Ambush Like This? The Defendant Map
The instinct in a case like this is to focus on the shooter and to assume that is the only target. In a federal death-penalty prosecution, that is reasonable for the criminal system. For the civil system, it is the wrong place to stop. Civil liability in violent-crime cases flows through several channels at once, and the families need a civil case built that considers every one of them.
The perpetrator directly. Rahmanullah Lakanwal is the obvious defendant for intentional torts — assault, battery, and wrongful death. Under D.C. law, an intentional tortfeasor is one hundred percent liable for the harm caused; comparative fault does not reduce his share. Punitive damages are available as a matter of law, both under D.C. common law and under the wrongful-death statute. The problem is collection. If he has no assets, the judgment is a piece of paper.
The owner of the stolen firearm. This is the channel that requires the most investigative work and that may be the one with real money behind it. The .357 revolver used in this attack was reported stolen in Seattle in 2023. That means there was an original owner. The original owner may have been a lawful gun owner who stored the weapon responsibly and was the victim of a theft that could not have been prevented. Or the original owner may have failed to secure the weapon in a manner that invited theft — a violation of Washington’s safe-storage law, RCW 9.41.360, which requires safe storage to prevent unauthorized access by prohibited persons.
Washington’s safe-storage statute is one of the strongest in the country for a reason. It recognizes that a firearm that can be picked up and used by someone not authorized to carry it is a foreseeable danger. When a stolen firearm is later used in a violent crime, the chain of causation does not necessarily stop at the thief. The original owner’s homeowner’s insurance policy may cover negligent storage claims, and that insurance is real money available to the victims.
The owner of the Toyota Prius. If the vehicle was not owned by Lakanwal, the registered owner faces potential negligent-entrustment exposure. Negligent entrustment applies when an owner allows someone to use a vehicle while knowing, or having reason to know, that the person is incompetent, unlicensed, impaired, or likely to misuse the vehicle. The facts here — a person with reported mental instability and a cross-country drive — may support such a theory depending on what the registered owner actually knew.
The federal government under the Federal Tort Claims Act. If any federal agency — Secret Service, Park Police, the FBI — had prior contact with the suspect that was mishandled, and that mishandling contributed to the harm, the FTCA may provide a remedy. The FTCA allows civil suits against the United States for personal injury, wrongful death, or property loss caused by the negligent or wrongful acts of federal employees acting within the scope of their employment. There are significant traps in FTCA cases, and we cover them below.
The State of West Virginia or the federal government under workers’ compensation frameworks. Guard members injured on duty may be entitled to workers’ compensation benefits, SGLI death benefits (a $500,000 automatic payment), TSGLI for traumatic injuries, and VA disability compensation. These are administrative tracks that run alongside the civil case, not in place of it.
The D.C. Wrongful Death Act and Why This Jurisdiction Matters
Cases arising from this attack will typically proceed under the District of Columbia Wrongful Death Act and the D.C. Survival Act. D.C. is, for civil litigation purposes, one of the most favorable jurisdictions in the country for catastrophic-injury and wrongful-death cases. Three reasons matter most.
First, there are no statutory caps on non-economic damages in the District. Many states impose artificial limits on what a jury can award for pain, suffering, and loss of enjoyment of life. D.C. does not. The jury hears the evidence and returns the verdict it believes is just.
Second, D.C. follows a modified comparative fault standard for negligence cases, but intentional tortfeasors are held to one hundred percent of the harm they cause. The shooter’s intent defeats any attempt to spread blame to the victims.
Third, D.C. recognizes both the wrongful-death claim (brought for the benefit of the estate and statutory beneficiaries) and the survival claim (which carries forward the decedent’s own pre-death pain and suffering and any economic losses sustained before death). A twenty-year-old killed instantly and a twenty-year-old who suffered in a hospital for days generate very different damages under these two claims. Both belong in the case.
The statute of limitations for wrongful death in D.C. is two years from the date of death under D.C. Code § 12-301. Two years is a hard deadline. It is shorter than many state limits, and it runs from the date of death, not from the date of injury. For the Beckstrom family, the clock began on Thanksgiving. It does not pause for grief, and it does not pause for the criminal case.
The civil case and the criminal case are not alternatives. They do different work. The criminal case punishes. The civil case compensates. The family needs both.
