Roundup Cancer & Monsanto Product Liability — Attorney911 & Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice After the SCOTUS Decision Overturning Missouri Resident John Durnell’s $1.25M Award, We Pursue the $7.25 Billion Settlement and Design-Defect Litigation Not Barred by FIFRA Preemption, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Insider Who Knows How Corporate Claims Teams Value Glyphosate Exposure, Pathology and Purchase Records on a Strict Preservation Clock, Millions Recovered for Serious Injury Victims — Free 24/7 Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911
The Missouri Roundup Decision: What the Supreme Court Ruling Means for Your Cancer Claim If you are sitting at your kitchen table in Missouri today, looking at a diagnosis of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma after years of using Roundup on your property, the news from Washington, D.C. likely feels like a second blow. The U.S. Supreme Court just issued a 7-2 decision that effectively shuts the door on one of the most common legal theories used to hold Monsanto accountable. We know the weight of this moment. You were told for decades that this product was safe, only to find yourself fighting for your life while the manufacturer’s owner claims this ruling is “good for science.” At Attorney911, we don’t see this as a scientific victory; we see it as a massive hurdle for Missouri families who were never warned of the risks. But here is the truth the insurance companies don’t want you to hear: while the “failure-to-warn” path just got harder, the $7.25 billion settlement fund is still moving forward, and your path to compensation is not necessarily closed. Understanding the SCOTUS Ruling on Federal Preemption The Supreme Court’s decision centered on a Missouri resident who had previously been awarded…