Transvaginal Mesh Litigation & Revision Surgery Lawsuits in MassTort-National — Attorney911 Pursues Boston Scientific, Ethicon, and Becton Dickinson over Erosion, Fistulas, and Organ Perforation | Ralph Manginello’s 27+ Years of Federal-Court Trial Practice, We Fight the Manufacturers Who Bypassed Clinical Trials via the 510(k) Loophole, Lupe Peña the Former Insurance-Defense Attorney Who Knows the Claims Reserve Process, Millions Recovered in Catastrophic Medical Device Cases, We Secure Forensic Explant Evidence and FDA 522 Postmarket Data — Free Consultation, No Fee Unless We Win, Hablamos Español, 1-888-ATTY-911
The Hidden Danger of Transvaginal Mesh: Your Medical and Legal Rights We hear the same story from women across the country: you underwent surgery to fix a private, uncomfortable problem—pelvic organ prolapse (POP) or stress urinary incontinence (SUI)—only to find yourself in a different, much more violent kind of pain years later. You might feel a stabbing sensation during intimacy, or your doctor might have used the word “erosion” to describe the plastic mesh literally cutting through your vaginal wall. If you are living with these complications, you are not suffering from a “rare side effect” or bad luck. You are the victim of a medical device industry that exploited a massive federal loophole to put untested plastic into the most sensitive parts of the human body. As of June 2026, the litigation surrounding these devices has reached a critical juncture, particularly with the release of the final 522 Postmarket Surveillance Studies regarding SUI mini-slings. Our firm takes these cases because we know the manufacturers—companies like Ethicon, Boston Scientific, and C.R. Bard—knew about these risks long before they were forced to stop selling these products. We move to freeze the evidence, identify the specific brand of mesh that is failing…