The Stolen Firearm: Why Washington Safe-Storage Law Creates Real Civil Exposure
Washington State has one of the most carefully constructed safe-storage laws in the country. RCW 9.41.360 requires that firearms be stored so as to prevent unauthorized access by children and by prohibited persons. The statute recognizes that a firearm is not a passive object — it is a tool that, when accessible to the wrong person, becomes a foreseeable instrument of harm.
When a firearm is stolen, the original owner’s potential civil liability depends on how the firearm was stored and what the owner knew or should have known about the risk of theft. If the weapon was locked in a quality safe, secured with a trigger lock, and the owner reported the theft promptly to law enforcement, the original owner may have done everything reasonable and the chain of causation may break at the theft itself. If, however, the weapon was unsecured in a closet, in a car, or in any other location accessible to people who should not have had access, the original owner may share fault for the foreseeable misuse.
The investigation here runs through the Seattle Police Department’s stolen-property records. We file a public-records request immediately. The make, model, and serial number of the .357 are already public. The trace goes from the manufacturer to the original purchaser through federal firearm tracing systems. The investigation determines who owned the weapon, when and where it was stolen, how it was stored, and what insurance policy may cover negligent-storage exposure.
For the family: this is the channel that may carry actual collectible money. A homeowner’s insurance policy covering negligent storage is a real policy with a real carrier. That carrier is not judgment-proof the way the shooter is.
The Federal Tort Claims Act: The Administrative-Claim Trap That Burns Cases
When the defendant is the United States, the Federal Tort Claims Act controls. The FTCA is the only way to sue the federal government for tort claims. The standard rule — and this is where cases die — is that a plaintiff must first present an administrative claim to the appropriate federal agency on a Standard Form 95 within two years of the claim accruing. The agency then has six months to respond. Only after the agency issues a final denial — or six months pass without a response — can the plaintiff file suit in federal court.
Miss the administrative claim, and the case is over. Sue the United States without exhausting administrative remedies, and the case is dismissed.
The FTCA also carries discretionary-function immunity, which protects federal agencies from claims based on the exercise of discretionary judgment. The combatant-activities exception excludes claims arising out of combat. For a case involving a National Guard member on duty near the White House, the question of which exceptions apply requires analysis of the exact orders under which the Guard members were operating — Title 32 state active duty, Title 32 federal, or Title 10 federal active duty — each of which carries different legal consequences.
If there is a credible basis to believe that any federal agency failed in its duty to identify, investigate, or detain a person who later carried out an attack, the administrative claim under the FTCA must be filed. Waiting to find out whether the criminal case reveals such failures is too late — the two-year clock does not pause.
What the Civil Case Can Recover: Damages in a Catastrophic-Injury and Wrongful-Death Case
The damages available in a case like this break into several categories, each of which is its own line of recovery.
Economic damages. Medical bills past and future. For Wolfe, that includes the acute hospitalization, surgeries, rehabilitation, and what is likely to be a lifetime of neurological care, attendant care, and adaptive equipment. For Beckstrom, it includes the medical bills incurred before her death and the funeral and burial expenses. Future economic damages for Wolfe include lost earning capacity over a working life that the injury has fundamentally altered. Future economic damages for Beckstrom include the lifetime of earnings she would have earned — a twenty-year-old on a military career trajectory has decades of income ahead of her, and D.C. law permits the estate to recover the present value of those earnings.
Non-economic damages. Pain and suffering. Emotional distress. Loss of enjoyment of life. For Beckstrom, the pre-death pain and suffering she endured between the shooting and her death. For Wolfe, the lifetime of disfigurement, cognitive impairment, and personal limitations the injury imposes. In D.C., there is no statutory cap on what a jury may award for these damages.
Loss of consortium and guidance. For Beckstrom’s parents, the loss of their daughter’s guidance, society, and companionship. For Wolfe’s spouse or partner, the loss of consortium that comes with catastrophic neurological injury.
Punitive damages. Available against the shooter as a matter of law. Practically limited by his assets, but the availability matters because it gives plaintiffs leverage in pursuing every insurance channel and third-party defendant who may bear any share of fault.
Wrongful-death damages specific to the Beckstrom estate. Funeral and burial. Pre-death pain and suffering under the survival claim. Lost future earnings. Loss of parental guidance and companionship. The total value to a jury is significant — a jury asked to value the life of a twenty-year-old who was serving her country will not arrive at a small number.
The honest range, based on comparable cases and the severity of harm, runs from $5 million at the low end to $25 million or more at the high end. That range reflects the jury’s likely view of what was lost, recognizing that collectability depends on which defendants carry insurance or assets. The number itself is not the limit; it is the ceiling of what a jury could reasonably return, and the ceiling matters because it sets the negotiation floor for every settlement conversation.
The First Seventy-Two Hours: Evidence That Exists, Who Holds It, and How Fast It Dies
Federal evidence moves through federal channels, and federal channels have their own retention rules. The sooner a preservation demand lands, the more likely the evidence survives.
The Toyota Prius. Currently in federal custody. Contains an Event Data Recorder and GPS data that documents the cross-country route, stops, and timing. This is the proof of premeditation — twenty-eight hundred miles is not a moment of impulse. The preservation demand goes to the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office immediately. Without it, the vehicle is processed and the data becomes accessible only through formal discovery much later.
HALO cameras and federal surveillance footage. The White House perimeter is one of the most heavily surveilled zones in the country. Multiple federal agencies maintain camera networks in the area. Footage typically rotates on rolling overwrites, and the rotation periods vary by system. Without a preservation demand, footage of the lead-up to the shooting — which may show the suspect’s behavior, the vehicle’s movements, and any interaction with security personnel — may be overwritten before civil counsel can access it.
The suspect’s CIA personnel file. Subject to FOIA and federal subpoena. Relevant to whether the suspect had known mental-health issues, security-clearance problems, or contacts with law enforcement that were mishandled. Retrieval is slow; the request must go out early.
The Seattle Police Department’s stolen-gun report. Public records request. Identifies the original owner of the .357 revolver and the circumstances of the theft. Without this record, the negligent-storage channel of recovery cannot be developed.
The suspect’s digital footprint. Social media accounts, search history, communications. Establishes motive and intent. Subject to search warrants in the criminal case; civil access requires formal discovery once the criminal case is sufficiently advanced, or independent subpoenas to service providers.
Witness statements from other Guard members. The two Guard members who subdued the suspect are the most important civilian witnesses. Their accounts establish the timeline, the shooter’s behavior, and the medical sequence. Statements they gave to law enforcement may be discoverable; their own testimony may require independent interviews.
The preservation letter goes out the day we are retained. It names the federal agencies, the specific items to preserve, and the legal basis for the demand. The letter does not wait for the criminal case to finish.
The Insurance Playbook: What Adjusters Are Already Doing
In a high-profile case like this, the insurance carriers — for the firearm owner’s homeowner policy, for the Prius owner’s auto policy, and potentially for any umbrella policies — begin building their defense within days of the incident. Three plays are common, and each has a counter.
Play one: the friendly investigator call. Within the first week, the carrier may reach out to the family offering a sympathetic conversation. The call is described as a check-in. It is in fact a recorded statement in which the family is asked to describe what happened, what they remember, what they have been told. Anything the family says will be used to limit the recovery. The counter: the family says nothing to any insurance investigator without counsel present. We handle every communication with the carrier.
Play two: the early lowball offer. In catastrophic cases, the carrier may make a quick settlement offer to a desperate family facing medical bills and funeral costs. The offer is calibrated to close the case before the full scope of harm is known. The counter: there is no advantage to the family in settling before the medical and economic picture is clear, and the offer is almost certainly below the case’s true value. We hold every offer until the evidence is complete.
Play three: the comparative-fault assignment. The carrier will search the case for anything that shifts fault from their insured to the victims. For the firearm owner: did the original owner secure the weapon? For the federal government: did the Guard members have any contribution to their own harm? For the perpetrator’s potential assets: are there any insurance policies that might respond? The counter: D.C. law assigns one hundred percent liability to an intentional tortfeasor. Comparative fault does not reduce the shooter’s share. Third-party defendants cannot escape by pointing at the shooter — they must answer for their own conduct.
Lupe Peña spent years inside a national insurance-defense firm before joining our side. She knows the playbook because she ran it. The calls that sound sympathetic, the offers that sound generous, the questions that sound routine — each one is a play. We name them. We counter them.
The Criminal Case Does Not Pause the Civil Case — and Why That Matters
A common misunderstanding is that the civil case has to wait for the criminal case to finish. It does not. In fact, waiting is often damaging. Evidence disappears. Witnesses become harder to locate. Statutes of limitations run. Insurance carriers use the criminal case as an excuse to delay settlement negotiations.
The civil case proceeds in parallel with the criminal case. In D.C. and federal court, civil plaintiffs may be entitled to obtain discovery from law enforcement files through proper motion practice once the criminal case reaches a certain stage. In the meantime, civil counsel can pursue independent investigation, FOIA requests, public-records requests, expert retention, and the development of independent evidence.
There is also a strategic consideration. The criminal case establishes a record — the indictment, the evidence supporting it, the findings of the grand jury — that can support civil claims. A guilty plea or conviction is conclusive proof of the perpetrator’s conduct. Waiting to see what happens in criminal court is sometimes the right move for leverage. But waiting to begin the civil case is never the right move.
SGLI, TSGLI, VA Benefits, and Other Compensation Channels Families Often Miss
Families in this situation are often unaware of the administrative compensation channels that exist alongside the civil case. These channels do not replace the civil case. They supplement it. Each is worth understanding.
Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (SGLI). National Guard members on federal orders are typically covered by SGLI, which provides a $500,000 death benefit paid to designated beneficiaries. For Beckstrom’s family, this benefit is automatic. The processing is administrative and runs through the appropriate military pay office.
Traumatic Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (TSGLI). For Guardsmen who suffer catastrophic injuries — including traumatic brain injury, loss of sight, loss of hearing, loss of limb, or severe burns — TSGLI provides a lump-sum payment of up to $100,000. Wolfe, if he suffered a qualifying catastrophic injury, may be eligible. The application must be filed within two years of the injury.
VA disability compensation. For service-connected injuries or death, the Department of Veterans Affairs provides tax-free monthly compensation. For surviving family members of a service member whose death is service-connected, Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) is available. These are separate from the civil case and do not reduce civil recovery.
State workers’ compensation. Depending on the duty status of the Guard members at the time of the attack, state workers’ compensation may also apply. The duty status — Title 32 state active duty, Title 32 federal, or Title 10 — controls which system applies.
Navigating these administrative channels while simultaneously pursuing a civil case is exactly the kind of work our firm does. The consultation costs nothing. We explain each channel, what it pays, and how it interacts with the civil case.
How a Case Like This Is Actually Built
Here is what the work looks like from the day a family calls us.
Week one. Preservation letters to the FBI, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, the U.S. Secret Service, the U.S. Park Police, the Metropolitan Police Department, the Bureau of Prisons, and the National Guard Bureau. Each letter names specific evidence to be preserved: the Toyota Prius and its EDR/GPS data, all HALO and federal surveillance footage, the suspect’s electronic devices, the suspect’s personnel records, the firearm and its chain of custody. The letter also demands the Seattle Police Department’s stolen-gun report and the chain-of-custody records for the .357.
Week two to month three. Public records requests to Seattle PD for the stolen-gun report. FOIA request to the CIA for the suspect’s employment file. Independent investigation to identify the registered owner of the Toyota Prius. Background investigation on the suspect’s history, contacts with federal agencies, and mental-health history.
Months three to six. Retention of experts. A digital-forensics expert to analyze the suspect’s electronics if and when they become available. A forensic pathologist to review the medical evidence. A neurologist and life-care planner to quantify the lifetime cost of Wolfe’s care. A ballistics expert to confirm the firearm’s history and trajectory analysis.
Months six through twelve. Filing of the civil complaint in the appropriate court — D.C. Superior Court for claims under D.C. law, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia for federal claims. Service on the defendants. Answers and motions. Discovery requests, including subpoenas to federal agencies under appropriate procedures.
Months twelve and beyond. Depositions. Mediation. Trial preparation if the case does not settle. Throughout, parallel pursuit of insurance coverage — for the firearm owner, the Prius owner, any umbrella policies, and any other insurance that may respond.
The number at the end of this work is not invented. It is built from the evidence, the medical records, the economic projections, and the jury’s likely view of the harm. That is the only honest number.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a family sue someone who is facing the death penalty?
Yes. A pending criminal case does not prevent a civil case. The civil case proceeds on a separate track, with separate rules of evidence, and it can be filed before, during, or after the criminal prosecution. The death-penalty case punishes the defendant. The civil case compensates the victims. They serve different purposes and run in parallel.
Who can file a wrongful-death case in D.C.?
Under the D.C. Wrongful Death Act, the personal representative of the deceased’s estate files the claim on behalf of statutory beneficiaries — typically the spouse, children, and parents. If there is no will and no personal representative has been appointed, the court can appoint one. The proceeds are distributed according to the statute’s distribution rules.
What is the statute of limitations for a wrongful-death case in D.C.?
Two years from the date of death, under D.C. Code § 12-301. This is shorter than many state deadlines. It runs from the date of death, not from the date of the incident. For the Beckstrom family, the clock began on Thanksgiving.
Can the family sue the federal government for this?
Possibly, through the Federal Tort Claims Act, if any federal agency’s negligence contributed to the harm. The first step is filing an administrative claim on Standard Form 95 with the appropriate agency within two years of the incident. Missing the administrative-claim deadline bars the lawsuit. There are also significant immunity defenses — including discretionary-function immunity — that must be analyzed case by case.
What about the stolen firearm — can the original owner be sued?
Possibly. Washington State’s safe-storage law (RCW 9.41.360) requires firearms to be stored to prevent unauthorized access. If the original owner failed to secure the weapon in a manner that allowed it to be stolen, the original owner may share civil fault for the foreseeable misuse. The original owner’s homeowner’s insurance may respond to such a claim. The investigation begins with the Seattle Police Department stolen-gun report.
What compensation is available to a Guardsman wounded on duty?
Multiple channels exist. TSGLI provides up to $100,000 for qualifying catastrophic injuries. VA disability compensation provides tax-free monthly payments for service-connected injuries. State workers’ compensation may apply depending on the duty status. And a civil case against the perpetrator and any third-party defendants can recover economic and non-economic damages — including lifetime medical care, lost earning capacity, pain and suffering, and loss of enjoyment of life.
What compensation is available to the family of a Guardsman killed on duty?
SGLI provides a $500,000 death benefit to designated beneficiaries. Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) provides monthly tax-free payments from the VA. A wrongful-death civil case can recover economic losses (including lifetime projected earnings), non-economic damages (including pain and suffering), funeral expenses, and the loss of guidance and companionship. In D.C., there is no cap on non-economic damages.
Does the Beckstrom family have to wait until the criminal case is over to file a civil case?
No. The civil case can be filed now. Waiting risks lost evidence, missed deadlines, and reduced leverage. The two-year statute of limitations is already running.
Who pays a civil judgment when the shooter has no money?
That is the central question of the civil case. The answer depends on identifying third-party defendants with insurance or assets. The stolen-firearm owner, the Prius owner, any federal agency whose negligence contributed to the harm — each represents a potential insurance channel. The investigation in the first weeks of the case determines whether there is collectible money to pursue.
What does it cost to hire our firm?
Nothing upfront. We work on contingency. There is no fee unless we recover. The consultation is free and confidential, available twenty-four hours a day. You can reach us at 1-888-ATTY-911.
Why Attorney911 for a Case Like This
Our managing partner, Ralph Manginello, has spent twenty-seven years in courtrooms, including federal court, fighting for families whose lives were shattered by the conduct of others. He was a journalist before he was a lawyer, and he explains like a storyteller — because the families we serve deserve to understand what is happening to them. Ralph has been admitted to practice in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas and has built a record of multi-million-dollar recoveries for Texas families over more than two decades, with firm-stated results including BP Texas City refinery explosion litigation participation.
Lupe Peña, our associate attorney, spent years inside a national insurance-defense firm before joining our side. She sat in the rooms where carriers decided how to value claims, where adjusters set reserves, where defense lawyers shaped strategies to limit payouts. She knows the playbook because she ran it. Now she runs it in reverse, and she serves our Spanish-speaking clients fully in their own language. Hablamos Español.
Cases like this — high-profile, federal, involving national security and military victims — require a firm that is comfortable in federal court, that understands the overlap between criminal and civil proceedings, and that can move quickly to preserve evidence before federal channels close. Our firm does that work. Past results depend on the facts of each case and do not guarantee future outcomes.
The consultation costs nothing. There is no fee unless we win. The call is free, confidential, and available twenty-four hours a day. If you are a member of the Beckstrom or Wolfe family, a member of the West Virginia National Guard community, or a family member of someone else who has been the victim of a violent attack with federal involvement, the call is yours to make. 1-888-ATTY-911.
For a broader look at how we handle wrongful-death cases, see our wrongful death practice area. For traumatic brain injury — the kind of injury Andrew Wolfe is fighting through — our brain injury practice page explains the medical and legal terrain. To understand what the insurance adjuster is doing when they call, our guide on what not to say to an insurance adjuster is worth ten minutes of your time. And for families wondering whether hiring a lawyer is worth it, our analysis of whether personal injury lawyers are worth it lays out the math.
Hablamos Español. The consultation is free. There is no fee unless we recover. Call 1-888-ATTY-911.